Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Characteristics on Hamlet
Nature of characters in hamlet
Hamlet character traits
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Characteristics on Hamlet
Just like water and oil, a want for responsibility and inability to act do not combine positively. The character Hamlet in Shakespeare’s play Hamlet learns this reality; however it is much too late. The ghost of Hamlet’s father speaks to Hamlet and gives him the task of avenging his murder. This requires Hamlet to kill the current king, Claudius, who is also his uncle. Hamlet chooses to accept this task and yet he is slow to act. He attempts to maintain a middle ground by neither relinquishing what he believes he must do nor acting. It is this middle ground that in the end leads to Hamlet’s demise. Many different factors play into why Hamlet maintains this middle ground, including his want for everything to be perfect, his sense of responsibility to avenge his father’s death and his procrastination.
Hamlet believes that in order for him to act, everything must be perfect. In part, this belief impedes him from killing Claudius. When given the perfect opportunity to kill Claudius, Hamlet instead of acting, lets the opportunity pass by saying that the timing wasn’t right. Hamlet believed that because Claudius was in prayer the timing was not right. The line “Why this is hire and salary, not revenge!” shows that he feared by killing Claudius while he was in prayer he would send Claudius to heaven, and would not have revenged his father’s death. This act shows that Hamlet is unable to act, a trait greatly contrasted by the character Fortinbras. Fortinbras is another prince in a similar situation to Hamlet’s. Instead of waiting for the timing to be perfect though, Fortinbras simply acts. He realizes the commitment he has made to revenge his father’s death and wastes no time. When Fortinbras finds out that he is unable to attack Denmer...
... middle of paper ...
...he loses his own life.
Throughout Hamlet the idea of people having to either act or give up their commitment is very strong. Unfortunately for Hamlet, he does not understand this concept until it is much too late. Instead, Hamlet procrastinates and maintains a middle ground between these two concepts. He is unable to either act or give up the idea of killing Claudius altogether. His desire to kill Claudius is caused by his sense that he is required to complete this task; even that it is his purpose in life. He is also unable to make the commitment. This is caused by his desire for the timing of his action to be perfect. This desire causes him not to act when he is given the perfect opportunity to kill Claudius. His procrastination and inability to make the decision to either act or give up ultimately cost Hamlet his life when the decision is brutally made for him.
The vengeance of his father 's death is the prime cause of Hamlet 's obsession with perfection, his tendencies of over thinking philosophically, and idealistically, are what cause Hamlet 's delay. Hamlet is exposed to multiple opportunities to take the murderer of his father, Claudius ' life, the most notable being when Hamlet stumbles upon Claudius alone, praying; when about to act Hamlet says "When he is drunk asleep, or in his rage, or in the incestuous pleasure of his bed, at gaming, swearing or about some act that has no relish of salvation in 't: then trip him, that his heels may kick at heaven and that his soul may be as damn 'd and black as hell, whereto it goes"(3.3.90-96) This inability to act when the chance is given exclaims how Hamlet is not willing to send Claudius to heaven and he will only act if he is to arrive in hell, which will in turn fulfill his need for the perfect
Sometimes, when people are asked to complete a deed, they are unable to do so until they are able to find an ideal set of circumstances. Shakespeare explores this very issue in his play Hamlet, Hamlet is a young man whose been asked to do something; however, Hamlet delays carrying out this deed, causing there to have been many discussions over the centuries on why Hamlet delays, but some theories are more prevalent than others. Hamlet vows to avenge his fathers death at the hands of Claudius; however, he procrastinates throughout the play and does not seek revenge until the end, when Hamlet finally acts by his instincts, and kills his fathers murderer. Hamlet is stopped in seeking revenge by a number of
One of Hamlet’s flaws is that he over thinks things a lot and it is first shown the most at the prayer scene with Claudius. Once Hamlet sees how Claudius reacts to the play he knows that Claudius killed his father and that the ghost was right, he has a chance to kill him and doesn’t take it . His only proof was the ghost and even though others saw the ghost no one else heard it talk except Hamlet. Hamlet was also considering a lot of other things at this time, like how if he killed Claudius now Claudius would be free of sin and would go to heaven. He was also thinking if his father didn’t get to die free of sin it wouldn’t be fair for Claudius to die free of sin either, which shows how vengeful Hamlet’s character is. At the same time, Hamlet has morals and understands the consequences so that’s why it’s harder for him to perform the act . After a l...
Hamlet is a normal person which brillant ideas. He waited so long to kill Claudius because he wanted people to be able to know the story of really happened and did not want to seem like a bad guy. Hamlet’s soliloquy, “To be or not to be” (Act 3,Scene 1 Line 64) also means should he live to do as his father or or die to betray him. Hamlet knew everything that was going on in the kingdom but wanted to act as if he did not to get even further in and have more information. He did this because he wanted to think a more brilliant plan to kill Claudius and anyone else that was dealing with it, that is how he killed
Hamlet’s inability to carry out decisions contributes to his mentality of self-hatred. He decides early on in the play that his revenge on his uncle for murdering his father would be to kill him. However, throughout the play he has many opportunities to execute this deed but fails to do so until his own life is at stake. Hamlet is a major proponent of action without words. Many men in his life, including Claudius, have no trouble carrying out actions.
One might say that Hamlet could be linked to many news articles today, specifically, consider the case featuring the Bever teens. These teens really didn’t have a motive behind their actions. Hamlet didn’t have a specific motive other than revenge, and the Bever brothers possibly had the same mind set. Maybe their parents didn’t treat them fairly, or possibly they struggled with coping with these parent struggles, just like Hamlet. He was still coping with his father’s death and his mom got over it pretty quickly. That could be a reason why Hamlet was out for revenge. Hamlet came across as a confused man. He was a very passionate man and then he descended into a deep, dark state of depression. A conclusion could be made for the brothers also.
As illustrated through his speeches and soliloquies Hamlet has the mind of a true thinker. Reinacting the death of his father in front of Claudius was in itself a wonderful idea. Although he may have conceived shcemes such as this, his mind was holding him back at the same time. His need to analyze and prove everythin certain drew his time of action farther and farther away. Hamlet continuously doubted himself and whether or not the action that he wanted to take was justifiable. The visit that Hamlet recieves from his dead father makes the reader think that it is Hamlet's time to go and seek revenge. This is notthe case. Hamlet does seem eager to try and take the life of Claudius in the name of his father, but before he can do so he has a notion, what if that was not my father, but an evil apparition sending me on the wrong path? This shows that even with substantial evidence of Claudius' deeds, Hamlet's mind is not content.
In the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare, Hamlet the king of Denmark is murdered by his brother, Claudius, and as a ghost tells his son, Hamlet the prince of Denmark, to avenge him by killing his brother. The price Hamlet does agree to his late father’s wishes, and undertakes the responsibility of killing his uncle, Claudius. However even after swearing to his late father, and former king that he would avenge him; Hamlet for the bulk of the play takes almost no action against Claudius. Prince Hamlet in nature is a man of thought throughout the entirety of the play; even while playing mad that is obvious, and although this does seem to keep him alive, it is that same trait that also keeps him from fulfilling his father’s wish for vengeance
In one of his soliloquies, Hamlet himself becomes well aware of his flaw and condemns himself for it while praising Fortinbras saying, “[s]ith I have cause and will and strength and means [t]o do't. [e]xamples gross as earth exhort me: [w]itness this army of such mass and charge [l]ed by a delicate and tender prince, [w]hose spirit with divine ambition puff'd [m]akes mouths at the invisible event”(IV,iv,45-50). This establishes Hamlet’s sense of respect and admiration towards Fortinbras also adding another appealing trait to his personality, kindness. For the duration of the play, Hamlet becomes progressively impolite towards most of the the characters because of the anger he holds towards Claudius. Hamlet aspires to be similar to Fortinbras and hopes to have more qualities that would enable him to take action.
It is from this point forward that Hamlet must struggle with the dilemma of whether or not to kill Claudius, his uncle, and if so when to actually do it. As the play progresses, Hamlet does not seek his revenge when the opportunity presents itself, and it is the reasoning that Hamlet uses to justify his delay that becomes paramount to the reader's understanding of the effect that Hamlet's mental perspective has on his situation. In order to fully understand how Hamlet's perspective plays an important role in this play, the reader must attempt to answer the fundamental question: Why does Hamlet procrastinate in taking revenge on Claudius?
Hamlet has evidently shown in the play how his uncertainty in his decisions slows him down in killing Claudius. His indecisiveness makes spend more time thinking about the situation and the possible outcomes. In act 2 scene, Hamlet has yet to fulfil his promise to his father. Hamlet is holding himself back from avenging his father. Hamlet refuses to act as if he knows what he is doing when in reality, he has not found out whether the act of killing is heroic and moral or cowardly and immoral. “O vengeance! Why, what an ass am I! This is most brave, that I, the son of a dear father murdered, prompted to my revenge by heaven and hell, must, like a who 're, unpack my heart with words and fall a-cursing like a very drab, a scullion! Fie upon’t, for!” (2.2 579-585). Despite all this, instead of taking revenge immediately, Hamlet wants to find out whether his ghostly father is telling the truth. This takes a while as Hamlet would eventually realize it is true later in the play. Hamlet had a so much time to kill King Claudius but it is his uncertainty of his father 's words that delays the revenge. Later in act 3 scene 3, King Claudius is seen kneeling in prayer as he confesses his sins.
William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, title character in the play of the same name, has been criticized for centuries due to his delay in killing his uncle Claudius and the consequences that occurred as a result. But as one critic once pointed out, “No delay, no play” (Jenkins 137). The entire plot of Hamlet is based on the events that occur due to Hamlet’s waffling as to whether or not he should, and when he should, avenge his father’s murder. Hamlet, who appears to be a Christian man, would be committing a murder regardless of the reasons. This is not something that most would take lightly or rush in to under any circumstances. This discussion will defend Hamlet’s continuous delays by analyzing certain situations in the play which affect his decision to wait to kill Claudius.
Hamlet's character lends itself to a possible motivation for his unwillingness to kill Claudius. He is a scholar, and a student of theology. It is a moral dilemma for Hamlet to kill without a just cause, or kill at all. He wants proof of the part his uncle and his mother played in his father's death. His royal birth leads him to consider his responsibilities to his country, which is Hamlet's internal conflict throughout the play.
Hamlet draws his sword and whispers, “Now I might do it… and now I’ll do’t” (3.3.74-75) but he does not act. Hamlet, much like the Elizabethan audiences of the day, is very religious. From Hamlet’s point of view King Claudius has taken a knee to pray and to ask forgiveness. Although this is untrue, Hamlet has taken it upon himself to ensure that King Claudius goes to hell. Hamlets moral fortitude and his sense of honour do not allow him to finish the task when he knows Claudius will go to heaven. Hamlet whispers to himself, “Why this is hire and salary, not revenge” (3.3.79), proving his belief that if he kills King Claudius, the task will not be valid as he will go to heaven. Delaying the step-patricide and ensuring King Claudius’s position in hell is another senseless detour in Hamlet’s given quest, and furthering the depth of procrastination that has plagued Hamlet from the first scene of the play.
Hamlet is a paradox; he is a perplexing character that throughout the play has more to show. Hamlet is a person of contradictions he is inquisitive and profound yet indecisive. The experiences Hamlet goes through led to dramatic changes in his character. In the beginning we are introduced to a young man who is mourning for the death of his father and struggling with the sudden marriage of his mother to his uncle. Hamlet faces the dilemma of wanting to avenge his father’s death and suppressing his intense emotions in order to calculate a plan.