Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Philosophy of frankenstein
Frankenstein and ethics
Frankenstein and ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Philosophy of frankenstein
Shelley takes the side of natural good of humanity and the creature but believes that when faced with events one is not accustomed to they result to evil. When the creature saved a girl from drowning he was shot; “On seeing me, he darted towards me, and tearing the girl from my arms, hastened towards the deeper parts of the wood...he aimed a gun, which he carried, at my body and fired….“This was then the reward of my benevolence!” (Shelley 286). The monster demonstrated his selflessness, risking himself to save a girl, a stranger. The man, on the other hand, was faced with a hideous creature. In his mind regardless of what the creature did it was dangerous and scary so he took a shot at it. The creature came to know that by doing good he would be rewarded with evil. The creature cursed his creator and surrendered to evil by vowing to kill everyone that Frankenstein loves; “Yet you, my creator, detest and spurn me….comply with my conditions, I will leave them and you at peace; but if you refuse, I will glut the maw of death, until it be satiated with the blood of your remaining friends” (Shelley 191-192). The creature, neglected and hated by …show more content…
The ultimate point Shelley tries to make is that when one is faced with violence or things not easily understood they turn to evil to find the fastest way out of that problem. The creature and humans are born good but it is the decisions and choices that bring out the evil. Though the creature kills many at the end he feels remorse; “What does it avail that I now ask thee to pardon me?....Alas! He is cold, he cannot answer me” (Shelley 459-460). This shows that if one chooses a path of evil they can find their way back to a life of good. Even though all are born good evil is very good at roping people in. However, good is always there, but sometimes one has to dig deep to find it even when under the control of
The creature’s moral ambiguity characteristic was a vile ingredient to the construction of this novel Frankenstein because it made the reader 's sympathies with him even after the audience knows he had committed murder because the readers had seen the truth this creature had to face. That he had tried everything within his power to peacefully live with them, to interact, communicate, and befriend them “these thoughts exhilarated me and led me to apply with fresh ardour to the acquiring the art of language”, that even though he was seen as a monster because of the looks he was created with, something he had no control over, he still had hope to be seen as equals, ”My organs were indeed harsh, but supple; and although my voice was very unlike the soft music of their tones, yet I pronounced such words as I understood with tolerable ease. It was as the ass and the lap-dog; yet surely the gentle ass whose intentions were affectionate, although his manners were rude, deserved better treatment than blows and execration;” this hope of his was utterly crushed, and can only set him up for utter disappointment(12.18). Because in the end he only received hates, scorns, violence, and prejudice from his good will. So in the end of the story, Mary Shelley’s forces the readers to see within the creature’s heart and for
When Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein is analyzed, critics comes to a conclusion about Victor Frankenstein's creation. The creature invokes the most sympathy from the readers than any other character in the novel. Because he is abandoned by society which manipulates the creature to do evil things despite his good heart. Therefore Shelley's message throughout the novel is that a person is not born evil, they are made evil.
Tragedy shows no discrimination and often strikes down on those undeserving of such turmoil. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, a creature more repulsive than one can imagine is brought to life by a young scientist. Although this creature is horrifying in sight, he is gentle by nature. Unfortunately, the softer side of the creature is repeatedly overlooked and the so called “monster” is driven to a breaking point. Even though the Creature committed many crimes, Mary Shelley’s Creature was the tragic hero of this story because of his efforts rescue the life of a young girl and helping destitute cottagers.
... good, but can be turned to evil by society’s narrow-minded view of what is normal, and the corruption of the mind through knowledge and education. The repercussions of Victor’s and others alienation of the creature turned a caring individual to an evil one. Shelley succeeds in bringing Rousseau's theory to life, that one is born good, but he can be turned to evil through civilization and education. This story still has a great meaning for us today. Millions of people are outcast by society, not only because of physical appearance, but also because of sexual orientation, social status, and religion. Once people quit looking so narrow-mindedly at one another, the world will be a much better place, and Frankenstein's "monster" will rest in peace!
A monster is not a monster unless he intentionally wants to hurt many and his plans are to hurt many. In Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, the monster is portrayed as an evil, hideous creature through everyone’s eyes. Victor Frankenstein creates a monster and once he brings him to life he abandoned him, leaving him to learn and discover the world by himself. The monster has to learn his way around society while being rejected by society because of this looks. Frankenstein’s monster is seen as evil because the way people treated him caused him to act out. The monster is not inherently evil because he helps others, has emotions, and does not fight back when he is attacked.
Throughout Frankenstein, one assumes that Frankenstein’s creation is the true monster. While the creation’s actions are indeed monstrous, one must also realize that his creator, Victor Frankenstein, is also a villain. His inconsiderate and selfish acts as well as his passion for science result in the death of his friend and family members and ultimately in his own demise. Throughout the novel, Shelley investigates the idea of monstrosity. She makes the point that a monster does not have to be genuinely evil in order to be considered monstrous.
In Shelley’s novel the creature created by Victor Frankenstein is faced with a difference which society uses as a prejudice against him, his external appearance. In both cases, the differences faced are constantly being oppressed due to the expectation of society to conform to normalcy. When the creature is created, he longs to be accepted by the human race but eventually finds that he is too ‘ugly’ to be accepted by them, similar to how members of the LGBTQ community long for the same kind of acceptance. After arriving to civilization Shelley writes from the creature’s point of view “The whole village was roused; some fled, some attacked me, until, grievously bruised by stones and many other kinds of missile weapons, I escaped to the open country,” (Shelley) demonstrating the harsh treatment humans displayed. Aggression and violence, in both cases, are used because of human ignorance towards what they do not
as we know that is not what he wanted to happen. But it is his fault
The concept of evil is often disputed between people. What really makes someone evil. Is someone born into it, or does one choose to be evil. The term evil is mostly used to describe a specific set of actions in which someone or something is responsible that another person disagrees with. In Frankenstein, the real monster is Victor due to his irresponsibility as a parent and his cruel actions towards his monster.
Humanity, as a race, is far from perfect: we cheat, lie, fight with one another, and at times, even with our creator. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is a story about a man named Victor who plays God and creates another being. Now it turns out that this “being” is truly a monster in appearance, and, due to this, Victor rejects him. This leads into an epic story of creator versus creation. While on the surface this just appears to be a thrilling story of creation gone wrong, Shelley has a deeper meaning behind it. Mary Shelley’s use of text such as Paradise Lost and her allusions to the Bible suggest that the story of Frankenstein's creature is a recreation of the Biblical creation story and the downfall of humanity. Through this Mary Shelley shows that creation can never live up to its creator’s expectations, and because of this, leads to rebellion.
The monster Frankenstein creates is completely artificial—he uses an unnatural process to create somewhat of a superhuman through combining scraps of the dead. The intention going into his project was that the “human”, or monster, would benefit the greater good. Shelley uses this to stand as a metaphor for the Enlightenment period and the new mindset that people acquired from it. She discusses society in this way throughout her novel, showing the positives and negatives associated with it. During this time, people’s identities changed; no longer were people putting their entire faith in religion and intangible explanations—instead people began to focus on science and tangible explanations. People also believed in the idea of prioritizing the greater good as opposed to prioritizing one’s own self, which is an idea which Shelley reflects on. When creating the monster, Frankenstein believed that he was serving the greater good by inventing a superhuman that would help society and open new doors (both in terms of science and in societal structure). In actuality, Frankenstein was being selfish and didn’t thoroughly think through his plan or the potential consequences; he just wanted the fame and fortune of being the first scientist that regenerated a human, which would’ve forever changed science and the world. This negatively depicts the Enlightenment period and the “regeneration” of humans because it shows that although serving the greater good is a good thought, it is idealistic to think that everyone would act in this way and be that selfless. With that being said, Shelley also shows this in a positive light through acknowledging good intentions; Frankenstein’s intention shows the value of focussing on the greater good that was rooted in society through the Enlightenment, and that even though it was universally unrealistic, it was still there.
In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the creature is portrayed as the antagonist of the story; a murderous scientific experiment gone wrong. At the moment of his creation, he does not posses any negative personality traits, it is only the hideousness of the creature that causes Victor Frankenstein to abandon him. Frankenstein is unable to accept the creature as it is different from himself. The abandonment of the creature by Victor Frankenstein causes the creature to venture out into the world without any knowledge or nurturing to protect him and set him on a righteous path. Frankenstein’s monster encounters many unpleasant and emotionally damaging interactions with society which harden him. The creature craved love and acceptance from a creature
Shelly introduces us to a very disturbed character of Victor Frankenstein, whilst we know he comes from “supposably” a very financially and emotionally stable upper class background Frankenstein is a psychopath, a person who has a hard time forming real emotional attachments with others. Instead, they form artificial, shallow relationships designed to be manipulated in a way that most benefits the psychopath. People are seen as pawns to be used to forward the psychopath’s goals. Psychopaths rarely feel guilt regarding any of their behaviours, no matter how much they hurt others.1) Frankenstein exhibits all of these traits through the duration of the film. The taking of the body parts without even batting an eye lid is disturbing in its self,
Shelley uses the gothic genre to show the dark side of human nature. Victor became so carried away with his with his experiments that he did not consider that it would be evil to try to play God. “I had deprived myself of rest and health” (51, Shelley). It can be seen here that Victor what very involved In his studies of the reanimation of life, he does not think of the moral issues that might arise from his experiments. It is Victor that controls the technology and knowledge of life, but he insists on creating the monster.
Shelley’s main idea is that without society’s acceptance, things that exist in this world can not be loved at all. This lack of love is what causes residents to produce and display hate. If one is producing enough hate to make up for thousands of criticisms and repulsions, it is only necessary that that hate be relieved somehow. Unfortunately for those in the story,