Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Karl marx and bourgeoisie
Marxism, proletariat and bourgeoisie
Bourgeoisie according to marxist philosophy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Karl marx and bourgeoisie
The theory of Hegemony is a theory proposed by Antonio Gramsci. Gramsci was an Italian theorist and politician and he was also the leader of the Communist party of Italy but was later over thrown by Benito Mussolini. Gramsci was then detained in fascist jails from 1926 to 1937 (Santoro 278). During this time, Gramsci was able to analyze the fascist approach to leadership from which he was able to draw conclusions for his theories. Essentially the theory of hegemony is the explanation of how states use cultural institutions to maintain power in capitalist societies (Calabrese 7). Gramsci defined hegemony as the dominance of a social class over another. For example, the Bourgeoisie rule illustrates Gramsci’s view.
History
From a Marxist view, Hegemony means the control of the working class by the ruling class (bourgeoisie). The Marxist view holds that the bourgeoisie manipulate the values and beliefs of society to alter the view of the social norm. With the perception of what is considered normal, the bourgeoisie are able to cause the rest of society to believe that they are benefiting from the status quo, while in all actuality it is only benefiting the ruling class. I found this quite interesting, as I did not know it was possible to manipulate someone that easily to where they blindly agree with their social conditions and do not further investigate if it is beneficial (Laciau 23-29).
In a philosophical and sociological view the term hegemony can derive itself from the Greek word hegemony, which means leadership and rule.
“Hegemony is the geopolitical method of indirect imperial dominance, with which the hegemon (leader state rules subordinate states by the implied means of power (the threat of intervention) rather t...
... middle of paper ...
...ne (Russia) tried to assert itself and its ideas onto other parts of the world. Wartime also proposes the issue of economic stability. In order to pay for war resources such as weapons and food for solders, fund from other places must be used instead, thus contributing instability and potential civil uproar.
Conclusion
Overall, the hegemony theory was quite interesting to research and to learn about. I learned quite a bit of information about the history of what hegemony means and where the word is derived from. Hegemony can trace its history back to the early 8th century, there are also two different viewpoints of the term, and there is the Marxist view and the philosophical and sociological view. Throughout the past the idea of hegemony has not changed, though the ruling classes have changed and the means by which they attempt to gain control have changed.
The non-fictional work Day of Empire: How Hyperpowers Rise to Global Dominance - and Why They Fall, by Amy Chua, evaluates how hyperpowers came to be, how they maintained strength, and how they declined. Chua’s thesis is exercised throughout many segments of her writing and is as follows, “For all their enormous differences, every single world hyperpower in history ... was extraordinarily pluralistic and tolerant during it’s rise to preeminence. Indeed, in every case tolerance was the indispensable to … hegemony. But … It was also tolerance that sowed the seeds of decline. In virtually every case tolerance … [led to] conflict, hatred, and violence.” Chua’s thesis is strongly supported through her examples of how great empires like The Persians, Romans, Chinese, and Mongols surged to power and the reasons for their deterioration.
Mussolini’s population policy was a clear effort to exercise his authoritarian control over the people of Italy, regulating the most personal and private details of their lives. In his bid for complete control, he used new laws, propaganda, and sometimes brutal tactics in order for his wishes to be recognized. It is during the 1920’s to the 1940’s that totalitarian control over the state escalated into full dictatorships, with the wills of the people being manipulated into a set of beliefs that would promote the fascist state and “doctrines.”
Domination politics is based on the belief of meritocracy. Meritocracy is the belief that a culture already provides the?dream yet to come true (pg. 11). Everyone in this politic is thought to have equal access to success or failure in their own society and therefore, a belief of superiority emerges among the rich, white, Christian, heterosexual, and able-bodied men. Domination politics survives so strongly because it thrives on economic injustice, oppression and moral insolvency.
According to Brenda Allen in the chapter “Power Matters,” she mentions that there dominant ideologies of identity that “reflect perspectives and experiences of ruling groups, whose members construct and circulate beliefs that will most benefit them.” We live in a country where there are dominant ideologies of organizational hierarchy, which “arranges job positions in a stratified structure, with power flowing from the top down.” This exemplifies the ideology of domination, which is a belief system in America that the “superior should rule over the inferior” (32). This ideology is so embedded into our system that most people believe it is natural. The American society we live in values patriarchy, white supremacy, heteronormativity, and a specific culture of wealth and poverty; any identity that falls outside of these dominant ideologies is marginalized and placed in the lower strata of social power.
"Oppression can only survive through silence" said Carmen de Monteflores and history proved this concept most thoroughly. However, the oppressed groups are generally not silent at all. They revolt, get violent, and are repressed again. This is not a rule, just a simple generalization and, of course, there are numerous exceptions. There is always a possibility that these downtrodden factions will get together to form a strong opposing force that will be an equal or almost equal rival to those that oppress. The coercion of the working class continued throughout the eighteenth century. Horrible working conditions, poverty, and hunger were blooming in the world of the industrial proletariat. The fruitless revolts did not change the situation and just when it seemed like the treatment of the waged people could not get any worse, the resolution appeared in all its glory. This historical period (1860-1914) could be best described using the Hegelian philosophy. The constant oppression of the working class will serve as thesis. The antithesis would come with the unification of the proletariats, forming the trading unions. The role of synthesis is given to the emergence of political democracy and mass political parties.
In “Biographies of Hegemony” by Karen Ho, she emphasizes that it is “only through the small and the everyday that we can understand the criteria of hegemony in all its particularity and contextuality” (168). To fully understand and evaluate someone or a group, people must look at the small and everyday stories each person possesses. Smallness can be defined as certain experiences and individual qualities that are overlooked by big corporations such as Wall Street. By reviewing the small stories and individual experiences, people can begin to unravel and fully understand hegemony and how it came to be. Through smallness, the major corporations on Wall Street have stereotyped, deindividualized, and set unequal standards
Hegemony was a prominent theme within the conquest of Latin America, which then led to the independence of the oppressed citizens. Thought the conquest was a fairly quick process, independence was not. It took a lot of revolts and acts of rebellion to get their points across. Hegemony will always be around wherever there are two groups or more with a large class difference. In the case of Latin America, the whole hegemonic process consisted of different classes and races which ultimately led to racial tension and conflicts among social groups.
It is possible that with no other country in the twentieth century clearly on the inevitable road to war has there been as much unpreparedness and complete lack of all comprehension than that of Russia prior to World War I. For the few years before 1914 and the start of the war, especially following the embarrassing loss to Japan, Russia recognized its eminent clash with Germany. The way with which it conducted its international relations and internal affairs is puzzling to say the least.
The 1800's were a renowned era in European history. With the rise of imperialism came the ruthless desire to seek new land through the use of authoritative implications. Whether it be the discovery of the Americas, where Christopher Columbus discovered various islands, which were clustered with indigenous people that were eventually completely wiped out for the pure desire of Spaniard power. This craving to "assimilate" indigenous people and to convert them to Christianity was an element, which rooted 19th century Europe. Although the actual question to whether these actions were good or evil are up for debate. Imperialism has been viewed as an expansion that serves only ones "object" and that it has no purpose beyond the benefit of the "self". This paper will explain Imperialism through a sociological perspective, while blending in notions of capitalism and modern day Imperialism that may now be viewed as Globalism.
Another reason that had a significant impact was the belief of fascists that their nations were superior to all other people. “Fascism was the governing ideology of Ge...
Powercube.net. 2014. Hegemony and invisible power | Understanding power for social change | powercube.net | IDS at Sussex University. [online] Available at: http://www.powercube.net/other-forms-of-power/hegemony-and-invisible-power/ [Accessed: 23 Mar 2014].
Antonio Gramsci, a leading Marxist thinker in the early 20th century, used hegemony to define class structure, (e.g. bourgeois hegemony). Gramsci's philosophy was that the subordinate class was to follow this "common sense" that the dominant class set, however, Gramsci ...
Economic hegemony implies the ability to center the economy around the power whereas political hegemony means being able to dominate militarily; essentially, a hegemon is a state that is able to force its will upon other states due to its power or means, economically, socially, politically, militarily, or a combination of these factors. According to David Wilkinson, a state must meet the following criteria in order to achieve hegemonic status: investiture, installation, appointment and deposition, adjunction, maintenance of order, convocation, command, veto, subsidy, tribute, and conversion. According to realist theory, states such as Napoleonic France pursue power and the strategy of offensive realism for main reasons: states seek security in an anarchic system, some states inherently possess offensive capabilities, states can never be sure of other states’ intentions, survival is the primary goal of international actors, and states are rational actors that act to survive and take advantage of opportunities to gain a better position. Under this criteria and according to these motivations, France under Napoleon was able to achieve significant control over Europe by “[launching] numerous military campaigns, [occupying] numerous countries, and incessantly [restructuring] the map of Europe,” but the state failed to achieve lasting and stable
...that even production can be a means of enforcing hegemony, and that he integrated slowly into the dominant structure of capitalist society.
Moreover, Fairclough has highlighted the fact that language is highly manipulative in nature as it is used as an agent of hegemony. By hegemony, the sub-ordinate class is made to think that the dominant group has all the rights to rule over them and to deal them as per their choice and interests. Such mindset is shaped by using several ideological means. Gramsci (1996) opines that the ruling