Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ways mass media has influenced American culture
Journalism as profession
Journalism as a profession
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ways mass media has influenced American culture
Question 3:
Professional journalism is a relatively new industry in American history. Before Civil War, there were a lot of tensions in the U.S. The conflicts between South and North offered journalism a great chance to develop, and by the end of Civil War, the modern print journalism was already on the right track. In 1920s, broadcasting started to develop and it created a new way to share the news from one point to multiple communities. To some degree, the Second World War benefited a lot from broadcast and inaugurated the modern broadcast journalism’s development.
Let’s start from the antebellum period. As we have learned in class, from 1820 (Missouri Compromise) until April 1865 (peace), US goes from crisis to crisis, and in 1850s, political system disintegrates. At the same time, newspapers started developing and they were the mass media –widely read, instantaneous reporting – capable of amplifying political debates of unprecedented complexity: they carried restlessness, anxieties and hopefulness of the public; it reported the economics and morality of slavery, various proposals for conciliation and compromises, and the meaning of the constitution. Just like Walt Lippmann once said “In an exact sense the present crisis of western democracy is a crisis in journalism.”
Therefore, the journalists started to share the information to general public and it had a huge influence. For example, the party press was very big during 1789-1833. It founded to bring party views to the public at times of debates. Its function was to serve parties, even for just one election, with no concept of balance/objectivity. At this time, editors/journalists sought and held political office, with no sense of conflict of interest. In 1820s-30s, press wa...
... middle of paper ...
...asons caused the black press to decline. Even though by the end of twentieth century, black newspapers were still struggling and they never regained their power back after WWII, however as Washburn’s said “No matter what the black papers became in the last half of the twentieth century, their distant roar can still be heard. And it is magnificent.”(205)
• Right after US entered WWI, FBI ordered its Chicago bureau to investigate the Chicago Defender, the most influential black newspaper
– Southern public and politicians accused it of leading to unrest, crippling the South’s war effort
– Government concerned paper’s highlighting of racial injustices would prevent African Americans from enlisting
• Only two black newspapers were prosecuted under sedition acts
• Agreement btw black editors and government—would promote loyalty, would condemn lynching and discrimination
The Civil War was unlike any other war ever fought in America and had many effects on the home front for both the North and the South. It is stated to be the first ever total war, which is a war against not only the civilians but also the armies. The Civil War is also considered the first modern war fought by the U.S. troops. Lincoln asked volunteers to sign up for only three months. Many people thought the war wouldn’t last long. However, the war continued on for four years. The Union armies had around 2,500,000 to 2,750,000 men and the Confederate army had approximately 750,000 to 1,250,000 men. The entire North and South society was affected by the war and desired for many social and economic assets. The Civil war brought new military techniques which caused the armaments to be more destructive. Ironclad ships and railroads were sufficiently used within the war. The north had a motive; they wanted to weaken the South’s longing to victory. The North tried to achieve this last motive by inflicting wholesale destruction upon the South (Janda, 1995). More than a hundred people seemed to be spies or secessionists in Maryland. In time, they were arrested due to not being faithful to the union and their state. Pro-secessionist newspapers were shut down, and telegrams and mail were censored (Perret, 2004).
At the start of the 20th century, journalists had begun to play an important role in exposing wrongdoings within politics and society. These journalists, often called muckrakers, used their journalism to focus on political flaws and corruption in city governments. Several popular publishers adopted this form of journalism, which became widely popular
In the years paving the way to the Civil War, both north and south were disagreeable with one another, creating the three “triggering” reasons for the war: the fanaticism on the slavery issue, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the separation of the Democratic Party. North being against the bondage of individuals and the South being for it, there was no real way to evade the clash. For the south slavery was a form of obtaining a living, without subjugation the economy might drop majorly if not disappear. In the North there were significant ethical issues with the issue of subjugation. Amazing measures to keep and dispose of subjugation were taken and there was never a genuine adjusted center for bargain. Despite the fact that there were a lot of seemingly insignificant issues, the fundamental thing that divided these two states was bondage and the flexibilities for it or against. With these significant extremes, for example, John Brown and Uncle Tom's Cabin, the south felt disdain towards the danger the Northerners were holding against their alleged flexibilities. The more hatred the South advanced, the more combative they were to anything the Northerners did. Northerners were irritated and it parted Democrats over the issue of bondage and made another Republican gathering, which included: Whigs, Free Soilers, Know Nothings and previous Democrats and brought about a split of segments and abbreviated the street to common war. Southerners loathed the insubordination of the north and started to address how they could stay with the Union.
...erature was written with such intricate writing methods, and complex undertones. The works of the period were a tough read. Many black felt the nee to be informed on what was going on in their communities. Many black journals, and magazines published and owned by black intellectuals kept blacks abreast on what was going on in the cities.
Siebert, Peterson, and Schramm argued that the press takes on the form of the society in which it exists. They support their argument by tracing the origins of authoritarian, libertarian, social responsibility, and Soviet Communist theory. Each theory’s historical background shows that the state of the press mirrored the society that it served, supporting the original premise of the book.
Of all the approaches the government made to sway the black press, propaganda was the least effective, somewhat because Emmett Scott was not trusted. Flattery of the editors was more efficient. However, threatening by legal action provided the best results. Overall the government succeeded in the efforts to change the most influential black journals.
Back in the 1840’s, word traveled quite slowly. A message from New York to Georgia could take as much as two months to arrive to its destination. Thus was invented the Newspaper, a proper media outlet for its time period, it lowed news to travel ten times faster than before. Between the years of 1810 and 1835 the amount of newspaper coverage tripled. From the years 1775 to 1835 the amount was 38 times the original. During the election process, having an excessive amount of media coverage on you could be seen as a great
The author brings us to review the historical development of American journalism and analyse the social motivation of objective norm emergence. Some opinion of other scholar were presented and criticized. In conclusion, this article is a significant guide to American journalism research.
During the early 1900’s and late 1800’s precipitated the first true form of American media. The daily newspapers have been a part of the United States for some time, but during 1880’s and 1890’s reports such as Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst began to transform the newspaper in order for it to become the first major stepping stone in mass media. These publishers, especially Hearst, took advantage of the American involvement in foreign affairs. Hearst convinced his audience that sinking of a U.S ship during the Spanish-American War obliged a military response. Although Hearst was not the initial cause of the war, there was proof that he had the power to distort information, images and options. By World War 1, the media involvement increase by a tremendous amount.
This investigation evaluates the significance of the role the media played in helping the Allie Forces win World War Two. To be specific, World War Two occurred between the years of 1939 to 1945. A brief synopsis of the developments of media outlets and their importance prior to the war will be investigated. Leaders of all the Allie Forces will be evaluated in this essay. The essay will focus primarily on the rise of media impact on the citizens of the United States, France and the United Kingdom. The Soviet Union will be mentioned but only minor. Two of the sources used in this essay Freedom Forge: How American Business Produced Victory in World War Two by Arthur Herman and World War II in Europe by World Book: Chicago are evaluated and used in this essay.
It begins with a detailed story discussing the history of the Negro press in the United States, preceding the lunch counter, bus boycott, and school desegregation activities affiliated with the civil rights movement in the twentieth century, and introduced the small group of white editors who were determined to encourage their paper to take a stand against the segregation that surrounded them for decades. The story covers everything from the Brown vs. Board of Education decision in 1954 to the march in Selma, Alabama in the summer of 1965. The Race Beat accounts for how the press covered the civil rights movement and how the movement learned to use the press to its advantage. Most importantly, it gave a better understanding of how the news changed over time.
Newspapers and nightly news shows have become a business. They no longer go by the public services values they once stood by (Sensationalism, 2005). Instead of being the fourth branch of government, they are just like any other money making business. It is no longer a race to put out the truth; it is more a race for dollars and control. Sensationalism is purely fueled by money and popularity. If a news outlet garners a large amount of popularity, they can swing votes, and influence voters. Sensationalism has already affected many political situations. Sensationalism has proven to spread like a virus. If sensationalism is not controlled, there is no way the news outlets can be the advocate for the people.
The old proverb “the Pen is mightier than the sword” (Edward Bulwer-Lytton, Richelieu; Or the Conspiracy) still holds significance in protecting of public rights. Words such as freedom, and liberty engendered the idea for democracy. Such words formed into sentences and paragraphs enlightened the public to take action against tyranny and corruption. Freedom of the press is what ensured the general masses of their public rights. The exemplary case in which the freedom of the press played a role was the endeavors of Woodward and Bernstein to unravel the corrupted politics behind the Watergate Scandal. The movie All the President’s Men depicts the proceedings of the Watergate scandal, the scheme to attack the crux of democracy: “ the open election”. Also how the two journalists of the Washington Post progressed to unveil the relationship between the Watergate Burglary and the White House. On one hand, the movie represents the role of the media in its obligation to convey the truth to the masses. On the other hand, the movie reflects political corruption and conspiracy. The accomplishment of Woodward and Bernstein presents the importance of the interaction between the media, the government, and the general masses of society. The role of the media is not only to intervene between the State and the public, but also to take account of public ideas and to apply those ideas to new policies. Also, the media acts as a safeguard to prevent the corruption of the State. Thus, the Watergate scandal signifies the significance of the media as an intermediary between the government and the public mass.
Thirty years ago, if I told you that the primary means of communicating and disseminating information would be a series of interconnected computer networks you would of thought I was watching Star Trek or reading a science fiction novel. In 2010, the future of mass media is upon us today; the Internet. The Internet is and will only grow in the future as the primary means of delivering news, information and entertainment to the vast majority of Americans. Mass media as we know it today will take new shape and form in the next few years with the convergence and migration of three legacy mediums (Television, Radio, Newspaper) into one that is based on the Internet and will replace these mediums forever changing the face of journalism, media and politics. In this paper I will attempt to explain the transition of print media to one of the internet, how the shift to an internet based media environment will impact journalism and mass media, and how this migration will benefit society and forever change the dynamic of news and politics.
Journalism: a profession under pressure? Journal of Media Business Studies, 6, 37-59. Scannell, P. (1995). The 'Secondary'. Social aspects of media history, Unit 9 of the MA in Mass. Communications (By Distance Learning).