Gun Control Law: District Of Columbia V. Heller

102 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Effects of gun control laws

District of Columbia v Heller took place in 2008, addressing the issue of a District of Columbia gun control law. This law stated that it was illegal to have an unregistered firearm while also prohibiting the registration of handguns. Although the Chief of Police was able to grant one-year licenses, these provisions made it illegal to have a handgun not registered before the law took effect, and the handguns were required to be re-license annually. Another provision required that the licensed handgun was inoperable for storage, meaning the gun had to be unloaded and disassembled or had to have a trigger

Show More
Related

  • District of Columbia v. Heller: The Use and Permit of Handguns

    1536 Words  | 4 Pages

    With many recent incidents that involve guns between 2012 and 2013, gun control laws have become a hot topic in America. On one hand, after the horrific incident like the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting at Newtown in 2012, most people wanting to limit guns from getting into the wrong by setting up a rigorous system that control who can and cannot obtain a gun. On the other hand, we have the people who believe that with such rigorous system in place is violated the individual rights that granted and protected by the United States Constitution. They believe that the rigorous system will prevent people from defending themselves and could be a violation of their privacy. Regardless of which side is right, if we want to understand more about our current conflict, we have to look back on how this hold debate started. The District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court case in 2008 that found the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 unconstitutional, which influence the individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense by questioning the Second Amendment and laws that restrict a person from acquire guns.

    Read More

  • Districs of Columbia vs Heller

    1318 Words  | 3 Pages

    District of Columbia Vs. Heller In 1976, the District of Columbia City Council enacted three of the strictest gun control ordinances in the United States. The ordinances entirely ban the possession of handguns within the District and, while allowing residents to keep rifles and shotguns in their homes, require those guns be kept disassembled or bound by a trigger lock. Then in 2003, Dick Heller and five other plaintiffs were recruited by lawyer, Robert Levy, and used to file suit against D.C. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, alleging that the D.C. Gun Ban violated their Second Amendment right to "keep and bear arms.

    Read More

  • Constitutional Arguments Against Gun Control

    641 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since the inception of the Brady Act, over 118 million applications for firearm transfers or permits were subject to background checks. About 2.1 million applications, or 1.8%, were denied.

    Read More

  • Gun Control and the Second Ammendment to the Constitution

    554 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Second Amendment says people have the right to carry concealed handguns. Judge Richard Posner said “must be interpreted to include a right to have a concealed gun in public, to have it ready for use, and have it for self defense”. The Second Amendment also says “a well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right to the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”. The Supreme Court has made a landmark that states ruling upholding the right of people to bear arms for hunting and self defense. The NRA argue that law bringing citizens who have gun can decrease the numbers of crimes, rates, and are safer from criminals. Since Virginia passed a right-to-carry law, more than 50,000 permits have been issued, not one crime had been dropped. Criminals are less likely to attack someone if they believe the...

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay: Gun Control Contradicts the Second Amendment

    1288 Words  | 3 Pages

    illegal for a felon to possess any firearm. ( Moore 1994 p 440) Most of the

    Read More

  • Current Event Article Analysis

    1475 Words  | 3 Pages

    By: Kristen Rand Summary / Analysis : This article discusses the amendment to gun control, specifically the right to bear arms. But it isn’t discussing it on the U.S. mainland, but instead on the District of Columbia. The controversy is whether or not the District is bound to the same laws and amendments that the rest of the United States is. The current law in Columbia is that there is a universal ban on guns. So should the U.S. Supreme Court vote to allow citizens to bear arms, or should the 30-year-old ban be erased?

    Read More

  • Why Is The Second Amendment Important

    778 Words  | 2 Pages

    Heller,” the United States Supreme Court revealed what the Second Amendment is really about. In June 2008, a S.W.A.T. officer with the Washington, D.C., Police Department sued in the District of Columbia District Court for the right to carry a handgun while off duty. The Supreme Court ruled that he had the right to carry a weapon for a lawful purpose, and the District Court's opinion was reversed from the decision in 1939 when the Second Amendment was last interpreted. It also ruled that two District of Columbia laws, one that banned handguns and the other one that required firearms kept in the home to be disassembled or trigger-locked, violated the Second Amendment

    Read More

  • Revisiting the Second Amendment: A Proposition for Stricter Gun Control

    1000 Words  | 2 Pages

    The second amendment grants all Americans the right to bear arms. The ability to hold a firearm at any time as long as the firearm is registered. In the United states, all it takes to hold a firearm is a background check and a safety class. In a short reading from the “American Now” book a short article By Christina Tenuta called Responsible gun ownership saves lives she asks “do Americans really need guns?”, but are the guns really the problem? Although the second amendment requires some decent documents , the qualifications to obtain a firearm needs to be revised to a mental check, a family history check , and also to make it a priority for reinforcement to check on the registered firearm every six to twelve months.

    Read More

  • United States: Gun Ownership and the Supreme Court

    905 Words  | 2 Pages

    Should the government outlaw handguns? This has been a controversial point for many years. There are those who argue: yes handguns should be banned because it gives guns to the criminal, its dangerous in households and the Second Amendment was intended for militia. However, others argue that handguns should not be banned because they are in the second amendment, for self protection, and for the fact that they are already restricted so that not just anybody can own a handgun. Handguns should not be restricted because they are a right in the second amendment, they offer self protection and crime deterrent and that there are already restrictions put in place to control guns, and finally there are a couple of examples where handgun bans have not been effective.

    Read More

  • The Second Amendment

    1716 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...o militias, and dismissed his lawsuit. Heller perused his lawsuit; the matter was appealed and sent to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The Court of Appeals reversed the lowers court decision based on reasons the Second Amendment clearly mentions an individual may bear arms while serving in the militia, and the same individual has a right protect himself and his family as sacrosanct. The court concludes that the city’s ban on handguns and its requirement that firearms in the home be kept nonfunctional violated that right. In other words, an individual need not be in a militia to own a firearm, it is an individual’s right to own a firearm in self -defense. Heller concluded his defense by saying, “self-defense is a basic right recognized by ancient legal system to present, and it is the central component of the Second Amendment”

    Read More

  • The Second Amendment vs Gun Control

    1515 Words  | 4 Pages

    President Barack Obama says we have an “obligation” to try anything that could save one child, but many people find this statement to be ridiculous. Gun control is thought of as a government policy or regulations to control or limit the sale and use of firearms. In the U.S. constitution, the 2nd Amendment states that a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Inside America today, gun control is a major issue, especially in the political arena. People debate on the daily that not all things in society make it a safer place to live. The best intentions of America’s lawmakers often do not achieve the desired outcome; therefore, the nation is somewhat split on the idea of gun control. Some advocate there is too much government, while others feel there is not enough. Gun control may or may not help society as intended; just as giving up your constitutional rights no more ensures a safer environment nor does the gun advocate who follows laws promoting progressive gun safety.

    Read More

  • Guns And The Second Amendment

    1734 Words  | 4 Pages

    ... government to have such high-tech weapons. Equally, they wanted to be trained on how to handle guns too; so in response the Bill of Rights was created. Cases such as District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald vs. Chicago (2010), showed readers that the Second Amendment allowed people to exercise rights given to them. In both cases, each defendant stood up for the right to possess a gun. In the end, the Supreme Court ruled that owning a gun was a fundamental right already in existences. In other cases such as Shepard vs. Madigan (2011) and Moore vs. Madigan (2012), gun rights helped to play an important role in self-defense as well as other incidents. The Second Amendment allowed each individual to carry a concealed handgun in public. All in all, guns have help deter crimes. They have helped in stopping criminals and have protected the rights of gun owners.

    Read More

  • Gun Control: The Right To Self Control

    1850 Words  | 4 Pages

    “A handgun ban is not realistically enforceable. Confiscating guns would require house-to-house searches and alienate the very individuals whose compliances is essential to the success of any regulation. If gun ownership were prohibited, organized crime would step in to provide the firearms that will continue to be procured with criminal intent” (Done Kates). Over the past decade, the media has reported an increase in the severity of violent crimes as individuals have killed and hurt many others, including kids. Since 2006 there have been over 200 mass murders in the United States. Between 2006 and 2011 alone, the FBI has counted over 172 cases of mass killings, not including those unreported from different police agencies to the FBI (“Murders

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On The Second Amendment

    1533 Words  | 4 Pages

    A certain Mr. Heller applied for a one year handgun license to keep in his home and was denied. The denial is surprising considering his employment as a

    Read More

  • The Influence Of Gun Laws In The United States

    534 Words  | 2 Pages

    Certain laws and cultural ideas play a fundamental part in society while others can be trivial, but if there's one set of laws and culturalistic ideas that dictate many aspects of the country, its gun laws and culture. Many countries have different gun laws, but the United States of America and the country of United Kingdom. Gun laws differ in these countries so much, that for a gun owner it's heaven or hell.

    Read More

More about Gun Control Law: District Of Columbia V. Heller

Open Document