Home Bound Summary

644 Words2 Pages

In Chapter two of Espiritu’s “Home Bound: Filipinos Lives Across Cultures, Communities, and Countries” Espiritu focuses on two main concepts; Filipino migration to and from the United States, and the effect of colonization on the Filipinos. Filipino migration is a result of U.S imperialism and their attempt to Americanize Filipinos. Gender roles of Filipino-Americans are also visible through imperialism and colonization. Immigrants from the Philippines have also went through similar treatment as every other immigration group in the United States. This treatment is what I like to call “the racism of immigrant groups in America pattern.” The racism of immigrant groups in America pattern (RIGAP) is my own theory that every immigrant group in America, …show more content…

The United States saw the Filipinos unsuitable to govern their society, as a result the United States enforced American education. This included teaching English to the Filipinos, and teaching American culture as being superior in an attempt to Americanize Filipinos. This caused a dramatic increase of Filipino immigration to America from 1910-1930. The Filipino population grew in the United States, along with their employment. In my RIGAP theory, the Filipinos first experienced racism through the community and labor. Filipinos were driven out and branded as sexual threats, seeking the company of white women at taxi dance halls. Their experience is comparable to the Americans first formed opinion of the Native Americans as “savages”. These racist views have occurred with every minority group in America, with Americans attempting to justify their acts based on religion, or falsely accusing a gender of that minority with inhuman acts. Filipinos then went through racism through the government. The Tydings McDuffie Act was put in place after the Filipino population went from 5-30,470. This act gave the Philippines eventual independence, declared Filipinos to be aliens, and Filipino immigration was kept to 50 people per year. A comparison can be made between the Tydings McDuffie Act and the Chinese Exclusion Act. Both Acts limited immigration from Asian immigrants because of their

Open Document