Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Problems with racism in literature
Define identity in literature
Papers on racism in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Ralph Ellison’s unfinished novel, Juneteenth, is not only about racism and racial identity like in his previous novel, but it also is the name of a celebration in that represents the end of slavery. The connection Ellison makes between his novel’s title and the celebration is ironic since a senator that goes by the name Sunraider, formerly known as Bliss, has an ideology that sees minorities as a problem people and not real Americans like himself. Ellison’s use of allusions and metaphors leads to the idea that a social identity is not a true identity because it is associated with the misrepresentation of a group and creates false appearances in social situations. In Juneteenth Ellison’s allusions refer to the protagonist and his experiences …show more content…
that convert him to an antagonist, from the young boy Bliss into the dubious senator Sunraider. Reverend Hickman, who thought of the boy Bliss as, “the lamb of God” (Ellison, Juneteenth 58), was not approving of Sunraider’s xenophobic behavior at the Congress conference. Reverend Hickman continues to evaluate Sunraider’s behavior through biblical allusions to make the connection that he was once pure, as opposed to his recent public appearances that have corrupted him with power. It is because of his new found identity that Hickman describes Sunraider’s currently misrepresented life as, “the Valley of Dry Bones in Ezekiel’s dream” (Ellison, Juneteeth 120), where the biblical allusion refers to his future, which was once bright, becoming his undoing. Now, Sunraider is a “passive slave” (Ellison, Juneteenth 153) to the white-dominated society, who continues the historical oppression of African-Americans, using their “traditions for his own selfish” (Rice) social appearance against the community that he was once a part of. Historically, there were some African-Americans when in public, would diverge from their actual beliefs. They were seen as traitors to their own race and faced the same repercussions as Sunraider. Therefore, the front he puts when in public is not his true identity, but rather a completely different personality much like Bliss and Sunraider, who are the same person but have opposing beliefs. Hickman use metaphors to compare Sunraider to his younger days when he was still named, Bliss.
After receiving Hickman's criticism, Sunraider decides to explain the reasons he chose to take on his discriminatory identity, which began with his powerful persuasive technique. Sunraider’s mannerism, which was taught by Hickman himself, was thought highly of and as a child he becomes “intoxicated with his power of persuasion becoming a drunkard” (Williams). By comparing human greed for power to an intoxicated man with little awareness or control over his actions, where he is essentially losing his identity. Hickman is unable to comprehend why he saw the need to throw away his identity asking, “why didn’t you pattern after Abraham Lincoln” (Ellison, Juneteenth 362), aiding African-Americans instead of causing harm to them. The metaphor compares Abraham Lincoln’s similar use of social persuasion to Sunraider’s provocative speech. However, while Abraham Lincoln died as a martyr Sunraider goes down as sore upon society, unknowingly harming the community he attempted to inspire. If Sunraider were to follow in Lincoln’s footsteps he would be unable to progress further due to Lincoln being “the most complicated of all great men” (Ellison, Juneteenth 362), and only those who oppose him could become greater than he. Therefore, in an attempt to become greater than Lincoln he joined those who opposed him, coming close to being revered as, “GOD’S TROMBONE” (Ellison, Juneteenth 49).
Sunraider’s metaphor is a result of his corrupted mind, much like politicians who lust for power and recognition, regardless of the provocative speeches they must make to maintain it. Sunraider suffered one last hallucination concerning the WID DE JOE CAH, a group of African-Americans and their jalopy. The WID DE JOE CAH beat Sunraider, standing as the final trial before going either to heaven or hell, where he is forced to acknowledge and state who he really is and what he has done to deserve getting beat. After a severe and harsh lesson in Sunraider’s final hallucination he acknowledges “that being a ‘true American’ means ‘also somehow black’” (Brucker and Wray), bringing closure to his conflicted identity where he lived according to black culture but was upholding a white man’s appearance. It is through Ellison’s contradicting characters, Sunraider and Bliss, who are the same person and by having these two distinct characters he presents the idea that social appearance clouds true identity. The comparison Reverend Hickman makes between Lincoln and Sunraider leads to the core reason behind Sunraider’s decision to represent the reactionary southern society, and revealing that his group’s beliefs did not reflect his own. Regardless of Hickman’s good intentions, providing Bliss the persuasive techniques was too much to handle as a child causing him to explore a way to use it. Growing up the only way he seemed to be able to properly use his persuasive skills was in exchange for his true identity, leading to a life of hypocrisy.
The novel covered so much that high school history textbooks never went into why America has never fully recovered from slavery and why systems of oppression still exists. After reading this novel, I understand why African Americans are still racially profiled and face prejudice that does not compare to any race living in America. The novel left a mixture of frustration and anger because it is difficult to comprehend how heartless people can be. This book has increased my interests in politics as well and increased my interest to care about what will affect my generation around the world. Even today, inmates in Texas prisons are still forced to work without compensation because peonage is only illegal for convicts. Blackmon successfully emerged the audience in the book by sharing what the book will be like in the introduction. It was a strange method since most would have expected for this novel to be a narrative, but nevertheless, the topic of post Civil War slavery has never been discussed before. The false façade of America being the land of the free and not confronting their errors is what leads to the American people to question their integrity of their own
The transition of being a black man in a time just after slavery was a hard one. A black man had to prove himself at the same time had to come to terms with the fact that he would never amount to much in a white dominated country. Some young black men did actually make it but it was a long and bitter road. Most young men fell into the same trappings as the narrator’s brother. Times were hard and most young boys growing up in Harlem were swept off their feet by the onslaught of change. For American blacks in the middle of the twentieth century, racism is another of the dark forces of destruction and meaninglessness which must be endured. Beauty, joy, triumph, security, suffering, and sorrow are all creations of community, especially of family and family-like groups. They are temporary havens from the world''s trouble, and they are also the meanings of human life.
During his speech he was ignored and laughed at after working so hard and battling to be heard, but once he spoke of equality someone from the crowd became upset. “You sure that about ‘equality’ was a mistake?” (1220). Some are born with access and advantages, but some have to go through hurdles to get what they want. “I spoke automatically and with such fervor that did not realize that the men were still talking and laughing until my dry mouth, filling up with blood from the cut, almost strangled me.” (1219). This places a challenge on the white men in the area that an intelligent black boy who they thought nothing of yet still considered him voiceless and moronic. This chapter alone worked off of a single scene of how the narrator was indeed an invisible man in his youth, not knowing which way to turn, but remembering the words his grandfather said from his deathbed carrying on throughout his years. “Son, after I’m gone I want you to keep up the good fight. I never told you, but our life is a war and I have been a traitor all my born days…” (1211). Neither the culture nor the crowd wanted to accept what was given, doing anything to repress someone from attempting to reach a goal. It is a way to discourage one due to others feeling you aren’t good enough or have the will and drive. The theory applied may help readers see something that we would not see unless we
One's identity is a very valuable part of their life, it affects the Day to day treatment others give them which can lead to how the individual feels emotionally. Atticus, defending Tom Robinson, who is an african american man from the plaintiff of the case, Mayella Ewell, who is a caucasian woman, accusing that Tom raped her is supposivly a lob sided case. During the great depression, any court session that contained a person of color against a caucasian would always contain the “white” individual winning the case. The cause of the bias outcome comes from the lawyer of the african american does not try to defend or the jury goes against the person of color simply because their black, this shows the effect of racism to anyone’s identity in the courtroom for a case simply because of race. Atticus, deciding to take Tom Robinson’s case seriously sacrifices his identity as the noble man he is, to being called many names for this action, such as “nigger lover”. He is questioned by
Ellison creates many stereotypes of African Americans of his time. He uses this to bring less informed readers to understand certain characters motives, thoughts, and reasoning. By using each personality of an African American in extremes, Ellison adds passion to the novel, a passion that would not be there if he would let individualism into his characters. Individualism, or lack there of is also significant to the novel. It supports his view of an anti-racial America, because by using stereotypes he makes his characters racial these are the characters that the Americans misunderstand and abominate.
The narrator’s father is being freed from slavery after the civil war, leads a quiet life. On his deathbed, the narrator’s grandfather is bitter and feels as a traitor to the blacks’ common goal. He advises the narrator’s father to undermine the white people and “agree’em to death and destruction (Ellison 21)” The old man deemed meekness to be treachery. The narrator’s father brings into the book element of emotional and moral ambiguity. Despite the old man’s warnings, the narrator believes that genuine obedience can win him respect and praise.
The main character is completely alienated from the world around him. He is a black man living in a white world, a man who was born in the South but is now living in the North, and his only form of companionship is his dying wife, Laura, whom he is desperate to save. He is unable to work since he has no birth certificate—no official identity. Without a job he is unable to make his mark in the world, and if his wife dies, not only would he lose his lover but also any evidence that he ever existed. As the story progresses he loses his own awareness of his identity—“somehow he had forgotten his own name.” The author emphasizes the main character’s mistreatment in life by white society during a vivid recollection of an event in his childhood when he was chased by a train filled with “white people laughing as he ran screaming,” a hallucination which was triggered by his exploration of the “old scars” on his body. This connection between alienation and oppression highlight Ellison’s central idea.
Sum up, the social relationship between these people here, this old town Maycomb is complicated and pretty tense. This novel has taught us so much, thanks to Harper Lee – one of the greatest writers of all time. It has opened our eyes wider about racism at that time and compared it to nowadays it has become so much better. People are equally, no matter what skin color you are, what religion you have, or where you’re from, what you’re appearance looks like, we are all equal, and we are all the same – human. So instead of treating badly to one another we should all united and make the world a better place.
The narrator is haunted by his grandfather's dying words. Speaking to the narrator's father, the narrator's grandfather expresses his guilt and shame he is burdened with for being “ a traitor” to his race. The narrator's grandfather urges his family to kill the white man with kindness and obedience. After his grandfather's death, the narrator is invited to give his graduation speech to the city's upper-class white men. His speech is contradictory to his grandfather's last words by urging the black race to advance forward in society by humility and submission to white society.
Racism was and forever will be a dark part of the American past, and no one can change that, no matter how many books one may alter. In this book a number of dialects are used, to wit: the Missouri negro dialect; the extremest form of the backwoods Southwestern dialect; the ordinary “Pike County” dialect; and four modified varieties of this last. The shadings have not been done in a haphazard fashion, or by guesswork; but painstakingly, and with the trustworthy guidance and support of personal familiarity with these several forms of speech. I make this explanation for the reason that without it, many readers would suppose that all these characters were trying to talk alike and not succeeding. (Twain 2)
Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is considered the great American Novel with its unorthodox writing style and controversial topics. In the selected passage, Huck struggles with his self-sense of morality. This paper will analyze a passage from Adventures of huckleberry Finn and will touch on the basic function of the passage, the connection between the passage from the rest of the book, and the interaction between form and content.
At a meeting of the American Colored League, where turn-of-the-century Boston’s black citizenry, along with delegates from all over the country, have gathered to confront a wave of Southern lynchings, Luke Sawyer rises to deliver an impromptu speech detailing the brutalities of southern racism. Scheduled speakers at the meeting are the transparent representatives of these leaders: Du Bois in the figure of the radical philosopher Will Smith and Washington in the person of Dr. Arthur Lewis, the “head of a large educational institution in the South devoted to the welfare of the Negros” and a man who advocates peaceful accommodation with southern whites (242). Luke Sawyer takes the podium and begins to preach by criticizing the previous speakers (the corrupt Mr. Clapp and his lackey, John Langley) for their “conservatism, lack of brotherly affiliation, lack of energy for the right and the power of the almighty dollar which deadens men’s hearts to the sufferings for his brothers” (256). Rather than engaging in the rational debate form (as represented by Clapp and Langley), Sawyer passionately narrates a personal story of his own family’s suffering, a history in which his father is punished by a lynching mob for operating a successful black business in
Ellison’s narrator states that he has “been hurt to the point of abysmal pain, hurt to the point of invisibility. And [he defends] because in spite of all [he finds] find that [he loves]. ... [He’s] a desperate man – but too much of your life will be lost, its meaning lost, unless you approach it as much through love as through hate. So [he approaches] it through division” (Ellison 567). The narrator articulately uses paradoxes to enthrall the reader in this segment of his epilogue. Still, the contradiction apparent between the narrator’s emotions is entirely possible, as there is no reason that both love and hate cannot coexist in an individual. The speaker, a bona-fide invisible man, despite all the hardship he has faced, still describes his story with some love. The idea of balance is brought into the equation, something that Ellison has seldom told of in the story, a friendly contrast to the rest of the novel’s stark unfairness and disparity. In the end, our storyteller finds that despite the hate thrust upon him, he feels compelled to love just as equally if not more. This gives a positive light to human nature, while suggesting that the antagonistic race of the novel, Caucasians, will ultimately feel that emotion as well and reconcile with African Americans. That’s a message that finally found its way into the minds of the American
In Ralph Ellison’s novel The Invisible man, the unknown narrator states “All my life I had been looking for something and everywhere I turned someone tried to tell me what it was…I was looking for myself and asking everyone except myself the question which I, and only I, could answer…my expectations to achieve a realization everyone else appears to have been born with: That I am nobody but myself. But first I had to discover that I am an invisible man!” (13). throughout the novel, the search for identity becomes a major aspect for the narrator’s journey to identify who he is in this world. The speaker considers himself to be an “invisible man” but he defines his condition of being invisible due to his race (Kelly). Identity and race becomes an integral part of the novel. The obsession with identity links the narrator with the society he lives in, where race defines the characters in the novel. Society has distinguished the characters in Ellison’s novel between the African and Caucasian and the narrator journey forces him to abandon the identity in which he thought he had to be reborn to gain a new one. Ellison’s depiction of the power struggle between African and Caucasians reveals that identity is constructed to not only by the narrator himself but also the people that attempt to influence. The modernized idea of being “white washed” is evident in the narrator and therefore establishes that identity can be reaffirmed through rebirth, renaming, or changing one’s appearance to gain a new persona despite their race. The novel becomes a biological search for the self due through the American Negroes’ experience (Lillard 833). Through this experience the unknown narrator proves that identity is a necessary part of his life but race c...
In 1960, a novel was written to outline injustices and racism against those who were innocent, though unfairly judged because of social expectations and prejudiced beliefs. This novel not only presented these issues, but is also considered a revolutionary piece of literature, still being read by many people today, more than 50 years later. The novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, has caused some controversy about the intents of the book and the way certain people or groups are presented. Whether To Kill a Mockingbird as a narrative outshines the issue it presents is a debatable argument. However, I believe that the narrative of the novel supports the concerns exhibited for numerous reasons. In what follows, some of these are presented: the historical