Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gun rights vs. gun control
Gun control vs second amendment rights
Gun control tragic consequences
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gun rights vs. gun control
Guns, like many other issues of the day, have two distinct and opposing views with many people in the middle or undecided. Even following the tragic events of December 7, 1993, when unemployed handyman Colin Ferguson boarded the LIR’s 5:33 out of Penn Station. Ferguson waited until the train, filled with local commuters on their way home, pulled out of the Hicksville station before drawing a 9mm pistol. Ferguson then opened fire walking up and down the aisle shooting passangers indiscriminately, stopping only to reload, twice. When he was finished six were dead and 19 were injured. Gun control advocates think that outlawing guns would have stopped the killings from ever happening. While gun rights advocates believe just as strongly that it could have been stopped by one innocent person being armed and fighting back. In order for an issue to even be at hand, both sides must agree that there is a problem with guns and gun control. Both gun control and pro gun advocates do agree that there is a problem. Pro gunners say it is too hard to own a gun and the gun controllers say it is too easy to get a gun. Gun control advocates would argue that gun ownership is not a right and is not protected by the second amendment. They further believe guns are harmful to society. Gun control advocates also believe guns are not needed for self-defense. Gun-controllers use points such as, the constitution, specifically the second amendment, hunting and gun related assaults to try to prove their point; however most of their arguments are based in emotions and only have merit in the specific case they are trying to illustrate. For when you strip away the emotional rhetoric and examine issues logically, so called gun control laws fail to accomplish any of their stated goals. A lawyer once said, "If the facts are with you, argue the facts. If the facts are against you, argue the law." Now gun control advocates have added, “If the facts and the law are against you, argue the emotions!” Let us start this discussion with the simplest and strongest argument for gun rights. This argument comes to us from the very foundation of our great nation, the Constitution. On December 15, 1791, the new United States of America adopted the Bill of Rights the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution, affirming the fundamental rights of its citizens. The First Amendment guarantees freedom of ... ... middle of paper ... ...ton D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1989 The Avalon Project at Yale Law School: The Federalist Papers. 2003. 27 Mar. 2005 United States v. Cruikshank. 92 U.S. 542. U.S. Supreme Court. 1857 Online. Find Law. 30 Mar. 2005 United States v. Emerson. Criminal Action No. 6:98-CR-103-C United States District Court Texas, San Angelo Division. 1999 Find Law. 30 Mar. 2005 United States v. Emerson. No. 99-10331 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. 2001 Online. Find Law. 30 Mar. 2005 United States. Department of Justice. Crime in the United States 2000 Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Report. Washington D.C., 2000. United States. Department of Justice. Guns in America: National Survey on Private Ownership and Use of Firearms. Washington D.C.: May 1997. United States. Department of Justice. National Crime and Victims Survey. Washington D.C., 2003. Wright, James D., and Peter H. Rossi. Armed and Dangerous: A Survey of Felons and Their Firearms, Expanded Edition. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter. 1994. Wright, James D., and Peter H. Rossi. The Armed Criminal in America: a Survey of Incarcerated Felons. Washington D.C., National Institute of Justice, 1997
The market revolution caused the decline in small-scale production for local use into a rise in large-scale production in manufacturing. The market revolution is the expansion of the marketplace that occurred in early nineteenth century, the construction of new roads and canals that interconnected for the first time. The Erie Canal provided a successful source of transportation, states got involved and spent money into the transportation networks that stimulated economic growth. With the rise of the economic growth there comes problems. Although changes brought by the market revolution helped strengthen the United States economy, there were many effects from the market revolution that caused boom-bust cycles, class division, struggle in upward
People against gun control feel that it is a violation of the Constitution to control the sale and distribution and the registration of guns and gun owners (Band, The Editorial 2) . But it is necessary for there to be certain limits on the way that firearms are handled in this country because of the homicide rate involving guns, and because of the violence created by criminals using guns. If gun control legislation were to go through; there would be a significant decline in gun related crimes and fatalities (Sowell 2). Gun control should be control in this society, and laws should be enforced. Gun violence, protection, and safety and fall into this category. The laws should protect people’s safety and also people’s self-defense. I do believe that gun control has a big impact on society because of: gun violence, gun laws, and people’s protection (Sowell
In today 's modern society racism is viewed very whole hearted and being a racist is condemned upon. Likewise in the film racism is also looked down upon by the protagonists of the film. A great example of racism in the film is when Dr Schultz and Django visit Candy’s house (the last antagonist) and are greeted by Candy’s leading worker Stephan, an older African American slave. This is where the film brings out its true attitudes on racism. As Stephan sees Django is black he immediately questions candy on why he is staying in the big house “ i ask you, who dis n****, on dis neigh“ “Is he gon stay in the big house!” this completely shifts the idea of racism to an issue of upbringing and that it is learnt from others and is not natural. This is proven because even a man from the same race can be racist to his own race. Django himself is viewing the events of the film in a modern times POV also and is meeting the same attitudes as viewers of the film. These of which include the fact that racism is pointless and that everyone in the world should be viewed as equals in
Library of Congress, “United States: Gun Ownership and the Supreme Court”. 2014. Web. 19 April 2014
After studying of the effects of the concealed handgun law, researchers concluded that after the first five years of the law, both robberies and rape declined by 1/10th, and murders decreased by just under 1/5th (Lott, “Carrying Concealed Weapons…”). Based on these statistics, the crime rate is greatly affected as more guns are added to the equation. As more civilians purchase guns, the amount of crimes have decreased immensely. By allowing guns to be sold to the general public, our country has become a safer place; guns in our society have not established a more dangerous world. Undeniably, by allowing more guns into circulation, the criminals are more likely to be turned off from committing crimes. For one well known example, New York City’s crime rate has dropped tremendously in the past few years. According to research, robbery decreased by more than half, aggravated assault by just under 40%, and rape has dwindled to a fraction of what it was before (Rosen). These numbers are mind blowing; they show that as more guns are distributed among the hands of the public, the streets of the city have become significantly safer. Thus, criminals have started to realize that their prey is no longer unarmed and is ready to protect themselves. By having such an abundance of armed people across the city, criminals have inversely been deterred from committing crimes. Although there has been roughly 700,000 crimes that involve guns (Connell), there has also been 2.5 million annual defensive gun cases that have been tossed aside (Lott, “Carrying Concealed Weapons…”). Each of these cases that have been ignored all involve guns which have been used to prevent
Gun control is the effort to restrict or limit the possession and use of guns. The gun control debate may be one of the most important issues in our society. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2008 that the 2nd Amendment restrains the government’s ability to ban handguns. Some politicians are passionate about gun control and make voting decisions based upon on this issue alone; hence, the people we elect into office directly affect our lives. A few republican politicians have a strong belief in the right to own guns. This battling contradiction can sometimes make it difficult to approach the issue reasonably. The arguments have different statistics and facts regarding how firearms can impact society. It is important to realize that there are strong and valid points to be made for both sides of gun control issues. With that in mind, is there a “right” or “wrong” side to this issue?
The South China Sea channels a third of the world’s shipping and is rich with fisheries, oil and gas deposits. It is also one of the most disputed areas in Southeast Asia and there have been scuffles between countries in recent years. Seven sovereign states, namely Brunei, China, Taiwan, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines and Vietnam, have been contending over territory within the region of the South China Sea for centuries. Examples of these territorial clashes include claims in the maritime boundary in the Gulf of Tonkin as well as in maritime boundaries off the coasts of Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei. Of course, the argument also involves overlapping claims among the various island chains of the South China Sea basin, including the Spratly Islands and the Paracel Islands, of which have contributed to the intensifying strains between several countries lately.
Although many of the new gun control laws put into effect target the firearm itself, firearm sales have been increasing. Since 2003, murder has decreased by 17%. Advocates need to review their assumption that more guns equals more crime. Private guns are now in the hands of about 300 million Americans, yet crime has diminished in the U.S.’s past 20 years. To halt any more mass killing shooters such as Adam Lanza, the 20 yr-old shoo...
The market revolution was a time of change, liberation, growth, and of course economic expansion. This revolution was initiated by the agriculture explosion in the South and West and the textile boom in the North that strengthened the economy in many ways. This brought many changes in the American daily life and how income was earned. With farmers failing in the agricultural developments, the emergence of factories led to the growth of commerce, manufactured products, and many jobs rapidly flourishing. Our country benefited by the market revolution by impacting the social groups of slaves and the middle class. In the light of the information given above, the emergence of the market revolution was caused by America’s land of settlement, lower transportation cost, and the rise of economic enterprises which later succeeded.
For centuries, countries have quarrelled over territory in the South China Sea, but the area has recently seen resurgence in tensions. This upsurge has caused international concern that the area is becoming a tinderbox with potential global consequences. The argument is regarding territory and sovereignty over oceanic areas and two island chains that are claimed in part or in whole by numerous countries, the Spratleys and the Paracels. Along with these islands, there are many uninhabited sandbanks, atolls, rocky outcrops and reefs, for example the Scarborough Shoal.
China is pushing an imperialistic agenda but the US is against them for self fulfilling interests. Instead of some belief in the rule of law and international treaties the US only wishes to maintain its control of the region. The smaller nations surrounding the Sea are stuck in the middle of two giants over who gets to guide their actions.
The people that are pro-gun control believe that the Second Amendment is out dated, that there is no reason that a civilian needs firearms that are not for hunting or sporting purposes, and that the Second Amendment was not an absolute right but one that could be limited with reasonable requirements (Krouse, 2009, p. 2). They believe that the out dated Second Amendment was only to allow citizens to regulate, with a state militia, any suppression from the central government and that in the present day with state police departments around that it surrenders the Second Amendment useless and out of date. Also the “right to bear arms” is not an absolute right that it can be limited with reasonable requirements goes hand in hand with civilians not needing any firearm that are deemed none hunting or sporting purposes. This argument has been the back bone to the creation of several federal laws including the Gun Control Act of 1968 and the 1994 Violent Crime Control Act. Both acts restrict the ability to own certain types of
The controversy of gun control has always been a topic of interest of Americans for a long time. As many violent crimes, especially organized crimes in the 1930’s, were done with some sorts of firearms, attempting to lower the number of guns available for use seemed to be a logical solution to the problem. First account of gun control was the “National Firearm Act of 1934” (N/A, History of Gun-Control Legislation, 1). “200 dollars of tax was placed on the production of machine guns and sawed of shotgun.” During the time period, as organized crime was the primary source of crimes in the US, the gun law then wasn’t directed toward the citizens. Over 30 years later, gun control is once again a topic of debate as public figures such as President John F. Kennedy, his brother Senator Robert F.
In the South China Sea, there is a major maritime security issue that has been growing steadily from a normal dispute to a worst case scenario of a war between the worlds superpowers. The Chinese government has virtually claimed the entire South China Sea as its own, which has overlapping territories claimed by several other Southeast Asian governments. In the last 4 years, the Chinese government has started ...
It is claiming land that is has no right to claim, it is claiming other state’s land while the states have legal claims to that land, and it is destroying the natural ecosystem by constructing islands on reefs. The United States “has stated the policy in the South China Sea – respect for freedom of navigation, peaceful resolution of disputes, freedom of commerce, negotiation of a Code of Conduct for dispute resolution, and the view that claims to water could only be based on legitimate land-based claims” (Bader, 2014). If the United States cannot ensure freedom of navigation and freedom of commerce, the militarization of the South China Sea threatens $5.3 trillion annually in international trade that passes through the legally international water of the South China Sea (Glaser, 2015). Half of the world’s oil supply is also transported through the South China Sea (Lo, 2015). Free trade throughout the seas has been made possible by a globally accepted international law that protects freedom of navigation. With this law potentially disrupted by China, the world’s trade and economy would be at