Horton Vs California Essay

2006 Words5 Pages

Running head: HORTON V. CALIFORNIA 1

HORTON V. CALIFORNIA 8










Horton v. California
Joe Velasquez
National University
CJA 356 Criminal Evidence


Horton v. California
Importantly, the case of Horton v. California is a United States Supreme Court case, which occurred in 1990. The case aimed to make clarifications on important legal and constitutional matters in the United States. Particularly, the case focused on explaining how the Fourth Amendment supports the warrant-less seizure of evidence that the constitution categorizes as the plain view. Also, it revealed the decision and explanations of judges regarding the inadvertent requirements. …show more content…

Even though the United States has a constitution that supports the privacy of the locals and protect them from intrusion by government officials like law enforcers, some doctrines limit that privacy to certain levels. In particular, Citron (2007) states that country’s Fourth Amendment to the Constitution guides the behavior, actions, and decisions of police officers to ensure they operate legally and lawfully. Under this amendment, the clause of the probable cause states that police need to show or inform the judiciary that if they search premise, it is probable they will find stolen items or evidence to support their claims against suspected criminals. The fulfillment of this clause permits officers to conduct reasonable searches and seizures in various premises in the country. In Horton v. California case, the police officer believed that evidence of robbery existed in the Horton’s house. As a result, he requested for a warrant of both search and proceeds of robbery before he searched the house. The decision of the officers to apply a warrant for a search of weapons before the actual search proves that he adhered to the principle of probable cause. Therefore, his decision to seize the weapons of crime was justified under this …show more content…

California case was a landmark legal suit in the country as it allowed intelligent judges to deliberate on the doctrine of plain view. Importantly, the judges eliminate the inadvertent requirement to ensure the improved collection of evidence. In particular, the judges argued that courts should consider the objectives of the standard to enhance evenhanded law enforcement. This approach gave policemen the authority to use their sense of touch, sight, and anticipation to obtain evidence and use them to prove their cases against deadly criminals in the country. Also, the case emphasized the three conditions that officers need to fulfil to ensure validity of warrantless searches and seizures. Apparently, the analysis of the case is informative and relevant to officers and learners in different

More about Horton Vs California Essay

Open Document