Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is a family
The impact of divorce on young children and adolescents
Attachment theory child development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is a family
Family does not only mean “mother” or father” a group of family is people that may be made up of aunts, uncles, cousins and grandparents. A good definition of family is a group of people sharing common ancestors. Family shares the same household; they all live together as one. Family is a social group in society typically containing of one or two parents and their children. A respectable family is called a nuclear family as this consists of both parents and their children, nuclear family is seen as the healthy family as this is the way it should be. Both parents are important to a child as they learn majority of things from their parents, both the mother and father have different things to teach their children. It is not advised to parents …show more content…
The first theory is a criminological approach as Hirschi (1969) looks at attachment as an emotive bond where children learn the norms of society. It is believed that crime would be low in families when the child is attached to the family and cares about the exceptions from their family, therefore less likely for that individual to perform anti-social behaviour. Hirschi states that the levels of delinquency will increase if the child’s bonds are weak with their family. (Cited in Sampson, R. and Laub, J. (1995) The second theory that links with attachment and delinquency is the attachment theory by Bowlby (1973). It has been stated that attachment is key in a child life. When an infant is separated from their mother they start crying and clinging and Bowlby calls this natural responses. If parent-child tie is disrupted during their early stage it will leave long-term affects and it is likely that delinquency behaviour will occur. (Cited in Cassidy, J. …show more content…
Both believe if parents and children have weak attachments and if they do not recognize their children’s wrong behaviour and correct their wrong behaviour, that child is more likely to suffer from low levels of self-control. As a parent having weak attachment mean that their children are more likely to turn to crime. This makes the child feel alone in life so they might have good attachments with peer groups or even feel like they need to belong somewhere. (Cited in Vito, G., Maahs, J. and Holmes, R. (2007)
Thornberry (1998) found out that predictors of gang membership is growing up in neighbourhoods where social attachment is low. When parent-child attachment is low due to the effect of the neighbourhood. Thornberry states that absence of biological parents, low parental supervision and low parental attachments to child increases the probability of gang membership. (Cited in Clauss-Ehlers, C. and Weist, M.
Criticisms of attachment theory have come mainly from the feminist schools of thought since the theory has been used to argue that no woman with a young child should work outside the home or spend time away from her baby (Goodsell and Meldrum, 2010). Children’s experience and development also depend on what happens after early years, whether bad or good later in life may change a child’s emotional development, e.g. lack of basic needs, diet, education, stimulation such as play might affect a child’s development (Rutter, 1981). Differences in cultures have to be taken into consideration as well. A study by Schaffer and Emmerson (1964) provided contradictory evidence for Bowlby’s attachment theory. They noted attachment was more prominent at eight months, and afterwards children became attached to more than one person.
Hamilton 's 2000 research suggests that attachment classification at 12 months predicts attachment in late adolescence. Hamilton (2000) designed a study to asses weather infants attachment would remain stable over time. Hamilton (2000) recruited 205 American families during the mothers third trimester of pregnancy. The study included both conventional and non conventional families to asses weather this effected attachment stability (Hamilton, 2000). Infants attachment style was measured at 12 months using Ainsworth 's (something) Strange situation task. Results from the strange situation task classified 153 infants as secure, 30 infants as avoidant, and 19 as resistant, there was no classification difference between conventional and non conventional families (Hamilton, 2000). About 16 years later families were contacted by mail for a follow up study, However due to varying circumstances only 30 participants out of the original sample size were available (Hamilton, 2000). Attachment in adolescents was measured using the AAI task which was developed by George, Kaplan and Main in 1984 (Roisman, Holland, Furtuna, Fraley, Clausell & Clarke 2007). Its a semi-structured interview with 20 question that take about an hour (Roisman et al., 2007).The results showed that 77% of participants retained the same classification from infancy to adolescences (Hamilton, 2000) . The results also suggested there was no difference of attachment stability between conventional or non-conventional families (Hamilton, 2000) . Hamilton’s (2002) study supports previous research in the area of attachment
Attachment is an emotional bond between two people regardless of space and time. The father of the psychological theory of attachment, John Bowlby, once said,” Attachment is characterized by specific behavior in children, such as seeking proximity with the attachment figure when upset or threatened.” Although scientists believe a child's development depends on their parenthood, the theory of attachment explains how children are pre-exposed to form attachments.
In criminology, researchers have constantly tried to explain why people commit crime and engage in juvenile delinquency. Many theories have emerged for over a century about why people commit these deviant behaviors. Macro-level theories focus on social structures and the effects of those structures on the human behavior. Basically, macro-level theories explains aggregate crime. Micro-level theories focuses on individuals and their interactions with various groups of people. For example, the relationship between family members, friends, and groups, that individuals interact with every-day, which explains individual criminal behavior. These interactions affect their attitudes, beliefs, and what seems normal for people. One of the most interesting theories that that tries to explain this, is Hirschi’s social bonding theory, which is based on how crime is the result of weakened bonds to society and is considered a micro-level theory.
The Social Bond Theory fits well into the life of Willie Bosket. Originated in 1969 by Travis Hirschi, Social Bond Theory argued that through effective socialization, a relationship forms between individuals and a social group. When this bond becomes weak or broken, deviance and a life of crime may result (Schmalleger 107). These bonds include components of communal relationships, including family attachments, individual commitments to social and organized norms, involvement in activities, and the belief that these factors are significant. Since the relationships have been thought to help in decreasing the need to partake in disobedient conduct, a great deal of emphasis is put on the fact that a shortage of these attachments exists among juvenile
John Bowlby’s attachment theory established that an infant’s earliest relationship with their primary caregiver or mother shaped their later development and characterized their human life, “from the cradle to the grave” (Bowlby, 1979, p. 129). The attachment style that an infant develops with their parent later reflects on their self-esteem, well-being and the romantic relationships that they form. Bowlby’s attachment theory had extensive research done by Mary Ainsworth, who studied the mother-infant interactions specifically regarding the theme of an infant’s exploration of their surrounding and the separation from their mother in an experiment called the strange situation. Ainsworth defined the four attachment styles: secure, insecure/resistant, insecure/avoidant and disorganized/disoriented, later leading to research studies done to observe this behavior and how it affects a child in their adolescence and adulthood.
Travis Hirschi presented a social bonding theory in 1969. The main idea of the social bonding theory is that each and every individual has a drive to act in selfish and even aggressive ways that might possibly lead to criminal behavior. Social bonding theory is somewhat have similarities with the Durkheim theory that “we are all animals, and thus naturally capable of committing criminal acts” (Tibbetts, 2012, p. 162). However, the stronger a person is bonded to the conventional society, for example, family, schools, communities, the less prone a person is to be involved in criminal activity. The great example of this would be the serial killer Nannie Doss. Since early age she did not have any bonds either to her family with an abusive father or to community she lived in. Most of the time during her childhood she was isolated from any social interactions with her schoolmates or friends.
John Bowlby was the first attachment theorist, he describes attachment as a “lasting psychological connectedness between human beings” (Bowlby, 1969, p.194), he believed that the earliest bonds that were formed between child and caregiver has a huge impact that continues throughout the infants life. Attachment is said to help keep the infant close to their mother, so it improves the child’s chance of survival.
The theory can be tested and it gives explanations for reducing crime. This theory does not mention the negative attachments, involvements, commitments, or beliefs that one may have. The theory could be extended a step further to looking negative impacts of the four elements to examine if they impact the chances of individuals committing more crimes. Social bond theory is applied to minor offenses; this theory would be more efficient if it would be applied to all offenses (Brown, Esbensen, and Geis, 2013).
Psychologist, Mary Ainsworth expanded upon Bowlby's original work. She conducted a study labelled the ‘Strange Situation’. In the study, based upon the children’s reactions, Ainsworth described three major styles of attachment: secure attachment, ambivalent-insecure attachment, and avoidant-insecure attachment. Work by Stroufe and Waters in 1977, further supported Ainsworth's attachment styles and have indicated that attachment styles also have an impact on behaviours later in life (Birns, 1999, p. 13). Researchers have found strengths in attachment patterns established early in life can lead to a number of outcomes. For example, children who are securely attached as infants tend to develop stronger self-esteem and better self-reliance as they grow older. These children also tend to be more independent, perform better in school, have successful social relationships, and experience less depression and anxiety (Birns, 1999, p. 13).
“Attachment is as essential for the child’s psychological well-being as food is for physical health,” claimed Bowlby, B (2001, p.54). Bowlby claimed in this statement that attachment is a necessary thing that a child needs in order to develop healthily. There is evidence from other theorists who support Bowlby’s theory of attachment, such as Harlow, whose approach is based upon a caregiver’s sensitivity and attachment. Ainsworth is another theorist whose research supports Bowlby’s theory of attachment. In her strange situation study, she tested for the attachment types and what effects they had on a child’s behaviour.
The second perspective is a psychological approach which will focus on the relationship between insecure childhood attachments being the underlying contributing factor to explaining why individuals resort to crime and deviant behaviour. Freud (1856-1939) was the first to hypothesise that abnormalities in human behaviour are due to unresolved conflicts of the Oedipus and Electra complex inhibiting the development of the superego therefore establishing the foundations for criminal behaviour as the superego governs the moral compass and the lack of its development could account for those who show no guilt or remorse for engaging in crime. Bowlby’s (1907-1990) attachment theory stems from Freud’s psychoanalytic theory. Bowlby hypothesised that
The four bonds are imperative in determining a person’s conformity or deviance to society. When bonds are weak, Hirschi saw that a person becomes “free” to engage in delinquency (Williams & McShane, 2010). The first bond, which is attachment, deals with the relationship one has with parents, friends or school and clubs. Attachment is the most important bond because a strong tie to parents or institutions will help prevent deviance. Attachment is also important because the other bonds are thought to build on attachment.
Family, a group consisting of parents and children living together in a household. Although family is a concretely defined term, the idea of family varies from person to person. But, what makes a family? For those who are surrounded by loving blood relatives, for those who have never known the one to grant them life, for those who have left their blood behind for a more loving and nurturing environment, what can commonly define a family? Family is something defined by the individual. Family includes those who you have come to love, whether platonically or romantically, those you have suffered with, those you have come to respect, and most importantly those you have cared for and in turn have cared for you. To one that could mean people who
The study looks at both male and females, from ages 13 to 18. The participants completed various surveys in relation to attachment. The results were inconclusive; it was not clear if attachment had anything to do with juvenile delinquency. According to the charts provided by the research, males were more affected by the attachment to either mother or father. With a low attachment rate comes the higher chance of juvenile delinquency. The researchers supposed that maybe we are all born delinquent; it is our relationships in life that determine whether we will increase or decrease in