Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Terrorism and its impact
Terrorism and its impact
Essay on effects of terrorism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Terrorism, random acts of violence, politically motivated attacks, and their psychological and societal consequences are nothing new; yet still, the effects are profoundly disturbing. Attacks undermine our presumptions about the safety of engaging in public life; a presumption that is vital for individuals, society, and the economy to carry on smoothly. The terrorist attacks on September 11th, 2001 have personally affected my life and has had consequences for many other individuals, the United States, and the world. In the essay, “Heading into darkness once again”, Richard Rodriguez postulates that the randomness and anonymity of terrorism is its most frightening aspect. While I do not disagree that these are integral aspects of what makes …show more content…
terrorism terrifying, to me the most frightening aspect is the disregard for innocent lives, and how attacks can subvert our better nature and societal values, cloud our judgement, and lead to a perpetuation of hate and suffering. The negative consequences of terrorism stretch far beyond the immediate aftermath of an attack. With terrorism, it is not only bodies and property that are injured or destroyed; there are potentially deep and long lasting wounds to our collective psyche and society at large that can impact day to day life. In 2001, I witnessed the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City and my life was impacted by the tragedy. That morning, I heard the news that a plane hit the World Trade Center on the radio as I drove to work at a deli on Long Island, New York. Like millions across America, at first I did not know what to think and my mind ran wild with terrible imaginings and scenarios. I rushed home. Once there, I turned on the television and saw the second plane hit the tower. It was then that I knew it was a terrorist attack. My parents scrambled to find out if my aunt and cousin were safe, both of whom worked in the buildings. By luck or grace, they were not there that morning. My aunt had called in sick to work, and my cousin had decided to stop at a hotdog stand before going in. Yet even with that good news, the overwhelming horror and fear that set in from that day's unfolding events had me in a state of sheer panic and despair. I wanted to flee Long Island with my family, fearful of further attacks, yet we were trapped. The government quickly shut down all of the ferries, airports, and bridges. There was no way into or out of Manhattan and Long Island. It was not long before the smoke from the buildings blanketed my neighborhood. With the smoke, a new immediate presence to the horror descended upon our home, as I imagined the ashes of my fellow New Yorkers floating in the morning breeze. I did not want to breathe. I went to the basement as my parents tried to cover the windows and doors to keep out the smoke. I was so afraid of what might happen next and wondered if more attacks were coming. In the weeks and months after that terrible day, I found myself afraid to be in traffic, public places, or any tall buildings. The sounds of planes sent chills through me. The local news helped keep us in a state of fear; questioning all unknowns and questioning each other. While most of America was being shown visions of New Yorkers coming together in media reports, my lived experience of being there was quite different. The city was essentially under martial law, which seemed to make everyone's anxiety worse. Xenophobia and fear of Muslims felt rampant as I listened to my fellow citizens. I witnessed several innocent Muslims get attacked on the streets. An acquaintance of mine attacked a cashier because he was Muslim; which was entirely out of character for him and absolutely shocking to hear about. I saw several white people attacked by Arabs. The city was in chaos; the rosy solidarity shown on television felt like a lie. I developed Post Traumatic Stress Disorder from the attack and from witnessing its hate-filled violent aftermath. I quit my deli job and didn't venture outside much at all until I moved to Connecticut some time later. To this day, I cannot bear to see videos of the towers in smoke and reflecting on terrorism is incredibly difficult. Terrorism is not something I think about in the abstract, it's something I’ve lived and experienced the consequences of. Terrorism has long lasting repercussions on individuals that affect how they live and perceive. Physical traumas inflicted on terrorist attack victims can take years to heal or may be permanent. First responder’s long term health is put at risk as well. In the case of 9/11 responders and those who were in the immediate vicinity of the attacks, many now suffer the long term effects of breathing the toxic smoke and ash that covered Manhattan. Cancer, diseases of the lung, heart, and neurological systems have affected many. Like the physical wounds, psychological wounds are also long lasting and can impact people's day to day life. People from around the world have suffered the effects of watching the events of that day. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, anxiety, and depression rates went up in the months after the attacks. These disorders can physically alter the brain and change a person’s perception and quality of life. In the aftermath of the attacks, many innocent people have been subjected to racial profiling, discrimination, and hate-crimes that surely impact their sense of security and justice. Hundreds of thousands more have been negatively impacted by the wars that came as a result of September 11th. Thousands of American soldiers have been killed, injured, or have committed suicide. Many suffer mental health disorders, addiction, and homelessness as an emotional result of their time in combat. For every individual impacted in these ways, so too must we count their family and friends whose lives are changed by the effects on their loved one. When living out of a state of fear, many people become more susceptible to mob mentalities, extreme conclusions and deductions, “group-think”, prejudiced thinking, and the emotional manipulation of propagandists. Retaliation feels more becoming than reconciliation, which perpetuates cycles of violence. For good or ill, American society has been altered by terrorism.
For any society, the ultimate consequences of terrorist attacks rests on its collective shoulder and is largely determined by the actions people and their government take as a response. In the wake of 9/11, the United States placed security as a top priority, sometimes in detriment to our freedoms and traditions. In the essay “Heading into darkness once again”, the author states, “The terrorist tries to break down civic life…[and] makes it necessary that inconvenience attaches to every act of the day.” This astute observation rings true today as security checkpoints have been normalized. We expect them at all major events and in public places like airports. Invasive pat-downs, surveillance, and body scans are more common than ever. Our government has deemed it fit to track citizens not only in public places, but it is now in the public record that millions of citizen’s phone calls, texts, emails, and purchases have been swept up and watched through massive surveillance programs. So too is it a matter of public record that anti-war protest groups, mosques, and others groups have had government spies planted in them to keep tabs on discussions. Through legislation like The Patriot Act, civil rights and privacy have arguably been curtailed. Programs of indefinite detention without trial, rendition, and torture have tarnished America’s reputation abroad. The two wars that resulted from 9/11 have affected the lives of millions. Still today, the far reaching geo-political consequences of Americas actions after 9/11 can be seen in world headlines. Vested interests throughout society, as well as terrorists, and agenda driven propagandists have used the attacks of 9/11 in attempts to stir and sway the public’s emotions and beliefs and capitalize on our
fears. Terrorism is a highly complex issue with no simple solution. Attempts to simplify it does a disservice to citizens and efforts to bring about lasting resolution. Globalization, economic pressures, regional, ethnic, and political histories and disputes are as much a part of the terrorism equation as are beliefs, ideologies, and culture. Terrorism can also be the result of cults of personality, desires for retribution, as well as poor mental healthcare and economic support systems for individuals across the globe. We cannot simplify terrorism into an easy catch phrase or mentality of “us verses them”, “with us or against us”, “evil doers verses freedom lovers”, for if the essence of a terrorist attack is a disregard for life and dehumanization, then we must not dehumanize others. To my mind, violence is an act of the vulnerable and desperate. Individuals can become radicalized extremists by desperate situations or contexts, mental vulnerabilities and manipulation. Terrorists are tragic human beings, not monsters with no soul. Those who commit, endorse, and condone violence should be held fully accountable but we must not become extremists ourselves and forget their humanity. Responding to terrorism is not a choice between a police state, war crimes, and escalating retaliatory strikes or cultural and moral relativism, apathy, and surrender. I believe the best response and preventive measure we can take to terrorism is to double our efforts to uphold human rights and support human dignity across the world. Terrorism and atrocious acts of violence on groups of innocent people traumatizes both individuals and cultures, yet we must not let these heinous acts cause additional harms and corrode human rights or the fabric of society. We must maintain perspective in the aftermath of attacks and work together from a place of love, not fear, to find the best course of action to prevent terrorism and cope with senseless violence.
In all of Sherman Alexie’s work, there are many recurring symbols. These symbols represent ideas that Alexie thinks are important to Native American life on a reservation. One of these symbols is basketball. Alexie uses basketball as a substitute for war. In Native American culture, war is a way to win glory and respect.
Ann Rinaldi has written many books for young teenagers, she is an Award winning author who writes stories of American history and makes them become real to the readers. She has written many other books such as A Break with Charity, A Ride into Morning, and Cast two Shadows, etc. She was born in New York City on August 27, 1934. In 1979, at the age of 45, she finished her first book.
A persona is a mask shown to the outside world developed in relation to consciousness, to hide the darkest aspects of a psyche, known as a shadow, behind it. Shadows contrast personas by holding undesirable and unwanted memories and behaviors, but the dark side of an individual must be accepted for the individual to fully understand oneself. In the coming of age novel, A Separate Peace, by John Knowles, narrator Gene Forrester returns to New Hampshire to visit Devon School, where he studied fifteen years ago just as World War II had begun to unfold. The narrative shifts back fifteen years ago to Gene’s days at Devon School with his best friend, Phineas, also known as Finny, as he recalls memorable events from his past. Gene’s persona and shadow
Michael Walzer is an esteemed retired professor from the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey. Walzer has written many books, essays, and articles. His essay, Excusing Terror, is one that best relates to the current events happening around the world. In this essay, Walzer talks about different reasons that people would want to resort to terrorism. In this essay I will argue Walzers view on Terrorism is correct in that terrorism is wrong because it is akin to murder, it is random in who it targets, and no one has immunity. I will also offer an objection to Walzer’s theory and explain why it is not a valid one.
Cole, D., & Dempsey, J. X. (2006). Terrorism and the constitution: sacrificing civil liberties in the name of national security. New York: New Press.
The Dying of the Light is an article by Dr. Craig Bowron that captures the controversy surrounding the role of medication in prolonging life. The author describes that many medical advancements have become a burden to particularly elderly patients who in most instances are ready to embrace the reality of death. Dr. Bowron believes that dying in these modern times has become a tiring and unnatural process. “Everyone wants to grow old and die in his or her sleep, but the truth is most of us will die in pieces,” Bowron notes (Bowron). The article does not advocate for euthanasia or the management of health care costs due to terminal or chronic illness. Bowron faults humanity for not embracing life and death with dignity as it was in the past. He blames the emergence of modern medical advances and democracy as the sole reason why everyone is pursuing immortality or prolonging of life rather than embracing the natural course of things. The article is very articulate and comes out rather persuasive to its target audience that happens to be health-conscious. Craig Bowron uses effective rhetorical strategies such as logos, ethos, and pathos to pass on his message. The article’s credibility is impeccable due to the author’s authority in health matters as he is a hospital-based internist. A better placed individual to dissect this issue by analyzing his experiences in the healthcare profession. The article incorporates a passionate delivery that appeals to the readers’ hopes, opinions, and imagination.
In times of great terror and panic, the citizens of a nation must decide what they value most: their right to privacy or the lives of the innocent. Government surveillance is criticized, however there are times in a nation’s history where, in order to ensure the safety of their citizens, they must surveill the country for potential hazards that might exist in the world. The government-issued program, COINTELPRO--a series of illegal projects during the twentieth century organized by the Federal Bureau of Investigation--while heavily criticized for its unconstitutional grounds--was justified because it benefitted the nation during a period of upheaval. COINTELPRO is popularly condemned by historians and professors such as Brandeis University Professor of Sociology, David Cunningham, who asserts that the FBI counterintelligence program was only a form of repression that allowed for the government to suppress matters that they consider bothersome (234). This however was not the case.
Host: On September the 11th 2001, the notorious terror organisation known as Al-Qaeda struck at the very heart of the United States. The death count was approximately 3,000; a nation was left in panic. To this day, counterterrorism experts and historians alike regard the event surrounding 9/11 as a turning point in US foreign relations. Outraged and fearful of radical terrorism from the middle-east, President Bush declared that in 2001 that it was a matter of freedoms; that “our very freedom has come under attack”. In his eyes, America was simply targeted because of its democratic and western values (CNN News, 2001). In the 14 years following this pivotal declaration, an aggressive, pre-emptive approach to terrorism replaced the traditional
In today’s society the word “terrorism” has gone global. We see this term on television, in magazines and even from other people speaking of it. In their essay “Controlling Irrational Fears After 9/11”, published in 2002, Clark R. Chapman and Alan W. Harris argue that the reaction of the American officials, people and the media after the attacks of 9/11 was completely irrational due to the simple fact of fear. Chapman and Harris jump right into dismembering the irrational argument, often experienced with relationships and our personal analysis. They express how this argument came about from the terrorist being able to succeed in “achieving one major goal, which was spreading fear” among the American people (Chapman & Harris, para.1). The supporters of the irrational reaction argument state that because “Americans unwittingly cooperated with the terrorist in achieving the major goal”, the result was a widespread of disrupted lives of the Americans and if this reaction had been more rational then there would have been “less disruption in the lives of our citizens” (Chapman & Harris, para. 1).
Some take life for granted, while others suffer. The novel, Night, by Elie Wiesel, contains heart-wrenching as well as traumatic themes. The novel unfolds through the eyes of a Jewish boy named Eliezer, who incurs the true satanic nature of the Nazis. As the Nazis continue to commit inhumane acts of discrimination, three powerful themes arise: religion, night, and memory.
Since September 11, 2001 many people can say that America has changed. Many people question if America has changed for the better or has it just gotten worse. Since the day those four planes crashed around the United States people’s lives have been changed. Many may not realize how their lives have changed, but with new laws passed life is different within America. The United States Patriot Act is one of the laws passed after 9/11: singed into order on October 26, 2001 just 45 days after the attack. The United States Patriot Act was put in place in order to protect Americans, yet has been affecting American’s civil liberties and caused controversy all over the United States.
In today’s world, everyone has a sense of security that is born from the technological developments that science has given to society. While they may feel safe, there are much larger threats of disaster that people are not prepared for. These include natural disaster and human error. Deep Survival by Laurence Gonzales aims to educate the people on how to better protect themselves and prevent death. The novel accomplishes this through sharing personal stories and stories of others who have survived near death experiences. This is an important subject in our culture and its importance is verified by professional reviews. To further express this importance, there are a plethora of popular television shows in pop culture that seek to entertain as well as educate its audience. Although modern technology makes it feel relatively easy to avoid and escape life threatening situations, basic survival skills, like those taught in Deep Survival by Laurence Gonzales, are a useful tool to have in any situation. These thoughts are reflected in qualified book reviews that further show the significance of the subject in today’s society.
Rothe, D. & Muzzatti, S.L. 2004. Enemies everywhere: Terrorism, moral panic and US civil society. Critical Criminology. 1(12): 327–350.
The attacks on American soil that solemn day of September 11, 2001, ignited a quarrel that the grade of singular privacy, need not be given away in the hunt of grander security. The security measures in place were planned to protect our democracy and its liberties yet, they are merely eroding the very existence with the start of a socialistic paradigm. Benjamin Franklin (1759), warned more than two centuries ago: “they that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Implementing security measures comes at a cost both economically and socially. Government bureaucrats can and will utilize information for personal political objectives. The Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of what the ‘law is”, causing a lack of circulated rule. The actual leaders with political purposes jeopardize our individual privacy rights, liberties, and freedoms.
The American government used to be able to keep the people in happy ignorance to the fact that they watch every move they make. After certain revelations of people like Edward Snowden, the public knows the extent of the government spying. On June 5, 2013 Edward Snowden leaked documents of the NSA to the Guardian (The Guardian 2). The whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed to the world how the American government collects information like cell phone metadata, Internet history, emails, location from phones, and more. President Obama labeled the man a traitor because he showed the world the illegal acts the NSA performs on US citizens (Service of Snowden 1). The government breached the people’s security, and now the people are afraid because everyone is aware of how the US disapproves of people who do not agree with their programs. Obama said that these programs find information about terrorists living in the US, but he has lit...