Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Religion
The practice of taking and preserving a head of a slain enemy, known as head hunting, has occurred throughout the world from ancient times into the 20th century. Headhunting tribes believed that the head was the most important part of the body, and taking it weakened the power of the enemy. Because the head was seen as so powerful, head hunting developed into human sacrifice. In many societies, some men were not allowed to marry until they have taken their first head. In Indonesia, Wona Kaka, a famous leader that led rebellions against the Dutch, an important headhunter, was recognized as a hero by the national government. There were even many rituals to bring back his soul from the dead. In Southeast Asia, the practices of headhunting have a relationship to the society’s perception of itself as a powerful agency. It was an important part of the society because they believed the human head held the soul, and was of great significance.
According to the Encyclopedia Britannica article on headhunting, headhunting has been associated with cannibalism, the head being the soul, and even cults. It has said to start in the Paleolithic times, when the heads were buried separately from the body, indicating the head had special meaning. Even though head hunting was popular amongst many different societies, there is no single head hunting “model”. Some Southeast Asian tribes engaged in hunting raids aimed at obtaining a few heads. There were no specific gender or race targeted (Schefold). Rituals, omens and oracles influenced the practice. When the task was completed, it tended grand, religious celebrations. Headhunters were welcomed back into the villages like they were gods. On the other hand, some believe that the head will serve as a go...
... middle of paper ...
... made dangerous journeys to bring back heads that were very important to their villages. The headhunters were seen as semi-human. They were so respected in their villages that they were compared to gods. The act of headhunting was important, but the ceremonies served as greater importance. They helped to resolve the difference between headhunters and culture heroes.
Although many people see headhunting as a violent tradition and ritual, it was a vital part to Southeast Asian people, who still practice headhunting ceremonies. The head of a person was seen as the most important part of the body. It contained the soul and had many benefits for the people of Southeast Asia, such as religious, political and agricultural benefits for the village. There was no one set means for headhunting practices, but the traditions have been carried well into the twentieth century.
The film Ongka’s Big Moka is about a Big Man named Ongka of the Kawelka tribe in Papua New Guinea. Being the Big Man of the tribe Ongka reasures his status by arranging a Moka ceremony. In this film we see the process of a Moka that takes up to 5 years of preparation. We follow Ongka’s struggles and successes of accumulating the number of pigs in preparation for the ceremony. The film allows us to understand the motives and functions of a Moka, provides topics that have been discussed in class, and relate this culture to a similar institution within the United States.
Myths were used to unite the people of the tribe, giving them a way of life, and a peace of mind. Armstrong states “The hunters feel profoundly uneasy about slaughtering the beasts, who are their friends and patrons, and to assuage them this anxiety, they surround the hunt with taboos and prohibitions. They say that long ago that animals made a covenant with humankind and now a god known as the Animal Master regularly sends flocks from the lower world to be killed on the hunting plains, because the hunters promised to perform the rites that will give them posthumous life” (Armstrong 4). Although the hunters feel uneasy and even fearful of killing their “friends”, they still follow through with it because of a myth telling them that the Animal Master will forgive them and even sent more beast for them to hunt if they follow a certain ritual before killing their prey. Without the ritual this type of action will become a simple murder without a reason, this action than hinders the mind psychologically and starts to deteriorate it, while treading the path of insanity. The myths and rituals allows these people to kill wild animals without conferring a mental breakdown by sugar coating their inhumane actions with meaning to the survival of the society. This type of myth allowed the ancient civilization to realize the undeniable truth of life where sacrifice is a necessity to the progression of another
Within these tribes the young men go through a process to become men. With this the young men go out with other warriors of the tribe to fight. Each man of the tribe has to show that they have individual merit (11). When a young man receives his...
hunt, like we to work, but when the hunt is over they get paid, in the form of
Hunting, which was the primal source of food, goes far beyond satisfying the physical body. Therefore societies, such as the Eskimo, handle every aspect of their food in a `special' and symbolic way. This is what Gill was explaining and the ceremonies, as well as, the way of life in regards to the food are evidence of this.
hunted with bows and arrows and as the years went on and how they trade with other tribes and
Hunting is the practice of pursuing any living thing, usually wildlife or feral animals, by humans for food and survival (“Hunting”, 2011). Hunting has been traced back to the beginning of man. In American culture, hunting has always been a way of life. The Native Americans and early American settlers hunted to survive, that is so they did not die of starvation, just in case that is in any way confusing. Today however, puny-minded individuals see it not as a way of life, but as a thirst for blood and murder. In order to survive, men had to hunt to provide food for their families and communities, and if unsuccessful, they would go hungry. Their survival depended upon what they hunted and killed, leaving nothing to waste. Every part of the animal was used from the bones to the meat to the pelt, to satisfy the needs of survival. Men had to be creative to outsmart these cunning animals; therefore, a wide variety of weapons were use...
familiar with their own culture that they do not easily recognize their culture’s uniqueness. People may face some opposition when observing how different a culture’s practices are from their own. Horace Miner’s article “Body Rituals among the Nacirema”, provides insight of how odd another culture may seem when people view it from their own perspective.
The main reason for hunting was not the display of nobility, but the thrill of the hunt, the danger it presents, the exhilaration of the kill. To add to the challenge nobles often would use inconvenient methods. Such as killing a bore with a knife, or charging a bear while on horseback.
Hunting has been a necessity for life since the start of time. Hunting was needed to feed family’s day in and day out. But in the twenty first century, Americans have evolved so hunting is not really as big of an obligation as it was in previous generations. Americans have learned to contain specific animals, such as cows, pigs and chickens, farmers then raise them and harvest them for their meat. But in some rural areas of the United States, it is a completely different aspect. Individuals who live in areas such as Alaska, Montana, and The Dakotas don’t have a local grocery store to buy their T-bone steak or ground beef. These individuals have to hunt for their meat in order to survive. Each hunter may have their own individual techniques; they may hunt for specific big or small game animals and use basic or more complex techniques. All of their different techniques come back to the basic techniques used for hunting. But all of the separate hunters have the same common goal, and that is to survive.
Burning of widows and slaves was a common practice in Asia and some parts of Europe until civilization started to influence such retrogressive cultures. Although the practice of suttee was not considered as a religious ritual, it was common among many Indian communities to practice it as part of their culture. Before the civilization process began, this practice was termed as appropriate and many communities were willing to sacrifice the widows as a way to pay tribute to their late husbands.
Birds and smaller animals were frequently hunted with balls of clay or lead. People usually did not use arrows because the arrow would most likely pass through their bodies and they could have easily escaped the hunter. Long bows have stayed plain through its life. Crossbows became more common in the fifteenth century. ("Crossbows")
Have you ever thought about the importance of anthropology in human history? Anthropology plays a significant role within every one of us. Anthropology is the “study of people in all places and times” (lecture). The following cultural sketches for example the Aztecs, the Basseri, and the Ju/’Hoansi have marriage customs that are different, but also have similar characteristics.
Women sat near the skulls of their children or husbands weeping and talking to the spirits. They brought their daily work like quillwork or hides to prepare, and shared part of normal life with their clan members. Before they left the circles, many women left food for their relatives next to their skulls. The Mandan and Hidatsa did not believe the dead needed food; rather it was a means of maintaining normalcy and including the dead in the practical components of familial life. By spending time with the skulls and bringing them food and conversation, the women continued their relationship with the spirits of their children or husbands. The spiritual world interacted with the physical, and as long there was a clan or village, the spirits belonged in their homes and with their families. Mourning in the skull circles was a period of healing for the women during which they transitioned from acute mourning and self sacrifice in the burying ground to a new normal without the physical presence of husband or child. Over time, mothers and widows spent less time in the skull circles and reintegrated into village life. Other children were born and widows remarried; however, there was always a profound connection between women and the spirits of the clan
... from a more balanced perspective. Given the importance of the theory and its affect on how modern humans view our ancestral past, the studies themselves have exposed the depth of which cultural bias can affect scientific outcome. The male dominated research of the 1960’s produced an image of ancestral man akin to a comic superhero, large, brawny, and dominant. In response, the female literature of the 1970’s and 1980’s discredited the ideas and placed emphasis on the woman gatherer in early society. Likewise, modern research has attempted to distance itself from the bias of the past, however even today assumptions make there way in to the research. While the man the hunter theory may not be headline news in this modern era, present day research approaching our past from a more scientific approach appears to have restored credibility to the once tarnished model.