Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Risk management in homeland security
Department of Homeland Security mission and protecting American citizens
Risk management in homeland security
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Risk management in homeland security
Bush 2003 states that the Federal Government defines homeland security as “a concerted national effort to prevent terrorist attacks within the United States, reduce America Vulnerability to terrorism and minimize the damage and recover from attacks that do occur”. I find this interesting since it is believed that this is a national effort which depends on a partnership involving everyone to include the American people. Today it takes everyone to secure the homeland, many people who are less aware of what is going on in the country and still some of who are aware of what is going on still see the federal government as the responsible authority to protect its people from terrorist. Few days ago I was watching the events as they unfolded September …show more content…
According to the reading the department is moving their focus on measures to prevent attacks. Some of the strategies that are being looked at can be from reorganization situating resources in places where it is needed most and where the threat is most likely to occur, intelligence gathering to include travel history, financial records and associations, internet searches these are all clues that are being used to identify and take out the threats. Law enforcements and military planners can also model this by doing the same thing for their cities, states and to include military bases. Planners at all level can look for vulnerabilities and identify risks and patterns the enemy can use to create serious harm or that can create serious harm and damage if a natural disaster should occur. Moreover planners at all levels should use the proactive approach, don’t wait till the threat to find out where your weaknesses are, knowing that the enemy can strike at any time is a good approach to not thinking that you might be immune, there are measures designed to protect our valued institutions. When reading about the different databases and how these systems do not link together in real time, this leads me to think that there is not a direct link with some states law enforcement databases and federal databases. However law enforcement will not know right away if the person …show more content…
Knowing what the Homeland Security does someone can know that the information that is obtained about terrorist groups is based off of intelligence both domestic and intelligence. The goal of the department is to warn the American public about any threats to the Homeland. The process involves rapid transit of intelligence collection, it needs to be analyzed and then distributed to other departments, know where the threat is most likely to occur and develop strategies that may eliminate the threat. A person hearing about threats to the homeland every day should take these seriously regardless if anything come out of it, people can be more cautious of their surroundings, look out for anything out of the ordinary and report the information to the
The National Response Framework is a guide designed to assist local, State, and Federal governments in developing functional capabilities and identifying resources based on hazard identification and risk assessment. It outlines the operating structure and identifies key roles and responsibilities. It established a framework to identify capabilities based on resources and the current situation no matter the size or scale. It integrates organizational structures and standardizes how the Nation at all levels plans to react to incidents. The suspected terrorist attack will have health, economic, social, environment and political long-term effects for my community. This is why it is essential that local government’s response is coordinate with all responders. Response doctrine is comprised of five key principles: (1) engaged partnership, (2) tiered response, (3) scalable, flexible, and adaptable operational capabilities, (4) unity of effort through unified command, and (5) readiness to act. An introductory word about each follows. (Homeland Security, 2008)
Chapter 1-3 showed the beginnings of homeland security and the expansion and growth of Homeland Security. Chapter 4 shows the actions of homeland security, and the steps they take toward a problem to access it. The DHS above all needs to realized and understand how to address an attack quickly and efficiently, and have counter measure put into place beforehand. The DHS must be able to access the risks of any situation, and must decipher the potential hazard the situation could cause. When looking at the many functions of the DHS, nothing could be more important than the ability to understand or hinder or stop an attack man made or not. First Homeland Security studies the nature of the risk; this means that they study what is likely to happen in a certain situation. The texted explains risk as what can go wrong. A cigarette smoker takes a risk every time he lights up, and everyone take a risk when getting into a car. The DHS takes what they know from prior circumstances to determine the reality of the risk; the department must also anticipate any attack even without prior knowledge to the circumstance. The main questions of risk assessment are easy to understand, questions like will people be injured or harmed. But when looking at chapter 1 which asks the reader to look further into why terrorist commit terrorism, that’s when its easier to see the DHS skill at risk assessment. For example if you understand that a terrorist attack could be coming from radical Islamist terrorist; then you would understand a risk by understanding their motive behind the attack like their religious holidays. The DHS uses a three-fold method for risk assessment and they are threat, vulnerability and consequence. The Rand organization uses th...
The Department of Homeland Security faces challenges of failure to coordinate and cooperate in the latest fight against computer crimes as well as more general intelligence-gathering operations. (...
After the fear of terrorism grew in the United States do to the Al Qaeda 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, the US Government found a need for a centralized department that umbrellas all other agencies when it comes to homeland security. The U.S. Government found this umbrella agency with the passage of the Homeland Security Act by Congress in November 2002, the Department of Homeland Security formally came into being as a stand-alone, Cabinet-level department to further coordinate and unify national homeland security efforts. (Homeland Security) With the creation of the new Department of Homeland Security (DHS) the government had a pinpoint location for the collection and gathering of intelligence, control of policies that effect national security, and a no fail mission. The Department of Homeland Security started to engulf other agencies and created many more, a total of 22 agencies now fall under the DHS. The DHS is control of all areas that deal with national security which included but are not limited to coastal and boarder protection, domestic terrorism, international terrorism, protection of the American people, protection of key infrastructure, protection of key resources and respond to natural disasters.
Homeland security is an American measure to ensure the security of the country. It is the national effort to ensure safety, security, and strength against terrorism and other issues, The goals of homeland security is to which will minimise the vulnerability of the U.S. to terrorism, and reduce the number of damages to the country.
In 2002, DHS, “with the passage of the Homeland Security Act by Congress in November, DHS formally came into being as a stand-alone, Cabinet-level department to further coordinate and unify national homeland security efforts” (DHS, n.d.). Not since President Harry Truman consolidated the armed forces into the Department of Defense had the government undergone such a large reorganization. Twenty-two agencies came together to form DHS with tasks that include border patrol, disaster recovery and transportation safety just to name a few.
September 11, 2001 was one of the most devastating and horrific events in the United States history. Americans feeling of a secure nation had been broken. Over 3,000 people and more than 400 police officers and firefighters were killed during the attacks on The World Trade Center and the Pentagon; in New York City and Washington, D.C. Today the term terrorism is known as the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives (Birzer, Roberson). This term was clearly not defined for the United States for we had partial knowledge and experience with terrorist attacks; until the day September 11, 2001. At that time, President George W. Bush, stated over a televised address from the Oval Office, “Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. These acts shatter steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve.” President Bush stood by this statement for the United States was about to retaliate and change the face of the criminal justice system for terrorism.
Unfortunately, terrorism is known to the United States very well because there are a lot of threats of terrorist acts against the United States. Unlike, a criminal threat a terrorist threat is considered to be very serious and has to be acted upon as soon as possible because these
In the Executive Order, it states the functions of this cabinet: " The functions of the office shall be to coordinate the executive branch's efforts to detect, prepare for, prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover from terrorist attacks within the United States" (Sec 3). It clearly states that an act such as terrorism is something not accepted by United States nationals and for anything in relation to it will be handled accordingly. It also makes it clear that terrorism is seen as an irregularity, in consistent with proper conduct and a threat to state power. To be able to exercise these newly established rules and standards; the state must demonstrate some degree of control in power in its implementation process.
Over the course of the history of the United States of America, the country has had struggles with its own borders and the protection of those borders. Illegal immigration is a big problem and the smuggling of drugs, weapons, and cash over our borders into our country has evolved into a bigger problem. The United States has over seven-thousand miles of border to cover each day. That is quite a bit of land, but the only problem with this is there is a lack of manpower to cover every single mile of border. The US shares its borders with Canada and Mexico. All along these borders are small communities and cities that are occupied by US citizens. This means that these cities and communities require the protection of our Homeland Security Agency.
Terrorists have different methods to get there point across. One of the potential methods is bioterrorism. Bioterrorism is the act of terrorism involving the release of toxic biological agents, including bacteria, disease and viruses (Riedel, 2004). One recent incident was the “anthrax letters” in 2001 which killed 5 people and infected 17 people. These dangerous biological agents are not very hard to obtain, which is why there is a high risk of bioterrorism at the CDC. With just one terrorist working inside the CDC, can cause tremendous consequences. Many of the harmful agents are colorless, airborne and microscopic, which makes it harder to detect. If these agents were to be exposed to someone, the agents would spread quickly in a population. When you a large population affected with a harmful biological agent, it would be very hard to control the situation and prevent it from
Have we improved our ability to protect the country from similar threats in the future? Has law enforcement intelligence analysis improved? The short answer is that new initiatives and new tools are giving us a powerful advantage, but not all law enforcement agencies take advantage of them. Let’s take a look at the issues and draw some conclusions. In the aftermath of 9/11, many law enforcement agencies sought to establish new data repositories to capture information, such as Tips & Leads, Organized Crime Intelligence, Counter-terrorism Intelligence, and even Web-based and electronic document open-source data. There was a strong focus on collecting new and previously unknown information.
Homeland security is the way Americans put forth the effort to ensure the homeland is safe, secure, and stands firm against terrorist acts and other hazard that could put the health and welfare of the American people. The mission of the Homeland Security is to prevent terrorism, secure and protect our open borders, uphold all immigration laws, safeguard and secure cyberspace, and be content and resilient when it pertains to disasters.
Therefore, the presidents are supposed to commit themselves to securing the homelandagainst the increasing threats of the 21st century. Besides, they are expected to prepare and plan for emergencies as well as investing quick response and recovery if a terroristattack occurs. The United States presidents are committed to ensuring that the nation is faithful to their ideals and values at the same time protecting American people.The head of state provides that the central government (Federal government) collaborates with the local states and the private organizations in the objective of prevention, mitigation and also responseto the attacks (Homeland Security, 2012). The attacks of September 2001 in America triggered amendment of security bill in 2002 called the Homeland Security Act 2002. This bill was ascent into law by the then President, George W. Bush.The manner in which George W. Bush and Hussein Obama approached the Homeland security issue is different. This partly forms the basis of the difference in leadership styles between these two
...ts of terrorism against the United States. Homeland security has not only proven to be effective, it has shown that it is providing safety for the U.S. and its citizens against terrorist attacks.