Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Guns laws in the us essay
Effects on gun control in the us
Arming teachers in schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Guns laws in the us essay
Tiffany Hsu, a author for “The new york Times”, In the article “Bank of america to stop financing makers of military style guns”, Tiffany argues that gun violence is wrong and that the people who start it all should solve the problem. First Tiffany says that Bank of America will stop lending money to gun manufacturers that make military-inspired firearms for civilian use. Next she then goes on to to inform that the AR-15-style rifles that have been used in multiple mass shootings” are a huge problem and are used in mass shooting. Finally Tiffany goes on to say The bank will wind down its relationships with the companies that choose to continue making AR-15 style rifles and similar guns. Through the use of pathos the author makes the reader
feel guilty about all of the mass shootings that are going on in the world today. The author also writes in a serious tone to people that think guns being distributed is fine and that what they are doing is ok. Work Sited https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/10/business/bank-of-america-guns.html?rref=collection%2Ftimestopic%2FGun20Control&action=click&contentCollection=timestopics®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=4&pgtype=collection Quotes The bank will wind down its relationships with the companies that choose to continue making AR-15-style rifles and similar guns. Bank of America will stop lending money to gun manufacturers that make military-inspired firearms for civilian use the AR-15-style rifles that have been used in multiple mass shootings, a company executive said Tuesday.
In his article “Our Blind Spot about Guns,” Nicholas Kristof argues for making guns safer for the people who use them by bringing up the comparison of guns to cars; “Cars don’t kill people. People kill people,” (261). Kristof’s purpose is to address the fact that guns are not as safe as they should be and are the cause of thousands of deaths each year. Although his ideas for increasing gun safety are interesting, there is a shortcoming in the comparisons he used. In order to make a stronger argument, one must use literary devices. In this case, Kristof used ethos, pathos, logos, and additional rhetorical devices.
In his article “Gun debate? What gun debate?” Mark O 'Mara discuses the controversial issue of gun control. O’Mara takes the tragic school shooting in Oregon as an opportunity to voice his opinion on the debate of guns. He clearly states his position and explains that gun violence has increased enormously because of the lack of command by the government and support from the public to speak out against it. O’Mara claims the issue is no longer a debate because it is so evident that guns have become a significant problem in this country and therefore actions must be taken to control and govern gun laws. In his article he attempts to raise awareness to the severity of the issue and tries to persuade his readers to take a stance against gun violence
Guns have possessed the spotlight of almost every news station. From the latest tragedy of a shooting killing innocent men, women and children to the arguments centering around if our gun laws possess strict enough qualities to keep our country safe. Charles C. W. Cooke, the author of “Gun-Control Dishonesty”, spreads his conservative view on the topic by ripping away any hope for a brighter day. Cooke’s main idea states that if nothing has happened to make gun law more strict even after the lives of innocent children were mercilessly ripped away from their young bodies than nothing should or could ever change. On the other hand, Adam Gopnik wrote his article, “Shooting”, uses a more liberal approach and inspires his audience to act upon the much needed change in our society
In 1997 Sarah Thompson, a retired physician, informed adults and families on the effects of gun control in American Gun Review. She believes it is not a good idea to enforce laws that restrict gun control and everyone should be able to carry a gun, as long as we use it carefully. In her article, Thompson uses real life examples of crimes such as murders, rapes, and theft to support her view on gun control and as of result of eliminating these restrictions, there would be a decline on criminal rates. However, her article is not fully effective as she fails to include people’s views that do not approve of guns; had an unbalance use of ethos, pathos, and logos in addition to not citing her arguments. Oddly enough, there is an important part of
U.S congress woman Gabrielle Giffords was shot in the head. This happened in Arizona, a state where guns are allowed in open carry meaning everyone has option to carry a gun as long as it is not concealed. When this congress woman was shot, the shooter became enraged. After shooting 3 more people his gun got jammed, this is when a civilian jumped him and stopped his irrational behavior. This brings up many different opinions on whether guns should be allowed or taken away. John Luik author of the article “The Increased Availability of Guns Reduces Crime” and Sabina Thaler the author of the article “The Claim of Increased Gun Availability Reduces Crime is Unfounded” are two examples of people having different opinions on such a debatable topic. Both authors talk about guns taking people’s lives, Thalers article focuses on guns taking innocent people’s lives, and Luiks article focuses on guns being innocent people’s protection.
In this article the author Fawn Johnson gives us a brief look of what goes on during the great gun control debate. This article gives us a look at the gun control proposals, from American’s not bein...
The Ethics of Gun Control The phrase "Gun Control" means different things to different people. One bumper sticker states that "Gun Control means hitting your target." However one defines gun control, the mere mention of it brings controversy.
It is interestingly sad how debates on gun violence and gun control is being handled in our society by our top leaders and lobbyist. Gun control has become a serious issue and a national epidemic, however, the debate is far from over. In the article “under the gun” by writers Rottenberg, Rice and Franich, for entertainment weekly, the writers discussed the failing of gun control laws and the increase in gun violence. By setting sides of their argument, the writers discussed violence in movies, TVs and videogames and how this violence impact our society, thus allowing their audience to decide for themselves.
A man by the name of Sean Faircloth, who is an author, an attorney, and a five-term state legislator from Maine; went against Sam Harris to give his own beliefs on the ordeal. Faircloth also wrote an article for The Week in response to Harris titled, “Why more guns won’t make us safer” in which he claims that Harris neglected the two largest problems involving gun-violence. Faircloth believes that Harris failed to acknowledge the substantial issue of gun-related domestic violence against women, and the success of gun-control legislation in foreign countries. Utilizing statistics, real world examples, and his own logic; Faircloth goes in depth with his core arguments. He wrote his article to dissuade the readers of Sam Harris’s article that “Why I own guns” lacks
When looking at all of the important issues of today’s society, one of the most neglected issues revolves around guns. Guns serve two different purposes: to defend and to kill. Even though I’ve been on this Earth for only 21 years, I’ve become keen and have taken an interest in the study of guns and how they pose more problems in society than any other issue. My interest all started around the time of the Columbine shooting in Colorado and how society has taken steps since that point in history. Going back to the two different purposes, both have been used to help explain the differences in the distinctions of different gun related events that continue to occur, such as mass shootings. Problem analysis, as stated, will help to explain how guns can be seen differently from each individual and what can be gained or lost from a deep analysis.
I realize you cannot legislate morality. I agree with that 100 percent. Yes, saying things like "Thou shall be moral" is foolish, but other things can be done. We have to get back to our roots and become more civil and moral. Throughout recent history our society has continually loosened its moral bonds until we have arrived at the 'everything goes' attitudes of today. This loosening simply has to be reversed. Let me say that this will be a difficult task, but our society MUST put common sense and civility forefront of today's efforts nationwide. It will be harder to fight then any war. We must have an awakening or things will continue to go downhill. Would you agree on that?
“The statutory regulation of the licensing and use of firearms; an instance or aspect of this (oxforddictionaries).” Americans take advantage of the use of being able to own a firearm. Journalist in Roanoke, Virginia, Sandy Hook Elementary, and Columbine if gun control was stricter these incidences may not have happened. If gun control was enforced these shooters would not have access to guns. Hillary uses pathos through her article to not only make readers understand the emotional effect guns have on families and the nation, but logos to give logical explanation of what we need to do to control incident from happening. Hillary Clinton was all for gun control since her husband was president. Hillary Clinton thinks that “Everyone
The conversation of gun control and gun regulation has been a great debate over the decades. NRA Executive vice president Wayne LaPierre, in his speech on Newtown Shooting that occurred on December 21st, 2012, addresses the topic of gun control and argues that guns are not the cause of gun violence. LaPierre's project is to instead of gun control and decreasing the numbers of guns, increase the numbers of guns to solve the problem of gun violence. On the other side of debate, an American journalist, Nicholas Kristof, in his journal, "Do We Have the Courage to Stop This?" argues that guns are the cause of gun violence, but they should not be banned. Kristof's project is to regulate guns with many cautions. While these two authors have different arguments and projects, they use similar strategies to advance their claims. This paper will focus on the way each author strategically uses compare and contrast, cause and effect, and problem-solution to advance their claims and how effective these strategies are used.
In the United States there are more guns than there are people (Washington Post 1). Due to this it is virtually impossible for the United States to actually get rid of all their guns, and or successfully get them out of the hands of the people they want them to. This creates a huge divide in America with people looking at the situation from all angles. “What should the United States do on this situation?” is a common question that is heard on the streets of America almost daily. One artist, named William Warren, created a political cartoon about this titled “Gun Control for Dummies”. In the image Warren uses the example of the people (criminals) that pro-gun law activists get guns away from. Through his illustration the artist conveys the message that creating stricter gun laws would create more problems than it would solve by using elements such as irony, emphasis, and capitalization.
The real tragedy of America's gun violence." Global Public Square RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Dec. 2013. .