More handpicked essays just for you.
How are quantitative and qualitative research similar and different
COMPARE AND CONTRAST qualitative and quantitative research methods
How are quantitative and qualitative research similar and different
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Keith, I thoroughly enjoyed reading your analysis on the article that you chose in regard to gun control. I agree with most of your analysis, but I have found a few more points that I would like to add after analyzing the article for myself. I would say that this article could also be considered a quantitative article because of all of the different studies surrounding armed violence and the statistics that were used to form this article. Like you, I also found this article to be ideological in nature. The author tends to lean in one direction and only really emphasizes one aspect of violence in Brazil and that is to have an anti-gun regime. However, I found that the author also looks at the bigger picture and emphasizes more ideas that will
"The Controversy of Gun Control." Open Discussion about Various Controversies. N.p.. Web. 3 Dec 2013. .
In his article “Gun debate? What gun debate?” Mark O 'Mara discuses the controversial issue of gun control. O’Mara takes the tragic school shooting in Oregon as an opportunity to voice his opinion on the debate of guns. He clearly states his position and explains that gun violence has increased enormously because of the lack of command by the government and support from the public to speak out against it. O’Mara claims the issue is no longer a debate because it is so evident that guns have become a significant problem in this country and therefore actions must be taken to control and govern gun laws. In his article he attempts to raise awareness to the severity of the issue and tries to persuade his readers to take a stance against gun violence
Guns have possessed the spotlight of almost every news station. From the latest tragedy of a shooting killing innocent men, women and children to the arguments centering around if our gun laws possess strict enough qualities to keep our country safe. Charles C. W. Cooke, the author of “Gun-Control Dishonesty”, spreads his conservative view on the topic by ripping away any hope for a brighter day. Cooke’s main idea states that if nothing has happened to make gun law more strict even after the lives of innocent children were mercilessly ripped away from their young bodies than nothing should or could ever change. On the other hand, Adam Gopnik wrote his article, “Shooting”, uses a more liberal approach and inspires his audience to act upon the much needed change in our society
Blanco and Vicencio are revisiting the gun control debate and they give a more detailed analysis of the subject. A comparison between diverse perspectives and viewpoints that is held by the pro-gun society and empiricist is laid down. The authors then try to suggest ways in which these differences and disparities can be resolved. The author offers a pragmatic approach to the policy making process that emphasizes on culture.
In this article the author Fawn Johnson gives us a brief look of what goes on during the great gun control debate. This article gives us a look at the gun control proposals, from American’s not bein...
Left, right, Liberal, Conservative, Democratic, Republican. There are a lot of synonyms for the sides of our nation divided. Divided on many things: religion, political views, morals, etc.. For a nation that prides ourselves on extraordinary security and unity, it is quite ironic that so many issues can cause such distress and uproar within communities. One such issue is gun control. As a white male in a middle-lower class family that has never owned a gun, I may be somewhat biased. Objectively as I can, I am going to report the facts and more importantly, try to find the core issues at play.
Aroung the time of John F. Kennedy’s assassination, the controversial and widely argued issue of gun control sparked and set fire across America. In the past decade however, it has become one of the hottest topics in the nation. Due to many recent shootings, including the well known Sandy Hook Elementary school, Columbine High School, Aurora movie theater, and Virginia Tech, together totaling 87 deaths, many people are beginning to push for nationwide gun control. An article published in the Chicago Tribune by Illinois State Senator Jacqueline Collins, entitled “Gun Control is Long Overdue” voiced the opinion that in order for America to remain the land of the free, we must take action in the form of stricter gun laws. On the contrary, Kathleen Parker, a member of the Washington Post Writers Group whose articles have appeared in the Weekly Standard, Time, Town & Country, Cosmopolitan, and Fortune Small Business, gives a different opinion on the subject. Her article in The Oregonian “Gun Control Conversation Keeps Repeating” urges Americans to look at the cultural factors that create ...
The development of arguments surrounding gun control corresponds to the increased violence and problems related to weapons and firearms use. This then prompted the expansion of gun control initiatives and has shapes public opinion particularly in the promotion of increased regulation to banning. Due to this, it became controversial as it split the opinions of the citizenry particularly in their stance to advance different objectives. Arguably, the process of developing gun control remains to be detrimental due to its capacity to challenge individual rights and liberty, undermine the value of guns and firearms in the promotion of deterrence and self-defense and inability to recognize the commitment of existing reasonable gun management and control initiatives already in place.
The conversation of gun control and gun regulation has been a great debate over the decades. NRA Executive vice president Wayne LaPierre, in his speech on Newtown Shooting that occurred on December 21st, 2012, addresses the topic of gun control and argues that guns are not the cause of gun violence. LaPierre's project is to instead of gun control and decreasing the numbers of guns, increase the numbers of guns to solve the problem of gun violence. On the other side of debate, an American journalist, Nicholas Kristof, in his journal, "Do We Have the Courage to Stop This?" argues that guns are the cause of gun violence, but they should not be banned. Kristof's project is to regulate guns with many cautions. While these two authors have different arguments and projects, they use similar strategies to advance their claims. This paper will focus on the way each author strategically uses compare and contrast, cause and effect, and problem-solution to advance their claims and how effective these strategies are used.
Guns debate you. More gun control laws would not reduce gun deaths it would increase gun deaths because we need self. If we had more laws on guns the population of guns with criminals would shoot up. People need guns to protect their families and themselves. People need guns to survive with other deadly people in the world. The NRA is against this person who is trying to put these laws in. (Hillary Clinton) People need guns. I say this because the Military uses guns to protect themselves. Why should we not. We need guns in our lives they help protect your family and mine.
Collinson Stephen, Editorial, “Barack Obama’s emotional evolution on gun control”, CNN News, 7 January, 2016; He’s claim is that many of the shooting happened across the United States. Collinson’s supports his thesis by showing examples of the shooting that happened throughout the U.S. His purpose is to show how guns are causing so much harm to our country. The intended audience for this article is anyone who wants to be informed about gun control.
Listverse,. '10 Arguments For Gun Control - Listverse '. N.p., 2014. Web. 30 Oct. 2014.
The 2nd Amendment states that, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This amendment gives people the right to bear arms and not be penalized for it. People tend to choose to own guns because they want a weapon that makes them feel safer. However, the second amendment applies to militias not civilians, so there’s no reason to let people have the right to bear arms. It tends to put people at ease yet, with all of the recent school shootings people are rethinking the second amendment. Many people are starting to believe that if the government gets rid of the right to bear arms then everyone would be better off and there would be many less school shootings. The gun violence in 2018 has killed many people. The increasing amounts of school
When the security of a society is threatened by a prevalent violence associated with specific weapons, the government should pass a strict law to restrict those dangerous weapons. In today’s society of the United States, the loose restriction regarding the excessive possession and use of guns has led to many mass-shooting incidents in this country, so, the is a raising demand in this country that the gun has to be restricted. The prevalent gun violence across the country is correlated with a large amount of privately owned guns. Therefore, strict gun control laws are necessary for maintaining and improving the security within the American society.
Strictly regulated guns is our only option, mostly because the amount of gun-related deaths are increasing. There is no reason an ordinary person should be walking around the street with a gun, especially if they have no license or certification. The government needs to have a better system and regulation on where guns are being sold and to who they are selling them to.