Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A summary about the most dangerous game
A summary about the most dangerous game
A summary about the most dangerous game
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A summary about the most dangerous game
Both of the stories High Noon, and "The Most Dangerous Game," are great stories that have many things in common. In High Noon the main character Will has to fight our people at once, and "In The Most dangerous Game" Rainsford has to fight a pack of dogs, and two humans, by being smart, and using his wit. In the end both characters overcome great obstacles, and survive what threatened them. Also in both of the stories the characters have to be very brave, and smart to survive. These two stores have many things in common, but one major thing that they have is that their themes are very strong, and helped their main characters survive.
In both of the stories the main characters have very different jobs. "They've got a new marshal-! Kane: Won't be here till tomorrow. Seems to me I've got to stay awhile (he reaches for his star.) anyway I'm the same man with or without this"(Foreman 296). His shows how even though he could have quit his job completely, and run away he still stays to fight the antagonist of the movies Miller, as the town's sheriff. "This hot weather is making you soft Whitney. Be a realist. The world is made up of two classes-- the
…show more content…
hunters and the hunted. Luckily you and I are hunters" (Conell 1). In the story "Most Dangerous Game" the main character Rainsford and his partner, and this quote can mean the literal meaning, or that people that are strong will survive, and weak people won't. To fulfill these two different job positions, and their beliefs they had to stand and fight even when the odds seemed overwhelming. In both of these stories more than one person hunted them down, and still they had to stand and fight. "Go home to your kids Herb" (Foreman 322). In the quote he is telling his only deputy to go home, which for Kane it meant that he would have to fight four other people by himself. "But the hope that was in Rainsford's brain when he climbed died, for he saw in the shallow valley that general Zaroff was still on his feet. But Ivan was not" (Conell 14). In this story the main character Rainsford has to fight more than one person, he has to fight two, and a pack of wolves, which are also trying to hunt him down, in this quote he kill one of the two people hunting him. Both of these reasons support the theme, which is very strong in both of these stories. Both of these stories had very important themes, which reflects a lot on the main characters.
"You and Me against Mitchell, and all four of em" (Foreman 322). The theme for High Noon is not to wait for other people to do things for you, or help you do them yourself. In this quote Herb is in disbelief that only he volunteered, and later leaves Will to fend for himself. "The general made one of his deepest bows. " I see," he said. "Splendid! One of us to furnish a repast for the hounds. The other will sleep on this very excellent bed. On guard Rainsford." He had never slept in a better bed, Rainsford decided" (Conell 15). In "The Most Dangerous Game" the theme is hunt of be hunted, and in this scene Rainsford kills his hunter. In both of these stories the main character is the underdog, but both of them overcome the
odds. Both of these stories have very strong themes, which show the longer, that you proceed throughout them. One difference between both of the stories is that they both have different jobs one being a hunter, and the other being a sheriff. Also in both stories the were underdogs, and didn't have any help from anyone else. One strong relationship is that both of the stories have very strong and meaningful themes. In conclusion, both stories are some of the best stories to watch, or read.
“You can’t Judge a book by its cover,” but you can judge it by its content. In the two stories: “Charles” which was written by Shirley Jackson, an American writer, who’s prominence was in the late 1940’s through the early 60’s and “The Open Window” which was written by H. H. Munro, also known as “Saki,” who was born in the United Kingdom and made his mark in the early 1900’s, took fairly different approaches to establishing a similar suspense and ending to their stories. This could possibly be attributed to the era in which the stores were written or may be variations in the author’s personalities or even geographical location, but at final conclusion Charles was the better story. The story Charles
The two story High Noon and "The Most Dangerous Game" are alike in some ways, but very different in many other ways also. High Noon is a story about an honest man named will khan; Who is a Marshall that has sent a prisoner to jail named frank Miller. Who has now come out of jail to get revenge on will. When will needs the towns people of hadleyville for help to defeat frank when he comes after will no one helps. In the other hand "The Most Dangerous Game" is about two very skilled hunter between Rainsford who get trapped on Ship-Trap island by Zaroff who owns the island. When Rainsford realizes what Zaroff hunts in his island he must leave as soon as possible. Zaroff tells Rainsford he could either hunt with him or against him.
After reading the stories “The Most Dangerous Games” and “The Cask of Amontillado”, “The Most Dangerous games” is my treasured of the two stories. The reason why I like “ The Most Dangerous Games” as a result the story is about hunting and I love to hunt. For example on the first day of the hunt for Rainsford, Rainsford tried to make a hard to follow him. After that he made a log and tied it to gather and then he put some of the strings over a branch and hid behind a log less than one hundred feet away. Next traps Rainsford dug next to the Quicksand and he put long like stakes pear in the bottom of the pothole and then climb a tree not far away. His plan didn’t direct the way he intended . He had retrieved a couple of the mongrel instead
The basic premise of the two plots is the same. Both stories deal with the capture of a young person who is to be groomed to live in a private, controlled environment to make them happy, but where they are never able to leave.
Initially in both stories there is an incident that traps a group of males in a secluded, unknown location. They are forced to work together to survive. As the stories progress we see an instance in each where someone threatens to kill another person. For example, in The 33, one man threatens to murder another man because he uses his iPod. One of the main differences we see is the outcome of the situations.
A skilled hunter sprints desperately through the woods, realizing the futility of hiding from his greatest foe: his own kind. Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” is the story of a hunter that becomes the hunted. The story explores the sense of extreme terror the protagonist feels being pursued by a psychopath living on a mysterious island. This protagonist, Rainsford, has many traits that aid him in his battle with the general. By demonstrating his cunning, sly, and remorseful traits, Rainsford shows the story’s theme of “walking a mile in someone else’s shoes”.
“You’re a big-game hunter, not a philosopher. Who cares how a jaguar feels?”. The story “The Most dangerous Game,” by Richard Connell introduces an adventurous type of thriller with two main characters named Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff. Both of which are hunters who in the story play a “game” invented by General Zaroff out of pure fear of becoming bored of the hunt. General Zaroff is a big fan of the hunt and everything he says about the hunt is to be taken serious. Rainsford and General Zaroff are described to be excellent hunters through the traps Rainsford makes, all the big game Zaroff has hunted, but Zaroff is better at hunting through the fact that the hunt has began to bore and he needs more of a challenge hunting humans.
Those similarities and differences can be found anywhere when comparing and contrasting, especially when it is over two genres with a main topic. In the case of The Most Dangerous Game, the short story was more descriptive, informative, and did not stray far from the central theme of everything has feelings no matter what someone may think. “You have one the game.” Rainsford did not smile. “I am still a beast at
A fairly obvious comparison between these two stories is the setting in which they take place. Both occur in New England territory, mainly in the forests and hilly country. It also seems as if the land in each of the tales is rocky and hard to work. The geographical features of these lands sound much the same. In fact, each of the two takes place in an area very close to, if not in, Massachusetts. Tom Walker lives a few miles from Boston, while Jabez Stone lives in New Hampshire, near the area where that state meets up with Vermont and Massachusetts. Daniel Webster lives in Massachusetts, in a town called Marshfield. The geographical and cartographical similarities here show an obvious parallel between the two.
In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game”, he uses several literary devices to keep the reader interested. During Rainsfords journey to and through the island of General Zaroff he partakes in an adventurous journey filled with mystery, suspense, and dilemma. These devices are used to keep the reader interested throughout the story.
One story shows how a man uses his dedication to work to create one of the best things that has ever happened to Chicago. The other story a man uses his dedication to work to create one of the worst things that has ever happened to Chicago. These two men chose different paths and different means to achieving their goals, but the one thing they have in common is determination and dedication. Holmes and Burnham don’t give up and continually work to make their job more successful that it already is, and they will go to any means to get that
The atmosphere between the two scenarios is very similar with the crowds cheering, the audience can relate to their own experience at a similar sport event. One of the main plots is revenge between the two because Tilly Dunnage wants revenge on the townspeople and jasper Jones wants revenge for whoever killed Laura. Another plot that is similar is murder, Eliza Wishart death and Stuart Pettyman death being the main drive for both texts. Another plot that most audiences can’t connect with is Small towns, simply because most people grew up in similar conditions and environments. A part of the plot that isn’t put together until the end of the in both texts is that one person knew the entire time what happened. Barney and Eliza Wishart saw exactly what happened but didn’t tell anybody because they were scared to be sent away or
In “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, Zaroff is a hunter that lives on an island in the middle of nowhere. Zaroff demonstrates that he is rich, smart, and confident.
Being able to overcome anything in life is a great feeling. There is a special feeling in the body and the mind when the body achieves a goal, and the mind gets a feeling of satisfaction. Since, the mind chooses to go against the body's will to quit, you have to be mentally strong. In Richard Connell's short story “The Most Dangerous Game,” large game hunter Sanger Rainsford is tested in the following ways: strong versus the weak, the value of life, and becoming what he fears. To begin with, Rainsford has to pose as the weak against the strong, General Zaroff.
In the beginning of both of the pieces of literature, the main character(s) have not had the experience that will shape their values yet. Rather, as time moves forward in the stories, the