Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Factors influencing learning style
Bilingualism and language development
Language stereotypes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Factors influencing learning style
The keynote article “Grammatical processing in language learners” by Clahsen and Felser, aimed to compare the grammatical processing in adult native speakers, child first language learners, and adult second language learners (L2ers) (3). The authors examined works that observed the processing of morphology, ambiguous sentences, and syntactic dependencies before going into their general discussion in which they summarize the results and suggest the shallow structure hypothesis.
The first topic looked at by Clahsen and Felser was morphological processing. Native adult speakers (L1ers) use two methods for processing: lexical storage and morphological decomposition (5). The authors wanted to know if children and L2ers use the same processing techniques. For children, they found that they did, indeed, use the same processing techniques as native adult speakers. A study on the production of high and low frequency German regular and irregular participle forms (6). It was found that like native adults, children produced high-frequency irregular participles faster than low-frequency one and high-frequency regular participles slower than low-frequency ones (7-8). A second study on comprehension of German noun plurals looked at ERP waveforms of children and adults while they listened to German irregular/incorrect and regular/correct plural forms (8) Again both adults and children showed similar results: “frontal negativity followed by a centroparietal positivity” (9).
Clahsen and Felser explain that the only difference is speed, which possibly attributed to incomplete acquisition and/or slower lexical access (12). For L2ers, Clahsen and Felser looked at a study by Hahne which looked at ERPs of Russian L1 speakers who had acquired German a...
... middle of paper ...
...claim that (93) Clahsen and Felser did not say that L1 transfer does not exist, they said that not enough evidence has been found to determine if and how L1 transfer effects L2 language processing (29). They did say that if there is an effect, it is probably not a strong one because speakers with different L1s use the same L2 processing patters (29).
Works Cited
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics,
27(01), 3-42.
Duffield, N. (2006). How do you like your doughnuts?: A commentary on Clahsen and Felser’s
“Grammatical processing in language learners”. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(01), 56-59.
Steinhauer, K. (2006). How dynamic is second language acquisition?: A commentary on Clahsen and
Felser’s “Grammatical processing in language learners”. Applied Psycholinguistics. 27(01), 92-95
The 'Secondary'. The dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 179-199.
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and
Eric Lenneberg was the first to propose there existed a critical period to learn a first or native language that was between that began around two and ended with the onset of puberty around thirteen years old. Lenneberg theorized that language acquisition was not possible before age two because of a lack of maturation, while post-puberty acquisition is inhibited by a loss of cerebral placicity occuring when the cerebral dominance of the language function is complete, happening around the time of puberty (Kraschen). “Children deprived of language during this critical period show atypical patterns of brain lateralization” (intro to language) Lenneberg argued that lateralization of the brain during this critical period is key to language acquisition. “The human brain is primed to develop language in specific areas of the left hemisphere but the normal process of brain specialization depends on ear...
Krashen, Stephen D.. "Lateralization, Language Learning, And The Critical Period: Some New Evidence." Language Learning 23, no. 1 (1973): 63-74.
In the article, “Current Developments in Research on the Teaching of Grammar” by Hossein Nassaji and Sandra Fotos two main issues had been discussed. The first one is whether grammar teaching make any differences to language learning where the questions raised are whether grammar should be taught or not. The second issue is what kinds of grammar teaching have been suggested to facilitate second language learning. If grammar should be taught, how much and should it be implicit or explicit grammar teaching? Lastly, the article discussed on the current approaches to grammar teaching in which formal instruction can be integrated with communicative activities which are processing instruction, interactional feedback, textual enhancement, task-based
In this part, the writer will point out the importance of the biological and neural foundation of language learning by discussing the following :First, the brain anatomy. Second, l...
For the purposes of this paper, I have defined adulthood as including any person who is at or above the age of eighteen, because there is so little research on language learning in early adulthood versus middle or late adulthood. It is not possible to find studies about particular divisions of adulthood that have been verified by subsequent research trials, so I have included research about all ages of adulthood. Throughout this paper, I will discuss the major aspects of the body of research literature that separates adult second language learning from that of natural bilingual persons, including full immersion into the language, biological and neurological factors, the structure of both the native and second languages, age of acqui...
Wolter. B. (2001). Comparing the L1 and L2 Mental Lexicon. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 23:41-69.
The stages of language knowledge develop by stages, and it is suggested, each successive stage approach more approximates the grammar of the adult usage.
What Role does Social Class Play in the Socialisation of Children Through Education? Sociology is a domain that, among other things, seeks to understand choice making in the context of society (Ball 2016). Choice making depends on numerous factors, most of which are influenced by one’s socialisation, that is, by the ongoing process through which social structures and institutions shape individuals. Social class undoubtedly affects this process and although there are individual differences within social classes (Zigler 1970), the way socialisation occurs tends to be different across classes. Much of these differences are explained by child rearing practices and the differences in constraints placed on parents (Zigler 1970), such as whether
A large part of an English teacher’s job deals with helping students find their own voices amidst the many teachings of their parents and peers. A student’s voice can be their values, their interests, and their perspectives of the world in which they live. Their voice can be their critical questioning of the many situations they face, whether in a text, the school cafeteria, or a park after school. It is the job of an English teacher to aid in finding this voice through their writing. It is by putting words and thoughts down on paper that a student can sometimes feel comfortable enough to take risks and find their true voices. Although traditional grammar instruction has long been thought to improve this skill, this is no longer the case. Instead, by providing a classroom environment in which students are immersed in classic literature from many genres including poetry, short stories, and novels, students will learn how to harness grammar for their own purposes of finding their voice in their writing.
Still today, it is the commonly held belief that children acquire their mother tongue through imitation of the parents, caregivers or the people in their environment. Linguists too had the same conviction until 1957, when a then relatively unknown man, A. Noam Chomsky, propounded his theory that the capacity to acquire language is in fact innate. This revolutionized the study of language acquisition, and after a brief period of controversy upon the publication of his book, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, in 1964, his theories are now generally accepted as largely true. As a consequence, he was responsible for the emergence of a new field during the 1960s, Developmental Psycholinguistics, which deals with children’s first language acquisition. He was not the first to question our hitherto mute acceptance of a debatable concept – long before, Plato wondered how children could possibly acquire so complex a skill as language with so little experience of life. Experiments have clearly identified an ability to discern syntactical nuances in very young infants, although they are still at the pre-linguistic stage. Children of three, however, are able to manipulate very complicated syntactical sentences, although they are unable to tie their own shoelaces, for example. Indeed, language is not a skill such as many others, like learning to drive or perform mathematical operations – it cannot be taught as such in these early stages. Rather, it is the acquisition of language which fascinates linguists today, and how it is possible. Noam Chomsky turned the world’s eyes to this enigmatic question at a time when it was assumed to have a deceptively simple explanation.
It is not uncommon to say that grammar instruction plays an important role in language teaching. Regarding the status and importance of grammar teaching, a variety of opinions have been made. Batstone (1994) states that “language without grammar would be chaotic: countless words without the indispensable guidelines for how they can be ordered and modified” (p. 4). More vividly, Wang (2010) makes two similes. She compares grammar to the frame of a house, which is a decisive factor to ensure the solidness of it. Additionally, she regards grammar as a walking stick, whose function is to help and support students to learn English. Thus, the nature of grammar instruction manifests its own significance as it helps students enhance their overall language proficiency by integrating grammar into other aspects of learning, like listening, speaking, reading and writing.
Morphological awareness as a multidimensional competence is defined as the ability to reflect upon morphemes and the morphological structure of words (Carlisle, 2003; Kuo and Anderson, 2006), and manipulate those smaller meaningful parts such as affixes, and roots that builds words (Carlisle & Nomanbhoy, 1993; Jarmulowicz, Taran, & Hay, 2007; Kuo & Anderson, 2006; Nagy, Berninger, & Abbott, 2006) . For children who are learning their native language, morphological awareness develops so quickly with the help of their exposure to spoken language, requiring limited exposure to printed words; However, the case is not the same when second language learning is considered. For EFL learners who have not been exposed to spoken form of the
It is necessary to draw a distinction between foreign language and second language learning. According to (Wisniewski, 2007), a language lear...