Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The publics response to gun control
Of gun control policies and violence in the united states policy brief
Of gun control policies and violence in the united states policy brief
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The publics response to gun control
“This is the way of peace: overcome evil with good, and falsehood with truth, and hatred with love.” This is one Peace Pilgrim said before. Almost everyone, not only in America but also in all around the world hoping peace. Barack Obama who is 44th the Democratic Party of the United States’ president. He making a speech: On Reducing Gun Violence and Making Our Communities Safer. And argues that in order to solve gun violence and making communities safer, reducing gun is the necessary solution should be actualized in America. Thus, Obama using recently event and fact leads to his argument, then using logical facts and statistic data make his argument convinced. Besides, using the sorrowful event of gun violence make the readers or listeners …show more content…
As we all know, this speech’s orator, Barack Obama, the president of America. Who have important contribute in the field of medical care, education, immigration and so on, he also gains Noble Peace Prize in 2009. Obama absolutely has enough duty caring and the appeal was reduced gun violence to making communities safer. As the president, there is no doubt that Obama has strong willingness hoping the people, the communities, and the country becoming safe. Obama uses strong appeals to logs, using enough his own experience of why and how could he manage gun and he also uses other famous people’s opinion to helping support his idea. And what he did about reducing gun is also not about the voting or politics, is for protecting people and country’s safe. Just like he said that “I’m not on the ballot again. I’m not looking to score some points. I think we can disagree without impugning other people’s motives or without being disagreeable. We don’t need to be talking past one another (8).” All he speaks in the speech are motivate reducing gun violence to protect people and country’s safe. Moreover, one policy the Affordable Care Act- also known as Obamacare is the policy Obama published. From the policy, he realized more about people’s pain. As the beginning of the speech, he is known how medical team busy with rescues people’s life because every single year thousands of people are under pain and …show more content…
Obama using many well-known events about gun violence, and talking about the results of these events, like gun violence given pain not only for people who hurt or died by gun violence but also make their family, friends sorrowfully which could make people feel this thing have just happened in the normal people 's daily life. He citing like “Care enough about a little boy like Daniel to come together and take common-sense steps to save lives and protect more of our children. (10)”, here he tries to appeal people’s care about gun violence because gun violence even hurts children the most innocent kids. And then he also citing that “those rights were stripped from college students in Blacksburg and Santa Barbara, and from high schoolers at Columbine, and from first-graders in Newtown. And from every family who never imagined that their loved one would be taken from our lives by a bullet from a gun. (41)”, “it happens on the streets of Chicago every day. (41)” These facts he using is explaining that gun violence is not far from normal people’s life, it will happen everywhere or everyone even the children, students and older may suffer the violence. These examples are the most direct way shown how dangerous the gun violence are and could lead people into sad emotion easily. Moreover, at last few paragraphs Obama citing a gun violence event happened recently in his speech
President Barack Obama was successful in reaching his intended audience by his use of rhetorical elements. Following the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary, President Obama addressed the need to reduce gun violence with the help of the nation and later began proposals to do just that. “Keeping with President Obama’s commitment to engage the American people in the process, the Vice President solicited input from citizens and organizations… [and] spoke with many groups about their ideas on curbing gun violence in the United States” (Now). After speaking to many people and a number of propositions, Obama set forth a plan on January 16, 2013, just a month after his address in Newtown, Connecticut, to protect children and communities from gun violence. “No single law – or even set of laws – can eliminate evil from the world or prevent every senseless act of violence in our society, but that can’t be an excuse for inaction. If there’s even one step we can take to save another child or another parent or another town then surely we have an obligation to try”
In the article “Gun Control Can Prevent School Shootings,” Bennett shares the effects of gun violence in the past, present, and future. The Sandy Hook shooting occurred on December 14, 2012 when twenty children and six adult staff members were killed. Barely a month after the shooting, eleven of the families affected by the shooting went to meet privately with Joe Biden, and members from the Congress and cabinet. Bennett stated, “They were preparing to wade into some of the roughest waters in American politics: the gun debate.” President Obama gave a speech in Connecticut vowing to fight for change. And as Bennett put it, “Members of Congress started acting as parents instead of politicians.” Bennett explained to the families that they couldn't get rid of assault weapons or high capacity ammunition magazines, no matter how bad the shooting was. The families got angry and stated they did not want to know what they couldn't do, but what they could do to honor their children.
In his article “Gun debate? What gun debate?” Mark O 'Mara discuses the controversial issue of gun control. O’Mara takes the tragic school shooting in Oregon as an opportunity to voice his opinion on the debate of guns. He clearly states his position and explains that gun violence has increased enormously because of the lack of command by the government and support from the public to speak out against it. O’Mara claims the issue is no longer a debate because it is so evident that guns have become a significant problem in this country and therefore actions must be taken to control and govern gun laws. In his article he attempts to raise awareness to the severity of the issue and tries to persuade his readers to take a stance against gun violence
By appealing to several different views, Wheeler is able to grab every reader’s attention. Using schools as his focus point grabs the reader’s attention on a personal level. A school is a place where your children, your friends, your spouses all could be, and we still aren’t motivated to change our gun control laws. Tragic events do not have to happen like those that occurred at Virginia Tech, The Jewish Day care in Los Angeles, and Pearl High School. Wheeler believes concealed carry should be allowed in every school. Let’s make the students and teachers of these schools and colleges their own heroes. Wheeler says we must embrace all of the varied disciplines contributing to preparedness and response. We must become more willing to be guided and informed of empirical finding. School officials base policies on irrational fears. Wheeler states, “What is actually worse, the fear of what we think might happen, or the massacres that actually did occur?” Wheelers essay is very well thought out and uses fear, credibility, and factual evidence to support his beliefs. My belief is we should allow teachers and students to have guns at schools, as long as they have gone through training to do
In a world full of hatred and hostility, gun control may seem like an easy fix to the ongoing issue of mass shootings and murders in the United States, but in reality placing restrictions on guns will not eliminate the problem entirely. Nicholas Kristof argues about this issue in his article, “A New Way to Tackle Gun Deaths,” posted in 2015 in the New York Times. Kristof claims that instead of banning guns entirely we should learn how to coexist with them. He argues that for change to occur throughout the world, it would be nearly impossible to rid the world of guns and that evil will always remain, but serious government threats could potentially eliminate this problem. Kristof builds his credibility by including statistics, incorporating
Although the families of those affected and the American people watching at home believed in the security of our Nation during the Sandy Hook school shooting, we as a Nation have not put in the recognition needed to see the restraint that has blinded us from noticing we aren’t doing enough for the safety of our children when it comes to gun violence; therefore, President Barack Obama wants the American people to see this as it is and to begin to resolve this issue, beginning with gun control policies.
How long do we have to wait until we see another body laying down on the ground motionless in cause of gun control? The next one might be a brother or a sister, son or a daughter or any family member. This has to come to an end, Obama speaks his heart out in the speech saying “In the month since 20 precious children and six brave adults were violently taken from us at Sandy Hook Elementary, more than 900 of our fellow Americans have reportedly died at the end of a gun -- 900 in the past month. And every day we wait, that number will keep growing.” This quote presents a real life experience of the whole nation that touches the lives of millions of Americans. Obama effectively appeal to the audience emotions by mentioning the tremendous loss of the 20 precious children, the six brave adults, and the 900 of our fellow Americans. Obama also appeals to the audience’s emotions by using another real life example where he argues a serious situation about mass shooting happens in amusement places. Obama states in his speech “And that's what allowed the gunman in Aurora to shoot 70 people -- 70 people -- killing 12 in a matter of minutes. Weapons designed for the theater of war have no place in a movie theater” This quote carries lots of emotions, how innocent citizens loss their lives in a matter of seconds. These machine guns
A growing number of publicized tragedies caused by gun violence have caused a great stir in the American community. Recently, President Barack Obama has made proposals to tighten the regulation of and the restrictions on the possession of weapons in America to lessen these tragedies. Should the legislative branch decide in favor of his proposals, all American citizens who do or wish to own the type of weapons in question or who use current loopholes in existing policy would be directly affected. His proposals, which are to “require background checks for all gun sales, strengthen the background check system for gun sales, pass a new, stronger ban on assault weapons, limit ammunition magazines to 10 rounds, finish the job of getting armor-piercing bullets off the streets, give law enforcement additional tools to prevent and prosecute gun crime, end the freeze on gun violence research, make our schools safer with new resource officers and counselors, better emergency response plans, and more nurturing school climates, [and] ensure quality coverage of mental health treatment, particularly for young people,” have been cause for a large amount of recent debate (whitehouse.gov).
“I don’t believe people should be able to own guns. (Obama)” This said prior to Obama’s presidency, in the 1990’s, is still a topic that is constantly questioned today. Many American’s feel the need to seek ownership of weapons as a source of protection; While others believe that private ownership of guns will do nothing more but heighten the rate of violence due to people taking matters into his or her own hands. Philosophy professor Jeff McMahan agrees with Obama’s statement in regard to the ownership of guns. In his New York Times editorial titled “When Gun ‘Control’ Is Not Enough,” McMahan provides evidence to support his theory of the dangers that quickly follow when allowing the community to own guns legally. McMahan, throughout the text, shows responsible reasoning and allows the reader the opportunity to obtain full understanding and justifies his beliefs properly.
Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms. This is not to say that firearms should not be very carefully used and that definite rules of precaution should not be taught and enforced. But the right of the citizen to bear arms is just one more safeguard against a tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible. -Hubert Humphrey, 1960 My background is probably atypical for a somewhat high-profile supporter of the right to keep and bear arms. I am black and grew up in Manhattan’s East Harlem, far removed from the great American gun culture of rural, white America.
Gun violence has been and continues to be one of the major problems in American. The U.S. has the highest rate of gun ownership in the world and consequently the highest rate of gun violence and fatalities compared to other developed countries. In a study by the University of Sydney it is estimated that there are 270,000,000 to 310,000,000 guns in the United States. According to the same study in 2010 there were 31,672 fatalities caused by firearms and on the following year the number went up to 32,163. Homicides resulting from guns are high in the United States and they are claiming more than eleven thousand lives every year (Guns in the United States: Firearms, Armed Violence and Gun Law). According to Vision for Humanity, an initiative for the Economics and Peace, the United States is ranked 99 out of 162 countries in the 2013 global peace index, homicide rates and violent crimes are among the various criteria used to determine the ranking (Vision of Humanity). Mass shootings at work places, schools, shopping malls and places of worship are happening in an a...
In 1982, a survey of male inmates from eleven different penitentiaries, stated that sixty-nine percent of the prisoners knew another criminal that had been scared off, wounded, or decided not to commit a crime because they thought the victim had a gun (Agresti and Smith). As The United States heads to the end of 2013, current gun control debates are striking the nation, leaving everyone to develop their own positions on which side of the debate they want to be on. Gun control is defined as efforts to regulate or control sales of guns; however, most of what we hear from other people is that Obama wants to take away every gun in the nation. That’s not entirely true. Obama’s proposal to Congress is a law that would increase background check protocols, ban assault weapons, high-capacity ammunition, and armor-piercing bullets. The proposal also provides more funding for additional police officers on the streets, first response training, mental health programs, and school emergency plans.
The conversation of gun control and gun regulation has been a great debate over the decades. NRA Executive vice president Wayne LaPierre, in his speech on Newtown Shooting that occurred on December 21st, 2012, addresses the topic of gun control and argues that guns are not the cause of gun violence. LaPierre's project is to instead of gun control and decreasing the numbers of guns, increase the numbers of guns to solve the problem of gun violence. On the other side of debate, an American journalist, Nicholas Kristof, in his journal, "Do We Have the Courage to Stop This?" argues that guns are the cause of gun violence, but they should not be banned. Kristof's project is to regulate guns with many cautions. While these two authors have different arguments and projects, they use similar strategies to advance their claims. This paper will focus on the way each author strategically uses compare and contrast, cause and effect, and problem-solution to advance their claims and how effective these strategies are used.
Throughout history, many political and societal issues on a plethora of topics which societies have faced, although dealt with differently under varying circumstances, are relatively constant. One such topic, that of violence in modern society, is of great importance in the public eye, and governments try to respond to societal violence, whichever way is deemed judicious and appropriate, considering the ways which the public views such matters. Specifically speaking to issues of violence in modern society, gun control is a topic that is enveloped in political controversy. Governments behave differently to combat gun violence, according to their fundamental ideals and the opinions and paradigms of those who society is comprised. The nature or presence of any legislative action is usually
Eighty-nine people die from gun violence in the United States every day according to the Brady Campaign , from school children to victims of domestic violence to people going about their daily lives. As we mourn the lives of those killed in incidents of gun violence across the country, we need to take action. We should all do everything in our power to keep tragedies like this from happening again. When it comes to addressing mass shootings, we need new answers