Hills Like White Elephant Conflict Analysis

592 Words2 Pages

Conflict in “Hills like White Elephants” Hills Like White Elephants is a short story written by Ernest Hemingway that follows the conversations of a young woman and her supposed loving boyfriend while they are stopped at a junction waiting on the next train. The story, without ever clearly stating it, is about the young woman’s external (and internal) struggle as to whether or not to have an abortion. She must consciously decide what the right thing to do in her situation is. With this as the premise, it is very clear to the reader that the main conflict in the story is one of man vs. self. This short story grapples with the immense moral dilemma of knowingly killing off another human life. The pregnant girl infers throughout the conversation that she would like to keep the baby, although this goes against the wishes of her suitor. She argues to him that “‘No, we can’t [have the whole world]’”, in reference to her unborn baby. In this instance, the whole world is the future that the man and girl would have, if the baby was born. This happy world would be lost to the girl if she aborted the baby within her. The girl also says “‘And after [the abortion] they were all so happy’”, in a sarcastic jab to the man about the procedure. The girl cares about her happiness and she believes that if she were to have the abortion her happiness would be …show more content…

The girl seems to want to have the baby while the man explains numerous times why he does not want to have it. The main conflict of the story emerges to be man vs. self within the girl when she is tasked with either getting on the train (having the abortion) or not getting on the train (having the baby). This conflict is very obvious when the girl has many reasons for and against having the baby and she must decide for

Open Document