Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relationship between humans and animals Essay
Relationship between humans and animals Essay
Relationship between humans and animals Essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Relationship between humans and animals Essay
This mise-en-scene will define the role of animals in the anthropomorphic relationship between a human being and a grizzly bear in the film Grizzly Man (2005) by Werner Herzog. Berger’s analysis of the ancient relationship between human beings and animals is defined through the anthropomorphic proximity of animals that has become increasingly disconnected in the modern era. Herzog’s film, Grizzly Man, is about a man named Timothy Treadwell that sought to reconnect human beings with bears outside of controlled settings. One scene in the film expresses this mise-en-scene of the reconnection with ancient anthropomorphism in Treadwell’s interaction with a bear named The Grinch. This important part of the film shows the interrelationship between Treadwell and a dangerous bear, which reconnects man with animals as part of this filmmaking process. Herzog’s presentation of Treadwell’s filming of the anthropomorphic relationship in mise-en scene of proximity with a wild bear captures this relationship in cinematography. In essence, a scene mise-en-scene analysis of the anthropomorphic …show more content…
relationship between Timothy Treadwell and a grizzly bear will be analyzed in Werner Herzog’s documentary film Grizzle Man. In John Berger’s (1980) analysis of “Why Look at Animals?” the historical relationship between human beings and animals is discussed as part of an observational perspective. Historically, the relationship between human beings and animals was far more intimate in a natural environment. This aspect of pre-modern animal/human relationship is defined through the “anthropomorphic” proximity to animals that was much closer than in the 19th century. This aspect of anthropomorphism defines the close relationship between human beings and animals in the wild: Until the 19th century, however, anthropomorphism was integral to the relation between man and animal and was an expression of their proximity.
Anthropomorphism was the residue of the continuous use of animal in metaphor. In the last two centuries, animals have gradually disappeared (Berger 11).
In this context, the increasing distance of human beings from animals in the wild is a major aspect of anthropomorphic behavior, which has decreased in the modern era. In Herzog’s documentary film, Grizzly Man, the documentary form of filming defines how one man, Timothy Treadwell, sought to reconnect with wild animals, especially with the grizzly bear. These aspects of documentary filmmaking are an important part of Berger’s understanding of how animals are observed in a historical context, since Treadwell actively seeks to gain closer proximity to wild bears outside of controlled
environments. Herzog’s documentary approach to filmmaking is primarily based on using footage of Treadwell’s own filming of direct contact with grizzly bears in the wild. This method also includes an interview format with family members and friends of Treadwell, which act as a post-mortem script of the anthropomorphic motivations of his life amongst the grizzlies. In this manner, Berger’s (1980) observational perspective of animals and human beings is a major part of how Herzog presents Treadwell’s life after he has been killed by a grizzly bear at Yellowstone national park. In this filming process, Herzog shows film footage from Treadwell’s own experiences with grizzly bear in the wild. These types of scenes show Treadwell re-engaging large grizzly bears with direct contact and close proximity, which reveals the danger of his actions within an anthropomorphic observational perspective: “Today, we live without them [the animals]. And in this new solitude, anthropomorphism makes us doubly uneasy” (Berger 11). This observational view reveals the reconnection of Treadwell with wild animals, which does reveal the very great potential for danger and death in the documentary process. In this case, particular scene used by Herzog showing Treadwell engaging a wild bear will define these various mise-en-scene factors in the setting and visual perspective of a direct re-engagement of man and animal in Grizzly Man. Herzog’s selection Treadwell’s documentary footage of grizzly encounters defines an important anthropomorphic relationship that re-defines Berger’s evaluation of the lack of proximity between human beings and wild animals. In one important scene, Treadwell is scene filming himself by a large stream. In the background of this scene, a massive bear (named The Grinch for her bad behavior) is seen eating a fish, which has bloodied a river rock. In a formal presentation, Treadwell describes the bear behind him back to the animal. Treadwell is standing 25-30 feet away from the animal, which shows the “uneasy” tension that Berger describes as part of the re-connection with human beings and wild animals: I want to introduce you to the key role players in this year’s expedition. This bear’s name is the Grinch. The Grinch has come on to be one of the more frequent bears here in the grizzly maze. Um, the Grinch is a female of about five years of age. “Oh, hi Grinch. And she has kind of an aggressive attitude….Hi (saying too the bear). (Herzog 17:06). During this introduction, Treadwell does not immediately notice that the bear is has seen him, and that it is now moving toward him. Of course, the mise-en-scene of this scenery is the terrifying notion that Treadwell is not a “animal sanctuary” or that he is a trained professional, but that he is literally out “in the wild” with a bear known for eating human beings. Treadwell has placed the camera view to show the background image of the bear as it moves towards him, which allows him to show the direct relationship between himself and his subject. More importantly, Treadwell uses this camera view to show his own direct confrontation with the animal, which becomes increasingly tense. These are important aspects of scenery that define the anthropomorphic relationship between Treadwell and the grizzly. Treadwell’s interaction with the grizzly bear is a shocking aspect of anthropomorphic filming, which shows him confronting a potentially hostile bear. The direct reconnection between a bear and human being provides a dramatic context for the scene, since Treadwell is now seen facing the bear and telling it to back off because he fears being bitten. Again, the camera view shows a direct line between Treadwell and the bear, which provides a close proximity between the two figures in an anthropomorphic setting. Treadwell’s own aggression with The Grinch reveals the potential danger between man and animal that is shown in the scene: If I turn around too much, she will bite me. “It’s ok. Hi, how are you? How are you? Don’t you do that! Don’t you do that! Back off!...It’s ok. I love you! I love you! I love you! I’m sorry” ( Herzog 17:28). This type of behavior not only shows Treadwell attempting to tame or console a wild bear, but it shows the willingness of a human being to interact with a potentially dangerous animal. The wildlife settings around this scene provide a ancient and terrifying interaction between a man and a bear. In this case, Treadwell has nowhere to go if the bear decides to attack him, yet he astoundingly drives off the animal by directly confronting it by telling it to “back off.” This is an important part of Herzog’s presentation of Treadwell’s own mise-en-scene style of documentary footage, which provides an astonishing reconnection between man and animal in the anthropomorphic mode. This scene provides a great deal of information on how anthropomorphic filming techniques were used in Grizzly Man to show Treadwell’s direct interaction with grizzly bears in the wild. In conclusion, a mise-en-scene analysis of the anthropomorphic relationship between a man and a bear has been defined in Werner Herzog’s documentary film Grizzly Man. Berger’s (1980) analysis of visual observations of animals defines the historical disconnection between man and animals, which defines the anthropomorphic perspective. Herzog chose to show Treadwell’s documentary footage as a an example of the reconnection between man and bear, which is shown the scene in which he is interacting with The Grinch, a hostile bear. The Mise-en-scene of this scene presents Treadwell as a somewhat emboldened natural observer seeking to forge a relationship with the bear. In fact, Treadwell defies all of the “uneasy” aspects of anthropomorphic danger and hostility that would typically deter a human being from being vulnerable to a bear attack. The river setting of the scene provides a unique and rare setting outside of a controlled environment, which makes Treadwell’s interactions extremely dramatic and dangerous. In this manner, the anthropomorphic reconnection between man and animal is shown in Herzog’s documentary depiction of Timothy Treadwell’s life as a “grizzly man”, especially after it is know that a bear had killed Treadwell before the film was made.
Grizzly Man (2005) is a documentary directed by Werner Herzog. It details the life of Timothy Treadwell, and how he spent thirteen summers in the Alaskan wilderness with grizzly bears, only to lead to his demise by the bears that he cared about so much. In a way it could be a documentary about a documentary. Herzog’s Documentary consists of several interviews of family, friends, and acquaintances, and several pieces of film shot by Timothy Treadwell himself. Grizzly Man as a films toys with several modes of documentary defined by Bill Nichols. The film as a whole is shown through reflexive mode, though through the film shot by Timothy, the documentary would also go towards an observational mode. From the rough, and in a sense, improvised camera
"Everyone is influenced by their childhood. The things I write about and illustrate come from a vast range of inputs, from the earliest impressions of a little child, others from things I saw yesterday and still others from completely out of the blue, though no doubt they owe their arrival to some stimulus, albeit unconscious. I have a great love of wildlife, inherited from my parents, which show through in my subject matter, though always with a view to the humorous—not as a reflective device but as a reflection of my own fairly happy nature.
The use of personification by the author displays the animal’s likeness to humans and therefore further aids to establish the future bond between the two, somewhat foreshadowing the ending to the story, where the humans inherited their somewhat slanted eyes from the coyote. This personification also gives depth to the animal characters, such as coyote’s laziness, or mole’s hotheadedness toward coyote and he hardworking personality. Personification like the
Many great authors that study human nature stood out the most during the period of time between the Imperialism and World War II. Among these authors were George Orwell and Virginia Woolf. Their study of the human nature is especially visible in certain short stories that each author respectively did. Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” and Woolf’s “The Death of the Moth.” In either of these stories the respective author uses animals to depict their complex ideas about the nature of life, men, and the whole world.
In the article “A change of heart about animals” author Jeremy Rifkin uses rhetorical appeals such as ethos, logos, and pathos to persuade humanity in a desperate attempt to at the very least have empathy for “our fellow creatures” on account of the numerous research done in pursuit of animal rights. Rifkin explains here that animals are more like us than we imagined, that we are not the only creatures that experience complex emotions, and that we are not the only ones who deserve empathy.
Many people visit parks to see the animals. They will encounter numerous animals snakes, birds, insects, and occasionally a bear. Many people would run away to safety not try to talk or touch them. Timothy Treadwell is a person who on numerous occasions touched the bears and even played with the bear cubs. He was a bear enthusiast who wanted to protect them. He was filming a documentary where he displayed personality disorders, depression, and Attention Deficit Disorder. He has displayed that he has a disorder and is clinically insane.
...n rabbits, Robert’s sense of protection is perceived in the presence of birds and his wild edge is from the coyote. This is an indication that animals and human beings are essentially one being, struggling for survival within a harsh world.
Christopher McCandless, a young American who was found dead in summer of 1992 in wild land in Alaska, wrote in his diary about his moral struggle regarding killing a moose for survival. According to Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild, Chris had to abandon most of the meat since he lacked the knowledge of how to dismantle and preserve it (166-168). Not only did he have a moral dilemma to kill a moose, but also had a deep regret that a life he had taken was wasted because of his own fault. He then started recognizing what he ate as a precious gift from the nature and called it “Holy Food” (Krakauer 168). Exploring relationships between human beings and other animals arouses many difficult questions: Which animals are humans allowed to eat and which ones are not? To which extent can humans govern other animals? For what purposes and on which principles can we kill other animals? Above all, what does it mean for humans to eat other animals? The answer may lie in its context. Since meat-eating has been included and remained in almost every food culture in the world throughout history and is more likely to increase in the future due to the mass production of meat, there is a very small chance for vegetarianism to become a mainstream food choice and it will remain that way.
The last decade of the twentieth century in America saw a rise in programs for human’s “self betterment.” A popular form of betterment is that of the inner animal. Interest in Native American animal mysticism, vision quests, and totem animals have increased dramatically in the past few years. No forms of media have been spared; Calvin Klein’s supermodels come on during sitcom commercials to tell viewers they need to be a beast, or to get in touch with their animal within. In the last decade of the nineteenth century, however, animalism was viewed not as a method of self-improvement but as the reprehensible side of humanity that lingered beneath the surface, waiting for an opportune time to come out and play. In Frank Norris’ novel McTeague, humans are no better than the beasts they claim to control. They cage and torment defenseless creatures, but cage and torment themselves far, far, worse. McTeague, Trina, Zerkow, and Marcus are animals in thin human’s clothing, walking the forests of McTeague, waiting for the opportunity to shed their skin and tear each other apart, while the real animals of the world continue leading lives far superior to their human counterparts.
David Attenborough’s The Life of Mammals: Meat Eaters and Steve Irwin’s Africa’s Deadliest Snakes are wildlife documentaries that have similar yet different purposes. Attenborough’s has a script that is rehearsed and the natural environment is followed. Irwin’s does not have a script and the animals are picked up. However, both hosts inform the audience of the animal and how they function. Attenborough achieves this through the use of language and Irwin achieves this by being a presenter. Purpose, audience, context, language and form will be compared between the two texts.
Jack London’s use of an animal’s perspective allows the readers to fully understand how the harsh landscapes of the Klondike influenced the individual; this strategy exemplifies the naturalism evident among many of his works. For example, in London’s The Call of the Wild, the environmental conditions that occur shape the main character’s destiny and his inability to control these changes. The protagonist is a dog named Buck who is forced to adapt to the austere conditions of the Yukon after being stolen from his pampered life in civilization and sold to a sled team en route to the Klondike Gold Rush. This journey proves to be extremely difficult when Buck faces several obstacles, such as being beaten with a club and the fierce rivalry between him and the nefarious pack leader Spitz. “Yet, by following his instincts, Buck takes his readers to the deepest reaches of the mind…” (“London, Jack”). He cannot control his fate; ...
Humans and animals have always coexisted together for as long as man could remember and exist. They would hunt each other for survival, sometimes man would come out as the victor, and sometimes it was the animal. Mankind would feast on them like they would feast on us. With time, this relationship would change. The animals would become our companions as well as being our food. They would become our hunting tools, such as in tracking prey. They would later be used as our means of transport and also as labor tools, such as when humans would need help working on their farmland. Let’s not forget that they also provide us with entertainment, such as in a zoo or as a circus attraction. Although only some cultures still consider some animals as sacred, most of us look down on them, consider them inferior to us. There was however a time when we worshipped them more and even admired them. We will explore this worship and admiration of animals in this essay as we compare and contrast the depictions of animals in the Upper Paleolithic period in cave arts and in Ancient Egypt in order to identify the presence of a shift, if there was one, in our reverence of animals in between both periods.
The abundant animal imagery in Timothy Findley's book The Wars is used to develop characterization and theme. The protagonist, Robert Ross, has a deep connection with animals that reflects his personality and the situations that he faces. This link between Robert and the animals shows the reader that human nature is not much different than animal nature.
Animalism bases its conclusion on personal identity that the bodies must have the same material body. It fails to address the mind of the bodies at both time t and t*. Also, though the body stays qualitatively identical (same properties); it’s not numerical identical (same substance). Nevertheless, psychological continuity focuses on the mind of the person but not its body. It suggest that
William Faulkner, with the successful use of imagery, explains that the only way humans can achieve true freedom is by connecting with nature. In “The Bear,” wilderness consists of “big woods bigger and older than any records of documents [available]” (Faulkner 185), meaning that the only way humans can achieve freedom in nature is by connecting with it, not by terminating it. Connecting with nature allows humans to discover the intimate deliverance that nature offers (Vickery 211). Ike seeks this deliverance when he “enters his novitiate to true wilderness” (Faulkner 189). At first Ike’s purpose is to be the human who “hunts [and kills] the bear” (Faulkner 204). However, once he obtains a deeper connection to the wilderness through Old Ben, his idea change. Ike, who once felt that all he needed in life was “humanity to survive” (Faulkner 186), begins to have a change of heart when he realizes that he shares a connection between him, Old Ben and nature. The relationship between Ike and Old Ben begins the first time the bear makes an appearance, Ike “looking at [Ike]… without an...