Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Biomedical ethics problems
Ethics in biomedical research
Henrietta lacks case ethical analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Biomedical ethics problems
Genetics influences equality in many ways. In class we learned a couple ways genetics has influenced equality throughout the years. Although this isn’t an issue in the present day, it was during the time of the civil rights movement. An example of how genetics influences equality is shown through the book we read in class. The novel Henrietta Lacks was about an African American born on August 1, 1920, in Roanoke, Virginia. She married her cousin, and had five children with him. Henrietta's children meant the world to her and she adored them. Although, she grew up in the 1940s-1960s, which was during the Civil Rights movement. Henrietta had to teach her children why they were being discriminated against and help them learn the right morals to …show more content…
live life by. Henrietta was diagnosed with terminal cervical cancer on January 29, 1951. She was treated at Johns Hopkins Hospital by George Gey. From the start of her treatments she felt as if they did not treat her properly because she was African American. This issue had always affected the way African Americans were treated medically. For example, while treating Henrietta, George Gey, snipped two cervical samples, without telling her. Since George Gey did not consult Henrietta before taking her cells this was illegal. Some say he did this act because she was African American, and he did not feel the need to ask. Throughout the book the issue of civil rights was brought up by medical treatments. Despite Henrietta’s fight and the doctors work, she died because of her cancer. She died at Johns Hopkins on October 4, 1951, at the age of 31. Permission for doctors to use anyone’s cells or body tissue at that time was traditionally not obtained, especially from patients seeking care in public hospitals.
Informed Consent as a doctrine came into practice in the late 1970s, nearly three decades after Henrietta Lacks death. The cells taken from Henrietta Lacks were obtained without her knowledge (Skloot 34). While this was once a common practice, her family was also unaware of the cells for 25 years. Despite this, if the cells were not taken from Henrietta, the polio vaccine would not have been created as soon (Skloot 38). The reason Henrietta was at Hopkins in the first place was because she was black, and there were not many other hospitals around where she could have gotten treated. She also had no money, and Hopkins was a charity hospital. So she was in the public wards. There are studies that have looked at how segregation affected health care delivery (Skloot 39). Henrietta received standard care, however the doctors were not quick to treat her every need. Henrietta was sent home multiple times, eventually she was in so much pain that she refused to leave. One question derived from this is that if Henrietta had been white, would the doctors have taken better care of her? It is possible that they would of found the cancer quicker, or at least treated her for something faster. Sadly, by the time the doctors realized her illness, the cancer had spread too much and she could not be saved. Throughout history, African-American’s and other minority groups have been mistreated and undervalued. If white supremacy had not been an issue Henrietta, and probably hundreds of others could have been
saved. Rebecca Skloot was a perfect example of somebody who did try to help and figure out why things like this was happening. Since she did try to help out the Lacks family, she actually did try to get the arrangement fixed and try to help them. During the Civil Rights Movement, the challenges that many individuals faced was based upon the color of their skin tone. The bathrooms, water fountains, hospitals and even buses were separated based upon the color of their skin tone. To a certain extent, you could also be discriminated when it came to your rights. Not a lot of states or a lot of individuals actually had the ability to vote or be able to stand up for themselves. When it comes to Henrietta, she had a major impact on the rights and challenges of individuals all around the United States of America. Through science, she also had a major impact since she did become the first individuals whose cells grew in a lab. Another example of civil and medical mistreatment in the book The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks was when Henrietta’s family was not notified that her cells have been used all around the world (Skloot 25). It is not the doctor’s right to share the medical information with the family, however even Henrietta was not given credit for her cells. Which ultimately hurt the whole family because they could sell the cells for money. When the cells were taken, they were given the codename HeLa, for the first two letters in Henrietta and Lacks. Today, anonymizing samples is a very important part of doing research on cells. But that wasn’t something doctors worried about much in the 1950s, so they weren’t terribly careful about her identity. Her real name didn’t really leak out into the world until the 1970s. This was not fair to the family, however it advanced medical treatment and civil treatment around the world. People realized how wrong Henrietta's family was treated, and wanted to change that. Henrietta Lacks also allowed for various individuals to change the way within they treat the families of multiple colored families. The Civil Rights Movement was a movement that gave rights to citizens of political, social freedom and equality regardless of the color of your skin. No only did Henrietta Lacks help in the Civil Rights Movement, but she also had a major impact on research and the medical field. Within many individuals who were actually working and trying to grow her cells, it was ethically wrong due to the fact that neither the family nor she actually known what was occurring with Henrietta’s cells. Since Henrietta's family was clueless, they did not know what to do when they found out what was going on. This is where individuals who care for other people regardless of their skin tone come into play. Rebecca Skloot also allowed for individuals to open their eyes and actually see what was going on behind closed doors. During the 19th century, African Americans did not have a lot of rights, neither did they have the ability to stand up for what they thought was right because of genetics. Since genetics made Henrietta African American, she was discriminated against. In today's time the issue is not as present as it was during the civil rights era, but it still plays a part. There is still discrimination in the world today because of what someone looks like, and that is part of their genome. Since genes cause the way you look, genetics furthers inequality.
In February 2010, author and journalist Rebecca Skloot published a book, "The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks," which included the stories surrounding the HeLa cell line as well as research into Henrietta Lacks' life. In 1951 a poor young black women, Henrietta Lacks was diagnosed with cervical cancer and at the time was treated in the “colored ward” or segregated division of Johns Hopkins Hospital. The procedure required samples of her cervix to be removed. Henrietta Lacks, the person who was the source of these cells was unaware of their removal. Her family was never informed about what had been accomplished with the use of her cells. The Lacks family has not received anything from the cell line to this day, although their mother’s cells have been bought and sold by many. This bestseller tells the stories of HeLa and traces the history of the cell while highlighting the ethical and legal issues of the research.
An abstraction can be defined as something that only exists as an idea. People are considered abstractions when they are dehumanized, forgotten about, or segregated and discriminated against. The scientific community and the media treated Henrietta Lacks and her family as abstractions in several ways including; forgetting the person behind HeLa cells, giving sub-par health care compared to Caucasians, and not giving reparations to the Lacks family. On the other hand, Rebecca Skloot offers a different perspective that is shown throughout the book. Rebecca Skloot’s book The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks describes the trials and tribulations the Lacks family has gone through because of HeLa cells and shows how seeing a person as an abstraction is a dangerous thing.
All I can say is amazing information of your glorious and late Henrietta Lacks. This incedible women bettered our society in ways no common human could understand at the time because of how complex this matter was and still very much indeed is. I know there is much contraversy with the matter of how scientists achived immortal cells from your late relative, and I do strongly agree with the fact that it was wrong for these researches to take advantage of this incredible women, but I know it is not for me to say nonethless it must be said that even though it was wrong to take Lacks’ cells when she was dying sometimes one must suffer to bring joy to the entire world.
Dr. TeLinde and Dr. Gey were collecting samples for reasons that could potentially bring large benefit to society, but they did not consider how the individuals who provided the sample would directly benefit. In the case of Henrietta her tissue sample ultimately led to major medical advances, but due to the fact that when the sample was taken the researchers did not give forethought to the benefits and risks that might occur; therefore, Henrietta and her family were exposed to severe loss of privacy and did not receive any form of benefits from the widespread use of her cell line. The Belmont Report (1979) states how relevant risks and benefits must be thoroughly outlined in the documents used in the informed consent process. The research was not well designed in the assessment of risks and benefits component and did not consider this
The Immortal life of Henrietta Lacks is a book about the women behind the scientific revolution of using actual cancer cells to perform cancer research. Henrietta Lacks was an African American woman who was barely educated and worked as a tobacco farmer. At the age of thirty she was diagnosed with cervical cancer. In Lacks’ time being uneducated, African American, and a woman was not a great mix. They were often undermined and taken advantage of. When Lacks started to become very ill she went to the nearest hospital that would accept black patients. There the doctor, George Gey, misdiagnosed her illness and took a tissue sample without her consent. After suffering through her illness and trying to keep up with her five children Henrietta died
Although she was taken from the world too soon, Henrietta Lacks was a warm hearted woman, and though unbeknownst to her, she would pave the way for the medical field and greatly expand our understanding of one of the nation’s greatest killers; cancer. In 1951 people did not talk about cancer lightly; cancer was a very touchy subject, especially for those who knew they couldn’t receive treatment once they had been diagnosed. When Lacks went to the hospital because of a “knot on her womb” she never thought that it would grow into a full fledge tumor that would end up taking her life. Henrietta lived a simple yet happy life which consisted of working on the farm, loving her husband, and raising children, and she was not going to ruin the lifestyle she knew so well by telling her family that she had cancer; it was just unheard of.
Most people live in capitalist societies where money matters a lot. Essentially, ownership is also of significance since it decides to whom the money goes. In present days, human tissues matter in the scientific field. Rebecca Skloot, author of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, shows how Henrietta Lacks’s cells have been used well, and at the same time, how they have been a hot potato in science because of the problem of the ownership. This engages readers to try to answer the question, “Should legal ownership have to be given to people?” For that answer, yes. People should be given the rights to ownership over their tissues for patients to decide if they are willing to donate their tissues or not. Reasons will be explained as follows.
In The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, author Rebecca Skloot tells the true story of the woman who the famous HeLa cells originated from, and her children's lives thereafter. Skloot begins the book with a section called "A Few Words About This Book", in which a particular quote mentioned captured my attention. When Skloot began writing Henrietta's story, one of Henrietta's relatives told Skloot, "If you pretty up how people spoke and change the things they said, that's dishonest. It’s taking away their lives, their experiences, and their selves" (Skloot). After reading that quote, an array of questions entered my mind, the most important being, "Do all nonfiction authors take that idea into consideration?" Nonfiction is a very delicate and
This was the same time that Henrietta Lacks lived. Henrietta Lacks was an African American woman who went to the doctor because she had cervical cancer. Her cells were taken and are still alive in culture today (Skloot 41). Hence, her cells were nicknamed Immortal (Skloot 41). Although many, at the time, saw no issue with using a patient without consent issue with what?
Henrietta Lacks is known as immortal because her cells are still being used to conduct research. On February 5th, 1951 Henrietta Lacks was diagnosed with malignant cervical cancer that was treated with harsh radiation. During her treatment and surgery of the cancer, she had a biopsy that collected a small portion of her cervical cells. Henrietta’s cells were special because they were able to self multiply under the right conditions. Her cells continue to be reproduced and sold all around the world for research. The question is should Henrietta and her family be compensated for her time and cells? This question will be analyzed from two different perspectives, which is the functionalist and a conflict theory perspective. In this
Imagine having a part of your body taken from you without your permission, and then having those cells that are a part of your body grow and are being processed in labs around the world and then ultimately being used for the highest of research. That is what happens to Henrietta Lacks. In the book, The Immoral Life of Henrietta Lacks, we see Henrietta Lacks and her families story unravel, the numerous hardships that they faced, and the shocking revelation that their relative cells were being used for research without her consent and theirs.
In “Part 1: Life” of “The immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” by Rebecca Skloot, she starts telling us the life of Henrietta, where she grew, that she married Day, and everything she went trough with her cancer. But, more than that, Skloot is trying to show us the ethical, social, and health issues black people had back in those days, and also she wants to let us know how lucky we are to live in this period where we have a lot of opportunities, racism is not a strong movement but still affects the society a little, and of course give thanks to the advances of the medical and science world most of it because of the HeLa cells.
Words are powerful. As a result, changing one word in a sentence can make the biggest of differences. The quote above is part of a statement by Honorable Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr. of the house of representatives commemorating Henrietta Lacks. Ms. Lacks was whom the HeLa cells that have been used since their discovery came from. The use of the word “provided” in Ehrlich’s statement is controversial, as Henrietta Lacks’ cells were taken from her and used regardless of her opinion. Her privacy was taken from her and used by the public without her consent. This turns attention to other women have had their privacy brushed aside, such as Frieda Kahlo. Lacks’ cells were made public, much like Kahlo’s diary was made public. The manner in which authors
What is privacy? Well, it’s the state or condition of being free from being observed or disturbed by other people. In terms of information, it is the right to have some control over how one’s own personal information is collected and used. This is a right that has been inherently protected by the U.S Constitution, agreed upon by the Supreme Court, and yet, issues around this very topic arise every day. In The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, the author Rebecca Skloot, addresses this issue in her story of the women behind the infamous HeLa cells. Her story shows that although privacy is a right that is inherently protected by the law, situations of injustice can still occur. Examples of this in the book include when Henrietta’s cells were given to Dr. Gey without any consent from Day, the situation in which Mr. Golde’s spleen was sold without his permission, as well as when the Lacks family were recontacted and mislead about the reasons they were tested years after Henrietta’s death.
Even though the United States government was already making improvements to the healthcare system, they excluded African Americans from all the progress that they made. Most believed that African Americans brought it upon themselves and that they inherited their sicknesses, and diseases. “Richmond's city officials were also aware that the high death rate of the city's African Americans, usually about twice that of whites, inflated the average for the city as a whole and negatively affected the health of all of Richm ” (Hoffman, 2001, p.177). Officials in Richmond Virginia first started to notice at how bad their death rates were when other states started to comment on it. African Americans made up the majority population in Richmond and even when they brought attention to problems they were excluded from the solutions, and the government was mostly worried about how the state looked overall.