Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discrimination against disabled people
Hate crimes in the u.s
Discrimination against disabled people
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Discrimination against disabled people
Hate crime is defined as ‘any criminal offence, which is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice towards someone based on a personal characteristic.’ This common definition was agreed in 2007 by the police, Crown Prosecution Service, Prison Service (now the National Offender Management Service) and other agencies that make up the criminal justice system. There are five centrally monitored strands of hate crime: race, religion, sexual orientation, disability, and transgender identity. (Home office 2007)
“All crime is wrong, but that which is motivated by hatred of a particular characteristic of the victim is particularly corrosive. The Government and all its partner institutions strive to tackle hate crime matters, not just because of the devastating consequences it can have for victims and their families, but also because it can divide communities”. (Cross government hate crime action plan March 2012)
This case study focuses on “Racism” and its continued prevalence as the most widely recorded hate
…show more content…
crime within England and Wales. (Home office statistics report 2014) One aims to outline the scale and scope of the problem, whilst also identifying interlinking criminological theories such as Resentment theory and Social strain/Anomie Theory amongst others. On concluding, current policies and future reforms would also be highlighted. Racism is an absolute ideology, because it explains the differences for definitive and in general. Racism is not a modern phenomenon, it has deep historical roots. Racial prejudice was present in the past as it is today. Over the last 400 years, victim and perpetrator characteristics have remained virtually the same. Section 1: Outline the Scale and Scope of the Problem Identified in Your Case Study Topic in England and Wales It is generally accepted that everybody has the privilege to carry on with their life, free from the trepidation of assault or ill will due to who they are or what they represent. England today is more assorted than at any time in the past, and the greater part of us grasp this rich blend of distinctive races, societies, convictions, disposition and ways of life. However, this hasn’t always been the case. Historically, diversity hasn’t been well tolerated. “England in the last 50 years has evolved from the pervasive, open racism of the fifties and sixties, to the pernicious sniggering racism of the seventies and eighties, leading up to watershed moments in the nineties” (Jack Straw, former home secretary 1997-2001). Instances of racial prejudice weren’t properly addressed until the terrible racial motivated murder of Stephen Lawrence over 20 years ago. This had a profound and lasting impact on attitudes towards race in Britain. The subsequent “Macpherson inquiry” which acknowledged the various failings within the police and the plague of institutional racism/prejudice, set out 70 recommendations to make amends and this triggered change across the public sector. There seemed to be a general consensus that things were changing, until another brutal racially motivated murder of teenager, Anthony Walker with an ice axe in July 2005. This shocked the nation and discussions/debates about race tensions was thrown into the spotlight of the media. Therefore to comprehend the size of the problem, there are 2 official records, which can be dissected. The first is the number of hate crimes recorded by the police nationwide, the other is the Crime survey for England and Wales (CSEW), which tries to gauge the number of crimes both reported and unreported. Both records are vital for building up a national picture regarding crime trends. Putting hate crime in figures, in 2013/14, there were 44,480 hate crimes recorded by the police, an increase of five per cent compared with 2012/13, of which: 37,484 (84%) were race hate crimes. This reflects the number of cases reported to the police. The increase year on year may not so much mirror an increment in hate crime cases but rather reflects more reports due to various campaigns and awareness schemes. The British crime survey estimated about 278,000 cases on average out of which only 40% was reported to the police. It is therefore clear that racial hate crime is vigorously under-reported. (Home office, 2014) Appendix 1: The University of Leicester carried out a “hate crime project” spanning over 2 years to gain better understanding of hate crimes and victimisation.
Their research uncovered new insights into the nature and forms of these acts and impact upon victims. From a survey of 1421 victims, they discovered that those most affected were victims targeted for their race or ethnicity. (26%) were 18-24 year olds. 58% female and 41% male. Also the main ethnicities involved were Black African and Asians (BME Community). 91% suffered verbal abuse, 72% harassment, 42% property crime and 29% victims of violent crime. The report uncovered that 21% of those affected dint report it to the police; highlighting a portion of victims who rather stay silent. Another key fact, Socio-economic status emerged as a recurring theme in relation to motivating and/or contributing to experiences of targeted hostility (The Leicester hate crime project,
2014) Appendix 2 The chart below reflects data from “hate crime” incidents within the City of Nottingham. “The most recent Hate Crime Partnership report showed that 1247 hate incidents were reported between June 2008 and May 2009” which illustrates an increase of 11% from the previous year. The types of incidents reported in Nottingham are summarised in Figure 1 below. Appendix 3 The extent of the scale and scope of various “hate crimes” within England and Wales is likely to be bigger than most individuals realise. Victims that stay silent and don't go to the police are a times terrified of repercussions or expect the police won't consider their circumstance important. Despite the fact that these figures give a harsh assessment as to what number of “hate crimes” happen, they can't be considered totally dependable as the dark figure of crime isn't considered. The dark figure reflects to incidents not reported to the police or picked up by the Crime survey for England and Wales.
The punishment of a crime should not be determined by the motivation for the crime, yet that is exactly what hate crime legislation does. It places emphasis on a crime for the wrong reasons. Hate crimes victimize more than just the victims, and this is why the punishments are more severe, but Sullivan argues that any crime victimizes more than the victims. He suggests that random crimes with no prejudice in place can be perceived as something even more frightening, as the entire community feels threatened instead of just a group. Proven in Sullivan’s article is the worthlessness of the “hate” label. I would agree that it only serves to further discriminate, instead of achieving the peace and equality that it pretends to stand
...o more attacks and feeling alienated, helpless, suspicious and fearful. (Ochi) This is an entry in a report regarding hate crime given by Rose Ochi from the U.S. Department of Justice. It explains all too well what people of both sides of hate crime feel. Those that commit hate crimes mentally ill; however psychologists do find that they have a, “high level of aggression and antisocial behavior.” (Dunbar) It was very interesting to find that those who commit hate crime offenses premeditate their crimes and will drive further out to commit these crimes.
In this world today, hate is becoming increasingly more abundant, especially as it concerns race. Whether it be an unarmed black man shot by a white police officer or the use of racial slurs towards someone, it seems like racism is all around us. In the book To Kill A Mockingbird, it shows a little girl named Scout using racial slurs. Racism is so culturally accepted in the town that it’s okay to use racial slurs such as the N-Word that even Atticus, a lawyer representing a black man falsely accused of rape, uses it a couple of times. Earlier this year, the Ku Klux Klan, a group of white supremacists, held a violent rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, and proved that racism isn’t a thing of the past.
There are several reasons why offenders commit hate crimes, they vary from case to case, however, one key element is fear which is caused by ignorance. The offenders fear the unknown and the competition they feel that exists, them vs. the ‘others’. When fear is accompanied by other factors it could potentially lead to a violent crime. “The
Profile of a Hate Crime Offender Sterilized from emotion, hate crime, also called bias crime, is those offenses motivated in part or singularly by personal prejudice against other because of a diversity-race, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity/national origin, or disability. Hate crimes are committed out of anger, ignorance, and lack of knowledge of another’s ideas and beliefs. There are many causes for an individual to commit a hate crime. Also, many different profiles fit the description of a hate crime offender. There are ways to prevent and control hate crimes, but they will always be present in society as long as every person has the right to express his or her opinion.
When the topic of hate and bias crime legislation is brought up two justifications commonly come to mind. In her article entitled “Why Liberals Should Hate ‘Hate Crime Legislation” author Heidi M. Hurd discusses the courts and states views that those who commit hate and bias crimes ought to be more severely punished. She takes into consideration both sides of the argument to determine the validity of each but ultimately ends the article in hopes to have persuaded the reader into understanding and agreeing with her view that laws concerning the punishment of hate and bias laws should not be codified. Hate crime is described as a violent, prejudice crime that occurs when a victim is targeted because of their membership in a specific group. The types of crime can vary from physical assault, vandalism, harassment or hate speech. Throughout the article Hurd tried to defend her view and explain why there should be no difference of punishment for similar crimes no matter the reason behind it. Her reason behind her article came from the law that President Obama signed in 2009 declaring that crimes committed with hatred or prejudice should have more sever punishments. While the court has their own views to justify their reasoning behind such decisions, in the article Hurd brings up points and facts to prove the wrongfulness of creating such a law. However, though Hurd has made her views clear in the following essay I will discuss reasons why the penalties are justifiable, why they should receive the same degree of punishment, less punishment and my personal view on the topic.
A hate crime is a crime, usually involving violence or intimidation committed against others based partially or entirely on race, ethnicity, gender, religion, sexual orientation or membership in another social group.
Society consists of many different sociological groups. These groups involve people of diverse races, religions, and more. Unfortunately, hate crimes happen when groups become angry or frustrated towards each other. These groups are formed mostly during times of economic struggle or even social change. Hate groups continue to be a problem in our society. A group believes that the reason for a specific problem is only the fault of another racial, religious, or other group. The most common forms of crime in our society are due to hatred. Hate crimes are defined as a crime motivated by hatred, prejudice, or intolerance of somebody’s race, religion, ethnicity, political affiliation, disability, and/or sexual orientation. Plenty of hate crimes happen due to the fact that someone is different from someone else.
Any crime motivated by a bias against a person or group based on their ethnicity, gender, sexual preference, religion or another characteristic is a hate crime. These crimes can either be committed against the people themselves or their property. When someone commits a hate crime they are targeting a group of people not just one individual. That’s why hate crimes have extra punishment. The punishment for hate crimes are very insignificant considering the deviant who committed a hate crime targeted an entire group of people. Hate crimes are very serious offensive but determining where to draw the line can be difficult. Hate crimes are very serious and can have lasting effects on victims.
A hate crime is described as a crime in which the victim is targeted specifically because of their "actual or perceived race, color, national origin, ethnicity, gender, disability, or sexual orientation.” The word hate crime did not exist until the 1980’s but the FBI had been investigating hate crimes as early as the 1930’s. After the passage of the Civil Right Act of 1964 the role of the federal government increased with more violence against African Americans. Hate crime legislation was first introduced in the 1980’s and was pass in the early 1990’s by way of the The Hate Crimes Statistics Act. The Hate Crimes Statistics Act only gave the FBI the power to track and record hate crime statistics. In October of 2009, the Hate Crimes Prevention Act or “The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act” was passed. The new law gave the Department of Justice the power to investigate and prosecute bias-motivated violence (FBI).
Hate crimes are not a new concept for society, because hate crimes have always been around. While the study of hate crimes and the laws that have been passed because of hate crimes is relatively new, hate crimes have always been around. Hate crimes were committed as far back as the 1800’s and even back to The Civil War. Hate crimes are prevalent in society today just like they were in the past; because whether the crimes are aimed towards Muslims, the gay community, or any other minority group; they are fueled by something that every person has come into contact with- prejudice. Prejudice is defined as a preconceived thought or opinion about someone. While prejudice can be positive, in the concept of hate crimes they are negative feelings, thoughts, or opinions that are aimed towards a certain religious, ethnic, race, or even sexual orientation group. The typical definition of hate crime is that a crime has been committed by a majority member against a minority member simply because the victim was a minority. However, as of recent the definition has been expanded to allow for any crime committed by bias towards the victim’s social group such as anti-gay or anti-lesbian. Hate crimes are an extreme, potential effect due to prejudice and discrimination towards someone based on ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation. These crimes are committed against an individual or a group of individuals based solely on the fact that they are part of a group that the offender doesn’t approve of whether it is because they are a different race or following an alternative lifestyle. While the hate crimes are not something that is new in society because prejudice has always been around, the concept of a bias-crime and the legal precedent that it ha...
Racism is one of the most revolting things within the vicinity of humanity. Many times it haunts our past, degrading our future. However, a good fraction o...
A hate crime is a crime motivated by several reasons that include religion, sexual orientation, race, nationality, gender, etc. It typically involves physical violence, intimidation, threats and other means against the individual that is being targeted. It is a crime against the person and it can have a devastating impact on the victim. Several argue that hate crimes should be punished more severely. However, it is not a crime to hate someone or something if it does not lead to some sort of criminal offense.
Racism and prejudice has been present in almost every civilization and society throughout history. Even though the world has progressed greatly in the last couple of decades, both socially and technologically, racism, hatred and prejudice still exists today, deeply embedded in old-fashioned, narrow-minded traditions and values.
Today we have looked at the problem known as hate crimes and the varied causes which keep it in existence. We have also discussed some solutions to this act of hate.