Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Scapegoat theory sociology
Scapegoat theory sociology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Scapegoat theory sociology
Societies prevent themselves from suffering a meltdown into generalized chaos and or into a war of all against all by scapegoating. According to Renee Girard, scapegoating occurs in society when anger and violence must be released.To release this tension of violence, they must together as a society choose a surrogate victim, the scapegoat, to take on all of the blame for causing this anger, and the victim is then sacrificed - or turned against by society. In The Dark Knight, Batman serves as Gotham’s scapegoat. However, throughout the film both Harvey Dent - the white knight - and Batman - the dark knight - take turns serving as the scapegoat. Both make it very clear that they are willing to be whatever Gotham needs them to be in order to
Scapegoat is defined as one that bears the blame for others or one that is the object of irrational behavior. Even though in retrospect the scapegoat has in some way failed in their own goals, we use scapegoats because it’s easy. When we don’t succeed in a particular goal or feel we are going to embarrass ourselves the person we blame is the person we assume to be the weakest. The weakest person is usually different from the norm and not the most popular they dance to their own beat.
It has been eight years since the ending of the previous movie, The Dark Knight. At the end of this movie, Batman took the blame for the people killed by Harvey Dent, the district attorney who set out a war against crime. During The Dark Knight, crime had decreased dramatically because of him and Batman. Numerous criminals were placed in prison because of him. Therefore, Batman took the blame for his murders because he understood that a discovery of Harvey Dent’s killings would allow the numerous criminals that he imprisoned to be set free.
Some of them could have even been used as scapegoats. Yet how does one become a scapegoat? Could someone out there have that much hatred and anger to blame one person for the faults of many? Is the need for blame significant? Does desire lead to hatred and evil?
I wonder why. Maybe because “scapegoating” speaks to the paranoia in all of us: the anti-immigrant or the anti-minority, the bigot or the conformist—the side of us that fear change because we have gotten too comfortable in our own little world. Maybe because it also speaks to our self-denial, to stick to such ideology that somebody else is responsible for our failure and misfortune, instead of facing our own individual responsibility and moral obligation. I truly do not understand such ideology; however, one thing I have fully understood—the society makes it seem as if embracing change can be pretty
Although, There is child who is locked up in a closet like room, and everyone knows that the child is there suffering. The reasoning behind the knowledge and unwillingness to help the child, “...They all understand that their happiness, the beauty of their city... depend wholly on this child’s abominable misery.” Although this child is suffering the society as a whole depends on it’s misery. Just like with the three children the society maintains peace through a scapegoat. In Mcdonald’s article expresses that a scapegoat is chosen at random and everyone unites against it. McDonald summarizes the idea of mimetic violence and scapegoating,” While mimetic violence divides each against each, scapegoating violence unites all against one. Thus the destruction of the scapegoat produces a genuinely unifying experience… Ultimately this ritualized violence becomes the basis for religion, mythology, kingship, and the establishment of those differences in a role that are so essential to bring about internal peace.” Based on the text that this mimetic or ritualized violence turns into religion, mythology, etc, it suggests that it has happened throughout human history and will continue to do so. Again this mimetic violence eventually leads to
When lies are taken as the truth by scapegoating it can kill innocent people and have adverse effects on the other community members.
Scapegoats appear abundant in the world today. Political parties and businesses consistently seem to find a person or small group that takes the blame for serious issues. This can cause problems and arguments that sometimes lead to something serious like wars. Scapegoats are just a way of passing blame off of oneself and on to others, just so reputations can remain intact. This sort of attitude shows how lethargic the world has become, where people don’t even take responsibility for their actions. Many people from older generations complain about how all the new generations become too comatose and unwilling to take on their own actions and indiscretions. With attitudes like this, peace will never be found and will inevitably lead to conflict. Something must be done to stem the flow of scapegoats which have been utilized far too much over time.
Other than the main theme of tradition, Jackson portrays the idea of scapegoating through choosing of one towns member to be stoned for the wellbeing of the town, mainly as a sacrifice for better weather for the next harvest. “A wrong is undressed when retribution overtakes its redresser.” (Poe 226) Poe shows the scapegoating through Montresor from the form of revenge to make amends for his troubled past, and that Fortunato was the scapegoat. World War 2, the mass genocide of Jews under Hitler’s regime is the ultimate description of what scapegoating truly is and that “The Lottery” is a perfect correlation of WW2’s scapegoat with the Jews, but in a smaller, very smaller form. That although the selection and murdering of the town a folk once a year could be for the next harvest, or it could be for the gods for grace of the sins of the town. Why does this type of activity or the quest of the removal of fear, regret, and sin is always used by humans, and is always used by the last resort, maybe not always in killing, but in public shaming? It seems that the people that organize and use this tool have a form of deception lased around the implementation of
Scapegoating is a better way to experience success. Margaret Atwood speaks the truth when she states “When societies come under stress these kinds of things happen. People start looking around for essentially human sacrifices. They start looking around for somebody to blame.” In “Half- Hanged Mary” by ……. they used Mary as a scapegoat by blaming everything on her which lead to her hanging. Therefore I defend Margaret Atwood that a world under stress will eventually lead to people being demolished so they can feel better about themselves.
¨When societies come under stress these kinds of things happen. People start looking around for essentially human sacrifices. They start looking around for somebody they can blame.” Margaret Atwood proposes this in an interview with Bill Moyers. The kinds of things she is speaking of is exactly what we observe in The Crucible by Arthur Miller which tells the story of the Salem witchcraft trials where many were punished and killed. In Arthur Miller’s ¨Why I Wrote The Crucible¨ we witness innocent people being blacklisted for conspiring with communists. All of these defend what Margaret Atwood declared in her interview. When a society comes under stress, we always find someone to blame.
Hysteria, it causes humans to afflict others by the guile of another. “As the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States intensified in the late 1940s and early 1950s, hysteria over the perceived threat posed by Communists in the U.S. became known as the Red Scare” (History.com, n.d., para.1). It was called the red scare because the reds were communists that were in allegiance for the soviet flag. America was finding communists in the country so they could keep it pure and this all started because of Joseph Mccarthy.(quote from the crucible). A similar situation happened three hundred years ago in the salem witch trials and a play named The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller.
Batman (Christian Bale) is hoping to hand on his crime fighting duties to D.A Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart) yet when Batman’s cards are on the table the twisted mastermind who goes by the name of the joker (Heath Ledger), forces the masked vigilante to go against everything he ever stood for.
Scapegoating is when a person irrationally blames their failures on others, therefore not taking responsibility themselves. The “scapegoating theory says that prejudiced people believe they are society’s victims” (Schaefer 38). It is always someone else’s fault that things do not go their way and the person “… transfers the responsibility for failure to some vulnerable group” (Schaefer 38).
Although Girard’s second chapter of The Scapegoat may discuss persecution among certain groups of people because of false perceptions, it is really about people's desires to utilize scapegoats as a way of justification for their misfortunes, but their reasoning for scapegoating is ultimately irrational.
In the story there is always a sacrifice at the end of the ritual. They are all susceptible to the hypothetical crass theory that if they murder the masses will flourish. May discusses how the heart of the story is based on this old concept: “the notion of the scapegoat”(2451). It is not a new theory as it is presented with grandiose to unsuspecting citizens. Jackson also hints at a comparison to the “holocaust” as “the townspeople are unable to fully question or prevent the brutal lottery process”(Moss, Joyce, and Wilson, 236-237). Making this theme hard to swallow and all too soon for some readers. Jackson repeatedly proves her bravery in her writing by touching such untouchable