Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character analysis where are you going
The stronger character analysis
Into the wild character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Character analysis where are you going
The Thief of Always, by Clive Barker, is a complex book with many different ideas and characters. It seeks to introduce the notion of time on a relative scale, and to show that wasting one’s moments can lead to one’s life passing by in an instant. In The Thief of Always, a theme has shown itself multiple times, that being Clive Barker developing evil. There are three main examples of the that topic, those being Hood’s personification of evil, Harvey’s potential for evil and Carna’s evil existence as well. Evil is one of the main themes throughout The Thief of Always. Hood, the house, is highly evil. He has two main characterizations that show how evil Hood actually is. The first way that Hood shows his evil is when it is revealed that he …show more content…
steals children’s souls. Ms. Griffin, the curse broken on her, says to Harvey, “There’s such a terrible emptiness inside [Hood]. He wants to fill it with souls, but it’s a [bottomless] pit.” (181). Ms. Griffin saying that Hood has “a terrible emptiness inside” shows why he needs souls to fill it up. Ms. Griffin also explains that it’s a “bottomless pit,” which explains why, after all the children coming through, Hood’s soul is still empty. Also, because Ms. Griffin is saying this, she is probably correct as she’s known Hood for the longest of anyone in the story. The second point is that Hood has no heart. When the robes that cover Hood are ripped off by Lulu, Barker narrates, “There was no great enchantment at [Hood’s] heart. In fact, there was no heart at all.” (215). Because Hood has no heart he may be evil. Hood is defeated by his vanity to cover up his lack of a heart, and as described earlier steals children’s souls to try to fix it. Having no heart is a result of being evil, but it is that that conquers him. Those points are the main points that illustrate Hood’s evil, but he is not the only character with evil. Harvey also has evil potential, despite having good in him.
While Harvey is the one who destroyed Hood and saved the day, he has evil tendencies as well. The first main point of evil in Harvey is his prank with Wendell that nearly got out of hand. When Harvey is pranking Wendell, and Jive is edging Harvey on to eat Wendell, Harvey thinks, “Who [is] this ridiculous boy Wendell anyway... He was just a tasty morsel. Any vampire worth his wings would chew [him up] as soon as [they looked] at him. And yet... “ (98-99). The fact that Harvey was having those thoughts shows that he wanted to eat Wendell up. That is magnified especially by Harvey thinking, “[Wendell] was just a tasty morsel.” Although, when he thinks, “And yet..” it implies that Harvey was having doubts about doing the evil deed; that is probably Harvey’s goodness coming through. Another point that shows Harvey’s evil is his obsession with vampires. When Marr is molding Harvey to look like a vampire, right before he pranks Wendell, Harvey says, “Yeah, I want to have fangs, like a wolf, and a red throat, and white skin, like I’ve been dead for a thousand years.” (89). The fact that Harvey listed so many details shows that he knows a lot about vampires, because someone who didn’t know much about vampires would probably say just “Oh,
I want to look scary!” Seeing that Harvey knows a lot about vampires, we can assume that he finds vampires awesome. By awesome, however, Harvey means awe-inspiring fear. In conclusion, there is definite proof that Harvey has an evil potential in him. However, he has some good in him. Although, not all characters have good in that evil. Carna, for example. Carna is a flying beast in the Thief of Always that consistently hinders Harvey’s progress. It has evil as well. Carna does evil deeds for Hood. When Harvey is in the attic of the Holiday house, and meets Hood, Hood says, “‘But if you will have what’s yours, have death. Carna?...Devour [Harvey]!’]” (205). Seeing that Hood said to Carna, “Devour [Harvey]!” that indicates that Carna will kill and eat Harvey. In most literature, killing is an evil act. Also, the fact that Hood said “Carna?” in an offhand manner suggests that this wasn’t unusual, and that Carna does his bidding. Because Hood, as shown in the first body paragraph, is evil, therefore the creature doing his evil bidding is probably evil, or is the tool of evil. The second point proves Carna’s evil is when it is destroyed by kindness. After Hood has told Carna to destroy Harvey, and it’s about to, Barker narrates, “But is was Harvey who [kindly] laid his hand upon [Carna]...and its body suddenly flew into a thousand pieces.” Because Carna had died from an act of kindness from Harvey this shows that it is evil because in most western literature, evil is the opposite of kindness. Also, because it flew apart from such a small act of kindness this proves that it had never had an act of kindness before, thus making it eviler and eviler. There is much evil in things that are made for evil, Carna one example of many. In the Thief of Always, there is much development of evil. But that is for a reason. Barker’s theme shines from these depths. At the end of all this,one can see the development of evil in the plot. However there is one thing in common with all this evil: love. Love is what is conquering this evil. Hood? He had no heart. He could not love, so he was killed. Harvey? He had evil in him. However, he turned his evil on Hood. He used his powers of good to turn around his evil. Carna? Carna was destroyed by a single act of compassion. Thus this essay arrives at the point: Evil, however destructive or powerful, can be conquered by love.
A fantasy fiction novel by Clive Barker known as the Thief of Always is a
In The Book Thief, author Markus Zusak communicates an over-arching topic. This topic is; all objects convey dark tones. The idea is transmitted into the writing subtly throughout the excerpt, as well as the story.
“She still today never told me she loved me…never… never in her life … it’s too hard to explain,” says Anthony Sowell as he mentions his mother while he is being interrogated by Cleveland Homicide Detective (Sberna). The classic neighbor that every family wishes to have, friendly, helpful and caring was holding back numerous secrets. In Anthony Sowell’s actions of the rape, beatings and murder of 11 innocent women, he demonstrates the qualities of a human monster while showing how nurture creates a personality as well as proving that humans are capable of creation more fear than those who are written about in fiction.
The obvious theme of the story is crime and mystery, however as a reader when reading beyond, it is realizable this story is not only based on finding the true evil. This novel consists of another theme which is decision-making, and friendship. In this novel, it is conspicuous the theme is crime due to the doings of the characters and the direction the author is leading the readers. Nevertheless, Collin has to make some difficult decisions in order to save himself as well has his new friendship with Alyssa. From Colin's perspective, we come to realize Alyssa is a beautiful female and him, as any young teenage boy feels once they get to know a beautiful girl, wants to help her out and become her Romeo. In this situation, Collin manages to give a hand to Alyssa often enough, at this point Alyssa begins to trust Collin furthermore. Alyssa now reveals to Colin as to why she vandalizes the posts he’s been cleaning daily. Following this event, Colin has to make a crucial decision, Colin has to reveal to the police the doings of the gang, however, all at once he has to make sure the gang does not find out Alyssa went to the cops or else Alyssa’s brother will face an unwanted life or death situation. This situation may not be something all teenagers are facing or even most, but this scenario does reflect upon other situations teenagers at this present time have to face. Being caught in between doing the right thing and helping your friend is a common situation most teenagers tend to face at this moment. Most teenagers tend to head in the route of their friend, however, this plot clearly portrays there is always a way around the obstacles. Collin instantly thought of a plan to help his friend and do the right thing. Alike this event, teenagers need to come to learn to think outside of the box, figure a way out and not narrow the
Everything is criticized at every level in this story, the people by the main character, the main character by the author and even the story by the author as well. The cruel egoistic personality of Anders is definitely identifiable through these different levels of criticism. I will prove that the inner motivation of this behaviour derives from Anders' egoistic personality which sometimes makes him cruel against others, sometimes against himself. Furthermore, I will prove that whenever Anders criticizes somebody or something he actually tries to punish because of the imperfectness of the object. In order to make the referring to the different part of the story easier I divide it into three parts. The first part ends when the robbers appear at the door of the bank, the second ends when one of the robbers shoots at Anders and the left is the third part.
Envision a world where evil has taken over, simply because decent people are willing to do nothing to oppose the evil that is taking over. The idea is not far off from reality, because many people believe evil is prevails when decent people do nothing. Among these people was Edmund Burke, who once said, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” He meant that injustice will continue to take place when good people don’t choose to fight against injustices. Many people agree with Burke, because true events have occurred that support Burke’s statement. Some people disagree, because they believe that even when righteous people intervene, evil will continue to prosper. However, Burke is correct in his statement
While literature often follows some pattern and can be predictable, it is often evolving and can change in an instant depending on the author. In most Gothic literature, a derivative of Romanticism, there is a gothic space in the work – a limited space in which anything can happen in contrast to the normal world in the work. In addition, normally, order is restored at the end of Gothic literature – the good is rewarded and the bad is punished. In his Gothic novella, The Terrible Vengeance (1981), Nicolai Gogol decided to expand the ‘normal’ idea of Gothic literature by, in the work, transforming the traditional Gothic space to encompass anything and everything; in addition to the use of space, through the ending in which there is no reward, Gogol conveyed the idea that evil is prevalent everywhere and in everyone.
To the character and to the author, it seems that ghastly nature murder and the immoral approach of treachery is merely an element of reality. This story is a true representation of author’s anguish and torment nature.
This section shows how characters are emotionally isolated which is an element of gothic literature. Not only do the people around the protagonist choose to isolate themselves, but he partakes in it too, as he judges them for their own lack of social behavior. The fact that there is a great amount of opportunity to do so also reinforces how far they have brought their minds into seclusion.
Tatyana Tolstaya’s “The Slynx” is a book that perfectly depicts the living situation under an oppressive regime. The life in the town she describes is full of fear, class division, trust issues, daily struggles of finding food and, most importantly, the strict control over the minds, and the words, both verbal and printed. Finally, there is always the unbearable fear in the darkness which blurs the thoughts of the people and makes them forget all the difficulties and oppression.
The Book Thief Short Essay: The Use of Foreshadowing, Irony, and Symbolism in The Book Thief
It can be said that “Man is the cruellest animal”. This statement is heavily supported in both texts because there are multiple examples where individuals pursue cruel acts. In the texts ‘The Stone Mattress’ by Margaret Atwood and ‘The Cask of the Amontillado’ by Edgar Allen Poe, the underlying theme of “Man is the cruellest animal” is highlighted evidently. However, different techniques are utilised to present this key idea such as committing cold murder, covering up tracks and feeling content with the idea of revenge.
After Bourgois publicly embarrasses Ray, he becomes hostile towards Bourgois and threatens him. The culture of violence and terror is rife in the illegal trade business. Violence is perpetually enforced in order to instil fear amongst workers and competitors so that boundaries are established. It is seen as a regulator in the illicit economy. However, the chorography of violence reveals that it becomes an obsession amongst poor people which is problem because community members who are in close approximation of the illicit economy fall prey to violence that comes along in these areas. The domain in which Ray operates negatively influence his agency not to be the good person his childhood friend Candy describes him to be when she says to Bourgois “[Ray] was like a Gumby Bear as a kid. He was always a nice kid”, “We were like brothers and sisters. He always helped me out.” Instead the circumstances and experiences that Ray has lived have caused him to become more violent with Caesar explaining to Bourgois that “Regular acts of violence are essential for preventing rip-offs by colleagues, customers, and professional holdup artists. Indeed, upward mobility in the underground economy of the street dealing world requires a systematic and effective use of violence against one’s colleagues, neighbors, and, to a certain extent, against one’s self.” (Bourgois,2003, p.24). The explanation supports that the underground, illicit economy requires the attitude of those in it to become more violent and “barbaric” (Bourgois,2003, p.24) thus the description of a good and kind Ray by Candy is
Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado” is a frightening and entertaining short story about the severe consequences that result from persistent mockery and an unforgiving heart. Poe’s excellent use of Gothicism within the story sets the perfect tone for a dark and sinister plot of murder to unfold. “The Cask of Amontillado” simply overflows with various themes and other literary elements that result from Poe’s Gothic style of writing. Of these various themes, one that tends to dominant the story as a whole is the theme of revenge, which Poe supports with his sophisticated use of direct and indirect factors, irony, and symbolism.
Later, the article retells the story and argues about the meanings behind the settings of Midnight Robber, such as 'Granny Nanny' and 'eshu.' She saw those as metaphors of slavery towards blacks. As the essay goes on, the New Half Way Tree is also under the thinking of the author. At the end of the essay the author analysis different decorporealizations of Tan-Tan in the novel.