Gonzales V. Oregon Case Study

656 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Death with dignity act essay

Gonzales v. Oregon is a Supreme Court case that took place in 2005, with the verdict and dissenting opinions stated in January of 2006. The case is about the General Attorney’s ruling of a medical practice to be illegal. The Attorney General at the time was John Ashcroft, appointed under President George Bush Jr., who authorized that the usage of lethal doses of medicine on terminally-ill patients to be illegal under the Controlled Substance Act in 1970. The Controlled Substance Act of 1970 is a federal United States drug policy which limits the usage of certain medications in a variety of ways. (Oyez, n.d.). Oregon comes into play when they passed the Death with Dignity act which granted terminally-ill patients to be able to consent to taking …show more content…

The majority opinion was delivered by Justice Anthony Kennedy. Agreeing with Kennedy were Justices Stevens, O’Connor, Scouter, Ginsburg, and Breyer. Kennedy stated that the intention of the CSA was not to “define general standards of medical practices”. They determined that the CSA was established in efforts of limiting the drugs themselves, not the medical decisions associated with the drugs. The dissenting opinion was delivered by Justice Scalia and was joined by Justices Roberts and Thomas. They declared that John Ashcroft had “sufficient grounds” for the interpretation of the Controlled Substance Act and the conclusions made after said interpretation (Scalia, 2006). Justice Scalia had made three grounds on which the Attorney General was able to make his interpretation valid. Additionally, John Ashcroft was covered by the statutory phrase “public health and safety” in Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. and the ruling in that said case. Griswold v. Connecticut was a court case that set the precedent for the right to privacy in 1965. It was ruled in a 7-2 vote that the Constitution does not mention the right to privacy, yet a few Amendments put together conclude that there is a right to privacy in marital relations. This case was important in selective interpretation, giving the right to privacy in many instances (Oyez,

Show More
Related

  • arizona v. grant

    599 Words  | 2 Pages

    The police responded to a tip that a home was being used to sell drugs. When they arrived at the home, Gant answered the door and stated that he expected the owner to return home later. The officers left and did a record check of Gant and found that his driver’s license had been suspended and there was a warrant for his arrest. The officers returned to the house later that evening and Gant wasn’t there. Gant returned shortly and was recognized by officers. He parked at the end of the driveway and exited his vehicle and was placed under arrest 10 feet from his car and was placed in the back of the squad car immediately. After Gant was secured, two officers searched his car and found a gun and a bag of cocaine.

    Read More

  • Arizona V. Hicks

    732 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Case of Arizona v. Hicks took place in 1986; the case was decided in 1987. It began on April 18th 1984, with a bullet that was shot through the floor in Hick’s apartment; it had injured a man in the room below him. An investigation took place. Officers were called to the scene. They entered Mr. Hicks’ apartment and discovered three weapons and a black stocking mask.

    Read More

  • Martinez V. Santa Clara Pueblo Case Study

    795 Words  | 2 Pages

    The American Indian Movement was formed and it was influenced due to the other civil rights groups speaking their mind about the oppression they found to be evident within the major of their culture. Martinez v. Santa Clara one of the most cited court cases focusing on the suppression of equal rights among all, Native American sovereignty, and the ability to govern over own domestic disputes. Martinez v. Santa Clara Pueblo a landmark case although no differences in stressors, cause Native American civil rights activists to speak out against the right of suffrage, ability for self-discrimination and Native American equal rights. The Native Americans have dealt with countless amounts of obstacles, however the government allows for federally funding

    Read More

  • Case Study On Death With Dignity

    1452 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Death with Dignity Act was passed in Oregon in 1994, and it is another option for dying with those who have terminal diseases. These people that want to die with dignity have to be seen by at least two doctors and have six or less months to live. While making the decision to use this act, the patient must be in a safe mental state to be making this decision. Currently, Oregon, Washington, Vermont, and soon to be California are the only states to carry the Death with Dignity Act. (Death)

    Read More

  • United States v. Alvarez

    1055 Words  | 3 Pages

    In United States v. Alvarez, Xavier Alvarez claimed that he was a retired marine who had received the Congressional Medal of Honor in 1987 for being wounded repeatedly by the same person in combat. These claims were made in an attempt to have him gain more respect from his peers. The claim was that Alvarez had violated the Stolen Valor Act of 2005. The Stolen Valor Act of 2005 states that there are protections against claiming to have received some type of military honor, such as the Medal of Honor and other military decorations and awards (GovTrack). The Government stated that there was first amendment value applicable to Alvarez’s false statements, and that his statements caused harm to others. By making this statement, it was argued that the value of the award of Honor would drop and that this type of false speech falls under the same category as speaking falsely on behalf of the government or as a government official. However, since his statements were not made with the intention of financial benefits or special treatment, his false claims may not be illegal because they were made for the purpose of gaining respect.

    Read More

  • Griswold vs. Connecticut

    1819 Words  | 4 Pages

    On June 7th 1965, married couples in the State of Connecticut received the right to acquire and benefit from contraceptive devises. In a majority decision by the United States Supreme Court, seven out of the nine judges believed that sections 53-32 and 54-196 of the General Statues of Connecticut , violated the right of privacy guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. The case set precedence by establishing marital (and later constitutional) privacy, and had notable influence on three later controversial ruling=s in Roe v. Wade (1973), Bowers v. Hardwick (1986) and Planned Parenthood of S.E. Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992) . The issue at hand was, and is still, one that still causes debate, wether a state has the authority to restrict the use and sale of contraceptives. Though it is not contraceptives, anymore, that is at the heart of the abortion debate, this ruling was the first step to the expectation of constitutional privacy.

    Read More

  • Case Analysis: United States V. Santana

    2091 Words  | 5 Pages

    The decision comes with a number of justices choosing to concur in part and dissent in part, the court said that the searches and seizures of Coolidge’s property were unconstitutional. Justice Stewart’s opinion wrote that the warrant authorized to seize his automobile was not valid because it was not issued by a “nature and detached magistrate.” Stewart also rejected the argument of New Hampshire argument to make an exception to the search warrant with “special circumstances” neither the incident to arrest doctrine nor the plain view doctrine justified the search, and that an automobile exception was also

    Read More

  • Physician Aid-in-Dying (PAD): The Right to Choose

    1783 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 1994, Oregon passed the Death with Dignity Act. This law states that Oregon residents, who have been diagnosed with a life ending disease and have less than six months to live, may obtain a lethal medicine prescribed by a physician, which would end their life when and where they chose to do so. This law or act requires the collection of data from patients and physicians and publishes it in an annual r...

    Read More

  • The Right To Privacy By Robert Bork.

    874 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Right to Privacy by Robert Bork. Robert Bork's The Right to Privacy examined the landmark case Griswald v. Connecticut. Bork's "originalist" view proclaimed that Justice Douglas erroneously interpreted the right to privacy from the Constitution. The originalist view is that judges must strictly adhere to the language of the Constitution, thus people do not have a general right to privacy because it was never actually written into the Constitution. This view severely restricts judges in dealing with new issues that our forefathers could not have possibly envisioned.

    Read More

  • Lawrence V. Texas

    1308 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the case Lawrence v. Texas (539 U.S. 558, 2003) which was the United States Supreme Court case the criminal prohibition of the homosexual pederasty was invalidated in Texas. The same issue has been already addressed in 1989 in the case Bowers v. Hardwick, however, the constitutional protection of sexual privacy was not found at that time. Lawrence overruled Bowers and held that sexual conduct was the right protected by the due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. The effects of the ruling were quite widespread and led to invalidation of the similar laws throughout the United States that tried to criminalize the homosexual activity of adults which were acting in privacy. The case attracted much of the public attention and quite a large number of briefs were filed in the cases.

    Read More

  • Roe v. Wade 1973

    2148 Words  | 5 Pages

    The right to privacy is nowhere listed in the Bill of Rights, however the First Congress that established the Constitution intended for the concept of right to privacy to be implemented or derived in some way. The Supreme Court decision made due to the case of Roe v. Wade has been called both radical and temperate (Edwards III, Wattenberg, and Lineberry 131). It was first argued in December 13, 1971 by a Texas woman named Norma McCorvey. “A three-judge District Court, which consolidated the actions, held that Roe and Hallford, and members of their classes, had standing to sue and presented justiciable controversies” (Thomas Reuters Business). The case was later appealed by Jane Roe and was sent to the Supreme Court to be tried again. She went by the pseudonym “Jane Roe” in order to keep herself confidential to the public. Jane Roe wanted to terminate her pregnancy by abortion but was prohibited by Texas state law stating that abortion was illegal unless it was required to say the woman’s life which wasn...

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Death With Dignity Act

    1181 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Death with Dignity Act was approved by voters in Oregon in 1994 and was confirmed in 1997 when the law went into effect. It is a law that allows mentally competent, terminally-ill adults to voluntarily request a prescription medication

    Read More

  • Abortion Essay - Roe v. Wade and Morality

    947 Words  | 2 Pages

    Such precedent setting decisions are usually derived from the social, economic, political, and legal philosophy of the majority of the Justices who make up the Court, and also represent a segment of the American population at a given time in history. Seldom has a Supreme Court decision sliced so deeply into the basic fabric that composes the tapestry and direction of American law or instigated such profound changes in cherished rights, values, and personal prerogatives of individuals: the right to privacy, the structure of the family, the status of medical technology and its impact upon law and life, and the authority of state governments to protect the lives of their citizens.(3-4)

    Read More

  • The Death With Dignity Act

    1734 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Death with Dignity Act (hereafter DWDA) allows terminally ill patients who are Oregon residents to obtain and use the prescription from their physician to self-administer lethal medications. Under the Act, ending one’s life is in accordance with the law and does not constitute as suicide. The Death with Dign...

    Read More

  • Should Celebrities Have Their Right to Privacy?

    1573 Words  | 4 Pages

    Historical/practical rights are one of the biggest issues and it all started back in colonial America. In colonial America, privacy was constrained. Colonial homes were often crowded, affording little privacy. There have been many events about privacy since 1639. In 1787, the U.S. Constitution was written declaring it does not contain an express right of privacy, in Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3, the Constitution mandates that a census be conducted every ten years. Critics of the census regard it as a threat to privacy (Right of Privacy Time).

    Read More

More about Gonzales V. Oregon Case Study

Open Document