High Cost Of Post-Secondary Education

1530 Words4 Pages

Almost every parent of a high schooler in America, except the parents whose child is a genius, a gifted athlete, or parents who are they themselves fabulously wealthy, worry about how they will be able to afford for their child to go to college. Most parents and students have resorted to finding scholarships, grants, and loans. Many of these loans leave students deeply in debt for years to come. Colleges and universities cost within the United States have increased to a level that is unaffordable and unsustainable for the average student and must be lowered to ensure that the United States remains an educated world power. Students usually have to shell out thousands of dollars a year for just tuition. If the student also needs room and …show more content…

“A typical college graduate earns an estimated $650,000 over a work life than a high school graduate” (Rosentiel). This amount of money is influential to not only the lives of the graduates, but also their children who will then be able to afford to go to college, and since it is such a financial benefit, post-secondary education should not be so expensive. Having that much more money in a lifetime helps the privileged and their children stay privileged and the unprivileged stay unprivileged, creating and sustaining a large wealth gap. “...when more men (and a few women) were going to college, many of them in preparation for their future high-earning careers, or simply because it was becoming more normal. Why, the reasoning went, shouldn’t they pay more” (Rothman)? Going to college was becoming more normal, so anyone who wanted to thrive in a competitive market had attend, but college was also becoming unaffordable because colleges raised their prices. Making college more expensive keeps many low-income people unable to become successful because they would not be able to enroll in college since they could not, at the moment, afford it. Seeing college as an essential but pricing it as a luxury perpetuates an already destructive wealth gap in American …show more content…

Universities could “Cap administrative costs… Operate year round, five days a week… More teaching, less (mediocre) research… Cheaper, better general education” (Pearlstein). All of these suggestions would not necessarily make colleges spend less, but they would spend less wastefully, and therefore each dollar spent would go farther. These suggestions would also improve the quality of the education students are paying for, making teachers teach instead of spending their time on often unimportant research that will go unnoticed. “Democrats focus on interest rates of loans, Republicans are focusing on how much the loan is” (Savidge). Even if college itself does not become cheaper, lower interest rates on loans and smaller loans would limit the amount of debt a student would be able to acquire. With less loans to pay off, students and recent graduates would be able to afford to buy things such as cars and homes, boosting the economy. “ ...the price of college would have actually declined since 2000… if funding had been kept constant and the schools applied that money entirely to the students’ tuition bills” (Webber). If the government kept its funding consistent and invested in the youth of America, the average student would have a much less substantial tuition bill to pay. Schools would lose little money by applying funding to tuition because they would keep the funding, regardless of where it is being applied.

Open Document