Government Interest Groups

743 Words2 Pages

Politics and interest groups are inseparable. Political parties influence the Interest groups and the groups discuss the moral of the parties and persuade them to think a different way. Except, most people are unfamiliar of the power and purpose of the groups. An Interest group is an organization whose members share common concerns and influence government policies. There are many reason as to how an interest group becomes powerful, some of those being: size, money, information, expertise, research, and policy proposals. Currently in our Government, these groups work closely with mayors, governors, elected officials, and government leaders. Working closely with officials has allowed interest groups to campaign their points of interest …show more content…

Because they work so closely with Congress they part take in drafting legislature and policy initiatives. They are also known as a ‘powerful source’ because many groups provide information to the government on public issues which contribute to political campaigns. Some groups owe their success to large members and substantial resources. Many officials have said “power lays in numbers,” and in the case of interest groups, political differences can’t refer to just one person. However, not all interest groups are alike, most groups depend on their most favored interest. These groups span from economic groups to government interest groups. To name a few more; Public groups, religious groups, civil rights group, ideological groups, and single-issue interest groups. Most recently, the media has been mentioning some specific groups such as the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the National Right to Life Committee. Because most of these groups are widely known and supported they receive donations and grow publicly which contributes to their …show more content…

The most well-known technique is called lobbying which is the “attempt to influence policy by persuading public officials to favor or oppose action.” In the US, 50% of ex-legislators become lobbyists in large interest groups. Many interest groups claim responsibility for policies and election outcomes, to impress and encourage the joining of new members, regardless of whether their lobbying made the difference. Sizable amounts that groups spend to lobbying Congress can easily overshadow the more important issue of what they received for their money. Another more common type of lobbying is refer to as Grassroots lobbying which is the participation of group members to voice their opinion in a protest or letter-writing campaign. This is impactful when the elected officials choose not to react because they wish not to act against a larger group of citizens, who will likely use their rights for protection. In a 2010 study by Jacob S. Hacker of Yale and Paul Pierson of University of California, Berkeley examined political and structural for rising inequality. Additionally, a literature review in 2014 written by John M. de Figueiredo of Duke and Brian Kelleher Richter of the University of Texas provide an overview of leading scholarship and suggests promising social science methods and new data sources. They concluded that lobbying funds at the federal level are

Open Document