Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of the SAT incollegemental education
Role of the SAT incollegemental education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of the SAT incollegemental education
Designed to measure the math, reading and writing skills necessary to predict college success, The SAT Reasoning Test is the most popular and widely accepted exam used for college entrance available today. A team of U.S. colleges developed its earliest form, known as the College Entrance Exam, in 1901. This essay-only test was designed for students applying to colleges to take one entrance exam instead of separate exams for each university. In 1926, the College Entrance Exam became the SAT (Student Aptitude Test). The test was formatted to multiple-choice in order to objectively assess a student’s college readiness while giving all students an equal opportunity for success. Since then, the title of the test was changed again to no longer stand for Student Aptitude Test due to the multifaceted purpose of the test. Published by the Educational Testing Service, the current title of the test, “SAT”, is just an acronym that no longer stands for anything. Still, the SAT has been constantly developing to best assess student scholarly performance (“History of the Tests”, 2014).
Since 1926, the College Board has been the non-profit organization responsible for the overseeing of the SAT. The latest edition of the SAT (SAT I: Reasoning Test) was redesigned in 2005 and over a century of research was completed by educators and colleges to ensure that the test fairly projects college success. The SAT is offered seven times per year in the United States (and six times at international sites), only at SAT test centers designated by the College Board. The SAT Program supplies administrators with the necessary training to administer the SAT, along with the testing materials and any support required (“College Board”, 2014).
Any student can registe...
... middle of paper ...
...itives. Some may debate the fairness of the SAT while considering the test in regards to college-admission decisions. Colleges favor the SAT because it gives students of poor circumstances a fair chance of admission. The misconception that colleges admit students solely on their SAT scores skew some people into believe the SAT itself is unfair. However, this is not true.
I personally feel that college success is determined by an abundance of factors and different cases will make it impossible to predict. It is important to acknowledge that the SAT measures only projected success. Whether a student who scores high on the SAT chooses or is able to perform well in a college setting will never be able to be predicted. However, when colleges are looking for students, they deserve to know the odds and be able to select the students that are the most likely to succeed.
News and Views: After Many Years of Repair, the Test Content of the SAT Now Appears Fair; The Way the Results Are Used Is the Problem. (1997). The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 28. Retrieved May 8, 2011, from ProQuest Education Journals. (Document ID: 494196011).
Standardized tests, such as the SAT and the SOL, have been implemented for many years now for individuals in grade school to take. The SOL’s, or Standards of Learning tests, are Virginia’s version of standardized tests that students are required to take in order to pass a class, evaluating their knowledge on a specific subject. SOL’s are mandatory for students to take as soon as they reach third grade. Additionally, the SAT is a test taken in the final years of high school that colleges look at when comparing students for post-secondary school. People concerned with student’s education can come to the common consensus that education is important and there should be some way to compare a student’s achievements to one another. However, the process
... a tedious process, but the change can have immense, positive effects for the future college student. The ACT and SAT that supposedly measure a student's learning potential through multiple-choice questions should be replaced by a test of a student's desire to learn determined through the analysis of essays, recommendation letters, and school or community involvement. This change can result in a more academically motivated freshman class. Standardized testing in its current form does not accurately measure most students' learning potential. It does not allow for diversity and creates a huge hurdle for many potential academic achievers. An adjustment to a diverse, open testing format of the ACT or SAT and a stress on the student's other academic accomplishments can accurately measure the student's desire to learn, therefore measuring the student's learning potential.
The main reason people think that is because many of these students do not have access to the best resources. Many minority students do not live in neighborhoods with the best schools and cannot afford expensive tutoring sessions for the test. Since that has been an issue, there are government funded SHSAT prep courses to help students. In order to be certain that there is no more discrimination, the specialized schools just have to ensure that there are enough resources for all who need them. The SHSAT is the only way to objectively test students. Alternative methods-- including interviews, portfolios, GPAs, and teacher recommendations-- are subjective criteria since the administrators get to know each
A study conducted by Charles Rooney a member of the National Center for Fair and Open testing states that, "[More than 275 colleges and universities across the United States, acting on the belief that "test scores do not equal merit," do not use the SAT or the ACT to make admissions decisions about some part or all of their freshmen.]"
Mr. Caperton who is the current president of the College Board who officiates the SAT states the SAT provides tools for college admissions to compare student (Caperton). The Ex-Governor of West Virginia also suggests that the test does not discriminate against minorities, he argues that colleges who make the SAT optional do it to enhance their status and not in the best interest of the students (Caperton). Alternative solutions exist. The test is going to have a major reform starting in 2016. Article from USA Today by Zoroya discusses the changes the test will have starting in the spring of 2016. According to the article by Zoroya officials from college board announced specific changes such as the test will become harder but questions will be more direct and practical, shortened duration of the test. The major change will be the change of high score from 2400 to 1600. I disagree with those who argue the SAT provides an equal playing field for all. There are studies that show the correlation between high SAT scores and high-income student. This date shows the inequality the SAT brings. Therefore all colleges should make the test as optional. I realize that the SAT gives students with bad grades the opportunity to attend good college with great SAT
"Former Bates College Dean of Admissions, William Hiss, said that intelligence is so complex, varied, and multifaceted that “no standardized testing system can be expected to capture it”(Westlund). Throughout the years standardized testing has changed its purpose and not for the better. In the late 1930s, the goal of taking standardized test was to award scholarships to "diamond in the rough" students (Westlund). Currently, the whole idea of taking the SAT or ACT is getting admitted into a college. Standardized test should not be a deciding factor of being admitted into a college.
The two most common aptitude tests administered for high school students are the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) and American College Testing (ACT), devised to assess a student’s potential for success and readiness in college. However, experience is still regarded as important; school-related learning, particularly in language and mathematics, is a prerequisite for success on the tests. Because aptitude tests are regarded as reliable, they eliminate teacher bias and differences in teachers’ grading practices, thus, adding valuable information in predicting future college success. There is no widely accepted definition of “aptitude” and “ability,” and the terms are often used
Thousands of students around the country and around the world will be preparing for the SAT and ACT tests while trying to maintain a high GPA. These tests will potentially have a significant impact on students' lives. Some will be taking these tests for the second or even third time to get that 1500 out of 1600 or that 33 out of 36, that they long desire. These flawed tests are not truly able to measure how well students will perform in college as they are supposedly used to predict. A single test that students have to wake up for at six, seven in the morning on a Saturday and travel to some random location to take a difficult test should not impact the student's chance of getting into college, let alone predict how well they will do in college.
SATs and ACTs are two major standardized tests. A University in California discovered that if colleges did not require SAT...
Colleges always want students to graduate and support their alma mater. However, this begins with deciding what students are mentally ready and determining the task that lies ahead, college. In today’s society, we struggle trying to find a proper definition for college readiness. This is the main reason statistics and graduation rates suffer in the way that they do. Just because a high school student reaches the age of 18, obtains a high school diploma, and has functional literacy, does that really make students college ready?
By definition, a test is a given short written or oral examination to determine a person’s proficiency or knowledge in a specific subject, and it seems that recently standardized tests have been lacking in regards to the true definition. Standardized testing is speculated to have its roots in seventh century China, where they would administer a test on Confucian era philosophy and poetry as a selection process for civil service, this form of testing has evolved into the tests we know today as the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) and the American College Testing (ACT). Today too many students are depressed and anxious from education related stress, the added mental strain of a mandatory test that sometimes even determines whether or not that student goes to college seems cynical and over the top. Standardized tests should be reformed to judge a students ability to retain knowledge and skills long term and steer educators away from solely teaching students how to pass the test.
High-stakes testing is for the cookie cutter student not the unique individual student. High stakes testing was started in 1905 by French psychologist Alfred Binet. He began developing a standardized test of intelligence which was named Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test. During World War I, standardized testing was standard practice, it was how U.S. servicemen jobs were divided and assigned. Years passed and the first test to come into play was the SAT, it was founded in 1926 as the Scholastic Aptitude Test by the College Board. Years passed again in 1959 and to compete against the SATs, the ACT (American College Testing) were created. The test was made up of questions that geared students to a course of study by asking about their interests. In addition to math, reading and English skills, the ACT assesses students on their knowledge of scientific facts and principles. These tests have become just geared toward college as the decades went by. Decades past and new tests came were created, in 1980 the Texas Assessment of Basic Skills (TABS), 1984 the Texas Educational Assessment of Minimum Skills (TEAMS), 1991 the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills
However, there are others that believe no matter how much a person prepares for the SAT, the outcome will remain the same. The College Board, along with psychologists thinks that SAT is uncoachable. According to them, “coaching leads to improvements of only 30 points per section (qtd. in Shea).” But if coaching leads to 60 points improvements, then the test is coachable. For an example, if a student takes the test and gets a 940 and when he/she takes the prep course, he/she gets a 1000, then there is a significant improvement.
Merely skimming a couple pages the night before of the practice booklet the school handed out a week ago. As the instructors of the test began to pass out our testing booklet, I could only hope that I would at least get a decent score that I could work on later on when I start preparing for the real test. My legs are bouncing, shaking and my fingers fidget with my number two pencil, I could feel anxiety crawling up my spine - I shiver. ‘Begin’ I hear, students are shuffling their papers, attempting to read the passage as quick as possible. Taking a standardized test like the SAT is a journey, a long harsh boring journey.