Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gun control problems around the world
Effect of gun control
Effects of gun control laws
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the documentary, Bowling for Columbine, film maker Michael Moore stresses the importance of more gun control in America. Moore focuses mainly on the shooting at Columbine high school in Colorado. He continues his documentary by examining why there are more yearly shootings in America than in other countries such as Canada, Australia, Japan, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. When Americans are exposed to just as much violence through the media, the poverty rates are equivalent, or more so in other countries like Canada, and people leave their doors unlocked, why does America kill the most? Moore conducts multiple interviews on different groups of people throughout the United States. Even though each of the people being interviewed …show more content…
leads separate lives, they each share a few things in common. They appear to have low education levels as noted by their poor communication skills, lack of understanding, and poor use of grammar. Moore interviews one young adult, Brent, who was expelled from school for using a stolen gun out of anger. Another man interviewed, Nicholas, jokingly puts his gun to his temple which demonstrates a lack knowledge about the guns potential danger. Another young man is at the top of the list for potential bomb threats. First, he denies knowing why he is on the list. Then, explains that he has made bombs, but they are only small bombs. This young adult who has the knowledge to make a bomb is allowed to own a gun. Another scene in the beginning of the film shows a local bank that gives away a free gun to anyone who opens a bank account with the company and passes a background check.
While filming, Moore opens an account with the bank and is awarded a gun of his choice. Moore walks out the bank saying, “Do you think it’s dangerous handing out guns in a bank?” This specific scene emphasizes the need for more extensive gun control in America. As mentioned earlier, a young man with no criminal record had the materials and knowledge to build a bomb. If this teenager opened a bank account with the local bank, he would be given a free …show more content…
weapon. In a following scene, Moore interviews members of a militia who believe it is the responsibility of an American to own a gun. The militia members explain knowing how to use a gun can protect you and your family and that their organization is simply built around that concept. Although this is the mantra behind the militia group, in 1995 two members used their guns to kill people. These members acted out of anger which explains why Moore is an advocate for additional gun laws. It should also be noted that during this interview when the men were asked about their current employment status, one member was unemployed. As mentioned earlier, men who tend to support the National Rifle Association (NRA) and fewer gun laws are from poverty stricken areas with low levels of education. Moore concludes the documentary by addressing the question is the media scaring Americans into owning guns? Moore interviews the author of The Culture of Fear, Professor Barry Glassner to discuss issues within the media. Glassner states, “They’re not making it up. But they’re choosing what they cover.” Glassner is referring to how the media portrays African American men as “dangerous black guys.” When news reporters have the choice to air the story of a young black man who robbed a bank or a white couple who adopted homeless children, they typically focus on the bank robbery. This type of media coverage has created nervous American citizens who are fearful of particular races of people. Therefor, they feel inclined to own a gun to protect themselves from possible threats. Another scene involves former President Bush asking Americans to defend themselves after the acts of terrorism on September 11th. After encouraged to purchase weapons by George W. Bush, gun sales at Walmart rose 70%. It is evident that the creation of fear is necessary for the continuation of the weapons and ammunition industry, according to Michael Moore. A common theme throughout these examples is a gun ends up in the wrong hands. Of course, there will always be people who intend to use guns responsibly, but there will also be people who do not. The message intended from Moore’s documentary is not to take away an American’s second amendment right to bear arms, but to highlight the dangers when citizens do not bear arms responsibly. Moore believes when measures are taken to prevent guns from being used out of anger or as an act of violence, we are acting as responsible America citizens. In Bowling for Columbine, Moore creates a documentary that causes viewers to question their own perceptions regarding our nations gun laws.
The film uses a variety of interviews from people who support the ownership of guns and people who are victims of gun violence. Moore also discusses the possible reasons for the number of gun related deaths and murders each year, but allows the audience to develop their own ideas about further guns restrictions. Although Moore never blatantly states his opinions on gun control, he focuses his interviews on people who have been directly affected by gun violence, people from low income areas who are uneducated and support the use of guns, and he questions the intentions of large, successful corporations. Each of these interviews and candid questions imply that Moore supports further gun control as he focuses on the negative aspects of owning a weapon with the ability to kill someone. Bowling for Columbine brilliantly related fear within American people caused by the media to the high number of gun owners by using creative scenes and imagines. Moore is correct to call attention to the number of gun related deaths in America as they amounted to 33,599 in 2014, according to the CDC, Centers for Disease Control. Of the 33,599 mortalities, two-thirds were intentional suicides and the CDC reveals that 12,000 of those deaths were
murders. In order to make the film more relatable to parents of children in school and students, Moore uses the shootings at Columbine High School and other victims such as a six year little boy, to convey his message. Fourteen years ago in 2002, two teenagers walked into Columbine High School and killed 13 students, injured 20 others, then committed suicide. Ten years later, Adam Lanza kills 20 children at Sandy Hook Elementary School with a semi-automatic AR-15 assault rifle (CNN). This weapon was not registered to Adam, but his mother, a gun enthusiast (New York Times Company). After the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary, by 2015, there were 64 more school shootings in the United States (BBC). Creating tighter gun laws will prevent people like Adam Lanza from harming anyone else. Based on these numbers and statistics, Moore was undeniably right to bring the lack of gun control to our nation’s attention. Moore uses this documentary to effectively call attention the the false perception that black urban areas have a higher number of gun related deaths. While visiting his homes state in Michigan, Moore interviews a prosector who corrects this fallacy. After the prosecutor explains that guns are a bigger problem in the white suburbs, Moore responses with “I didn't think that’s what you were going to say.” Moore continues by saying” I thought you were going to say it was black kids in the inner city.” The prosectors’ statement is confirmed with data recorded by the FBI, Federal Bureau of Investigation, stating that Caucasian offenders outnumber African American offenders in murder cases during 2013. Finally, during the documentary, Moore visits James Nichols who is the brother of Terry Nichols, the man who assisted Timothy McVeigh with the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. The Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building was the set target by McVeigh who killed 168 innocent people and injured 500. During adolescence, McVeigh had a history of selling and collecting weapons ranging from small pistols to eventual deadly bombs. Contrary to the way McVeigh presented himself, a decorated army veteran who was very knowledgeable, he purchased weapons that would be used for one of the largest acts of terrorism on American soil (CNN). By the end of the documentary, Moore has presented the audience with the tragic deaths associated with guns. He effectively demonstrates how the easy access of guns is linked to school shooting such as at Columbine High School and Newtown Elementary School. He uses original and entertaining imagines to retain the viewers interest while discussing policy changes. He presents all of the necessary factors for viewers to take into account such as lack of knowledge regarding a gun’s danger, negative media influences, and the need for large corporations to be profitable. As the number of gun sales have continued to rise over the past decade, Moore makes a compelling and engaging argument as to why our country would benefit from further gun restrictions.
"Columbine High School Shootings." History.com. A&E Television Networks, n.d. Web. 08 Sept. 2015. Eighteen year old Eric Harris and seventeen year old Dylan Klebold were two boys with a fascination of violent video games and music. These young men were known to be “goth” and were bullied all throughout their high school careers because of their different interest. In 1999, on April 20th these boys went into their high school with mixed emotions and a devious plan to get revenge. The two teens went into the high school with handguns and killed both students and faculty members, before they turned the guns around on themselves. This is a reliable source because it informed us of both previous emotion, and the aftermath of the tragedy with detail about the boys, the school and the lives affected. This source was relevant for me because of how thoroughly it described the shooting, and gave me background information as to why and how it happened.
The documentary format obviously does not allow every person in the population to speak or give his or her opinion, but Moore has a few select people to speak about gun control, and lets the viewer assume that is what most others of that population believe. This use of hasty generalization is a bit difficult to notice whilst watching the film, but once the documentary is over, the viewer may start to realize that the opinions presented in the film may simply not be the general consensus. For example, Moore interviews a small group of teenagers near a fast-food restaurant and asks them if they believe Canada is a less violent country than the United States. Simply because of this segm...
environments. Bill Clede ideas in his article seem to be guild by the idea of
One prominent rhetorical appeal he uses in the film is ethos. Ethos is the credibility or ethical appeal by a means of convincing your character as an author; in this case, Moore proves himself as a worthy or appropriate person to bring up the claim to install limitations on guns. He first explains the relevance of guns in his life by explaining that was born in Flint, Michigan - where the majorities of the population either owned a gun or were pro-gun advocates. From his childhood to his young adult years, he focuses directly that guns have been a very influential part in his life. For example, Michael Moore is a lifetime member of National Rifle Association meaning he accomplished several requirements and or task to be indicted; also, in doing these objectives, they may have changed his opinion to be pro-gun or for guns control. In fact, when the viewers of the documentary were informed of his members, probable suggestions came up that he will favor guns and lean to the opposition of gun control; in actuality, he takes a neutral, unbiased stand towards gun and collects data and statistic to p...
The columbine massacre the day where no one is safe in school or out of school. The columbine massacre is about two students named Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris both seniors 17 years old both two weeks before graduating they killed 12 students, one teacher, and 21 injured to their shooting on April 20, 1999. Both Dylan and Eric were some believe they were bullied by the sport teams in their school so they planned to kill the people who bullied them and other mostly anyone who gets in their way but that wasn’t really why the FBI he said that there target was everyone no one in pacify we will not get in to more details now. Dylan and Eric were both intelligent boys with solid parents and a good home and both had brothers younger than them. They played soccer, baseball, and both enjoyed to work on computers. Both boys were thinking on commit suicide on 1997 but instead started to plan a massacre in 1998 a year before it happened. Then the two boys had got into some trouble for breaking into a van on January 30, 1998 trying to steal some fuses and wires for bombs for them to make, but they got caught in trouble. So the court put them in a program called the juvenile diversion program, but even if they were there they were still planning the massacre and the court also put Eric in some angry management classes and people believe it worked but it didn’t he just did it to look like it work and both boys made it look like they were really sorry but they weren’t. Dylan and Eric both really hated everyone in their school and the court as well after they got caught breaking in to that van that’s when they really started to plan the massacre more and that’s when Harris started he’s journals no one really knows way but they didn’t hate a hand...
Gun control is an important issue in the United States. The big issue with gun control is some people want stricter gun laws. On the other side of the argument people that supports the usage of a firearm thinks that it is an individual’s right under the Second Amendment and guns are needed for self-defense.
America probably has the highest rate of gun ownership in the world. In Canada, the percentage of Canadian households with a rifle is approximately equal to the level in United States. According to the statistics of gun murder rates around the world from ‘Bowling for columbine’, America has 11,127 gun accidents while Canada merely has 165. Is the number of gun ownerships a main factor behind a violent society? Indeed weapon does not commit crimes, the perpetrator does.
The United States will not soon forget the rampage at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Connecticut that came just two weeks before Christmas last year. This tragic event resulted in the death of twenty students and eight adults. Although the event shocked the nation, rampage shootings are nothing new. Over the years, many families have lost loved ones to these horrific events. As a result, these mass shootings such as the one that occurred at Sandy Hook Elementary caught public attention leading to a push to find the cause of these events. Out of this research a variety of possible causes came to light consisting of arguments stating that high school bullying, availability of guns, mental illness, violent movies and video games are the cause of mass shootings. However, these researchers and debaters tend to ignore the role of massive media coverage in the increase of copycat shootings in the United States.
Gun violence has been and continues to be one of the major problems in American. The U.S. has the highest rate of gun ownership in the world and consequently the highest rate of gun violence and fatalities compared to other developed countries. In a study by the University of Sydney it is estimated that there are 270,000,000 to 310,000,000 guns in the United States. According to the same study in 2010 there were 31,672 fatalities caused by firearms and on the following year the number went up to 32,163. Homicides resulting from guns are high in the United States and they are claiming more than eleven thousand lives every year (Guns in the United States: Firearms, Armed Violence and Gun Law). According to Vision for Humanity, an initiative for the Economics and Peace, the United States is ranked 99 out of 162 countries in the 2013 global peace index, homicide rates and violent crimes are among the various criteria used to determine the ranking (Vision of Humanity). Mass shootings at work places, schools, shopping malls and places of worship are happening in an a...
My subtopic was gun violence in schools “school shootings.” There have been many schools shooting and most of them had many innocent people dying because of one or two people who had committed these horrible crimes. There are many things that should be done to help innocent people from getting hurt and prevent this from happening again. One thing that should happen is to put guns away or just getting rid of them. People get guns many different ways as you may already know. Sometimes we would just want guns to vanish and everyone one to have peace in the world. Gun violence in schools occurs around the world not only in the United States. The news inform us about the many other countries that are attacked and children or students that have been killed because of terroirs groups. People aren’t safe now days in places that we should believe schools are safe. Many parents are nervous sending their children to school because of the different stories they hear about on the news and from others.
Gun control is a highly controversial topic in today’s world where the fight is between the liberal and the conservatives. Many people believe that guns should be banned due to many recent massacres that have happened whereas others are wanting people to have background checks done before owning a gun. I am against gun control because banning handguns in the United States should not be allowed because handguns fail to protect the people and it is ineffective.
The topic of gun control comes with a widely spilt crowd. Some people believe that gun control is essential, especially in today’s world. Some people think gun control will help with decreasing crime and making the nation a safer place for us to live. On the other hand, there are people who speak of anti-gun control. These people believe the right to bear arms would make our nation a safe place to live due to the fact that we would have protection. Do you think the Government has the right to make something illegal like the right to bear arm? In my opinion, the Government cannot simply because it will be an offence to our founding fathers, who gave us the national right to bear arm. Also, for making
Due to the recent disruption of violent crimes on campus, many citizens that are pro-gun activist have suggested that both the students and teachers should be allowed to carry concealed weapons on school campuses. Those who are with guns allowed on school campuses claim that their rights have been violated for the reason that many college campuses refuse to allow weapons of any kind on their property. The Constitution of The United States of America already grants citizens the right to carry guns with them. It is not appropriate for guns to be in a vulnerable area such as a college campus or any University. There are already too many guns available to the public or easy to get any kind of gun, and allowing them on
High homicide rate can be directed link to present of guns in family household. America is known to have the highest gun possession rate in the world. Due to the Second Amendment, American have easy access to guns. Anyone can
With the media shining so much light upon this topic, it is evident that mass murders in the United States of America are more frequent and deadly. In fact, studies have found that the USA has more mass public shootings than any other country (Christensen). These numbers have only been increasing in the past decades. This is shocking because the USA holds only 5 percent of the world’s population, but as a nation, contributes to 31 percent of mass murders (Christensen). Although these murders continue to be a rare phenomenon, weak gun laws, the need for fame, and issues with societal views are the main causes of the increase in cases.