Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Blindness in literature
Blindness in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Blindness in literature
Ms. Nelle Lee is the author of “To kill a Mockingbird” which is a very famous 20th century novel. Recently “Go Set a Watchman” which is a sequel to her previous book was controversially published. Lee is very old and in bad health. Some people believe she never wanted “Go set a Watchman” published. Other people thought that she did want this book published. One of these people is her lawyer Tonja Carter. Carter is the spokesperson for Ms. Lee since Lee is mostly deaf and blind. The people who believe Lee did not want this book published believe Carter is manipulating her in order to make more money off the new book. To answer the question of “Should the publisher have published the book?” I will rely on Joseph L. Badaracco Jr.’s Defining Moments …show more content…
I will be relying on this framework to answer the question above. I believe “Go Set a Watchman” should not have been published because Badaracco’s framework for an ethical decision suggests against it. Although one step of the framework suggests to publish the book the majority suggests not to publish the book. “Go Set a Watchman” should be published because of the net-net consequences principle. According to Joseph L. Badaracco Jr. net-net consequences involves listing the winners and losers, then picking a plan that does the most good and least harm. Relating this to publishing the book I will first explain the winners. The first winner is Ms. Lee. “Lee, in a statement released by Carter, said she was “happy as hell” that is was finally being published” (Tucker, 2015). This shows that Lee is very happy and wanted the book published. The next …show more content…
According to Joseph L. Badaracco Jr. there are certain groups and individuals that have rights that we cannot violate. I believe Lee is in one of these groups because her health is declining and she may be vulnerable to coaxing. Before Lee’s health started to decline she promised she would never publish a book again. “Lee had long vowed she would never publish again” (Tucker, 2015). Since before her declining health she vowed she would never publish again, it would be against her personal rights to publish the book. Many of Lee’s friends have noticed a major decline in her health and memory. “They say they have witnessed a stark mental decline in their friend and report that her short-term memory is erratic” (Tucker, 2015). This shows that Lee’s mental state is diminishing. One of Lee’s friends also said, “I went to see her the next week, telling her how excited everyone was that she came. And she said, “Oh, but I didn’t go to that” (Tucker, 2015). This quote was talking about when Lee randomly showed up to a writers symposium. This shows that Lee is not aware of what she is doing sometimes so it would be unethical to publish the book because that is not what she really wants. If she didn’t want to publish the book for many years it would not make sense for her to want to publish it now that her health is declining. Therefore I believe “Go Set
Does It Deserve To Be Banned: Go Ask Alice In 1971 a book was published under the name of Go Ask Alice, with no author or editor. It was just written as anonymous. Although anonymous during the mid 1980, Beatrice Sparks, a teen physiologist, was uncovered to have helped write a good portion of the book. Although she helped, the real author was never revealed.
Considering all of this, Of Mice and Men should not be a banned book because it provides readers with information that they can use in school or for later in life. Another thing is that John Steinbeck makes readers enjoy the book with details that bring you inside the story. Also because banning a book that contains euthanasia is not necessary because having something suffer would be much worse. Lastly Steinbeck’s book helps people understand the disabilities that people have. Don’t let this great book rot away with the other banned books!
The narrator makes statements that may come off as unpatriotic and anti- Christian. It is also true that the story may be too descriptive of gore filled events, but this should not stop someone from finishing the book. Once the reader gets through the mature content, they are able to see the true meaning of the story. They find out that the reason behind the novel was to warn people about sending kids to war. They can get many types of psychological diseases that cannot be cured by pills, treatments, or therapy.
Albert Camus once said, “Rebellion cannot exist without the feeling that somewhere, in some way, you are justified.” This genius makes it clear that one does not rebel against society unless one feels that it is for the better. This accurately sums up the mindset of both young Scout Finch, the main character of To Kill a Mockingbird, a classic American novel, and Harper Lee, the author, when they made their decisions to go against “the flow” and follow their hearts. Scout Finch goes against the flow by being one of the only people in Maycomb who discounts racism enough to voluntarily associate with black people, and Harper Lee goes against the flow by publishing a controversial novel that does not agree with everyone in America. The author
Nelle Harper Lee is best known for her novel, To Kill a Mocking Bird, which was published in July of 1960. Initially named “Atticus” It was an immediate success.
To Kill a Mockingbird is a novel written by Harper lee in 1960. The novel tells the story of Atticus Finch, a white lawyer, and Tom Robinson, a black servant, accused of raping a white female. Finch defends Robinson in court arguing lack of evidence as his main point. However, the judge and jury still believe the woman’s testimony and orders Robinson to be killed. The novel has been praised for its outstanding literature since its publication. However, it remains a banned book by the American Library Association for its use of racial slurs and profanity. Due to it being banned, many high schools have reconsidered the notion of teaching it to their students. Two prominent authors wrote articles pertaining to this piece of literature: Angela Shaw-Thornburg wrote an article on her re-reading of the novel and her opinions on it; while Malcom Gladwell wrote an article comparing Atticus Finch to a state governor liberalist, James Folsom, and the restraints of liberalism in the south. In addition, Rebecca Best contributes her thought on how the novel should be taught by introducing the idea of “the other.” Regardless of the modern day political arguments surrounding this piece of literature, this novel contains a large insight into the time period of the 1960s which is an influential topic that should be taught to young high school students.
...ves to be on the banned books list because of its level of violence. One that wants this book off the banned books list could say that violence is everywhere, why should one book be banned for showing something that is everywhere in todays society. I think this book shows a good concept of war. It could open ones mind to the idea of war and how one is forced to fight for themself and even their country. In the book they fight for themself and their district but relating it to the readers life he or she can think of it as fighting for themselves and their country. Which I believe is a good concept for young teenagers to be exposed to. I think this book should be off the banned books list because there are many reasons The Hunger Games can be considered a “good” book, it portrays many good themes throughout the novel and it can be translated into modern day war.
Harper Lee’s novel Go Set a Watchman is a sequel of her previous To Kill a Mockingbird, in which the author portrays the story of a girl Scout, who is now twenty-six years old and visiting her home town for very short period of time, though Maycomb is her hometown but nothing remains the same. Moreover, the author uses her disappointment as a theme which she feels for her home which is now become an ice cream shop as well as she feels great disenchantment with her father as Mr. Atticus completely changes her personality even her childhood friend Henry, changed a lot. Thus, when she comes back from the New York which is her new residency, she only faces grief and unexpected personalities of her beloved ones. Hence, author Lee brilliantly uses
Harper Lee’s only book, To Kill a Mockingbird, is the stereotypical tale of childhood and innocence, yet it successfully incorporates mature themes, like the racism in the South at the time, to create a masterpiece of a work that has enraptured people’s minds and hearts for generations. According to esteemed novelist Wally Lamb, “It was the first time in my life that a book had sort of captured me. That was exciting; I didn’t realize that literature could do that” (111). Scout’s witty narration and brash actions make her the kind of heroine you can’t help but root for, and the events that take place in Maycomb County are small-scale versions of the dilemmas that face our world today. Mockingbird is a fantastically written novel that belongs on the shelves for classic literature that everyone should take the time to read and appreciate for their execution of style and the importance of their content.
Censorship is defined as the act of taking out unacceptable parts from books, movies, and other content available to the public eye. In Ray Bradbury’s novel, Fahrenheit 451, censorship takes over a major part of the citizen’s lives. In the modernistic era, the story is based upon a lot of television and is censored to the important and educational content we have in the present, such as; books, which open doors to infinite amounts of knowledge.
The height of this movement was in 1960 when the novel was published. Lee grew up during a time when slavery was not uncommon. Racism and prejudice were common beliefs at this time. When Lee was a kid, a case had arose called the Scottsboro Case. The Scottsboro case was when nine black men were accused of raping two white women. Lee had a different perspective than everybody else at the time. She believed that everybody has equal rights and she wanted other people to see this as well. She wrote To Kill A Mockingbird to get society to accept others for who they are and their individuality instead of their gender or race. The book get people to think about the effect they can have on equal rights (“Why Did Harper Lee Write ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’?”). To Kill A Mockingbird addresses tolerance, prejudice and the courage it takes to make a change in society (“Why Did Harper Lee Wrote The Novel To Kill A
...tional stage with the Scottsboro trials, which became the inspiration for Harper Lee’s burning expeditionary work of fiction, To Kill a Mockingbird, in which she employs a tone critical of racism. The two cases, fictional and real, shared many stunning similarities, such as the preservation of southern womanhood and police brutality, as well as minor differences such as the attitudes of the accusers. The great tragedy of both cases is best exemplified by Atticus Finch’s declaration that “this case should never have come to trial. This case is as simple as black and white” (Lee 271).
In Rebecca’s article there are many things that I do not agree with. The first argument that I have to disagree with is when Rebecca stated that the American Library Association recommends books for young readers, but these recommendations reflect their liberal values and the books recommended by the ALA contain cures words and graphic sexual information (Hagelin). I got in contact with the ALA and I asked them, “Do your librarians or any of your higher branches read any of the books on any of your book lists?” I got a response back from a lady named Angela Maycock who is the assistant director for the Office for Intellectual Freedom. Angela responded saying, “I assume when you ask about ALA’s boo...
I agree with Ray Bradbury on his theory about the book not having censorship simply because a person could have thought he had censorship while he was writing the book, but he believes different. Also are books being replaced by television? I believe that, that theory is true in the most but less amount of truth.Mr.Bradbury would say that the book means the same thing. The book basically talks about how the world has changed but in a literature way. He want to show people that the book wasn’t about the government but simply about the racial deification. For example, Bradbury had an interview with Amy E Boyle from LA WEEKLY, and the stated, “Bradbury imagined a democratic society whose diverse population turns against books: Whites reject Uncle Tom’s Cabin and blacks disapprove of Little Black Sambo”.
...s like with the mob that was after Tom Robinson. To Kill a Mockingbird is full of many truths that people need to know; Harper Lee has done an amazing job bring those truths to light through the eyes of a child.