Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast extrinsic and intrinsic motivations
Compare and contrast extrinsic and intrinsic motivations
What motivates human behavior
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
An Introduction to J. A. Hobson with a Description of his Policies Born in 1858, Oxford educated John Atkinson Hobson was a “system builder” widely considered as one of the most respected economists of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. Despite gaining recognition mostly by the acknowledgement in Keynes’ General Theory, Hobson was an excellent and broadly relevant political economist. A self described economic heretic, Hobson was not unwilling to oppose conventional wisdom in the interests of a greater understanding of economic behaviour. His main emphasis was on the role of ideas in human action with a particular emphasis on the role of underconsumption in economic crises. Hobson had very strong beliefs regarding the intrinsic motivations of humanity. As a humanist and organicist, Hobson felt strongly that there was a link between the psychological and physiological aspects of human behaviour, and hence that the environment a person existed in was fundamental to their actions and behaviours. Because of this, Hobson was intrinsically opposed to any policy which did not improve the wellbeing of the individual and the society, such as unemployment and increasing inequality. Hobson firmly believed in the fundamental ideal of intrinsic altruism, that people …show more content…
Whilst Hobson was cautious about investment, he was also aware that hoarding could occur in a strict crisis, which could prevent equilibrium levels of supply and demand from being reached. By investing into infrastructure during the crisis itself, as well as infrastructure, education, health and energy, the American government would have created jobs, or at the least minimised job losses, which Hobson would likely have viewed as absolutely crucial as it would have prevented unavoidable
How would you describe the founding team of Fenton, Hoffer, and Le Tuan? Is it a balanced team? What does each member bring to the business? Can you see gaps in their skill sets and capabilities that should be adjusted for in some way?
Archibald, Robert, and David Feldman. "Investment during the Great Depression: Uncertainty and the Role of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff." Southern Economic Journal. 64. no. 4 (1998): 857-879. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1061208 (accessed October 7, 2011).
Despite its size, only 190 pages, the authors address the basic concepts of economics while also applying those politically and for personal finance decision making. Those basic concepts include scarcity, gains from trade, marginal decision-making, profit management, income growth, and Adam Smith’s invisible hand theories are all discussed within the first part of the book; allowing readers to understanding the concepts, Gwartney applies the same concepts to the creation of wealth and the importance of competition, private property, open trade, monetary stability, and lower taxes. This book educates its audience by evaluating our economy and government mechanisms without the overpowering display of charts, formulas, and graphs; which you would typically see in a textbook allow...
Keynes and Hayek represent different options. Should we steer markets or set them free? “Which way should we choose, More bottom up or more top down?” (Fight of the Century). These questions reflect the opposite ways Keynes and Hayek address the economy. Keynes wants to “steer” the economy from the “top down.” From his understanding of the economy, Keynes theorizes that the market can be directed by those with the power to do so to accomplish goals leading to a prosperous economy. This is the basis in his approach to dealing with recessions where the government or central bank manipulates the economy. The other side is a free market from the “bottom up” on which Hayek stakes his claim. Instead of steering the economy, Hayek proposes to leave it alone. Do not try to control it, but let the market determine the interest rate and price level, as it eventually will, through supply and demand. In this way, control is not exerted downward, but reality is expressed from basic economic forces. Fundamentally, Keynes’s model focuses more on the spending and consumption aspects of GDP, and Hayek’s approach focuses more on the investing aspect which flows from saving. These are the options from which to choose. Keynes vs. Hayek, Short run vs. long run, controlled vs. free, top down vs. bottom up, each possibility has its negatives and positives. This debate is not wrapped up
...e excessive speculation in the late 1920's kept the stock market artificially high, but inevitably led to the big crash. Overproduction may have seemed like a good idea but in the long really hurt the U.S. as the farm industry fell, workers fired, and purchasing levels across the country were at all time lows. These speculators combined with the overproduction and the maldistribution of wealth, caused the American economy to crash. Today, our government still argues over who should have the nation’s wealth and even if the wealthier should pay higher taxes then the less wealthy. Some could argue that the government should of utilized laissez faire and kept there hands off of the people’s business and let the people work things out on there own. Either way, the country did a very good job of making changes and not letting anything get as worse as it was in the 1920’s.
John Maynard Keynes, British economist, journalist, was born on June 5th 1883, in Cambridge, England. His father, Dr. John Neville Keynes, was an economist and a philosopher. Keynes attended Eton and then Cambridge University. At first he studied Mathematics but then turned his attention to Economics when he was offered the job at the British treasurer after the First World War when the British economy was at pressure. A man who gained a modicum amount of wealth during 1919 to 1938, married to Lydia Lopokova in 1926 and passed away in April 21st, 1946. Keynes believed that price level has to be stabled in order to have a stabled economy, and that is only possible if interest rates go down when prices rise. He also believed that the market forces alone will not deliver full employment but boosting government spending (main force of the economy in Keynes theory) will aim in his theory full employment or close to that. He believes by Governments intervening and spending will finally stop recession, unemployment and most importantly depression. For spending will increase the aggregate demand of the economy.
Humanistic psychology relies on client centred therapy and the idea that each individual has the potential to achieve a position in their psyche named self actualisation. Humanistic psychology differs from psychodynamic theory in that it is optimistic about the human psyche and does not view conflict as inevitable. Humanistic psychology assumes people attach meaning to their unique perspectives on the world and that behaviour is strongly influenced by this. Carl Rogers defined the healthy personality as being one that had congruence between the perceived self and the experienced self and that the individual in question experienced unconditional positive regard from their parent or guardian. He defined an unhealthy personality as being one which lacked these components. Abraham Maslow alternatively suggested a hierarchy for which a person’s healthy personality could be measured by stages of psychological and physical needs (see diagram 2). He suggested that, for a person to achieve self actualisation and become a fully functioning person, they must first satisfy all the needs of each level in the pyramid before moving onto the next
Hume believes that natural virtues are instinctive and are more intrinsically motivated than natural virtues. He believes that natural virtues are like moral instincts (Moehler). Hobbes is a radical egoist, believing that people are predominantly self-interested. However, Hume argues against this by stating that hums also have certain moral feelings; that if you want to explain human behavior, self-interest is not enough.
This is an act based on maximizing one’s own utility, even if it is merely in his own mind. To those for whom morality and helping the greater good is important, altruistic acts exist even it is within the category of selfish acts. Thus, Hobbes’ theory concerning actions based solely on self-serving motivations is not truly complete.
humans were no more than complex machines operating within a mechanical universe. For this reason, Hobbes was strictly a materialist, or monist, in the belief that the mind was purely a manifestation of chemical processes in the brain. He believed that behavior was not caused by the interactions between the physical body and an immaterial being or soul. Instead, he believed that all human behavior was dictated in accordance to the theory of hedonism which states that all human behavior is driven by the notion of maximizing pleasure and avoiding pain. It is difficult to agree with Hobbes philosophies about human behavior as hedonistic because there has been many arguments throughout history that have question the legitimacy of the theory of
My research in Classical Economics and Keynesian Economics has given me the opportunity to form an opinion on this greatly debated topic in economics. After researching this topic to great lengths, I have determined the Keynesian Economics far exceeds greatness for America compared to that of Classical Economics. I will begin my paper by first addressing my understanding of both economic theories, I will then compare and contrast both theories, and end my paper with my opinions on why I believe Keynesian Economics is what is best for America. Classical Economics is a theory that suggests that by leaving the free market alone without human intervention equilibrium will be obtained. This theory was the first school of thought for economists, and one of the major theorists and founders of Classical Economics was Adam Smith.
The theory of economics does not furnish a body of settled conclusions immediately applicable to policy. It is a method rather than a doctrine, an apparatus of the mind, a technique for thinking, which helps the possessor to draw correct conclusions. The ideas of economists and politicians, both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is commonly understood. Indeed the world is ruled by little else. Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influences, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist." (John Maynard Keynes, the General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money p 383)
Two proponents most noted for humanistic approaches to personality are Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers. Both the Person-Centered Theory (Rogers) and the Hierarchy of Needs (Maslow) considered that humans ' true nature was good and that each has the potential for growth. A comparison of the two approaches demonstrates a compatibility between theory and practice. Furthermore, each approach focuses on individual choices and rejects the theory that biology will determine human potential.
The humanistic perspective on personality deals exclusively with human behavior. Humanistic psychologists believe that human nature includes a natural drive towards personal growth, that humans have the freedom to choose what they do regardless of environmental factors, and humans are mostly conscious beings and are not controlled by unconscious needs and conflicts. They also believe that a person's subjective view of the world is more important than objective reality. Two of the humanistic theorists that have made an impact of humanism are Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow.
Lord Lionel Robbins was born in 1898, and was one of the many great economists of our time. Robbins was known for his contributions to economic policy, methodology, and the history of ideas, but made his name as a theorist. Robbins was made famous for his definition of economics, "Economics is a science which studies human behavior as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses." (The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics 2007) Robbins was able to change the Anglo-Saxon thought economics off its Marshallian process and onto the Continental train of thought.