Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Parents should be aware of their children using the internet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In "The Undercover Parent" (2008), an op-ed article, Harlan Coben explains that the internet is a dangerous place and he states his opinion that spyware should not be used to protect children. Schools, including Glendale Unified school District can install spyware at students’ homes. With spyware, it is possible to view a complete history of one’s computer activity. Although spyware can keep kids safe, I side with Coben that spyware is going way too far to the point where it invades a child's privacy. Spyware is a radical way of monitoring the Internet activity of children, and it invades their privacy. While parents do have the right and the responsibility to be protective of their children, when it comes to spyware, the rights of parents …show more content…
Spyware can help parents find what children are secretly doing on the computer that could potentially harm the child. One of Coben's friends, "...using spyware to monitor his college-bound, straight-A daughter, found out that not only she was using drugs but she was sleeping with her dealer" (Coben 1). In this scenario, spyware was the only way that the father found out about his daughters actions. Some parents may feel that checking their child's internet history is enough monitoring. This is not a solution because there are ways to evade this method. Furthermore, children can be very sneaky and find ways around other, less radical ways of monitoring, so in cases such as these, spyware is best. A child can simply browse in private mode, which stops the browser from logging visited internet pages or by deleting part of their history. Another popular method to monitoring children is by having parent-child talks. This does not work because children, unfortunately, are gifted liars. Children are not diabolic people; they simply are ignorant about what is out in the world, and they just happen to be very curious and would like to stay quiet about their actions. A plethora of issues
The expansion of the Internet infrastructure across the world, has brought an increased audience. Which has provided expanded markets for businesses and exploited new opportunities. There are virtually countless social sites and media used by individuals to access and share experiences , content, insights, and perspectives. Parents today tend to believe they should spy on their kids online activity. I argue parents should respect the privacy of a child's social life and his/her internet activity.
Internet is advancing every day, parents have no idea what their kids are doing in cyberspace and are contemplating the idea of spyware. In the article, “The Undercover Parent” by Harlan Coben, he argues the idea of parents putting spyware on kids’ computer is a good idea to keep the child safe. Many American parents have no idea what happens in cyberspace; sex, bullying, and drugs. Parents are torn between protecting their child with spyware and allowing the child to have privacy. Coben uses his friends’ personal experiences to support his argument without leaving room for counterarguments. By using strong emotional appeals, weak qualifiers, and sugary word choice Coben creates a weak argument that lacks persuasion.
Harlan Coben’s essay “The Undercover Parent” attempts to enlighten readers, specifically parents, of the benefits to installing spyware onto their children’s computers in order to keep record of their child’s online activity. Whilst admitting at first he was not particularly keen on spyware himself, Coben aims to persuade his audience of the benefits by highlighting the dangers of children using the internet unsupervised and without boundaries. However, Coben fails to supply factual evidence to back up his claims, all while stating a number of contradictions within his own arguments. Coben states, “…overprotective parents fight their kids’ battles on the playground, berate coaches about playing time and fill out college applications…” (19). This is a weak argument because it inadvertently suggests that overprotectiveness
Alessandro Acquisto a professor at CMU coauthor of the study attributes the results of a recent poll to the notion of rational ignorance in the 70 percent of incorrect answers in regards to face book privacy policies (474). Many people would agree that protecting children is the parents’ responsibility. Let’s be honest though a lot of kids know more than their parents about internet usage so how helpful can the parents be to protect them properly? This is also to assume that parents are doing their job protecting their children properly. A lot of pa...
As shown in the two short stories children are seen to be innocent and “precious” incapable of deception (Wilson 178). The two pieces of literature clearly invalidates that belief that children are incapable of deception. In “The Open Window” Vera showed deception when she lied to her aunt why Framton Nuttel had left the house by saying “He told me he had a horror of dogs. He was once hunted into a cemetery somewhere on the banks of the Ganges by a pack of pariah dogs, and had to spend the night in a newly dug grave with the creatures snarling and grinning and foaming just above him. Enough to make anyone lose their nerve.”(Saki 254). Likewise in “Charles” Laurie showed deceptio...
Online predators, pornography, drug trafficking, piracy, and hate sites are just some of the dangers that a child can face on the internet. The article “The Undercover Parent” by Harlan Coben states that parents should use spyware to monitor their children. Coben argues that parents should be able to know what is in their children’s lives. he believes that spyware can prevent children from being targeted by internet predators on social networking sites and even prevent children from being cyber bullied. I agree with Coben’s claim that parents should consider using spyware as a protection for their teens online. There are many possible dangers facing children on the internet and it is essential that parents install spyware.
¨The Undercover Parent¨ by Harlan Coben, published in an online newspaper ¨New York Times¨ (16 March 2008), claims that the Internet is dangerous for kids. Harlan Coben explains how spyware could be a resource that keeps track of our kids’ internet use, but how it could also invade sons’ and daughters’ privacy. He also claims that parents should have conversations about their concerns with teens, and let them know spyware is a possibility. In my opinion, I quite agree and do not agree with the most of it.
Computers are main technological features that allow criminals to step into unsuspecting victims lives. With a simple piggy-backing program hackers are able to track every keystroke made by the victim. One such program is called spyware, not to be confused with adware, which is often referred to interchangeably with spyware, but is potentially harmless (Louis 15). Spyware, hidden within downloaded software, implants itself deep within a computer’s hard drive, allowing it to track every move made by the user (Louis 16).
I believe that putting spyware on your teenagers or child's computer can be a good thing as long as you are doing it to be protective, making sure they only talk to good people, and telling them that you have the spyware on the computer. Parents of teenagers want to make sure you are not being nosy and only finding out information that is not good to your children. The parental responsibility is to be protective and not to be invading the privacy of your children. The first reason on why spyware can be a good thing is because you are protecting your children.
Although, it is unfair to blame technology because of the content people put on it. Greenfield, Patricia, and Zheng Yan put it best when they say, “Just as we cannot ask whether a knife is inherently good or bad, we cannot ask whether the Internet is good or bad; we can simply document how it is used.” So, as much as some may blame the Internet for its problems, the real war is against the substance within the Internet (Greenfield, Patricia, and Zheng Yan 390-93). And thus comes the main argument against the Internet, is the composition of the Internet harmful to children?
Spyware is a category of computer programs that attaches itself to the specific operating system. They are designed to track your Internet habits, nag users with unwanted sales offers or generate traffic for their host Web site. According to recent estimates, more than two-thirds of all personal computers are infected with some kind of spyware. This is disturbing given the fact that computers are becoming a necessity in America’s society.
There are programs available to those parents who feel it is necessary to monitor their childs use of the Internet. Cybersitter can be purchased for around $39.95, and can help to regulate your web browser keeping your childs access to the world wide web restricted. There is even and option in which incoming and outgoing e-mails for inappropriate material.
These individuals feel that it is an invasion of the teenagers’ right to privacy and the development of their trustworthiness. Kay Mathieson states “only by giving children privacy will they come to see their thoughts as something that belongs to them – to which they have an exclusive right.” In the United States and according to the law, monitoring the internet usage of a minor does not break any laws and is a moral obligation of the parent. Trustworthiness is an important development of a child to learn in order to develop genuine relationships with others in the lifetime. “Not only does monitoring have the great potential to undermine the trust of the child in the parent, and thus to undermine trust in others more generally, it also has the potential to undermine the capacity of the child to be worth of trust” (Mathieson). If the parent has not already had conversations with the teenager about monitoring internet usage and the parent is not telling the child about the monitoring, there is already an issue with the development of trustworthiness in the teenager. There was already a failure of development of this skill before the internet or internet monitoring was introduced.
Also the fact that you can choose what your children see on the internet, so you can ban websites that will influence them to do things you do not want them to do and protect them from rapists, murderers, and other dangerous predators. The disadvantages are you destroying any trust your children have on you, making your children have trust issues, and being so sheltered that when you are no longer there they do not know what to do and how to stand up for themselves. I disagree with the use of these products, because they will completely destroy any children self-esteem. They will start to question why their parents would not trust them and constantly having to check themselves to not say any wrong things. Over time, the children will withdraw themselves and stop trusting their parents with anything, because if their parents do not trust them why should they. They will grow up to be better liars than anyone else from constantly having to hide things and be more experimental to see what could be so bad. Overall, it will corrupt all the family
...r by “following” them on social medias. One more thing, is to know what sites your kids visit and their online activities. Ask where they’re going, what they’re doing, and who they’re doing it with.