Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Difference between organic and conventional farming
Abuse of animals in factory farming essay ilets
Difference between organic and conventional farming
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Difference between organic and conventional farming
In today's society, organic food is a giant new thing in which food is produced without any chemicals. In other words, the product must be 100 percent natural. A major food source of the American people is meat, and the way that it is produced today is a major issue. In feedlots, where cattle are fed grain to grow before being slaughtered, the conditions are terrible and horrifying. Cattle are confined to a limited amount of space and not allowed to roam freely. Also in these cattle growing yards, the risk of disease is much higher in these animals than out on the open range grazing on the grass. Beef critics say that there are no cattle breeds that posses the amounts of marbling present to make a good steak. It is a true statement to say that …show more content…
This is not the case. Beef cattle today are so much different than they were twenty-five years ago. They are even different than ten years ago. Modern Black Angus genetics today are outstanding. They are very easy keeping cattle, meaning that they require less food and nutrients to put on weight(Hasheider 34). Simmental cattle are the same way, they offer everything that Black Angus do, but in a more extreme muscled, more moderate package. Way back when, Angus and Simmental cattle were bred to be very long and elegant and extremely tall at the shoulder. Today, these cattle are very moderate in size. Over the years, ranchers have culled out cattle that are tall and long, and have been focusing on getting the angus cattle to be fairly short in height, but maintain that long skeleton to producing huge quantities of meat. These Angus genetics are so popular, that fifteen years ago, they began massive embryo transfer programs and cloning operations to keep these amazing genetics going. What embryo transfer allows ranchers to do is simply ground-breaking. It allows ranchers to flush their best cow, or a cow of their liking, with exceptional EPD's( expected progeny differences), and flush eggs out of the uterus of this great cow. The eggs are then fertilized to the bull of the ranchers choice. Once these eggs are fertilized, they are called embryos. The embryos are then implanted into recipient cows, and the cows carry the tiny embryo for nine months, until the baby is born. These recipient mother cows have absolutely no genetic tie to the young calf. They are only surrogate mothers, and they raise the calf until weaning time. Embryo transfer allows ranchers to produce multiple outstanding calves, out of a single outstanding cow, in a single year(Hasheider
Walsh, Bryan. “America’s Food Crisis.” NEXUS. Eds. Kim and Michael Flachmann. Boston: Pearson, 2012. 166 – 173. Print.
... flesh are then ground into a paste-like matter, which is cleansed with the previously mentioned ammonia to rid it of E. coli. The meat filler product is purchased by many fast food restaurants, such as McDonald’s. The Beef Products executive predicts that his product will be in 100% of hamburgers within the next five years.
Kellems, Richard O., and D. C. Church. Livestock Feeds and Feeding. 6th ed. Boston: Prentice Hall, 2010. Print.
Speed, in a word, or, in the industry’s preferred term, “efficiency.” Cows raised on grass simply take longer to reach slaughter weight than cows raised on a richer diet, and for a half a century now the industry has devoted itself to shortening a beef animal’s allotted span on earth… what gets a steer from 80 to 1,100 pounds in fourteen months is tremendous quantities of corn, protein and fat supplements, and an arsenal of new drugs. (71)
From my introduction we can see that Brazil is the world’s main beef producer. The beef produced in Brazil is mostly from their own breed of Nellore cattle. The production system is mainly grass based which can lead to low efficiency. In recent years feedlots have become more common for finishing off animals to meet external demand. Animals usually spend about 70 days in the feedlots to achieve the minimum of 4 millimetres fat cover needed before slaughtering cattle are fed in feedlots mostly during the dry season, when pasture availability is decreased. This strategy is used to maintain a constant beef supply to the external markets nonetheless the beef cattle industry in Brazil is still based on grass feeding. At some point this constitutes an important advantage for Brazilian beef exportations because some countries look for “natural beef.” Animals are usually slaughtered at around 36 months old this late age is due to the tropical grass that they have been eating. For the domestic consumer in Brazil flavour is more important than tenderness so this late slaugh...
"The Importance of Livestock." CGIAR News. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, 1997. Web. 11 Mar. 2014.
However, health concerned organizations want to ban the use of these products due to the increasing fears that they can cause harm to the consumers. For over 50 years, antibiotics have been added to the food of animals such as poultry, cattle and pigs. The main purpose for doing so is to lower the risk of disease in animals. Farm animals are housed together in overcrowded areas, which are very dirty. The hygiene level can get to such a poor state that they are often in contact with their own excreta as well as excreta of the other animals they are housed with and because of tight single air space they share, the likelihood of catching diseases from one another is further increased and very often a whole heard can be infected at one time.
The first thing to consider when looking into the production of animal products is what the animals rely on: food. The production of animal feed includes the use of gr...
... C. T. Lawrence., and Keith McHenry. Food Not Bombs. Tucson, AZ: See Sharp, 2000. Print.
Wein, Harrison, Ph.D. "Risk in Red Meat? - National Institutes of Health" U.S National Library
Although many people believe that the nutritional content of beef is the same no matter what the cow is fed, its diet has a dramatic influence on the nutrients it provides. Cows that are fed grass produce healthier beef than those that are fed a grain-based diet. The staff at one of the best restaurants in Hawaii, Honolulu Burger Company, explains the reasons to eat beef from grass-fed cattle.
An abundance of Americans have no idea that most of the food that they consume are either processed or altered in one way or another. “Almost all beef cattle entering feedlots in the United States are given hormone implants to promote faster growth. The first product used for this purpose is DES (diethylstilbestrol) it was approved for use in beef cattle in 1954. An estimated two-thirds of the nation's beef cattle were treated with DES in 1956. (Swan, Liu, Overstreet, Brazil, and Skakkebaek)” Many people enjoy the various meats that comes from a cow, but that would probably change if the consumers knew that cattle is one of the most processed meat source in the market today because of the synthetic hormones that the cows are given. “ The three synthetic hormones are the estrogen compound zeranol, the androgen trenbolone acetate, and progestin melengestrol acetate. (Swan, Liu, Overstreet, B...
The differences between conventional and grass-fed beef clearly indicate which beef is a better option. Conventional cattle are crowded into feedlots where each cow is confined and is covered in their own manure. Conventional cattle are also fed corn and soybeans which can cause ulcers and promote an overgrowth of Clostridium perfringens. Antibiotics and hormones are also given to conventional cattle to promote growth and prevent disease. Grass- fed cattle
The original trade agreement was that hormone-treated beef was safe and therefore, allowing trade of this product. Then the European Union banned all trading of this type of beef internally throughout Europe as well as throughout the world. The United States and Canada mounted a challenge against this restriction, since 90% of all beef that is produced in the US uses a combination of up to six growth hormones. The ban of this type of beef has cost the US approximately five million dollars annually. (Birchard 1999)
There have been studies that showcase people picking up illnesses from their local water line, in which is related to the feces of chickens who had already been carrying some form of disease and/or infection, some of which has irony due to the fact that the chicken have picked up on “ammonia burn”, along with other illnesses, developed from the high exposure of the ammonia, linked to the accumulation of feces within these factories. Heart failure has showed to effect the chickens at a rate of at least 4.7% and is also linked to the manipulated genetic practices that they take on chickens either before birth or after, which is referred into simpler words as “baby hearts with adult-sized bodies”. Additionally, the factories “catcher” grab chickens in the middle of the night, when they least expect it, and harshly stuff the chicken into crates in which they are later loaded into trucks to be taken to slaughterhouses, although, many of the chickens die before even arriving to the slaughterhouses because of the rough impact; they suffer from lacerations, hemorrhages, and a very common one, heart failure. Along with other infections that the chickens develop such as salmonella and campylobacter, of which is known to make people sick with foodborne poisons. A chicken’s short life span within a factory farm, consists of abuse, infections, diseases, manipulation, torture, and death, sometimes even before they were sentenced to be