Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Understanding the decision making process
Understanding the decision making process
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Understanding the decision making process
Global Communications
As Global Communications headed to the media announcing their new strategy, many doors were opened to see the facts, analysis and goals behind that strike. GC’s scenario illustrated the conflict between decision making elements in which a dilemma might occur as a result of ignoring some of the values and opportunities.
“Too much competition” that was the problem as defined by the company. Typical continuing problem in an industry that continuous change is part of its characteristics. Issues are opportunities as described by the problem solving model. And when issues grow, opportunities must be the same. However, when that model skips some steps it turns to dilemmas opportunities.
The situation that GC went through demonstrated the impact of neglecting values and any of the stakeholders. Any company at the end is that combination of values, interests and rights which are driven by common goals. Tough decision like outsourcing in GC’s case might be taken after exhausting all options in solving the situation. Also should be a result of exercising other options that fail to generate acceptable solutions. Unfortunately, the decision and discussion between the senior team reflected the opposite of most of these concepts.
“Make the decision-making process a collaborative, rather than a competitive” (Snell, 2003, p.84) creates common goals and absorbs any conflict between any of the values involved. Once this chain is broken, GC’s situation in facing the union and Government actions would be a good example to read.
Situation Analysis
Issue and Opportunity Identification
The term that describes the big picture for what happened to Global Communication, is lack of planning. It was quite shocking that the senior management team was discussing the “challenges” in a meeting a day before announcing the new strategy. Unfortunately, avoidable mistakes led to the fact that GC struggled in their negotiation with the union to discuss the impact of their decisions.
The entire process was based on personal assumptions and imaginations. However, keeping stakeholders in the dark made the situation a mess. Even with incompetent management team like GC, stakeholders’ involvement in the situation would alert any overlooked aspect of potential risk or dilemma. GC even failed to weigh the union as a partner even after the union support to cut some benefits to help the company’s growth.
The major issue in GC’s situation is their inability to analyze their own industry. Global Communication and for the same reason “Helping company growth” had the union dropped health and education benefit.
...during the negotiation. Because they did not explicitly articulate their objectives to each other, the union and management did not reach a settlement that was mutually beneficial. I believe both teams prioritized “winning” over fulfilling their initial objectives. Therefore, I better understood how both teams suffered under pressure during the negotiation because they realized they could no longer rely on a zero-sum strategy. Moreover, I realized how important team cohesiveness is to the bargaining process. Both the union and management lacked basic cohesiveness among their team members and consequently exacerbated the contentious and emotional environment that they created during the negotiation. Nevertheless, under these circumstances I believe the union and management ultimately reached an adequate proposal that satisfied both sides of the bargaining table.
- Marketing is one of the main issues in the company because its not being used properly to take full advantage to help increase sales.
The case study of GMFC provides an example of a company attempting to avoid unionization of its workers. GMFC is expanding by building a new U.S. plant which will manufacture motorized recreational equipment. The company plans to hire about 500 production workers to assemble mechanical components, fabricate fiberglass body parts, and assemble the final products. In order to avoid the expected union campaign by the United Automobile Workers (UAW) to organize its workers, GMFC must implement specific strategies to keep the new plant union-free. GMFC’s planning committee offers suggestions with regards to the plant’s size, location, staffing, wages and benefits, and other employee relations issues in order to defend the company against the negative effects of unionization and increase...
Even though the very purpose of a union is to defend the interest of its members, the company could also use the instrument to promote the official point of views of the company’s management. In clear, the union and the management could work in good intelligence to promote the interest of worker and the interest of the company. Generally, the problem between management and union come when they one as another as an adversary and not as a partner. To be more constructive and create a working atmosphere profitable for both parties, union and company’s management need to work side by side to address real problems. Thus, worker must understand that the best job security for them comes primarily from the existence of the company and so their union should not be a mean for jeopardizing the company’s purposes. Similarly, the management must also understand that he will not achieve his annual goals unless the workers are well treated and the condition of work meet the standards set by official rules and regulations. This is a clear psychological contract between the company and it workers. The success of the company depends heavily on the respect of that psychological contract. Personally, I will play the role of a mediator between my boss and the worker who want to unionize and explain. I will clearly explain to my boss the benefit of having a union in the company and also explain to the worker the necessity to help the company increase it performance by working harder. And the union should not be a tool for undermine the efforts of the management to achieve better
The primary stakeholders in this case is the employees and managers who are being fired and having to firing good employees because of the change in the companies policy. The customers who are receiving poor service because of the conduct and e...
Whilst it is evident that there is a decline in union membership, it is important to analyse why this is so and what the unions are doing to combat the downward trend. In attempting to tackle this issue, it is important to state the main objectives of a union that attract employees to join a membership and why the memberships are declining.
Key Issues: At the end of 2012, Costco was a successful business; however, there are some issues that they would need to deal with. These issues mainly arise from their previous successful ventures as a warehouse wholesale company. The first issue is that Costco has competitors that can actually be and are a threat to their success. Competition allows a company to improve itself and prove its prowess to its customers. However, when a competitor is able to provide the service at a much reduced cost, problems will arise.
There are two types of relations that unions can have with management; acceptance, and accommodation (Huston, 2010, p. 297). Since unions have realized that they don’t make progress when they are aggressive they try to use these tactics to help improve their relationship with management (Huston, 2010, p. 296 & 297). Acceptance is when management is willing to accept what the union is proposing, but is still hesitant, and apprehensive of them (Huston, 2010, p. 297). They sometimes feel as though the union is stepping on their toes sort of speak. With accommodation there is a mutual respect for one another, and together they can establish mutual goal (Huston, 2010, p. 297). Of course out of the both of these the unions would most prefer to have accommodation with management, since it would be much easier on them to deal with management.
...etween unions. In term of governance and administration, trade unions members were more comfortable with maintaining the status quo and concerned about being disenfranchised, leaders who are more worried about losing political base and staff who are unsure of where they will fit in the new organization if there any structural change (Fletcher and Hurd 2001).
Cindy you bring to light some interesting points about return on investment for unionized facilities. Based on your writing it is clear that companies as well as unions must be happy with their situation as it relates to performance and compensation models. You mention that it employees are not happy they will seek union representation to mitigate their concerns. I don’t necessarily agree that this is the only way to iron out employee issues. One way to do this without employing union representation, is to have an employee counsel that works directly with company management to apply both company wants and employee needs. These employee councils can easily relate to the local labor needs and quickly react to company requirements. Whereas union
No company that falls behind the competition is guilty of standing completely still. But sometimes our efforts fail because of the level of commitment to change.
General Motors (GM) has earmarked $554 million dollars for production at Canadian Unifor union staffed plants. The firm will invest the bulk of the funds in the Oshawa and St. Catherine’s facilities. Unifor reached this tentative agreement just short last Monday’s deadline. Union members are voting whether to accept the deal today. Although, the agreement has reached a vote, both sides made confessions. The voter is significant in that it will affect works at Fiat Chrysler and Ford if ratified, as these two manufacturers are next on Unifor’s agenda. (See also, General Motors Reaches Agreement With Canadian Labor Union)
This paper focuses on the Ribena controversy and will aim to identify the key issues of the case. The paper shall recommend, based on theory and concept, a set of coherent actions that GSK may have taken to possibly avoid the legal and reputational situation that resulted from their actions. Potential problems that may arise in implementing these suggested actions will also be tackled. Finally, The implications of these suggestions to organisational and management practice will also be determined from a risk management perspective. ¬¬¬¬¬¬The discussion will revolve on theories and concepts discussed in Mr Michael Burgess’ MGT5STM: Strategic Management 1st semester 2015 class. Additional theories and concepts were used to further support the clarity of the paper’s arguments.
Peetz, D. (2012), ‘The Impacts and Non-Impacts of Unions of Enterprise Bargaining’, Labour and Industry, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 237-254.
Firstly, it will seem that the management and the labor union of any organization have a stake in the success or failure of that organization. The success of the organization has to be the priority or the number one goal of any member or members of the organization. As such, the entire organization has to work as a team in order to succeed, thrive and survive. In the real world, that is not what is happening. As a matter of fact, the labor unions and the management of some organizations see each other as adversaries.