On March 23, 2000, Pope John Paul II delivered the speech “At Israel Holocaust Memorial” at Yad Vashem’s Holocaust Memorial. This breathtaking speech pays homage to those that lost their lives during the events of the Holocaust. What makes this speech unique is that the Pope was alive when these events transpired, and although it has been half a century later, he still mourns the loss of his Jewish friends. Pope John Paul II condemned the murder of the millions of victims and took time from his day to meet with Polish Jewish survivors. The Pope recognizes that evil had prevailed and how the world must remember to make sure that complete domination never occurs again. The Pope made the mistake of not talking about the calamity when it first …show more content…
occurred, which caused a bridge between Christians and Jews. He hopes that the tragedy that was suffered will give rise to a new connection between these two groups, which leads into the theme of the speech being about finding hope while forming a new relation with a similar religion that adores the Creator and the common father, Abraham. The Pope, often idolized, aimed to educate others on the Holocaust and make people understand that this tragedy will not be in vain. Many people worship the Pope, and therefore his speeches need to be as effective as his appearance.
The Pope achieves this by using rhetorical devices throughout the speech to make it as impactful as possible. Ethos, also known as convincing someone because you are an idolized figure, is the main technique that Pope John Paul II uses. For people of the Catholic religion, the Pope is like God’s right-hand man; the Pope makes all the decisions, and the dioceses must adhere. The Pope is clearly seen using his jurisdiction when he says, “As bishop of Rome and successor of the Apostle Peter, I assure the Jewish people that the Catholic Church, motivated by the Gospel law of truth and love, and by no political considerations, is deeply saddened by the hatred, acts of persecution and displays of anti-Semitism directed against the Jews by Christians at any time and in any place” (Paul II 8). In this sentence, the Pope is using his authority to assure the people that Catholics are motivated by truth and love, and that Catholics are devastated about the losses that the Judaism religion has endured. The Pope has religious and moral credibility and uses his command over the common people to ascertain that his speech will be …show more content…
successful. Along with ethos, pathos is also evident, which is an appeal to the listener or reader’s emotions. As a result of the Holocaust, families have been torn apart, and because of this, it is an emotional topic. This is apparent when the Pope says, “I have come to Yad Vashem to pay homage to the millions of Jewish people [....] Men, women and children, cry out to us from the depths of the horror that they knew. How can we fail to heed their cry? No one can forget or ignore what happened. No one can diminish its scale” (Paul II 1). I can not even imagine the horrific memories that people had while listening to this speech. Their own family members have died; they have died because of an unruly dictator. The Pope makes the speech powerful by appealing to their emotions, and then suggesting a way to fix what they have lost; Catholics and Jews must come together. To effectively appeal to the audience’s emotions and command authority over the audience, repetition is strategically utilized throughout the speech. The Pope persistently repeats “I assure,” these words make the people feel secure and let them know that they are in good company. The Pope also repeats, “My God,” which stems from the fact that this was a religious gathering and shows that God is present and watching over everyone through the remembrance of this event. By referencing God throughout his speech, such as when the Pope says, “How could man have such utter contempt for man? Because he had reached the point of contempt for God,” (Paul II 4), the Pope is able to convey that God is within all and there was a point that not even God could stop Hitler. The Pope also reitterates the word “cry” multiple times throughout his speech. From a reader’s point of view, this was done to show that this event did not go in vain, and people are still mourning to this day. It is important to show the people that their relatives and friends will not be forgotten; they will be remembered by every religion, not just the Jewish faith. For most, it is difficult for the strongest believer to think that God would allow a horrific event to take place, but Pope John Paul makes it clear that God is present when he says, “Out of the depths of pain and sorrow, the believer's heart cries out: ‘I trust in you, O Lord: I say, you are my God’" (Paul II 6). Pope John Paul II is able to use the idea that most of his audience is religious and uses words that directly and indirectly relate to the Bible, such as “God,” “cries,” and “assure,” to convince the audience that while this gathering was about the Holocaust, it was also about the future. Allusions can also be recognized at many points during the speech and portray the events of a famous era, the Holocaust.
The Pope quotes the Bible numerous times, which is extremely effective as most of the audience is religious. As the Pope talks about people heroically giving their lives to help their fellow neighbors, the Jews, he says, “That is why the Psalms and the entire Bible, though well aware of the human capacity for evil, also proclaims that evil will not have the last word,” conveying the message that there is still human kindness in the world (Paul II 5).. God is seen as a strength for people when there is nothing else to hold onto, which the Pope recognizes when he suggests, “‘I trust in you, O Lord: 'I say, you are my God’”(Paul II 6). Pope John Paul II is seen bringing people of two different religions together and even says, “Jews and Christians share an immense spiritual patrimony, flowing from God's self-revelation,” and that while we can pray, we must “commit ourselves to their cause” (Paul II 7-8). Yes, this event was terrible, but by acknowledging that it happened, more people can be educated and can see that this is an important era to
remember. Pope John Paul II’s speech inspired fervor in the gathered audience. As reiterated multiple times throughout this analysis, the Pope wants to ensure that this speech does not go in vain and that the world must “heed the warning that comes to us from the victims of the Holocaust, and from the testimony of the survivors. Here at Yad Vashem the memory lives on, and burns itself onto our souls” (Paul II 11). The Pope is able to construct a new relationship between two faiths. The final rhetorical device, peroration, concludes his effective speech and ends with a high note when he says,“Only a world at peace, with justice for all, can avoid repeating the mistakes and terrible crimes of the past” (Paul II 7). Regardless of religion, you still cry to your God and have faith in him knowing he will do what is righteous. As a result of the Holocaust, families were torn apart and left questioning what they did to deserve this fate. Even though decades have passed since this event, it is still memorialized for the effects of a dictatorship. Through this speech, the Pope has gathered Christians and Jews alike to remember the awful events that occurred. The Pope used rhetorical devices to his advantage, and without these devices, this speech could not have been possible or, as effective.
This essay will review Daniel Goldhagen’s controversial moral inquiry, ‘A Moral Reckoning: The Role of the Catholic Church in the Holocaust and Its Unfulfilled Duty of Repair’, published in 2002. Goldhagen attended Harvard University as a graduate, undergraduate and assistant professor until he was denied tenure in 2003; this possibly indicates his limited status as an academic. Goldhagen notes that he is ‘indebted’ to his father, a Holocaust survivor, for some of his findings on the Holocaust. This personal connection to the Holocaust on the one hand allows Goldhagen to write more passionately. On the other hand, it obscures his ability to view evidence objectively, evident in this book under review. Goldhagen status rose to notoriety due to the controversial nature of his first book, ‘Hitler’s Willing Executioners’ published in 1996. This received much criticism and perhaps more importantly to Goldhagen, plenty of publicity. The contentious assertions of the book, whether academically valid or not, established the relative novice amongst historians. This is evident in the abundance of secondary literature that comments on Goldhagen’s work including that edited by F. Littell and F. Kautz. Goldhagen’s credentials as a controversial author explain the extremist content of his second book, ‘A Moral Reckoning’. Goldhagen’s academic background in political science is evident in the books emphasis on the church as a ‘political institution’ and the pope as a ‘political leader’ (p. 184). . This limits his work as a historian as he fails to fully examine the role of the individual.
In conclusion, from local governments to large influential organizations, people around the world turned their back on the Jews during the Holocaust. Almost every day in our lives we have the opportunity to be more than a bystander. We should put aside our own individual fears in order to pursue fairness for others around us. Being a Boy Scouts has taught me to do for others “…to help other people at all times.” When I consider our oath, it reinforces how selfless we all must be to make the world a better place to live.
The Holocaust or the Ha-Shoah in Hebrew meaning ‘the day of the Holocaust and heroism’ refers to the period of time from approximately January 30,1933, when Adolf Hitler became the legal official of Germany, to May 8,1945. After the war was over in Europe, the Jews in Europe were being forced to endure the horrifying persecution that ultimately led to the slaughter of over 6 million Jews with about 1.5 million of them being children as well as the demolition of 5,000 Jewish communities.
The warm blood trickled down his chin. It was the first warmth he’d felt in a while. The warmth fell to his hand and he looked at it through his swollen eyes. It was almost brown instead of red because of the dirt on his face. He had finally grown accustomed to the pain he’d endured for so long… In Germany, the Nazi Party, led by Adolf Hitler tried to establish the German “Master Race” or Aryans, and rid the world of minorities including Jews, Gypsies, the physically and mentally disabled and political opponents with the ultimate goal to conquer the world. When Hitler rose to power in 1933, the Nazis started ripping Jews from their homes and throwing them in concentration camps. With Hitler ruling Germany, the Nazi’s invaded Czechoslovakia,
The Holocaust was a very impressionable period of time. It not only got media attention during that time, but movies, books, websites, and other forms of media still remember the Holocaust. In Richard Brietman’s article, “Lasting Effects of the Holocaust,” he reviews two books and one movie that were created to reflect the Holocaust (BREITMAN 11). He notes that the two books are very realistic and give historical facts and references to display the evils that were happening in concentration camps during the Holocaust. This shows that the atrocities that were committed during the Holocaust have not been forgotten. Through historical writings and records, the harshness and evil that created the Holocaust will live through centuries, so that it may not be repeated again (BREITMAN 14).
an And The Controversy Over The Bombing Of Auschwitz." Journal Of Ecumenical Studies 40.4 (2003): 370-380. Academic Search Premier. Web. 30 Jan. 2014 Rice, Rondall. "
Holocaust Facts The Holocaust has many reasons for it. Some peoples’ questions are never answered about the Holocaust, and some answers are. The Holocaust killed over 6 million Jews (Byers.p.10.) Over 1.5 million children (Byers, p. 10). They were all sent to concentration camps to do hard labor work.
From this experience, I felt that the Pope was an exemplification of the closest human being to God. Everything he said gave me the same feeling that I get when I read the bible, except this happened in reality instead of my imagination while reading the bible, which magnifies the intensity for my love of God even more.
“One is astonished in the study of history at the recurrence of the idea that evil must be forgotten, distorted, skimmed over. The difficulty, of course, with this philosophy is that history loses its value as an incentive and example; it paints perfect men and noble nations, but it does not tell the truth.”
When individuals think about the Holocaust, most place the responsibility of the terrible events on the perpetrators. However, bystanders played one of the largest roles in the Holocaust (Evans, Carrell) simply by staying safe for way too long (Florida Center) and the world wants to make sure it never happens again (Shriver Jr., Donald W).
When I signed up for this course, I had limited knowledge of the holocaust and was not very interested in its history. This course ended up being one of my favorites and the most informational courses that I have taken. Other Political leaders such as Mao Zedong and Joseph Stalin had committed mass murders that caused a much higher victim rate than Hitler, so my thoughts were that the holocaust was just another tragedy in human history. This class has given me a different perspective in the way I view the holocaust. It has personalized this horrific event in that it begs a person ask themselves how could this tragedy take place? How come the Jews and the world did not do more to prevent it from happening? The course has spiked my interested in the the holocaust in that I have found that if I come across a holocaust program while watching the television, I will stop to watch that show or read a holocaust article that I would not have read in the past. The four books assigned for reading by Browning, Sierakowiak, Lengyel, and Rajchman expounded on the personalization of the holocaust by giving insight into the experiences of
My name is Eva Berlinski. I’m only 13 years old and I was brought up
Many historical events took place in the 20th century that will be remembered forever, but the one occurrence that everyone knows of and will forever be remembered was World War Two. World War Two, the greatest tragedy that has ever happened on the face of the earth, the genocide of Jewish people, a complete nightmare. When people think of WW2, many of the time the image of “those poor Jewish people” comes to mind. Many ask themselves how this could have happened. It just doesn’t make sense to them. Did people around the world at the time of WW2 have these kinds of deliberations? If they did have this kind of reflection then how did six million people perish? During the time leading up to the outbreak of World War II, the Western Press consistently carried numerous reports of the German's anti-Jewish policies and their purposeful victimization of the Jews living in Nazi Germany as well as the annexed territories. The general public cannot claim that they did not know what was going on, that they were uninformed. Whether or not they chose to believe it however, is a completely different story. The public were indeed outraged in many of the cases but the governments of the major European democracies felt that it was not for them to intervene for they felt that the Jewish problem classified as an internal affair within a sovereign state. The attempt to discover what exactly the people around the world did to save the Jewish race is not going to be an easy task but it is going to be a worthwhile one which should uncover a lot of unknown facts to many people.
This speech was articulated to the Holocaust survivors, their descendants, and political individuals. Chancellor Gerhard Schröder presented the speech on the 60th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz death camps. He gave this speech on January 25, 2005, right before his time in office was up. The focus of his speech was meant to express the shame of what had happened in concentration camps during the Holocaust. Chancellor Gerhard Schröder expressed his anger toward those that were responsible for the agonizing pain they made these individuals go through, claiming that this was the "the greatest crime in the history of mankind." He contends that "words by the government leaders are inadequate" in regards to this horrific event.
The Holocaust was one of the most tragic and trying times for the Jewish people. Hundreds of thousands of Jews and other minorities that the Nazis considered undesirable were detained in concentration camps, death camps, or labor camps. There, they were forced to work and live in the harshest of conditions, starved, and brutally murdered. Horrific things went on in Auschwitz and Majdenek during the Holocaust that wiped out approximately 1,378,000 people combined. “There is nothing that compares to the Holocaust.” –Fidel Castro