Hot Coffee Movie

598 Words2 Pages

Summary of The Hot Coffee Movie
Hot Coffee Movie is a film produced in 2011, which discusses and analyses the impacts of the amended tort reforms in the US judicial system. Susan Saladoff is the director of the movie, who has practiced medical malpractice attorney for more than 25 years. The movie has four evidenced exhibits, which Susan Saladoff uses to illustrate the alleged lame side of the United States tort reforms. Tort reforms are the limits set by the states on the payment allowed to be honored by the defendant as damages to the plaintiff.
The first exhibit is on Stella Liebeck, where McDonald spilled coffee on her lap, which resulted in severe burns. Stella Liebeck was in the passenger seat, together with her grandson Chris. She ordered some coffee at local McDonald. While trying to take …show more content…

Nevertheless, the Chamber of Commerce developed a cynical slogan against judge Oliva. Under the President’s George W Bush government, the Supreme Court’s decision in Federal Election Commission and Citizen offered the all the corporations the right and the mandate to give unlimited campaign contributions. The right gives a massive corporate influence in electing the Supreme Court judges. Therefore, despite Oliva winning in the first elections, he faced numerous lawsuit claims, which disadvantaged him from winning the second campaign.
The last instance illustrated in Hot Coffee Movie tells a story of Jamie Leigh about mandatory arbitration. Jamie Jones was a KBR, Halliburton employee, who signed the arbitrary employment contract. At the age of 19, Jamie was dragged by her male coworkers in Iraq, which got her rapped. She tried to file criminal charges against KBR, Halliburton company, but the mandatory arbitration clause that she signed hindered her to have a jury

Show More
Related

  • The Case Of Enso Martinez And Rebecca Fielding Against John Hopkins Hospital

    718 Words  | 2 Pages

    Medical malpractice cases are difficult for the families who have lost their loved one or have suffered from severe injuries. No one truly wins in complicated court hearings that consist of a team of litigation attorneys for both the defendant and plaintiff(s). During the trial, evidence supporting malpractice allegations have to be presented so that the court can make a decision if the physician was negligent resulting in malpractice, or if the injury was unavoidable due to the circumstances. In these types of tort cases, the physician is usually a defendant on trial trying to prove that he or she is innocent of the medical error, delay of treatment or procedure that caused the injury. The perfect example of being at fault for medical malpractice as a result of delaying a procedure is the case of Waverly family versus John Hopkins Health System Corporation. The victims were not compensated enough for the loss of their child’s normal life. Pozgar (2012) explained….

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Kenneth Vogel's Big Money

    1391 Words  | 3 Pages

    Kenneth Vogel’s Big Money explores the invasion of money into our political system. In the novel, Vogel explains one of the most important important events that is currently happening in today’s elections: donors. This, according to Vogel, has been brought on by a ruling in the case Citizens United vs. the Federal Election Commission. The result of this case destroyed finance restrictions, giving Corporations and Unions the same laws of freedom of speech as individual Americans. The novel opens in February of 2012 where Vogel sneaks into a donor banquet. As our current president, Barack Obama, gives his speech, Vogel makes a note of the President’s words. In particular, Vogel focuses on one line “You now have the potential

    Read More

  • Comparing Upton Sinclair's The Jungle And The Progressive Era

    1401 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rings and alliances within political forces allowed powerful individuals to dictate the outcomes of decisions that would further increase their power and influence. By exploiting the desperation of powerless workers and immigrants, prominent figures like Mike Scully were able to rig elections, keeping specific people in power by buying votes with money replaceable to him, but invaluable to the desperate. The democratic party, to which Scully belonged, remained in power by giving the poor man so little that he was eager to undertake any task for the sake of money. When Jurgis was offered bribes for his vote, he realized that it was not “supposed to be right” to sell his vote, but also that refusing the money would not make “the slightest difference in the results” (Sinclair 134). Sacrificing the bribing money to take a stand was not an expenditure that the poor man could afford, and the working class was thus forced to facilitate the medium of their

    Read More

  • Gilded Age Dbq Essay

    1434 Words  | 3 Pages

    The growth of large corporations had impacted American politics by causing governmental corruption because of the power some industries had in society. Since the government had used laissez faire in the late 1800s for the big businesses to...

    Read More

  • It’s Time to Tell the True History of Texas

    1246 Words  | 3 Pages

    The first exhibit I saw was the “It Ain’t Braggin’ if it’s True” (one of my friends told me I had to see the shrine to Lance Armstrong and the rhinestone car). The name of the exhibit didn’t make much sense to me though; aren’t all museum exhibits, especially ones about history, supposed to be true? The big banner in the middle of the room didn’t help much either. It simply said “Vision” and had a quote about how only those with great vision can see opportunity where others see empty space. Maybe those who have this type of vision get the braggin’ rights?

    Read More

  • Government Corruption In The Progressive Era

    652 Words  | 2 Pages

    First exposed by Lincoln Steffens in 1902 through a magazine article called “Tweed Days in St. Louis”, government corruption was one of largest problems in the Progressive Era. Many big businesses of the time period had formed monopolies or trusts in order to control their industry and increase their power. They used this power to set high prices and increase their wealth. Political machines, which were powerful

    Read More

  • Fried Green Tomatoes at the WhistleStop Cafe

    1741 Words  | 4 Pages

    Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Café, one of my finest works. Who am I? I am the author Fannie Flagg. I’ve been writing since the fifth grade, when I wrote, produced, directed and starred in a three-act comedy titled “The Whopee Girls”. It made the audience laugh, but it got me expelled because it had the word “martini” in it. I’ve always had dry wit. I then entered a Miss Alabama contest winning a scholarship to the Pittsburg Playhouse. I was the only girl who failed ballet.

    Read More

  • Campaign Finance Reform

    2679 Words  | 6 Pages

    Campaign finance reform has a broad history in America. In particular, campaign finance has developed extensively in the past forty years, as the courts have attempted to create federal elections that best sustain the ideals of a representative democracy. In the most recent Supreme Court decision concerning campaign finance, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Court essentially decided to treat corporations like individuals by allowing corporations to spend money on federal elections through unlimited independent expenditures. In order to understand how the Supreme Court justified this decision, however, the history of campaign finance in regards to individuals must be examined. At the crux of these campaign finance laws is the balancing of two democratic ideals: the ability of individuals to exercise their right to free speech, and the avoidance of corrupt practices by contributors and candidates. An examination of these ideals, as well as the effectiveness of the current campaign finance system in upholding these ideas, will provide a basic framework for the decision of Citizens United v. FEC.

    Read More

  • Stephen King The Reaper's Image

    800 Words  | 2 Pages

    The story takes the atmosphere of a museum and gives it a dark twist. Carlin, avid collector and keeper of the museum, is being visited by Johnson Spangler. The building is dim and cluttered with gothic statues and random worthless collections. The setting is described as having “Madonnas holding numberless

    Read More

  • Frivolous lawsuits

    2876 Words  | 6 Pages

    Tort reformers believe that courts must reduce the ability of defendants’ liability in order to avoid economic decline. In the years to come, the proposals likely to generate the biggest dispute include malpractice and class-action reform, limits on noneconomic and punitive damages, and a legislative solution to asbestos legation (Rushmann, 2006). There are many lawsuits. But the frivolous lawsuits should not be taken seriously and not cost our courts and citizens time and/or money.

    Read More

  • Decision-Making in a Democracy: the Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker

    829 Words  | 2 Pages

    The significant impact Robert Dahl’s article, “Decision-Making in a Democracy: the Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker” created for our thought on the Supreme Court it that it thoroughly paved the way towards exemplifying the relationship between public opinion and the United States Supreme Court. Dahl significantly was able to provide linkages between the Supreme Court and the environment that surrounds it in order for others to better understand the fundamental aspects that link the two together and explore possible reasoning and potential outcomes of the Court.

    Read More

  • The Marshall Court

    1506 Words  | 4 Pages

    The life of every American citizen, whether they realize it or not, is influenced by one entity--the United States Supreme Court. This part of government ensures that the freedoms of the American people are protected by checking the laws that are passed by Congress and the actions taken by the President. While the judicial branch may have developed later than its counterparts, many of the powers the Supreme Court exercises required years of deliberation to perfect. In the early years of the Supreme Court, one man’s judgement influenced the powers of the court systems for years to come. John Marshall was the chief justice of the Supreme Court from 1801 to 1835, and as the only lasting Federalist influence in a newly Democratic-Republican government, he and his fellow justices sought to perpetuate their Federalist principles in the United States’ court system. In one of the most memorable court cases of all time--the case of Marbury v. Madison-- Marshall established the idea of judicial review and strengthened the power of the judicial branch in the government. Abiding by his Federalist ideals, Marshall decided cases that would explicitly limit the power of the state government and broaden the strengths of the national government. Lastly, the Marshall Court was infamous for determining the results of cases that dealt with the interpretation of the Constitution and the importance of contracts in American society. The Marshall Court, over the span of a mere three decades, managed to influence the life of every American citizen even to this day by impacting the development of the judicial branch, establishing a boundary between the state and national government, and making declarations on the sanctity of contracts ("The Marshall Court"...

    Read More

  • Donnie Darko

    991 Words  | 2 Pages

    Twenty-eight days…six hours…forty-two minutes…twelve seconds, that is when the world will end. The movie Donnie Darko, Frank tells Donnie that the world will end in just a short time. Throughout the movie, different literary devices are experimented to give the movie a deeper meaning. This provides the audience with a hidden message that gathers the viewer’s attention while keeping them entertained. Donnie Darko is a movie that has imagery, symbolism, and foreshadowing and by merging these devices creates a film that holds their audience’s attention.

    Read More

  • Interest Groups and Political Parties

    1676 Words  | 4 Pages

    The advocacy explosion is strongly linked to the decline of the American political party and the role of the political parties in elections. As interest groups have gained more power and had a larger control over politics and political goods the power that is exerted by political parties has dwindled. The power of the interest group has grown larger with the amount of members and the financial rewards that have come with the new members. In elections interest groups do not usually participate directly with the candidate or the election. Berry points out that “Groups often try to leverage their endorsement to obtain support for one of their priorities” (Berry, 53). With interest groups spreading their resources around the actual election can be affected very minimally by the many interest groups that contribute money to the election. However, the candidates who obtain political office through the help of special interest money still owe some sort of loyalty to the interest group regardless of which party wins the election. This loyalty and the promise of more money in the future gives the elected of...

    Read More

  • Management of the Employer-Employee Relationship

    1530 Words  | 4 Pages

    Gies, T. P., & Bagley, A. W. (2013). Mandatory arbitration of employment disputes: What's new and what's next?. Employee Relations Law Journal, 39(3), 22-33.

    Read More

More about Hot Coffee Movie

Open Document