Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Experiences with public speaking
Public speaking progress
Experiences with public speaking
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Experiences with public speaking
Following the Group speech that was given on November 15, 2013, I have been asked to write this reflection paper to address the nature of the speech and how I can improve.
Upon reading the peer review sheets we received from the class following our speech I believe that we all improved since our last speech. Everyone seems to state the most important area for improvement was using filler words too much. I think we as a group seemed to have improved as far as talking towards the audience and using less filler words. The most effective part of this speech would seem to be our elaboration and passion for the subject. Overall this seems to make sense to me. I knew these would be our problem areas and strong points going into this speech.
First we will start with the overall voice and projection. I
…show more content…
We worked really well setting each other up to speak and building on our group members’ points. The presentation flowed very well overall. We were very effective in gaining and maintaining the audience’s attention. We asked a series of questions in the introduction to stimulate interest early. In order to involve each group member in this early form of engagement, we took turns asking questions to the audience. In addition to asking general questions to the audience as a whole, we also engaged specific individuals in the audience to make it seem more personalized. Throughout the body, we used a series of techniques like an audience poll, maintenance of eye contact, and more questions to keep the audience engaged. During the conclusion, we passed out coupons and cups of hot chocolate to motivate our audience to come to our Grand Opening. Additionally, we realized that presenting in a monotone and unenthusiastic manner could easily cause the audience to become disengaged. Therefore, we made a point to speak with enthusiasm and passion throughout the presentation in order to capture and maintain our audience’s
The author of the essay, Carol Tavris, seems to be very passionate about what she is writing. She has her doctorate in Psychology and has had her articles published in many well-known magazines. The intended audience of her essay is the general public. The purpose of this article is to inform the public that they need to stand out and use their own minds in a group setting instead of hiding in the comfort of their fellow friends and colleagues.
adequate. Hickam did use good transitions between his main points. The speech did expand my
The speaker organized the presentation very well and made it easy to follow for the audience. She chose words that got the message across clearly and were not difficult to understand. Since this was targeted at a younger audience, she simplified the concepts and was very specific. The sentences of the speech were structured appropriately, and had no grammatical errors. She also included some transitions in between, especially when moving from one idea to the next which made the flow
Upon reviewing my speech, I can understand where I need to improve my speaking skills, as well as places where I just need to fine-tune them. I chose to talk about skiing because it is an activity that I look forward to every winter, and knowing I had a trip out west over break I knew I would be able to talk about this topic easily. Although I do think that I gave an effective speech, I think there were many things to learn from the overall content, organization, and delivery of the speech. The content of my speech was an area that I think was adequate for an informative speech.
The speaker did not seem to me to be successful. He brought a new idea to the audience with good reasoning behind it, but there was little motivation to apply in the day to day life. The audience is a class of college students who are interested in knowing what the speaker is passionate about.
Informative Speech Peer Assessment - Mayra Ceballos Mayra’s speech was to inform the audience about Mexicans crossing the border illegally to the United States. Specifically, it was about unaccompanied minors who crossed the border due to poverty, violence, and family reunification. Overall, Mayra did an extraordinary job in the use of suitable visuals and the organization of her speech. However, a couple things that she could focus more on for the next assignment is the delivery of her speech in vocal variety and articulation.
While watching my video I did notice that I was able to understand and clearly know what the main point was. I spoke in a clear and a tone loud enough for everyone to hear. The speech was organized very well, so one idea or thought flowed to the next. I don’t think I need to change anything in regards to my central idea being clear. I was satisfied with that part of the speech.
However, I did notice that there were a few faults in the presentation, one being a fault that I personally consider may have negatively impacted our presentation. It seems to me that I was not able to deliver the presentation to the best of my ability as I had let my nerves get the best of me when talking to the staff. The reason for this was that I was not comfortable with taking on the speaking role that I was given and that there were last minute changes made to my slides right before presenting. Bruner, (1996) stated that the learning process for staff relies on the “meaningful dialogue” that is presented by the presenters. In this case, I think that my speech was not strong enough to grab the audience’s attention, thus not being able to portray my message about what an Ofsted inspection is and what the results from an Ofsted inspection mean. Nevertheless, although I was not able to present to the quality that I had wished, the feedback received was reassuring that I had not done terribly bad. I was able to see myself grow as a presenter as I noticed that my
Working with the group changed the speech making dynamic in a large way. When I am with myself I am able to format my outline a certain and more simple way. However, when working in a group the outline had to be more of a manuscript so it was clear to understand each point and the group was able to stay on the same page. Another difference was practicing. When going solo I could practice whenever I had a free space of time, but when in a group the practice time had to be planned out far in advance. During the presentation I tried hard to support my group members. When they were speaking I either look at them and or the audience. I sometimes looked at the PowerPoint too. I looked at the PowerPoint in order
I thought he did everything perfectly and based on the audience reaction, I believe they think so, too. If I had to choose one critique, I would say it may be helpful to add some more detail overall about the Biden Institute. But that may be more effective for another time and speech. In all, I don’t think I would have advised him to change anything because it was a well delivered speech that engaged the audience and got them thinking about the subject of public policy and the need for younger political
I thought that the speech was organized in a good order and you could tell he spent a sufficient amount of time preparing his speech. The language he used was appropriate and he explained any abbreviations he used before he used them. He did however lack humor in the speech but his topic didn’t really call for humor so it was acceptable for this
Making a successful public presentation or speech to an audience was a very big task for me before I joined the public speaking class. I was always frightened and very nervous. Since then I now understand the process of making a speech or a presentation including coming up with a topic and from this topic develop the main points of the speech, research, organize my points, revise them, edit and make a magnificent presentation to any audience. People in the audience might sometimes agree or disagree with my opinion or points, it was therefore necessary to communicate my information clearly to the audience without making any judgments since every person was entitled to a different opinion and views about things.
After completing the group task of preparing a presentation on, transferring individual facilitation skills into a group work setting I will critically reflect upon my own participation. I will evaluate my self-awareness while working in the group, as well as those around me. The way that I personally dealt with any issues that arose within the group and how that affected the group dynamics. I will also briefly discuss the roles in which each member of the group took and how role allocation affected, the group dynamics and the working relationships. Finally I will evaluate my work having discussed it with my fellow group members.
In public speaking I learned many types of concepts, theories and terms of communication. In concepts of publicly speaking there’s, relaxation, practice, credibility, attention getters, attire, organization, volume, emotion, audience relation, and movement. In my first speech, “The any old bag speech” I quickly learned the do’s, don’ts and concepts of my speech performance.
I had a lot of information on my mind, but the tension obstructed the flow of my words. Therefore I could not speak continuously, and accurately to the point. The fact that English is not my native language might have also been a reason for this. Therefore I was not satisfied with my performance.