Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How negotiation helps in resolving conflicts
Negotiation in resolving conflict
Negotiation in resolving conflict
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How negotiation helps in resolving conflicts
Assignment Submission 1 – GTY (Chapters 2-5)
Chapter 2 – Separate the people from the problem
The authors, Roger Fisher and William Fury, encourages readers to view negotiations as a value add activity, rather than a competing activity. Parties involved in a negotiations should collaborate to reach a win-win situation, rather than take the stand of adversaries. To do so, it is essential to separate people from the problems – i.e. attack the problem and not the people. The following are problems exists among people:
1. Perception: Same facts can be perceived and interpreted differently by different individuals. It is important to put oneself in another’s shoes to understand their viewpoint. The worst should not be assumed and ensuing blame games should definitely not occur.
2. Emotion: Most people are reactive, which is unproductive. It is a tendency to get frustrated during negotiations and have an emotional outburst. Therefore, to control emotions, it is important to first acknowledge them and second to identify the source of such outbursts. Also, parties must allow each other to free express their emotions without reacting or making judgements. Symbolic gestures play an important part in defusing strong expression of emotions.
3. Communication: Listening is under-rated and often a problem for negotiating parties. In order to understand one another, it is important to carefully listen to each other. Silently listening to the opposing party does not imply conforming to their views.
Finally, the best method of dealing with problems is to prevent them from arising, altogether.
Chapter 3 – Focus on interests, not positions
Good agreements should focus on negotiating parties’ interests, rather than their positions. If a problem is ...
... middle of paper ...
...ally lead to inefficiency (an attempt at win-lose negotiation). However, if objective criteria is introduced, then mutual consensus is more likely to arise and relationships between the parties will remain cordial. Objective standards must be practical, scientific and fair. Also, the standards must be accepted by all concerned parties.
In order to discuss objective criteria with the other party, the application of following points is necessary:
1. There should be a shared interest between parties and hence a shared objective standard
2. It is important to be open to other persons during negotiation. Also, reasons behind one’s objective standard must be justified. In short, not only should one’s own position be considered during the negotiation process, but the opposing party’s position must also be taken in to account.
3. Never yield to pressure, only principle.
Lewicki, J. R., Barry, B., & Saunders, M. D. (2010). Negotiation: Readings, exercises and cases
Many situations present the important synchronization of internal versus external negotiations. Many individuals have studied how each side in the negotiation is able to manage the internal opposition to agreements being negotiated. This can also be known as “on the table”, or what exactly is on the line in a heated argument. Each individual involve in an argument has a particular position to be managed, and often times own personal interests are widely expressed. This paper will expand upon the case of Fischer collecting needed funds from Smith with proposals and ideas for a manageable negotiation.
To achieve win-win outcomes, it is essential to separate the people from the problem. Thus, it is important to "Face the problem, not the people. The basic approach is to deal with the people as human beings and with the problem on its merits" (Fisher,Ury & Patton,1991, p.40-41).
However this negotiation was totally different from the other ones as our goals were completely different. My counterpart was looking for fund for his boss' campaign whereas I was looking for a buyer for my dam projects. In such a case it's difficult to negotiate as we are not looking for the same things. Thus, we need to communicate effectively to understand the other part will and then be creative in order to offer the best solution regarding both parties interests.
Lewicki, R., Saunders, D.M., Barry B., (2010) Negotiation: Readings, Exercises, and Cases. 6th Ed. McGraw-Hill Irwin. New York, NY
Negotiations are supposed to begin in a positive way in which the negotiators consider the needs and wants of the others involved and their shared interests and interdependencies.... ... middle of paper ... ... References Michael R. Carrell, C. H. (2008). Negotiating Essentials: Theory, Skills, and Practice.
Negotiations styles are scholastically recognized as being broken down into two general categories and those are distributive bargaining styles and integrative negotiation styles. Distributive bargaining styles of negotiation are understood to be a competitive type of negotiation. “Distributive bargaining, also known as positional bargaining, negotiating zero-sum, competitive negotiation, or win-lose negotiation, is a type or style of negotiation in which the parties compete for the distribution of a fixed amount of value” (Business Blog Reviews, 2011). This type of negotiation skill or style approach might be best represented in professional areas such as the stock market where there is a fixed goal in mind or even in a garage sale negotiation where the owner would have a specific value of which he/she would not go below. In contrast, an integrative negotiation approach/style is that of cooperative bargaining, or win-win types ...
Explain the importance of defining the objectives, scope and success criteria of the decisions to be taken
Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2007). Essentials of Negotiation. New York: McGraw-Hill/ Irwin.
Whether or not we are aware of it, each of us is faced with an abundance of conflict each and every day. From the division of chores within a household, to asking one’s boss for a raise, we’ve all learned the basic skills of negotiation. A national bestseller, Getting to Yes, introduces the method of principled negotiation, a form of alternative dispute resolutions as opposed to the common method of positional bargaining. Within the book, four basic elements of principled negotiation are stressed; separate the people from the problem, focus on interests instead of positions, invest options for mutual gain, and insist on using objective criteria. Following this section of the book are suggestions for problems that may occur and finally a conclusion. In this journal entry I will be taking a closer look at each of the elements, and critically analyse the content; ultimately, I aim to briefly bring forth the pros and cons of Getting to Yes.
Lewicki, J. R., Barry, B., & Saunders, M. D. (2006). Negotiation: Readings, Exercises and Cases (5th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
I included this paper because I enjoyed the discussion about the qualities of a good negotiator. Good negotiators are usually people who are respectful others, can develop a strategic negotiation plan, and understand you have to think about certain things, like the “big picture” of a situation in order to generate creative options (Dietmeyer, 2008). One of the reasons why I included this written work in my Artifact, was for the second part of the assignment, we were required to describe a conflict scenario. For that conflict scenario, we were to evaluate reasons as to why utilizing negotiation would be wrong for that situation. Next, we were allowed to take the opposite approach, and list reasons as to why we should use negotiation techniques for the conflict scenario. I always enjoy getting to do assignments that look at both ends of the spectrum: “why should we do something and why should we not do something.” If you have ever been in therapy, it sort of like doing the “empty chair exercise” that some therapists ask you to do when a client is experiencing conflict. And essentially, the whole point of the exercise is for the individual to be able to experience different aspects of a conflict in a new manner through the “empty-chair”
Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2010). Negotiation: Readings, exercises, and cases. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin
Negotiation approaches are generally described as either distributive or integrative. At the heart of each strategy is a measurement of conflict between each party’s desired outcomes. Consider the following situation. Chris, an entrepreneur, is starting a new business that will occupy most of his free time for the near future. Living in a fancy new development, Chris is concerned that his new business will prevent him from taking care of his lawn, which has strict requirements under neighborhood rules. Not wanted to upset his neighbors, Chris decides to hire Matt to cut his grass.
Negotiation has been used as a vital communication tool not only in business but also in social intercourse. It helps people make common agreement and avoid conflict. So we need to use the tactics which we learned from this course and books to do more practice, only in this way we can gain advantages in negotiation.