In his narrative, “A Narrative of James Albert Ukawsaw Gronniosaw, an African Prince, as Related by Himself”, Gronniosaw paints a positive portrait of his life as a slave. His assimilation into white culture distances him from his roots as a black man, creating a barrier between himself and his own culture. The process of the assimilation reads as if Gronniosaw is experiencing internalized hatred as he learns more about what the color of his skin means in relation to society. The reflections of internalized hatred scattered throughout the text therefore create a sense that Gronniosaw is not only opposed to “the black man” but that he idolizes “the white man”. However, it is important, with all of these speculations, to note for whom the narrative …show more content…
was written for. Gronniosaw’s narrative is not an anti-slavery text, rather it is written for the white audience in order to evoke a sympathetic view towards himself.
That being said, his text is not pro-slavery, instead, it is a demonstration on how estrangement from identity creates protection of the slave and furthermore creates a sense of humanity in regards to the slave. Gronniosaw’s narrative begins in Western Africa, however, his voice is reflective of a white society. Gronniosaw questions the world through the lens of a white Christian: “it being strongly impressed on my mind that there was some GREAT MAN of power which resided above the sun…” (34). As a young child not yet assimilated into white culture, it is very improbable that he would have had this religious revelation. Gronniosaw would not even have had the language to talk about biblical references- such as his speculations that eerily reflect the biblical …show more content…
passage Genesis. Gronniosaw is using the knowledge he would later learn in a white society to persuade his readers into thinking he is a “man of God”. By saying he has always had a relationship with God (before he even knew what “God” was), Gronniosaw is convincing his readers that he is good enough to be a part of white society. In other words, he is making the point that the only way he could have known about God at such a young age was if God had sought him out, and therefore, Gronniosaw is putting himself in the position of someone who was chosen by God. Not only does this placement put Gronniosaw in a position that is higher up than his fellow folks of color, it actually places him in a higher position than white folk. Because religion was something that was available to any and all white people, it’s as if all white people were chosen by God, and that puts them all on an equal playing field. However, because Gronniosaw is a man of color, the fact that God would choose him must speak lengths to white society. By implying that he is chosen, Gronniosaw is forcing whites to look at him differently than they normally would. As the narrative continues to be told through the lens of white Christianity, Gronniosaw convinces his readers that he is worthy of humanity by idolizing white folk. Gronniosaw has an intrigue with whites before he leaves Africa: “I should see houses with wings to them walk upon the water, and should also see the white folks;” (35). He also speaks highly of his sister: “I loved her entirely; her name was Logwy, she was quite white” (36). Gronniosaw would, at this point in his life, have no idea of what skin color means in regards to society. Taking that into account it appears as if he is trying to prove that even from an ignorant perspective, something drew him towards the skin of whites. By inserting comments on race before being forced into slavery, Gronniosaw is not only saying he can fit in with whites because of religious reasons, but because he gravitates towards them, and even loves them. In loving whites, Gronniosaw can admit his subservience to them, and therefore shed his identity as an African prince, and actually own his identity as a slave. This is important because in order for Gronniosaw to be granted humanity by whites they must not fear him. In Africa Gronniosaw had servants: “even my servants slighted me” (36). Gronniosaw must go from being served to serving. He needs to prove to his white audience that he has an identity that they can strip- he once was a royal prince who had servants. However in the same breath he must admit that even his servants had no respect for him. By doing this Gronniosaw is showing his willingness to be “slighted”. His love, or rather subservience, is portrayed as an offering; he will give away his identity, in order to gain purpose. Through owning his identity as subservient, Gronniosaw protects himself from uproar by white folks. His lack of commentary on the brutality of slavery furthers himself from being a threat towards whites. Gronniosaw is writing his narrative in order to survive, not as an attempt to abolish slavery. Therefore, his adoration of his numerous masters throughout the years must not be read as necessarily the truth: “My master grew very fond of me, and I loved him exceedingly” (38). However it is not important whether or not Gronniosaw loved his master; what is important is that he states his love for him in the text. By doing so, he is professing a love for the institution that makes him subservient and thus reflecting love on to all slave owners. Again, this is an attempt to further himself from those who are anti-slavery in order to grow closer to those that are pro-slavery. By growing closer to societal standards and those in favor of slavery Gronniosaw is protecting himself. His protection is necessary in order for him to survive and is therefore more important than his identity. However, this text goes further than just portraying a love for whites- it actually reads as if Gronniosaw has a hatred for people of color. Gronniosaw creates a barrier between himself and other slaves in order to claim humanity and create a purpose for himself. On page 39 of the narrative Gronniosaw associates the devil with a black man. By doing this the reader can assume that he has negative connotations associated with his own skin color. The point of Gronniosaw connecting black with the devil is to draw the white reader of the time in and prove that he has no ties to the culture he was born into. This barrier estranges him from his own people and allows his assimilation into white culture appear more authentic. When Gronniosaw builds this wall between him and other slaves, it shows white society that he believes he has more purpose than other slaves. However, it is necessary that this barrier is balanced with subservience. His language must portray a man who is better than other folks of color, but not quite as good as white folk, in order to receive empathy, and ultimately compensation for his work. When reading Gronniosaw’s narrative, it is important to take into account the audience he was writing for.
This essay has alluded to his writing being for white folk, but it is necessary to echo this concept. The fact that he was writing his narrative for white people must change the way it is read in current times. His idolization for whites and hatred for blacks needs to be assessed and reevaluated. Instead of looking at him as actually trying to assimilate into white culture because he wants to, the reader needs to look at the assimilation as a form of survival. Gronniosaw wrote his narrative in order to make money- so he and his family could eat: “I now blamed myself for bringing her from London, as doubtless had we continued there we might have found friends to have kept us from starving” (50). Gronniosaw is in a life or death situation. Imagine having to choose your life over your identity. Which would you sacrifice? Whilst some may believe living a life absent of your true self would be an injustice- Gronniosaw had no other choice. In order to keep his family warm and fed, he needed to estrange himself from his identity as a black man. He needed to find humanity, and in his case, humanity was in the hands of the whites. White folk literally dressed him up: “He dress’d me in his livery, and was very good to me” (38). However by doing this, they are labeling him as something, and figuratively dressing him to be whomever the prefer him to be. Gronniosaw must act the
part of a doll in order to gain respect from society. He must present himself- through his narrative- as a reflection of white standards; this is the only way he can keep both himself and his family alive. In comparison to slave narratives written by Frederick Douglass or Solomon Northup, James Albert Ukawsaw Gronniosaw’s narrative might appear to be fraudulent. The characteristics commonly associated with the genre are missing (physical abuse, rape, desperation). However, Gronniosaw’s narrative is just as important when read through the lens of survival- for we see his testimony, not necessarily in the words he has spoken, but rather in the reason behind the words. Gronniosaw’s estrangement from identity ultimately gives insight into his true character and through his sacrifice one can see strength and perseverance. His language may not portray a man who has been defeated by society and this is because Gronniosaw did not let society defeat him. Although his identity was taken, and assimilated into a reflection of white- Gronniosaw gained humanity and through his words proved his survival.
During a period of time, the world lost its values due to ambition. Blacks were enslaved for being different. Races became a huge part of people’s everyday talk and to succeed, farmers and business owners had to make African Americans do their dirty work for them. During this period of time, people like Joe Starks from “The Eyes Were Watching God” and people like Frederick Douglass’s slavemasters became abundant in the world. The belief that they were superior to everyone else lead them to impose power in a way that even themselves could not tolerate. Even though “The Eyes Were Watching God” was written after slave abolition, Joe Starks and Douglass’s slavemasters have many characteristics in common and differences which are worthy to be noticed.
The old Negro was known as more of a myth than a man, because of the vindictive formula’s of who Negroes were allowed to be way back when. When it came to African Americans, there was always debate as to how they should be treated, because of the color of their skin. In addition to being condemned and silenced as if they had no voice. Commonly being enslaved whether it was physically or mentally the old Negro could not dispose of past, history has contributed to them socially. Furthermore, the old Negro never knew his worth he was known as a “creature of moral debate” treated like a non human figure in society eyes. In order to get ahead or outsmart the old Negro played the role of a trickster, because of their socially declination they played
In the autobiography Black Boy by Richard Wright, Wright’s defining aspect is his hunger for equality between whites and blacks in the Jim Crow South. Wright recounts his life from a young boy in the repugnant south to an adult in the north. In the book, Wright’s interpretation of hunger goes beyond the literal denotation. Thus, Wright possesses an insatiable hunger for knowledge, acceptance, and understanding. Wright’s encounters with racial discrimination exhibit the depths of misunderstanding fostered by an imbalance of power.
In the novel, the author proposes that the African American female slave’s need to overcome three obstacles was what unavoidably separated her from the rest of society; she was black, female, and a slave, in a white male dominating society. The novel “locates black women at the intersection of racial and sexual ideologies and politics (12).” White begins by illustrating the Europeans’ two major stereotypes o...
In, “The Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass”, readers get a first person perspective on slavery in the South before the Civil War. The author, Frederick Douglass, taught himself how to read and write, and was able to share his story to show the evils of slavery, not only in regard to the slaves, but with regard to masters, as well. Throughout Douglass’ autobiography, he shares his disgust with how slavery would corrupt people and change their whole entire persona. He uses ethos, logos, and pathos to help establish his credibility, and enlighten his readers about what changes needed to be made.
The literary work advanced by Paul Robeson entitled “What I Want from Life” gives the reader a holistic overview of the journey that African-Americans have faced since they arrived on the shores of the American continent. Robeson begins by elucidating on the very complicated development of African-Americans when he says that the understanding of African nationality is “an extremely
Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an 1845 autobiography by the eponymous author, is rife with conflict and contradiction. The wealth and cruelty of slave owners is contrasted with the poverty and helplessness of slaves; the ideal of freedom is set against the looming dread of its consequences; but some of the most polarizing and intense conflicts are internal and paradoxical in nature. Among these is the idea of hope, to which the slaves cling and the masters try to crush. Hope almost always carries a positive connotation, but Frederick Douglass’ narrative exposes its paradox in relation to slavery and freedom, how it was used as a tool to both help and harm.
Ralph Ellison’s short story, Battle Royal, is mainly a description of the African American struggle for equality and identity. The narrator of the story is an above average youth of the African American community [Goldstein-Shirlet, 1999]. He is given an opportunity to give a speech to some of the more prestigious white individuals. His expectations of being received in a positive and normal environment are drastically dashed when he is faced with the severity of the process he must deal with in order to accomplish his task. The continuing theme of Battle Royal is that of a struggle for one’s rights against great odds. Instances of this struggle are found throughout the story. Ellison highlights the vastness of the problems faced by the African American community to claim themselves. This is done by the extreme nature of the incidents described in the Battle Royal. A short analysis of the major theme found in Ellison’s Battle Royal, supported by a literary criticism dealing with the tone and style of the story.
This conversation also implies that a person is not a slave when he was born. He should have the right to obtain freedom, but he is not controlled by others. Slavery does not happen naturally and is not caused by the environment. On the other hand, it is forced by human being. In his book A
Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave, brings to light many of the social injustices that colored men, women, and children all were forced to endure throughout the nineteenth century under Southern slavery laws. Douglass's life-story is presented in a way that creates a compelling argument against the justification of slavery. His argument is reinforced though a variety of anecdotes, many of which detailed strikingly bloody, horrific scenes and inhumane cruelty on the part of the slaveholders. Yet, while Douglas’s narrative describes in vivid detail his experiences of life as a slave, what Douglass intends for his readers to grasp after reading his narrative is something much more profound. Aside from all the physical burdens of slavery that he faced on a daily basis, it was the psychological effects that caused him the greatest amount of detriment during his twenty-year enslavement. In the same regard, Douglass is able to profess that it was not only the slaves who incurred the damaging effects of slavery, but also the slaveholders. Slavery, in essence, is a destructive force that collectively corrupts the minds of slaveholders and weakens slaves’ intellects.
The reader is first introduced to the idea of Douglass’s formation of identity outside the constraints of slavery before he or she even begins reading the narrative. By viewing the title page and reading the words “The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave, written by himself” the reader sees the advancement Douglass made from a dependent slave to an independent author (Stone 134). As a slave, he was forbidden a voice with which he might speak out against slavery. Furthermore, the traditional roles of slavery would have had him uneducated—unable to read and incapable of writing. However, by examining the full meaning of the title page, the reader is introduced to Douglass’s refusal to adhere to the slave role of uneducated and voiceless. Thus, even before reading the work, the reader knows that Douglass will show “how a slave was made a man” through “speaking out—the symbolic act of self-definition” (Stone 135).
Frederick Douglass’ landmark narrative describes the dehumanization of African-American slaves, while simultaneously humanizing them through his moving prose. Douglass shows the dehumanization of slaves through depictions of violence, deindividuation, and the broken justice system. However, Douglass’ pursuit of an education, moving rhetoric, and critique of his own masters demonstrates to the reader that African-Americans are just as intelligent as white people, thus proving their humanity.
The first element of slavery that Frederick attacks is that slavery puts constraints on a slave’s individuality. In his narrative, he states that slaves were compared to animals by the way the slave owner treated them because slaves were considered as property and not as human beings. When slaves came into the new world, they were sold and given new names and over time were supposed to assimilate to the American culture. Since slave masters did not think slaves could assimilate to the American culture, slave masters kept them as workers; therefore, slaves were not given an education, leaving them illiterate, and thereby leaving them without any knowledge on how the American political system works. Slave owners thought that if slaves would become literate, that slaves would start to question the rights they have. Frederick argues that slaves l...
The author gives well-founded conclusions as they are based on a thorough analysis of the work of the writer. These findings have given me a chance to see the dynamics of Douglass’s identity under the influence of various factors, including the opposition between the two types of identity - the identity of a slave and the identity of a free man.
Being born and raised in Ukraine I have never experience racism in my life until I came to the United States. In the land of freedom I 've witnessed inequality the most, and not only towards African - Americans, I felt people being racist towards me, despite my so-called “white” look . As a student in the City College I was fortunate to take such courses as African Literature, Harlem Renaissance, African - American Detective Fiction and Toni Morrison class, that helped me understand the problem of racism considerably better. The new, undoubtedly interesting and challenging course, Advanced Topics in Anglophone Literature, gives me a chance to explore in depths the struggles of African ex-colonies after they gained their independence. My latest discovery Why Are We So Blest? by Ayi Kwei Armah is the beautifully written novel that not only discusses the complexity and enormity of Africa’s problems, but brings into the light the topic of racism. The scholar Derek Wright in his studies claims that the book is a racist novel that depicts “fictional” racist “white man” perceptions towards “black people.” After analyzing the novel I have to disagree with the scholar.