Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect of technology and its social relation
The development of inca
The development of inca
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effect of technology and its social relation
“Why is it that you white people developed much cargo and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people had little cargo of our own?” (Diamond, page 3)
This is the question that Jared Diamond attempts to answer in his book, Guns, Germs, and Steel. Diamond’s answer is this: It is geography, not race or genetic superiority, that allows for certain peoples to develop better and more powerful guns, germs, and steel that enable them to gain access to greater wealth and power.
To back up this claim, Diamond uses various pieces of evidence throughout his book. Firstly, he discusses the issue of the Polynesian societies of the Maori and the Moriori. Although both civilizations were from similar areas and were of the same ethnical background, the slight difference in geography enabled the Maori to gain an advantage over the Moriori, in terms of technological advancement and their warring tendencies. Despite being relatively similar, that difference in geographical location allowed the Maori to take over the Moriori.
Another example Diamond uses to support his claim is the Spanish defeat of the Incas. Pizarro, the leader of these Spaniards that invaded the Americas, had access to greater and more advanced guns, germs, and steel. Their advanced maritime technology allowed them to sail to the Americas in the first place, writing and well-developed means of communication allowed them to have more information about these Incas before they got there, diseases that Native Americans had no immunities to could wipe out much of the population, advanced weaponry like guns that Americans had never seen before, and Spanish centralized political organization also gave them great advantages. Diamond argues that Pizarro’s advanced technology came from ...
... middle of paper ...
... superiority in terms of domestication. They also had access to iron and bronze (“steel”) to make weaponry and tools. These factors allowed the Bantu to extend to various parts of Africa, including the African eastern coast.
From the given evidence, I must agree with Jared Diamond that it is geography and not ethnicity or genetics that allow for certain peoples, like the Europeans, to become dominant. I believe that Diamond’s claims are legitimate, sound, and logical, and unless I am given strong evidence to prove him otherwise, I am inclined to agree with his thesis. Diamond’s supports are relevant and understandable, even to younger readers.
What I truly enjoyed about this book was wondering the answer to ‘Yali’s question’, and I believe that Jared Diamond has managed to answer it in a clear and logical way.
Works Cited
Guns, Germs, and Steel (Jared Diamond)
... The Economic History Review, by Behrendt, Stephen D. David Eltis, David Richardson that stated, “…second impact of Africans that goes beyond violence on slave ships followed from the natural Africans assumption of equal status in the trading relationship…came in the wake of holding Europeans…”(Source 9). The result of considering the equal status between the Africans and the Europeans from Africa’s point of view was the Atlantic slave trade which millions of African people’s live had been jeopardized and their fate had been seal to work in the fields for the rest of their lives.
Jared Diamond, author of the Pulitzer Prize Winning, National Best Selling book Guns, Germs and Steel, summarizes his book by saying the following: "History followed different courses for different peoples because of differences among peoples' environments, not because of biological differences among peoples themselves." Guns, Germs and Steel is historical literature that documents Jared Diamond's views on how the world as we know it developed. However, is his thesis that environmental factors contribute so greatly to the development of society and culture valid? Traditions & Encounters: A Brief Global History is the textbook used for this class and it poses several different accounts of how society and culture developed that differ from Diamond's claims. However, neither Diamond nor Traditions are incorrect. Each poses varying, yet true, accounts of the same historical events. Each text chose to analyze history in a different manner. Not without flaws, Jared Diamond makes many claims throughout his work, and provides numerous examples and evidence to support his theories. In this essay, I will summarize Jared Diamond's accounts of world history and evolution of culture, and compare and contrast it with what I have learned using the textbook for this class.
Diamond wrote this book to answer the question of a New Guinean politician, Yali. He asked “Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people had little cargo of our own.” Diamond set out to find the answer to this question, to find out why history unfolded like it did. Diamond credits the inequalities in history to differences in environments not biological differences as so many people like to say. Most of the advantages the Europeans had were a direct result of geography. The main points that Diamond attributes to European dominance are early plant and animal domestication and as a result of close contact to animals the deadliest germs were given to the Europeans. As result of its East-West axis the diffusion of food production, technologies, humans and ideas were easily spread throughout Europe. The axis mean that there were similar climatic, geographic, and disease conditions to migrants and no barriers. So anything that could be grown in one area was sure to quickly spread and thrive in the neighboring locations. Moreover, political administration, economic exchanges, incentive for exploration and conquest, and making information available to every individual were facilitated after the development of writing.
“ [They] spent most of the conquest and colonial periods reacting and responding to the European strangers and invaders” (99). Both sides were different in many ways; Their communication, transportation, culture, and the way they survived differentiate the Europeans from the Native Americans. They both acted as wisely as they could when this encounters began after the discovery. “[Tribes] worked mightily and often cleverly to maximize their political sovereignty, cultural autonomy, territorial integrity, power of self identification, and physical nobility” (100). The Europeans were stronger, had better technology, better weapons, and had plenty of experience fighting people like the Native Americans. They could have easily conquer them , but they had a problem of resources, reinforcements and survival. Native American were many but they lacked the knowledge and experience of war and evolution. Europeans were technologically evolved and were experienced at fighting wars, but they ...
Jared Diamond's fundamental argument in Guns, Germs, and Steel is that Eurasians were able to conquer the Americas, sub-Saharan Africa, and Australia because continental differences set Eurasia on a different, better trajectory than the other continents. His argument addresses a simple question: Why did human development proceed at such different rates on different continents? According to the author, the most important continental differences appear in domesticable plants and animals, germs, orientation of continental axes, and ecological barriers. Throughout the book, he refers back to the "Collision at Cajamarca," or the first encounter between the Incan emperor Atahuallpa and the Spanish conquistador Francisco Pizarro, as a "broad window onto world history." The encounter is effective in capturing his argument, nam...
The reactions of sheer shock and awe is used by the author to support the thesis by demonstrating the brilliance of the society that existed in the Americas before Columbus relative to to Europe and the society Columbus brought to America. An additional way Charles C. Mann supports his thesis is explaining why the natives were defeated if their society was so advanced. Precisely, he stated that disease was why the native society fell: “The People of the First Light could avoid or adapt to European technology but not European disease. Their societies were destroyed by weapons their opponents could not control and did not even know they had”(70). A common reason for disagreeing with the author’s thesis is that the natives could not have been so advanced if they were so easily dispatched by the European people. Fortunately, Charles C. Mann addresses this issue furthering his thesis that advanced society existed in the Americas before the arrival of Columbus by stating it was not the society of the Europeans that was more advanced but rather the uncontrollable spread of disease by the Europeans. A final way Charles C.
advantage of the rich black soil for farming. Corn was their main source of food,
Jared Diamond’s explanation for Yali’s question, is that it is not because of the racial diversity between the white and the black to make one have cargo and one not to have any cargo, but the fact that there were geographic variations that made certain region more suitable for agriculture than others. The whites had better geographic variations than the blacks, which made it why they had developed so much cargo and the blacks had little cargo of their own.
... Their existence proves that Africans were capable of managing their own affairs and creating noteworthy civilizations long before Europeans appeared on that continent. They left a legacy that continues to influence the lives of Blacks in Africa and abroad today. BIBLIOGRAPHY Koslow, Philip.
“History followed different courses for different peoples because of differences among peoples ' environments, not because of biological differences among peoples themselves” (Jared Diamond). In the book Guns Germs and Steel he accounted a conversation with Yali, a New Guinean politician that had asked “Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people had little cargo of our own?”. Diamond tries to answer this by describing the difference in use of government throughout history by bands, tribes, chiefdoms, and states.
The purpose of Guns, Germs, and Steel starts with a question posed by a friend 30 years before. Professor Diamond searching to explain how certain fluctuating civilizations became dominate and how others were dominated based on a question. Diamond approaches this question by examining the conditions which caused inequalities in different societies. Ultimately Diamond questions how these inequalities led to certain civilizations developing guns, weaponized germs, steel, other advanced technology, and highly structured governments which lead to societal dominance. Professor Diamond uses his research from traveling to different regions and archeological sites to disprove the adopted notion of why some societies have so much, and others have so little. His research resulted in Diamond concluding that there is no difference in intellect, creativity, culture, or physical advantage in certain groups of people which could explain the dominance of one society over another. Ultimately, the documentary concludes that dominance arises in certain civilizations solely based on geographic advantages which can lead to modernization.
...tain, this argument has been shown to be flawed, as it without motivation and analysis, and disregards many critical factors, such as the culture of non-European societies. A more compelling case has been made that, instead, the Great Divergence had very little to do with European superiority, and instead occurred because of geographic advantages.
of the book. New York: Penguin, 2008. Print. The. Ferguson, Niall. "
While Collins does a succinct job of examining the economic and political factors that heightened colonization, he fails to hone in on the mental warfare that was an essential tool in creating African division and ultimately European conquest. Not only was the systematic dehumanization tactics crippling for the African society, but also, the system of racial hierarchy created the division essential for European success. The spillover effects of colonialism imparted detrimental affects on the African psyche, ultimately causing many, like Shanu, to, “become victims to the white man’s greed.”