Hewlett Packard Case Analysis

1690 Words4 Pages

Hewlett-Packard Company and its subsidiaries provide products, technologies, software, solutions, and services to individual consumers, small-and medium-sized businesses (SMBs), and large enterprises, including customers in the government, health, and education sectors worldwide. The company was founded in 1939 and is headquartered in Palo Alto, California (HPQ Profile). HP products are recognized in a vast range from a tiny HP printing label to very high-end computer products. As with any major company, HP has grown in part by its acquisition. One of the most notable moment was when HP merged to Compaq 2002, and the worst, probably was acquired Autonomy in 2011 (Pimentel, 2012).
Oracle Corporation
Oracle Corporation is multinational computer technologies, specializes in developing and marketing computer hardware systems and software products. It is the second largest software maker, after Microsoft. Oracle founded in 1977 and is headquartered in Redwood City, California (Oracle Profile). Started as a small developing software company, Oracle now is well known worldwide in software products and hardware systems. Oracle business platform focused in both R&D as well as Oracle’s acquisition strategy.
In 2010, Oracle acquired Sun Microsystems and made marking the company’s entry into the hardware market. This deal entailed that Oracle would pay $7.4 billion (Montalbano, 2009). In return, this would enable Oracle to deliver complete and “integrated computer systems – from database to disk – that would be optimized for easier management, enhanced security, improved reliability and high performance while at the same time reducing the total cost of ownership” (Montalbano, 2009). Prior to this event, the company has never had a server ...

... middle of paper ...

...a team work and need many strong leaders. One great example was HP where its acquisition of Autonomy was thought as the worst move in the company history, but now HP started making use of the great technology in to serve as an important role in the vendor’s big plans in the coming years (McLaughlin, 2014)
Conclusion
Change is a part of continuing improvement process that occurs in every organization, at some point... Change management is an essential component and should be recognized and understood that it is not just a list of tasks to be checked off and considered finished. It is continuously to ensure a successful transformation. There are six contrasting images of managing change. Depending on how we view an organization will determine how we manage change and our ideas are influenced by the images, or frames that we hold, both from managing and from change.

Open Document