Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of media in identity formation
Globalization effect on united states
The role of media in identity formation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of media in identity formation
1. Identify and discuss the ways in which globalization has impacted diversity within the United States.
According to Hanser and Gomila (2015), “Globalization is the process by which societies, cultures, and economics around the world have become integrated due to advances in communication and transportation technology, as well as the passage of laws and treaties that facilitate this integration” (p. 7). The concepts of globalization have impacted small, medium and large businesses in the United States. Globalization has influenced the way leaders think, make decisions, and lead their organization. We are surrounded by super information highways and modern technology, which makes it easier and accessible to conduct business across nations.
…show more content…
Globalization has impacted diversity within the United States. Globalization not only brought advantages to a workplace, but it also facilitated crime and immigration activities (legal and illegal). The term diversity has varied meanings, and “there are a multiplicity of perspectives from which one can approach the notion of diversity because they are all valid yet unique in many respects” (Hanser & Gomila, 2015, p. 2). Hanser and Gomila believed the term diversity is subjected to diverse forms of meanings; therefore they prefer to use the term culture diversity. Hanser and Gomila (2015) referred culture diversity to a “concept whereby the history, beliefs, behaviors, language, traditions, and values of racial and/or ethnic groups are what make them distinct” (p. 5). Private and public sectors of the government can benefit from a diverse workplace because their employees can bring leadership skills, talents, team building skills, intelligence, and innovative perspectives that can foster organizational needs. Cultural diversity in a workplace could also create various challenges in an organization due to cultural and religious differences; therefore, leaders must develop employee training programs to ensure tasks and goals are accomplished. Due to technological advancements, globalization, and cultural changes in the 21st century, law enforcement organizations in the United States has evolved tremendously with advanced equipment and software, which helped made police work more effective and efficient. Hanser and Gomila (2015) noted, “The criminal justice system does not operate in a social vacuum; rather, it is directly impacted by this sense of rapid and continual cultural change” (p. 7). In light of globalization, law enforcement organizations must change the way it operates in a world where criminal activities and terrorism are more geographically diverse and sophisticated. That being said, law enforcement organizations must be multifaceted by: Increasing minority hiring and sensitivity training for police working in immigrant communities, exchange with personnel from other countries, interagency task forces concerned with specific types of crime, increased awareness in the court and corrections system, and bi-and multilateral cooperation and treaty insurgents (Schiller et al., 2000, p. 2). Police agencies must develop positive rapport and channels of communication with diverse communities in order to achieve goals and avoid conflicts. Racism, discrimination, and miscommunication have been the cause of countless police shootings in this past month. Police leaders must find innovative methods to collaborate with Black communities and stop all of these pointless police killings. 2. Discuss the various challenges faced by the criminal justice system due to the rapid social changes in the United States. The issue of immigration is one of the various challenges faced by the criminal justice system and in advanced economies. Hanser and Gomila (2015) noted, “In states such as California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas, there has been a substantial back lash for citizens of the United States toward persons migrating to the U.S. whether legally or illegally” (p. 8). Most immigrants leave their countries in hopes for better economic opportunities and high demands for low-skilled jobs (Hanser & Gomila, 2015). Studies from Hanser and Gomila (2015) indicate that Mexican immigrants, legal or illegal, accounts for the largest influx of persons in the United States (p. 8). The cause of and effects of illegal immigration would be too broad of a topic to examine; therefore, this question will focus particularly on crime and illegal immigration. Numerous opinions have been made regarding the issue of illegal immigration, and whether it is the primary cause of violent crimes in America.
According to Spenkuch (2010), “Immigrants from Mexico commit between 3.5 and 5 times as many crimes as the average native, while all other immigrants commit less than half as many crimes as natives, or even more” (p. 15). In opposition, statistics from the 2010 Census Bureau revealed “incarceration rates among the young, less-educated Mexican, Salvadorian, and Guatemalan men who make up the bulk of the unauthorized population are significantly lower than the incarceration rate among native-born young men without a high school diploma” (American Immigration Council, 2015. p. …show more content…
1). Statistical data and research studies may indicate that illegal immigrants contribute a vast majority of crimes in the U.S; however, concluding that all illegal immigrants are criminals is an invalid statement. Immigrants (legal or illegal) believe they are faced with disparity among white Americans and the criminal justice system. Individuals who see immigrants as burglars, robbers, or drug dealers will contribute more hatred and discrimination in our society. Police officers must not conduct their duties and make judgment calls with personal biases; furthermore, their biases can also impede their neutrality throughout the investigation. Studies from Spenkuch (2010) revealed higher crime rates from Mexican immigrants; however, police officers are “limited in their ability to arrest without a warrant, and are prohibited from racial profiling to affect an arrest” (p. 10). According to Peak (2012), “Legal abuse and civil rights violations consist of police actions that violate citizens’ constitutional or statutory rights. This abuse usually involves false arrest, false imprisonment, and harassment” (p. 112). In the Ortega-Melendres v. Arpaio court decision, the Latino community had filed a law suit against the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office for discrimination and intentional racial profiling. A federal court cited Sheriff Arpaio for authorizing his deputies to detain people based on their appearance, and emphasized on the racial characteristics of individuals who have the look of a Mexican illegal (Feder, 2012). Mexican immigrants who have committed criminal offenses in the United States will be prosecuted and punished to the fullest extent of the law. The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), is an enforcement act that permits deportation of illegal immigrants who commit crimes. The U.S government has also utilized the IIRIRA as a security strategy to track foreign visitors after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack (McCabe & Meissner, 2010). The IIRIRA have developed rules of deportation for unauthorized immigrants, whom has been prosecuted and convicted for theft offenses and serious violent crimes (Hanser & Gomila, 2015). According to the American Immigration Council (2013), “Local police now play an increasingly active role in immigration enforcement. Consequently, even relatively minor offenses can result in a person being detained in immigration custody and deported, often with no hope of ever returning to the United States” (p. 3). Granting that immigration law is civil in nature, criminal activities that are committed by immigrants could cause them to be deported. 3. Are Americans inherently ethnocentric? Do Americans always believe their culture is better than everyone else’s? Why or why not? By definition, ethnocentric is “Characterized by or based on the attitude that one's own group or culture is superior or more important than others” (Merriam-Webster, 2015).
Orey and Park (2012) conducted a study on high school seniors and their parents, and examined their levels of ethnocentrism (p. 71). The authors concluded that there is a correlation between the parents’ ethnocentrism and their children’s ethnocentrism. The author revealed that “ethnocentrism seems to have more to do with genetic inheritance than with social learning” (Orey & Park, 2012, p. 72). Orey and Park (2012) further states, “The genetic similarity theory posits that genetically similar people gravitate toward one another and work to maintain supportive environments through various institutions and networks, including marriage, friendships, and social groups” (p. 72). Similarly, Marger (2011) believed that an ethnocentric thought “Naturally leads to the idea that ethnic groups must be kept socially and, especially, physically apart. To encourage social integration is to encourage physical integration, which, it follows, contributes to the degeneration of the superior group” (p. 26). Ethnocentrism occurs in every ethnic group and
religions. The United States is a powerful and wealthy country with state of the art technology, military weaponry, telecommunications, social networks, healthcare/medical, automobile engineering, and aerospace. The United States is competent they are on top of the totem pole, and no other nation is as powerful as they are. U.S. military forces is seen in almost every continent, and they are known as the “world’s policeman”. American citizens argued that the U.S
Our book opens us up to the world of diversity and inequality in the United States. It presses on issues about groups that hold superiority towards inferior groups for multiple reasons. In “Imagine our country” our book blatantly calls out America’s problems and how we in some cases are only increasing the chances of them continuing. It helps define the differences between racism and discrimination, which I never thought about enough to distinguish before taking this class. These chapters also offer hope and ways to combat these differences, because while we may be stuck in a social loop-hole there are available ways to challenge these and make society aware of changes and in act upon them!
The core standards of America are founded, in principle, on the basis of its diversity and equality among citizens. Begin- ning with its Declaration of Independence, the United States distinguished itself from other modern nation-states by establishing a country of men who were different but equal. Yet, despite the unifying images America projects within and beyond its borders, the idea behind E Pluribus Unum does not resound as one might assume it would.
Cultural diversity is an American ideal yet our cultural experience is similar to many around the world. An analysis of two vastly different scientists’ views on the nature of cultural change and diversity sheds light on why deep-rooted cultural intricacies from generations ago are fading into oblivion. Thomas Sowell and Wade Davis clearly have differing opinions on the evolution of cultures and the significance of diversity. Wade Davis (2007) presents in “Dreams from Endangered Cultures,” that he is not concerned about the fact cultures evolve over time in a “dance with new possibilities of life,” but that power and corruption is destroying the unique expression of the human spirit in various indigenous peoples of the world. On the contrary, Sowell (1990) believes cultural changes results from a Darwinian law of survival of the fittest. He contends cultural diversity and change occur as a dynamic process that evolves from things that work over time, and if these changes don’t work, they disappear much like Roman Numerals (Sowell, 1990). Both scientists have valid points but their diverse perspectives on cultural change and diversity and its implication on society as a whole are particularly interesting.
As many immigrants arriving from Mexico and other Latin American countries are young males with little to no formal education or skills, they fall deftly into classic American stereotypes of criminality – meaning that much of the public baselessly associates Latino immigrant populations with higher levels of criminality and incarceration than the U.S. average. The mass media has wrongfully portrayed Mexican immigrants as foreign desperados; shaping public opinion using generalized case studies rather than aggregate data, the American public would be led to believe that immigrant crime – especially against U.S. citizens – is incredibly high and a dire threat to our national security and way of life. Contrary to these assumptions, first generation Latino populations in fact have significantly lower incarceration rates than all U.S. born ethnicities – including non-Hispanic white. This low incarceration rate holds true even for undocumented Latino populations within the U.S. – a commonly stereotyped group in regard to
Students attending American schools are taught clearly about the United States’ image as a melting pot; however, there is evidence to support that, while there is not an official federal stance on the matter (Sengupta), the amount of assimilation required to be legitimately considered a “melting pot” is not being reached. Although similar, there is often confusion about the differences between “multicultural” and “assimilated” communities. By definition, assimilation is the complete “merging of cultural traits from previously distinct culture groups” (Dictionary), while multiculturalism is delineated as the “preservation of different cultures or cultural identities within a unified society, as a state or nation” (Dictionary). Early to mid-1900’s America entertained the idea of a melting pot, where people from all parts of the world would join together and assimilate. It seems, however, that the growing trend has been to treat America as more of a “salad bowl” (Porter), in that people are joining together but instead of merging as one unit, are maintaining a majority, if not all, of their primary culture with little attempt to adapt. This underachievement has left America to unintentionally become a multicultural society. The clear differentiation between expectation and reality brings vast amounts of controversy among the nation’s people.
As we enter a new era, immigrants will have more impact on society than ever before (Feldmeyer, 2009). There can be numerous reasons to believe immigrants are more prone to commit crimes, for example, they have to learn to adapt to the cultural traits and social patterns of the harboring country, as natives do not (Desmond & Kubrin, 2009). However, despite such claims, empirical studies have revealed that immigrants are understated in criminal statistics. Throughout the years, many texts and scholarly articles have been published further analyzing and proving that immigrants are less prone to committing crimes than their native peers. Furthermore, researchers examine the reason as to why immigrants are weighed as a whole, even though ethnic groups among immigrants have different rates of crime.
The 20th century had years of segregation, regression, and progression. Diversity was one of the main precursors for the change in American politics, demographics, and economy. The diversity in America by immigration included African Americans, Chinese, Japanese, Mexicans, Native Americans, Women, and Jews. These groups all sought their own re-institutions and goals. The diversity in America brought change in the 20th century that created the framework for our 21st-century common era in American politics, economy and demographics. Diversity in a prominent Anglo-American established society took America by surprise in realizing the currently established society and the government had to institute equality in society when segregation took an unpopular turn and created more
In discussions of America, one controversial issue has been whether or not America cherishes diversity. On one hand, Eboo Patel, in his work “Making the Future Better, Together,” claims that America does in fact cherish diversity, while using quotes from both Martin Luther King Jr. and George Washington to further prove his point. On the other hand, Jena McGregor, in her work “Fixing Hollywood’s Diversity Problem,” opposes the idea that America cherishes diversity by claiming that Hollywood needs to be more diverse, precisely in the Academy. Even though McGregor only speaks about the problems with Hollywood, instead of the entire United States, the majority of my class still switched to ‘No’. My own view is that America does cherish diversity because of the recognition of the different ethnicities and religions,.
The United States of America faces many challenges due to its immense diversity. Cultural, religious, and social-economic differences have helped advance the American Dream, yet at a cost (Baker). The United States is being torn down due to the corruption in our government, the media, and unemployment.
“The land flourished because it was fed from so many sources- because it was nourished by so many cultures and traditions and peoples”. President Lyndon B. Johnson spoke of the positive aspects of diversity, and how differences brought good. The United States was built by people in search of a better life. They saw so much potential here and had the chance to begin again and improve upon past morals.*
Being an American has a different meaning to everyone. When I think of America, I think of freedom, diversity, and equality. In America, everyone is free to do what they want, when they want. America represents diversity. There are many different types of people who have different beliefs, but we all can get along. America represents equality because everyone has equal rights. Nobody has power over one another and everyone has equal say in decisions like the presidential elections.
The United States is a nation that is made up of cultural diversity because of the high number of people immigrating to America for freedom, financial success, and education. People have different reasons of choosing to migrate whether it is the harsh conditions in their native homeland that makes the people take action and leave to a better environment or etc. The number one question that most American ask to themselves is: Why does America attract about 20 percent of the world’s international immigrants? The answer is that America benefit its people civil right and their privileges that can’t be taken away. Thanks to the U.S Citizenship and Immigration Service immigrants are becoming citizen by the naturalization process which means they
Globalization remains a pivotal topic in many schools of thought, and continues being a topic of controversy even in local economies today. Perhaps the reason for this is integration and competitiveness the world over. Conceivably, even more than integration, is the competitiveness of organizations, has possibly facilitating the fascination and misconception about of globalization. Nevertheless, globalization has brought about a number of effects influencing the design and geographical location of the organization. However, globalization has effectively placed the world in a bubble, or maybe one could equate the changes to being placed in an envelope.
Globalization is the connection of different parts of the world. Globalization results in the expansion of international, cultural, economic, and political activities. As people, ideas, knowledge, and goods move easily around the globe, the experiences of people around the world become more similar. (“Definition of Globalization“, n.d., ¶ 1)
Globalization’s history is extremely diversified and began during the beginning of civilization. Now we live in a world that is constantly evolving, demanding people to use resources in locations that are very difficult to obtain certain resources. This could make it completely impossible to operate in these specific parts of the world. However, globalization allows people across the world to acquire much needed resources. Globalization creates the opportunity for businesses to take advantage and exploit the ability to take part of their business to a different country. Nevertheless, globalization is part of today’s society and will be involved in virtually all situations.