Historical Accuracy Of The Bible Essay

In response to Oswalt’s statement that “if the historical basis on which the supposed revelation [the Bible] rested was false, then why should we give any special credence to the ideas resting on that basis”, people can trust in the Bible for it is theologically accurate despite some misunderstanding between it and some other historical record. Even though some of the details of the Bible were historically false, there are several reasons in defense of its theology reliability. First, the reason of copy and printing mistakes of Bible will be discussed. Then, the core features of the Scripture will be compared with myth. In the end, the combination will be concluded with the purpose and the process of the production of God’s Word.

Though people doubt the reliability of the Holy Bible pending on different reasons that mainly focus on the historical accuracy, there are several concrete supporting ideas can prove the Bible is trustworthy. The original Scripture might be correct in corresponding to the historical record; however, some minor mistakes could be found from the copy version or in translated version. There were no successful printing skills in the early centuries, so some mistakes might have happened during the copy process. For example, the

Comparing the Bible and the myth, the Bible is not polytheistic whereas myth is as the images of gods of myth are presented in the shapes of this world. Moreover, there was no conflict involved when God created the universe, while the view of all mythical religions rejects the agreement of it as it devalues the gods for their untrustworthiness. The low humanity and the lack of standard ethics in myth all indicate the discrepancies of the myth and the