Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on sherlock homes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on sherlock homes
House and Sherlock are two parallel characters from two different shows, who have two different occupations. Sherlock is a character that solves crimes that interest him. To interest him the crimes have to be hard to solve and be a fun case. House is a character that solves medical cases. He will not take a case unless the medical cases unless the interest him. The way these characters solve their cases is what makes them parallel and unique from the other characters from the show. Although Sherlock and house both have a passion for what they do, they also have different characteristics, social behaviors, and interest in their daily lives. House and Sherlock have multiple characteristics that define the way they act. They think of themselves …show more content…
This dark sense of humor made other characters believe he was a psychopath. House will be interested on the ways people get sick and how different methods make them react. He gets excited when a person’s condition gets worse just so he can work harder on finding an interesting way fixing that person. The characteristics of both characters might be similar but their social behaviors are how other characters see them as. House and Sherlock are mainly known by their social behaviors to their characters. People see them as unique humans who can’t act right in society but, get the job done in the oddest way possible. In some cases people worry if their practices are ethical or harmful to themselves or society. What they don’t understand is that if they don’t use their skill the way they want to, they would never get the job done. People see Sherlock as a psychopath because he gets excited when people die in mysterious ways. He will only try to solve the case if the victim death was interesting and the suspect did it in a unique way. House will gets excited when a patient’s illness or injury is unique and difficult to solve. He loves it when he can do anything to the patient because the patient has no other …show more content…
One of the most noticeable difference is that they have different jobs and interest. Sherlock is considered to be a consulting detective. Basically the police come to him for help and he examines the crime scene. He does it for free just because he likes that kind of work. That is also a reason why people think he is a psychopath because they believe he cause those crimes to happen. House is considered the Head of Diagnostic Medicine. He is the head because is the best doctor that hospital has. No matter how weird his procedures are the hospital will let him be head just because he can solve the case. While solving the cases Sherlock and House will use risk but in different ways. Sherlock will risk his own life to solve the case. He will meet the suspect one on one, just like he did in season 1 episode 1, and find out personally how they did it. House on the other hand will put his patient’s lives at risk just to solve the case in the most interesting way possible. He will use what would most likely kill the patient and use it in a way to help the
(The adventure of the speckled band) The two also differ in other ways, for example although Holmes is intellectually gifted he lacks the contact of friends, this shows him as a loner. On the other hand, Watson, being the average man, has friends and later in... ... middle of paper ... ... olmes gives us the information that Watson didn’t see and tells us the rest of the case. In my opinion, the best of the Sherlock Holmes stories is The Last
A detective is vital in an effective detective story because arguably there would not be a story and a detective to restore law and order and the villain/criminal would not be caught. Whereas it there was a detective it would have been a different story. A typical detective should be smart, observant, manipulative, and analytic and should have a good sense of justice. Sherlock Holmes has all of these elements to fight crime. Sherlock Holmes has the typical elements as a normal detective in classical detective fiction for example he is observant “Sherlock Holmes’s quick ...
...help and protect his adopted son. These characters, in their seemingly mad obsessive curiosity, show also bravery and nobility in uncovering mysteries. They do what they do not only for themselves, but for the benefit of others as well, and this is what makes them literary heroes and not mere protagonists. Another Victorian character who is also driven by curiosity but who is not brave or noble is Dr. Jekyll. He was obsessively curious about the duality of good and evil in the human soul, but all of his research was for his selfish gain, which ended in his death. Sherlock Holmes and Ludwig Horace Holly, who at times act selfishly, also do things unselfishly to help others. That is why they are heroes, and that is one of the reasons why they are popular to this day. In their case, their curiosity, which turns into dangerous obsession for them, is worth it.
Since Watson is the "master" or ruler of his own "establishment," he insinuates that the members of his family are his servants not his equals. Watson's wife is a trivial character, clearly evident because we never hear from her and never learn her name. On one occasion, Watson spends the night at Watson's house on Baker Street without once thinking to call his wife. Watson's behavior shows what little respect he has for his wife. This blatant disregard for his wife's feelings illustrates the insignificance of this woman.
“People who are in earnest are always interesting, whether you agree with them or not” (The Chronicles). Doyle may be known as the author of Sherlock Holmes, but there are other facets to his life. On account of some strange events that occurred, Doyle was persuaded into thinking that spiritual beings existed. As Doyle’s career advanced he drew the attention of many to himself. He succeeded both by gaining supporters and detractors. He built on his fame by giving lectures. These aspects of his life are connected; his painful childhood led him to a successful medical career where his writing and life partner stepped into the picture. These aspects, when combined, led Doyle to a new world view of spiritualism.
This paper will explore the relationship between Sherlock Holmes and his companion and friend Dr. John Watson. What is the relationship between Holmes and Watson? Are they compatible or are their differences to great for them to overcome. Looking at how they work together will also be a key factor in how well the relationship works between the two of them. Do their own interests and abilities get in the way? Does the time period in which they live factor into the environment of their communication styles?
In the novel, The Hound of the Baskervilles, by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes and his sidekick, Dr. Watson, is confronted with an eerie mystery situated around the fabled Hound of the Baskervilles. They are challenged with many risks and in the end must unearth the mystery before it is too late. Throughout the enigma, Sir Arthur explores the theme of what can happen when one does or does not let themselves be ruled and dominated by fear.
The acclaimed authors, Edgar Allan Poe and Arthur Conan Doyle, formulate the characters of Auguste Dupin and Sherlock Holmes respectively, to be similar in the way that they analyze, deduce, and connect segments of desperate and often-thought “unsolvable” detective cases. Through their comparable techniques and system of deduction, Dupin and Holmes never fail to trace back their evidence to the scene of the crime. However, due to the vast difference in the writing styles of Poe and Doyle, the audience observes the main characters not as clones, but rather an analogous pair that think alike, but do not act alike. The personalities of Auguste Dupin and Sherlock Holmes, although present are recognizable differences in their actions, continue to
House’s most prominent interpersonal relationship throughout the series is with his boss, Dr. Lisa Cuddy. When the series begins, the viewer learns she had to make a critical decision on House’s behalf after he went into a coma due to major muscle damage in his leg. Cuddy’s decision to take House’s side and remove the dead muscle instead of amputating his leg is the root of their relationship. House mainly interacts with Cuddy via means of conflict in the hospital. During a diagnosis, House commonly uses a unorthodox and extremely risky procedure on his patients. These procedures require permission from Cuddy to b...
There are many instances in which it is highly plausible that Jack the Ripper and H.H. Holmes were truly the same serial killer. He was able to slice up prostitutes in the middle of the streets without ever getting caught. Jack the Ripper would throttle his victims as he began mutilating them, similarly, this is how H.H. Holmes would subdue and incapacitate his victims. H.H. Holmes was a highly skilled and qualified doctor just as Jack the Ripper was believed to have been. The Ripper’s final victim, Mary Kelly, was murdered in her home showing how his MO was beginning to switch from a street killer to a man who preferred to take his time in the home of his victims. A well regarded investigator, Amaryllis Fox, believes the Ripper’s murders may represent Holmes “adolescence as a serial killer”, when he was still discovering his
Comment on the way Conan Doyle uses the character of Watson in The Hound of the Baskervilles.
Over time the reader can tell that Watson and Holmes are alike but very different which makes them great partners. From the start Watson is seen as smart but Holmes is seen as a genius. After finding the mysterious walking stick Watson tells Holmes what he observes and Holmes replies with “Really Watson,you excel yourself,”said Holmes(Doyle 2).Sherlock Holmes is seen as the type of man that thinks he is higher than anyone else. Although Holmes blatantly tells Watson that he is a “conductor of light,Some people without possessing genius have a remarkable power of stimulating it (Doyle 3).Holmes is seen as to be a man of action. Your instinct is always to do something energetic.
belittling characteristic "He used to make merry over the cleverness of women, but I have not heard him do it of late." Bohemia. Holmes has a great store of knowledge that he has acquired over many years at his disposal, and this helps him greatly in his cases. " special knowledge of tobacco ashes enabled me to pronounce as an Indian cigar" (The Boscombe Valley Mystery). This yet again proves
Likewise, changes have been made on the level of the character in pursuance of the strong bond between Holmes and Watson. For instance, due to plot change some character have been removed, but John H. Watson and Sherlock Holmes the heart of the whole story indeed are kept. For instance, Sherlock Holmes is portrayed as Watson describes him in the “he was as sensitive to flattery on the score of his art as any girl could be of her beauty” (Doyle 38). Also, Holmes calls himself a “consulting detective” just like the title he gave himself in the novel. Indeed, Holmes as one of the main characters of the story needs to show similar characteristics of the original Holmes, or else the show would have lost its meaning. Although Holmes’ deductive skills are shown pretty clearly in the show, his expertise in cigars are not mentioned as in the book the detective says he “‘can distinguish at a glance the ash of any known brand either of cigar or tobacco’” (Doyle 37). Yet the writers of the show, might reveal Holmes’ expertise later on in the show since they have the 60 different
Watson sees "an average commonplace British tradesman, obese, pompous, and slow." But Sherlock sees a lot more: “Beyond the obvious facts that he has at some time done manual labour, that he takes snuff, that he is a Freemason, that he has been in China, and that he has done a considerable amount of writing lately, I