Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of discrimination and prejudice
Effects of prejudice on individuals
Ethical dilemmas in tourism industry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of discrimination and prejudice
I believe that we have the choice to shape who we are and how our future will look. The things that we do, can shape the things that happen to us in the future, or our destiny. In Hotel Rwanda, the characters have many choices to make, they can run and try and survive or they can help those in need and show kindness to them. The film shows that everyone has the chance to change or chose their future. Showing kindness to others, as Paul did for those in his hotel, can play a major factor in your destiny. If you chose to be kind, your future could be full of happiness and benefits but you could also chose to ignore those in need, thus choosing a future that may not be filled with happiness.
In the film Hotel Rwanda, the main characters are
…show more content…
These people are the kind of people that are not kind, they are far from. I believe that their destiny is being shaped toward the darker side of life. Those Hutu people that killed Tutsi people must now live with the fact that they have murdered people, they will have to live with that guilt for the rest of their lives. Their future will have been changed from one that could have been all sunshine and rainbows to one that is like a living prison that cannot be escaped. The Hutu people chose to kill, when they could have continued to live in peace, but they let hatred control their thoughts. Driving them away from kindness and showing them a darker future. They did not let kindness shape them and their future. They instead thought about what was best for their tribe and only those that believe the same as them. Paul was a part of the Hutu people, but did not believe the same, he treated them the exact opposite of the Hutu people, and was rewarded for it. In 2000 he was awarded, and given the Immortal Chaplains Prize for Humanity. Those Hutu people that did the killing were not rewarded, they instead punished
“May your choices reflect your hopes, not your fears”-Nelson Mandela. This quote from Mandela relates to the novel Tangerine by Edward Bloor. The characters in Tangerine have you make difficult choices in their lives, but the choices don’t always end up right. Erik Fisher’s choices affect Paul in the novel by causing Paul to have vision loss, lose a friend, and lose self esteem.
The article “Freewill and Determinism in Psychology” by Saul Mcleod like all the other articles have something in common with the movie, and that comparison in this case is the idea that we can make our own fates with having free will. The Bureau best exemplifies this idea where at minute 1:37:57 the Chairman changes the plan the A.B was on for David/Elise so they can make up their own future. Likewise, Saul makes a statement in his article that there are people “…who believe that human beings have the ability to control their own destinies.” These two have the same idea for one reason: both agree that we are in control of our
The main reason the Hutus killed Tutsis in the Rwandan genocide was for economic reasons. The Tutsis began to benefit greatly from killing Tutsis by looting them and gaining things like money, land, and cattle. The looting of Tutsis became a means of income to the Hutus. The Hutus neglected their fields in favor of killing so they could loot for better food and goods. As Jean Baptiste states, “Why dig in the dirt when we were harvesting without working, eating our fill without growing a thing?”(Hatzfeld, 60) The Hutus mind set of being farmers shifts to being killers who can benefit more from that, than from their regular jobs of harvesting. As stated by Adalbert, “…we didn’t care about what we accomplished in the marshes, only about what was important to us for comfort.” (Hatzfeld, 83) This shows how the men became more concerned with looting and profiting from the killing than actually being concerned with killing people. So in a sense, the job of killing became a means for the men to do their more comfortable job of looting. One can begin to enter the Hutu mind set and see how, by killing other people, people they may have a...
The Hutu and the Tutsi have been in conflict with each other for years but after what happened in 1994 I don’t think that anyone will ever forget. In that year Rwandas Presidents plan was shot down and he was killed. In the days following is when the genocide started, because the Hutu believed that it was the Tutsi that shot down the plan and killed the President because he was a Hutu. The United Nations let this go because of the killing of ten of their own and because of their rules of engagement that resulted from the ten Belgian members being killed while trying to protect the Prime Minister. During a short time period of only a few months about 800,000 Tutsi and Hutu moderates were killed by the militia, other groups and even neighbors.
The decision of Adam and Cal Trask to overcome their struggles and Cathy’s decision to succumb to evil prove that the choice of what to do with one’s life is completely up to the individual. John Steinbeck’s use of the biblical story of Cain and Abel builds on the idea that a person is completely responsible for choosing what becomes of them in result of a word, an action and a memory. Undoubtedly everyone has the choice whether or not they wish to triumph over the pain and the sins they are struggling with. After all, look at Ghandi he witnessed children burdened with evil inheritance walk away surmounted because of their strength to rein over evil.
The state-sponsored massacres of Hutus by the Tutsi-dominated Burundian army in 1972 was one of the most significant post-Holocaust genocides and as such received appropriate levels of international attention due to a lack of political distractions within western nations. The genocide broke out as a Hutu-lead rebellion in which Hutu insurgents massacred Tutsis and resisting Hutus in the lakeside towns of Rumonge and Nyanza-Lac. As many as 1200 people killed in this initial incident, the Tutsi-dominated government responded by declaring martial law and systematically proceeded to slaughter Hutus (Totten 325). After hundreds of thousands of Hutus had been massacred by the Burundian government, the neighboring nation of Zaire aided the Hutus in a counteroffensive attack on the Tutsi-controlled army. Having succeeded in their effort, the genocide was quickly brought to international attention within a few days. The United Nations invested $25,000 from the World Disaster Relief Account’s fund...
The RPF decided to create a government consisting of a Hutu and a Tutsi holding the highest government positions. As the RPF took control of the government, “some two million Hutus – both civilians and some of those involved in the genocide – then fled across the border into DR Congo… fearing revenge attacks”(“Rwandan Genocide: 100 days of slaughter”). However, the violence did not stop here. The RPF then became angry at the Democratic Republic of Congo, claiming that the Democratic Republic of Congo “letting[let] Hutu militias operate on its territory” (“Rwandan Genocide: 100 days of slaughter”). As a result of the RPF’s claims about the Democratic Republic of Congo, they have invaded the Democratic Republic of Congo two times(“Rwandan Genocide: 100 days of slaughter”). The problems of the Rwandan Genocide has led to chaos in the Democratic Republic of Congo that has caused around 5 million deaths(“Rwandan Genocide: 100 days of slaughter”). In an attempt to punish those who were involved in the genocide, a large number of people have been sent to court. This genocide goes to show you how seemingly small problems between two groups can grow over time if not addressed, and cause major problems in the
Africa has been an interesting location of conflicts. From the conflict between Ethiopia and Eritrea to the revolutionary conflict in Libya and Egypt, one of the greatest conflicts is the Rwandan Genocide. The Rwandan Genocide included two tribes in Rwanda: Tutsis and Hutus. Upon revenge, the Hutus massacred many Tutsis and other Hutus that supported the Tutsis. This gruesome war lasted for a 100 days. Up to this date, there have been many devastating effects on Rwanda and the global community. In addition, many people have not had many acknowledgements for the genocide but from this genocide many lessons have been learned around the world.
There are several ethical issues surrounding the decision by the Hutu politicians to start the genocide. It is unfair and unethical for the Hutus to blame the entire Tutsi tribe for the president’s death. The Hutu politicians are so much driven by hatred that they fail to consider the innocent lives to be lost in the planned genocide. Instead, they organiz...
...appened because of a variety of reasons; long struggle of the Hutu, knowing that they were different and a bane aspiration to being able to be placed in an important place in society, holding a good position in government or in Church, for example. However, greed was not the reason for the killings. Perpetrators were poor, as poor as their victims were and neither the killings started in the poorest regions of Rwanda (Stratus, 2006). Now, focusing on religion to Rwandans Religion became so important because they became aware of “something bigger than themselves”, understanding that with God everything is possible, they realised that their life must had a meaning. Faith was obviously their food, the source of the strength that kept motivating them to commit the “work”. Now, they forgive, now they ask for forgiveness and once again, the power of religion is upon them.
Carney, J.J. "Beyond Tribalism: The Hutu-Tutsi Question and Catholic Rhetoric in Colonial Rwanda." Journal of Religion in Africa. (2012): 172-202.
Fate seems to defy humanity at every turn. A man may have his life planned out to the last second, but then some random force intervenes and he dies the second after he has completed his life plan. Some believe in fate, believing that our lives are predetermined from the moment we are born. Other people believe that everything is random, the result of some god rolling the dice in a universal poker game. Still other people believe that each and every person is in total control of his or her destiny, every step of the way. Who is to say which viewpoint is false? Every culture has a unique perception of the role of fate in our lives, and no group has the "right answer," simply a different answer. Taking into consideration the views of other cultures can help an individual refine his personal viewpoint on this inconceivable subject.
Many of the Tutsi people have had their rights taken away by being captured, tortured then killed, being dehumanized and being called cockroaches, women specifically being captured, abused and raped, and innocents killed by machetes, clubs, etc. Many of these acts of violence are basically eliminating the human rights for the Tutsi people. Many of the human rights of the Tutsi people were taken away when the Hutu radio classified the Tutsi's as rebels or “People who have brought us down” or blaming the Tutsi for everything, as said in the movie. The human rights of the Tutsi people were taken away by not giving them full rights of course, taking away their homes by either burning it, etc and were
When the genocide began, many of Paul`s Tutsi neighbors took shelter in his home, but when the neighborhood became ransacked by the Hutu rebels he had to bribe the head officer to allow him to take his family and friends to his hotel. Paul is such a hotel manager. He is a Hutu, married to a Tutsi named Tatiana Paul is concerned above all with his own family. 's a Hutu, he is safe, but his wife is Tutsi, his children are threatened, and in any event, he is far beyond thinking in tribal
The four films show political scenarios in different countries. This paper will focus on the use of landscape in cinematography. This is not just footage; it is important that it matches well with the action. According to Semiotics is a science that deals with the study of the life of signs within society. It depicts what make up signs and the rules that govern them (Saussure 1974:16).