Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on helen keller
Essays on helen keller
Helen Kellers help in the world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on helen keller
There were other women that shared similar beliefs as Keller and who also spoke about their controversial political opinions. Joining the Socialist Party in 1906, only three years before Keller, Emily Greene Balch reviewed the living conditions of workers, immigrants, minorities, and women. A highly educated a respected teacher of sociology and economics, Balch inspired her students with her passion for bettering wages and conditions for laborers, women suffrage, and racial justice. Balch was best known for her antiwar efforts by leading the organization of the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom. During World War I, she worked with friend Jane Addams and traveled to neutral countries to persuade officials to intervene to stop the war. In 1946, Balch was given the Nobel Peace Prize with no congratulations from the United States government because she was labeled as a dangerous communist radical.
Like Balch, Keller was a supporter of improving working conditions and promoting peace during the World Wars and the Cold War. After many years of only expressing her socialist ideals through writing, Keller began to take physical action during the uproar of World War I. She joined with the radical union Industrial Workers of the World (IWW). This group “sought to unite all workers, skilled and unskilled, in the overthrow of capitalism via strikes, direct action, propaganda, and boycotts.” After previous strikes and riots, Keller decided to remove herself from the Socialist Party and become a radical member of the IWW because she felt that the Socialist Party was “too slow”. Keller was also a strong supporter of healthy international relations and saw violence to be the worst action to take during the country’s struggle w...
... middle of paper ...
...rently apolitical, overlooking the historical incidence, depth, and breadth of US radicalism.” Keller’s complicated life and controversial opinions enables her to be one of the most interesting subjects in history but also one of the most underexposed.
“Character cannot be developed in ease and quiet. Only through experience of trial and suffering can the soul be strengthened, ambition inspired, and success achieved.” Helen Keller believed that in order to be successful and make a difference, problems must be confronted, tried, and solved. Keller’s words of wisdom go hand in hand with the American way of success today. Without argumentation, criticism, or suffering, the nation cannot progress and succeed. With people like Helen Keller in society, who are always ready to challenge popular beliefs, America can and will continue to progress.
In the book “The Triangle Fire: A Brief History with Documents” by Jo Ann E. Argersinger. In a short summary this book talks about the tragic factory fire that took lives of 146 workers in New York City, March 25, 1911. The tragedy happened during the great uprising of a women revolution, of many young females going to work to support their families. During this period many women wanted to be treated and work like how men worked. Having equal rights at jobs that were a risk to them, nothing stopped the uprising, until the fire became a change. Both sympathy and rage among all sectors of the American public got up to fight for a change. Argersinger examines in the context, trajectory, and impact of this Progressive Era event. During the Progressive Era, many big changes were being
... fighting for a Jewish cause. This book carefully examines exactly how much Wald distanced herself from her Jewish heritage. Marjorie N. Feld did a wonderful job of portraying Wald as not only a strong, independent woman, but firm in her belief of universalism not particularism. Although the book is written in a highly academic format Feld was able to give the story of Lillian Wald in a matter that allows all who read it to appreciate and understand her work. Wald is the kind of woman all people should hope to meet in their life. After a few pages readers will find themselves intrigued at how well the book was written, Feld inserts quotations from Wald herself that quickly and concisely show the kind of woman she was. This book should be read by anyone who has an interest in the progressive era, women’s rights, or simply the rights of all the world’s diverse people.
Because of Keller’s use of pathos to grab attention, using a strong, independent ethos and then backing it up using logos, it was easy to get wrapped up in her cause. Keller’s style was effective and left the audience with the desire to take action.
She was now getting into the field of labor agitation and would change America forever. In 1903, she organized a march in which children, mutilated from their jobs, marched the streets to the home of Theodore Roosevelt in order to draw attention to the grueling and wicked child labor laws. “Federal laws against child labor would not come for decades, but for two months that summer, Mother Jones, with her street theater and speeches, made the issue front-page news.” This shows how after several attempts from previous progressive reformers, Jones was the only one whose protests were powerful and effective enough to open people’s eyes to the issues. A reason that Jones had become so effective was that of her exploration and observations. She frequently visited factories to observe the cruel working conditions in which people worked in and interviewed workers to get a feel for them and understand the brutality of the work. She stated herself that because of rough conditions, “The brain is so crushed as to be incapable of thinking, and one who mingles with these people soon discovers that their minds like their bodies are wrecked. Loss of sleep and loss of rest gives rise to abnormal appetites, indigestion, shrinkage of statue, bent backs and aching hearts.” By examining workplaces, she was able to gather empathy and sympathy for the workers who were suffering.
Heroification is a degenerative process that makes people into heroes regardless of any type of character flaw they may possess. It appears that Mr. Loewen?s greatest concern about heroification does not revolve around who gets chosen for the history books but what actually happens to them after they do. He cites two examples of people that had led colored lives but in our textbooks show them as people we should strive to become like. These two people are Helen Keller and President Woodrow Wilson. (Lies?19) Mr. Loewen feels that heroification has distorted the lives of Keller and Wilson and that we can no longer think straight about them. He does not just think this of these two but many other people throughout history. When it comes to Keller we think of someone who, throughout her entire life has struggled to overcome her disabilities. I feel that no one would dispute this but in reality Miss Keller was a radical Socialist for most of her life. This in itself is not so bad but her condemnation of the country into which she was born to and lived in could be considered treasonous. (Lies?20) President W...
By 1913, the suffragette movement had exceeded a decade. The growing desperation of the suffragettes is clear in their calls for the aid of working men, echoing Emmeline Pankhurst’s “Freedom or Death” speech in November 1913. This appears as a change of heart in the operation of the WSPU, which had decreed to exclude men from their organisation and broken with the Labour Party in the previous year.
Heroification is the process where details—both important and trivial—are left out or changed to fit the archetypical mold of the flawless, inhuman "heroes." This "degenerative process" makes "flesh-and-blood individuals into pious, perfect creatures without conflicts, pain, credibility, or human interest (Loewen 19)." For example, many people know of Helen Keller only as the blind, deaf girl who despite her handicaps learned to read, write, and to speak, but this is only the first twenty years of her life. Whatever happened to Keller for the next sixty-four years of her life? Keller was, in fact, a radical socialist in Massachusetts starting in the early 1900s, and was one of the most passionate and famous woman during that time rallying for the new communist nation. Keller's love for socialism did not stem from a vacuum but was rooted deep within her experiences as a disabled person, and she sympathized with other handicaps and learned that social class controls not only people's opportunity but also their disabilities. But during the heroification process, the schools and the mass media omitted Keller's lifelong goal and passion to bring about radical social change because we would rather teach our young to "remain uncontroversial and one-dimensional" than to have a room full of leftists (Loewen 35).
The contrast between how She sees herself and how the rest of the world sees Her can create extreme emotional strain; add on the fact that She hails from the early 1900s and it becomes evident that, though her mental construct is not necessarily prepared to understand the full breach against Her, She is still capable of some iota of realization. The discrimination encountered by a female during this time period is great and unceasing.
While the women’s suffrage movement was none violent and mainly carried out by organized meetings, lobbying congressman, and picketing protests, the women that participated in it could do nothing to stop the violence of their oppressors from coming to them. In January 1917, the National Women’s Party, led by suffragists Alice Paul and Lucy Burns, began to picket, six days a week, in front of the white house for their right to vote. At first largely ignored, they became under frequent attack with no help from the police. Then starting th...
Even so, she still faced her fare share of naysayers. These people say she was engulfed in her self-proclaimed radical ideas (Elshtain, 9). Additionally, during World War 1, her urgency for peace resulted in her expulsion from the Daughters of American Revolution and unwelcomed at her alma mater because of the lack of religious teachings at the Hull House ( Elshatin,
All you need to do to bring about this stupendous revolution is to straighten up and fold your arms” (Zinn, 284). The almost flippant language “straighten up and fold your arms” makes this “revolution” seem a lot easier to achieve than it actually is. This change would have required sweeping reforms to the labor system in the United States that would have been nearly impossible for the public to perform without the same scale of changes to the legislation. Keller suggests that all the working class needs to do is to strike to create the change they want. I do think that the people could have brought about changes to the system. It would have required a staggering amount of work to reach enough of the work force to actually create enough momentum for there to be change. Convincing that large a part of the population that stopping the war in the face of the consequences they would face would be the first insurmountable task. Then there is the fact that working class people needed the resources from working in factories to survive. Walking away from one’s job for however long it takes for change to occur is an option only available to people with savings. The ability to walk out of work for a time and still survive is a privilege, and even if everyone with the means to do so went on strike, I feel that those who are in need could fill their
In the mid nineteenth century America was going through an age of reform. The person who would be the center of these reforms would be the women in society. Women soon realized that in order to make sure that all the reforms went through they would need more power and influence in society. The oppression and discrimination the women felt in this era launched the women into create the women’s right movement. The women fought so zealously for their rights it would be impossible for them not to achieve their goals. The sacrifices, suffering, and criticism that the women activist made would be so that the future generations would benefit the future generations.
Elizabeth Flynn, “The Industrial Workers of the World and the Free Speech Fights,” in Voices of Freedom. Ed. By Eric Foner
“Courage in women is often mistaken for insanity” (von Garnier, 2004, part 10) and that is exactly what courage was viewed as when the women’s suffrage movement erupted in the mid 1800’s and it was quite the uphill battle from there. Iron Jawed Angels captures the height of the women’s suffrage movement with Alice Paul, a liberal feminist, as the front woman on the battle against Congress. Paul’s determination to pass a constitutional amendment can be seen through her dauntless efforts to go against the societal norms of the time to fight for women’s rights. Through the first wave of the women’s suffrage movement seen in Iron Jawed Angels, the struggles women endured for equality have a lasting impact on
...eyond Nationalism”, Balch showed a strong sense of realism by advocating a gradual and pluralistic approach. She believed in the development of international unity, while recognizing that a world government could only be developed gradually. Apart from well over a hundred articles on women, labour, and social settlement, another genre of Balch’s writings included pamphlets, petitions, and policy recommendation including: “The Miracle of Living”, a book of poems in 1941, and The Social Thought of Emily Greene Balch in 1972.