Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Utopia and society
Essays on utopian societies
Essays on utopian societies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Fight Between Equality and Individuality Equality is a topic of great debate in the world today, ranging from the people of the LGBT community fighting for their right to marry the person they love, to minorities fighting for the right to not be racially profiled and prosecuted for their skin color, to store owners and clerks fighting for their right to religious freedom if they do not want to serve a gay man or woman. While not all of these rights are fully recognized, there are rights that every man, woman, and child, in democratic countries, have. Whether these rights are God given or legislative, they allow everybody to better himself the way he sees fit. Every person has the ability to say or write what he wants and how he wants to. …show more content…
Every person has the ability to become wealthier or more successful. Every person has the ability to become healthier or more physically fit. What makes a human an individual is how these rights are used to develop unique characteristics that only one person has. However, even though there are equal rights and opportunities for every person, that does not make everybody equal. There are some people who are much wealthier or healthier or stronger than others. At some point in trying to give everyone equality, there comes a time that the citizens become so equal that they are no longer individuals. They can no longer better themselves because that would make them unequal to everyone else. In any utopian society, everyone is equal.
Nobody is better than anyone else. Nobody is wealthier than anybody else. Nobody is healthier than anybody else. Nobody is more beautiful than anybody else. This description of utopia can bring about two possible outcomes: one as seen in Thomas More’s Utopia and the other as seen in “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. In More’s Utopia, the best possible outcome came from everyone’s equality. However, all the conditions just happened to be perfect. Everyone was willing to work while receiving the same supplies as everyone else, everyone was incredibly healthy because the country of Utopia had free hospitals with the most skilled nurses, and everyone just happened to be amazingly beautiful. This is one of the few instances that total equality can still keep individuality intact. While there is no way for the citizens to better themselves financially or through inheritance, there is still the opportunity for every person to better themselves physically and intellectually. This allows for the individual to choose what he wants to better about himself in and how he can do that, whether that is a workout regimen or a certain diet or a subject of learning that interests him. Even though this bettering of one’s self is expected in Utopia, it is still the right of the citizen to decide if he wishes to do …show more content…
this. On the other end of the spectrum, in Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron”, the United States has taken equality to such an extent that everyone is perfectly equal.
Nobody is wealthier, smarter, stronger, or more beautiful than anyone else. Unlike Utopia, instead of bringing the people up, the government in “Harrison Bergeron” brings down those who are above average through handicaps such as radios to distract the intelligent, weights to hold down the strong, and masks to hide the beautiful. By stripping everyone of the rights which once gave everyone equal opportunities, the United States government created a country where, by making everyone equal by force, its citizens are no longer individuals, but the same person repeated over and over again. The country would be different if some personal development were allowed but any sort of activity that would make one person different from another is punishable by two years in prison, a large fine or even death. It is one thing to not value personal improvement, but to punish the action creates a society were individuals are not just rare, but are illegal. By outlawing the individual, the government is creating a country that will eventually be filled with mindless drones, only capable of doing one thing:
work. Individuality is the ability to express and change oneself in any way that person sees fit, and the combination of all of these expressions and changes that make each person unique. There are no two people who are exactly alike. Some people are smarter than others, while some people are stronger than other, and some people are more beautiful, or faster, or wealthier than others. This great diversity in society is what makes individuality possible, and allows mankind to diversify even further. When these abilities are stripped away, or when the right to enhance these abilities is stripped away, that is when a society is no longer a group of individuals, but a group of clones. Today, when groups say they are fighting for equality, they are fighting for equal rights and abilities, for if they were fighting for total equality, the groups would no longer exist.
Equality appears to be the ideal factor that can perfect a society. It eliminates the need to feel envious of any human or their qualities. Nevertheless, with impartiality comes lack of diversity and ambition. Inequality is the entity that provides individuals with the passion to strive for a better life. If everyone has already reached their full potential there is no purpose for living. The short novel “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut presents a futuristic portrayal of a world where everyone is equal in every way possible. In “Harrison Bergeron,” Vonnegut displays the clear flaws in society that lead to the creation of a horrific dystopia that lacks genuine human emotions, fails to develop as a civilized community and is strictly government
“Harrison Bergeron” features a society that emphasizes some fundamental problems of total equality. While it is human nature to want to be accepted and up to par with others, there has to be a distribution of achievement for the sake of achievement itself. We wouldn’t be human without our differences in aptitude. We just have to celebrate that diversity in order to
“Harrison Bergeron” starts with explaining the society within the story. It begins, “The year was 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren't only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way,” (Vonnegut 158). With this startlingly different introduction, Vonnegut explains that everyone is equal but does not include how during this time. As the story progresses, the reader begins to see exactly how the citizens are “equal.”
What would happen to the world if everyone in our society was equal in every aspect? Would this create utopia or hell? In this short story "Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. America has finally achieved full social equality, and living up to the first amendment fully. In this futuristic society, handicaps force this equality, the strong, the beautiful, the intelligent are forced to wear weights, masks, and headphones. These constraints force equality among the American people from beauty and brains, to strength. Harrison is the symbol of defiance and individuality, and represents the aspects of the American people that still want to try hard, out do their peers, and show off their attributes. The story criticizes the policy of equality
An impartial society: Utopia or Hell? What would happen to the world if the people were literally equal in every aspect of their lives? In the futuristic short story, “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut Jr., the world is finally living up to America’s first amendment of everyone being created equal. In this society, the gifted, strong, and beautiful are required to wear handicaps of earphones, heavy weights, and hideous masks, respectively. Thus, these constraints leave the world equal from brains to brawn to beauty. With the world constantly pushing for equality among people, Vonnegut reveals a world that society is diligently working toward. Through this foreshadowing of the future, Vonnegut attempts to use Diana Moon Glampers and
In conclusion, the complete freedom and absolute equality have been a goal of innumerable societies throughout human history. However, these two ideal cannot exist together in their most perfect forms because the perfect forms of either freedom or equality represent total chaos or total oppression, as we can see in “Harrison Bergeron,” the consequences of sacrificing freedom for perfect equality. The author uses the story of this imaginary perfect world where everyone is happy to demonstrate that a society in which total equality exists is not only oppressive, but also inert and unproductive. Using his futuristic scenario, the simplicity of the society, and the actions of his characters, Vonnegut makes his point of view of a repressive society. In addition, societies that try to create total equality have almost always proven to be oppressive, such as China.
A utopia is a community which possesses highly desirable or perfect qualities. The beginning of the book Anthem, written by Ayn Rand, is supposed to be represented as a utopia, but the reader soon discovers that it is actually a dystopia; which is merely the opposite of a utopia. The main character of the book, Equality 7-2521, explains to the reader that there are many laws and regulations that the people of City must obey such as: not to write or have their own thoughts, citizens can’t have individual names, and the citizens of the city also have to refer to themselves as “we.” Equality 7-2521 soon realizes that a society that lacks individualism does nothing to make the community prosper; meaning there must be a stop to the collectivism within the city.
The pages of history have longed been stained with the works of man written in blood. Wars and conflicts and bloodshed were all too common. But why? What could drive a man to kill another? Many would say it is man’s evil nature, his greed, envy, and wrath. And certainly, they all have a roll in it. But in reality, it is something far less malevolent, at least at first. The sole reason why conflicts grow and spread comes from the individuality that every human cherishes so dearly. This can easily be shown in the story “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut, in which a society has been created where everyone of talent has been handicapped so they are not better than anyone else, all for the sake of equality. This text will show that Individuality
What gives the reader the false idea of utopia in Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron” is the deep social control in the form handicaps where individual’s abilities and competence and even appearance are neutralized and vilified as a form of inequality. The characteristics of equality chosen by Vonnegut; beauty, athleticism, and intelligence is important to the story’s message. The main focus of the story are the characteristics of equality that are subjective, the very same characteristics we are born with that makes us different and minimally states the objective ones, the ones that plague our society today. This not only satirizes the epitome of equality itself, but rather the people’s flawed ideals and belief of what total equality is supposed to be or should be.
The handicaps are to people as the cage is to the bird. This simile describes how Caged Bird and Harrison Bergeron are alike. Harrison Bergeron and Caged Bird are very alike in many reasons. They both reference limitations on freedom. In Caged Bird the limitation is that the bird is in the cage and cannot fly or go wherever it pleases. In Harrison Bergeron the limitations are all the handicaps. In Harrison Bergeron there are limitations to the citizens. These are called handicaps. When you are more capable at something then other people are then you receive handicaps that limit your abilities so that everyone is equal. Some handicaps are earpieces that stop you from thinking with a ringing sound, masks for those that have superior beauty, and
Although the comparisons are well hidden, both today’s society and the story ‘Harrison Bergeron’ share similar qualities. They both deal with equality, which leads to problems and consequences. A second similarity is the struggle of competition and trying to prevent it from occurring, which also leads to problems. Lastly, both struggle with normality, and the fact that it’s hard to accept that different is okay now.
Kurt Vonnegut’s dystopian fiction, or a type of fiction in which the society’s attempt to create a perfect world goes very wrong, “Harrison Bergeron” was first published in The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction in 1961. This story is about Harrison Bergeron, who is forced to diminish his abilities because they are more enhanced than everyone else’s. This short story is an allusion of a perfect society and it is maintained through totalitarian. The author expresses his theme of the dysfunctional government of utopia through his effective use of simile, irony, and symbolism. Kurt Vonnegut was one of the most influential American writers and novelists, and his writings have left a deep influence on the American Literature of the 20th century. Vonnegut is also famous for his humanist beliefs and was the honoree of the American Humanist Association. “Harrison Bergeron” is about a fictional time in the future where everyone is forced to wear handicapping devices to ensure that everyone is equal. So can true equality ever be achieved through strict governmental control?
Never would I thought that we have a dystopian-like society in our world. Don’t know what a dystopia is? It is a society set in the future, typically portrayed in movies and books in, which everything is unpleasant. The novel Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut is a dystopian story of a fourteen-year-old boy named Harrison who grows up in a society that limits people’s individuality. When he is taken away from his parents, because of his strong idiosyncrasy, his parents do not even recall his presence because of the “mental handicaps” that the government forces onto them. Harrison eventually escapes from his imprisonment and tries to show others that they can get rid of the handicaps and be free. Though the government official, or Handicapper
“The narrator of the story Harrison Bergeron definitions’ of America’s equality begins not by positing a future equality as much as exposing the misunderstanding of it in the past and the present” (Hattenhauer). The story Harrison Bergeron has two meanings: too much equality and too much inequality. Too much equality is expressed through the Handicap General, Diana Glampers, as she wants everyone to be equal because she envies the talented and beautiful. However, “it is not fair to the productive, the risk taking, or the hard working, to deprive them of what they have produced, merely to make them equal to others who have worked less, taken less risk, and produced less” (Moore). This society would never work because “no one who has lived very long can think that all men are equal in physical, prowess, mental capacity, willingness to work or save, to assume leadership, to design or invent new products or processes, to get votes, to preach sermons, to play the violin, or even to make love” (Even Fingerprints Differ). In any society one should not have the power to make people equal for each “were endowed by our creator” (Moore). In a society where there is too much inequality, or a potential dictatorship- Harrison Bergeron, society would fail as well. Kurt Vonnegut wrote Harrison Bergeron in order to show the world that we cannot take away talent or
11. When ability is confused for opportunity, society takes the blame. When freedom is traded for happiness, society takes the blame. When total equality is achieved, there will be no more achievements. It is obvious from this story that total equality diminishes everything. It causes complicity in stupidity. It causes hubris in those above of the fray. It paves the way for the authoritarians to corrupt under the guise of “perservativation”. What the story of Harrison Bergeron, more specifically Kurt Vonnegut, is telling us, is one of warning. And it must be heeded.