High School Diploma Dbq

656 Words2 Pages

As Nelson Mandela, a South African revolutionary once remarked, “Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.” Students should be required to stay in school until they're 18. This evidence is supported through the negative effects later on in life when not receiving a diploma, the increase of graduation rates if the dropout age is increased, and the insubstantial counterarguments placed. First, negative effects can be seen in the long run if a high school diploma is not under a student’s belt.
Dropping out of school may seem reasonable to pupils now, but can have a negative impact in the long run. According to a data collection on average income, “High School Diploma- $27,380. High School Dropout- $19,540”( Source 3). One can clearly see that children who did not dropout of high school made more money than children who did. Money is an essential part of human life and raising the dropout age can increase the pay of many adolescents. Based on Paul Moran’s talk with Missy Remiss, “Those without a high school diploma have lower earnings, higher …show more content…

As President Obama exclaimed, “When students don’t walk away from their education, more of them walk the stage to get their diploma” (Source 2). If the age requirement is raised to 18, students will believe that only a couple of months is needed to succeed and receive a diploma. Effectively, it increases the adolescent's choice to graduate. Paul Leather proclaims, “What it does is it sets the moral imperative so that students, parents, educators become committed to the idea that the student will infact graduate” (Source 2). The dropout age requirement can not only motivate young adults but the teachers and parents too. The extra motivation from the groups may be enough to push children through high school. Whilst school is a proven avenue to betterment, children may have obstacles that might persuade them to

Open Document