Colgate toothpaste in Asia
1. Identify the major strategic and ethical issues faced by Colgate in its partnership with Hawley and Hazel.
In 1985, Colgate purchased a fifty percent ownership of the company Hawley and Hazel, a leading manufacturer of toothpaste in Singapore, Taiwan, China, Malaysia, and Thailand, in order to gain a foothold in the Asian market. This was an important business decision as Colgate felt Hawley and Hazel had valuable strategic assets, such as brand loyalty, customer relationships, distribution systems, and production systems (Hill, 2014, p. 224). It was easier and less of a capital risk for Colgate to acquire the firm in order to establish a presence in Asia without having to spend the resources to build their own manufacturing plant. This was sound thinking as Colgate had a well-established reputation in the European markets, and the company saw an excellent opportunity to form a partnership with Hawley and Hazel to expand their market share and sales.
The main product of Hawley and Hazel, “Darkie” toothpaste initiated the ethical uproar faced by Colgate. The product logo, fashioned after comedian Al Jolson, who used to paint his face black during his comedy routines, was considered by many minority and civil rights groups in the United States to be racist and inappropriate.
2. What do you think Colgate should have done to handle the situation? Justify your answer.
Colgate was so anxious to expand their holdings that they neglected to consider the implications of the product and the ramifications of the acquisition. Colgate should have conducted an in-depth study to evaluate the positives and negatives that the product offered prior to completing the merger. When it formed the partnership with Hawley and Hazel, Colgate did not take into consideration what the views of home consumers would be regarding foreign products and markets. Unfortunately, the company neglected this aspect of business operations to the detriment of consumer loyalty at home.
3. Is it possible for Colgate and Hawley and Hazel to change the toothpaste’s advertising without sacrificing consumer brand loyalty? Is that a possible reason for Colgate’s not responding quickly to domestic complaints?
Unfortunately, the company was reactive to the situation instead of proactive. If Colgate had done a proper evaluation at the onset of the merger, they would have possibly initiated a campaign that utilized public relations, various advertising mediums, and sales to promote the product in the home and foreign markets.
The Procter and Gamble Company. (2013, November 17). Company Strategy. Retrieved March 22, 2014, from http://www.pginvestor.com: http://www.pginvestor.com/GenPage.aspx?IID=4004124&GKP=208821
Another marketing strategy that Clorox is employing is consumer fragmentation. Through consumer fragmentation, the company is able to group its target consumers into groups that can be served with a particular advert or marketing approach. Clorox also intends to increase its brand investment behind superior products and more targeted 3D plans. The company appreciates the influence that media has on the purchasing decisions of consumers, it therefore wants to evolve its demand-creation model of 3Ds in the face of increased fragmentation of retailers and consumers. The three D’s of the model stand for desire, d...
The Clorox Company purchased Kingsford in 1973. Kingsford became one of the largest product groups within Clorox’s portfolio by 2000. Charcoal also represented a large percentage of Clorox’s revenues and net income. Therefore, a change in growth of the charcoal market would have a significant direct impact on Clorox’s annual sales and net earnings. Since the 1980’s Kingsford enjoyed growth in revenues ranging from a 1-3% increase each year. The charcoal industry had also experienced a steady growth as a whole. However, during the summer of 2000 charcoal sales declined and Kingsford’s summer results were projected to be below target. Clorox must now rely on Kingsford’s improvements in sales and profits to re-establish the company’s growth objectives. The two brand managers Marcilie Smith Boyle and Allison Warren will be challenged with determining the causes of decline, the impact of altering Kingsford’s current pricing, advertising, promotion, and production methods, and developing recommendations to increase profits.
b. What is the essential ethical issue here? (In your own words, write out a one-sentence summary of the ethical issue as it arises in the type of situation being described here.)
L’Oreal is the largest beauty company in the world and in the past 100 years that it has expanded, it has supplied to 130 countries with offices in 58 different countries. This global company is the number one premium cosmetic product in the world today and has taken the core and beauty of people’s everyday lives since 1907, the beginning of L’Oreal. The superior leadership of a guy named Eugene Schueller started this strategic company with basic products such as hair care and also the first man-made hair color product. Five years later you could find these products in Austria, Italy, and the Netherlands. In 1934 Eugene invented the first mass market of soap less shampoo and this led the success of L’Oreal in the country of Europe which soon recognized them as the leader in body care and hair coloring products. Finally soon after World War II L’Oreal moved into the United States and the company seemed to change. When L’Oreal expanded the competition was more involved and more growth was needed in order for the company to be more successful. With problems like this, the strategy and planning that has been applied in L’Oreal has been huge for the success of the company. L’Oreal realized they needed to expand in other fields of the beauty market and target markets in order to stay alive and successful. This would mean that L’Oreal would need to acquire other companies as part of their expansion and through this they have kept the constancy of the leading company with acquisitions of many small companies. Finally in the 1980s they started their globalization into new markets all around the globe by acquiring new companies that would form the cosmetics that we know today. Although the role of acquisitions has never been the main focus of the company, internal growth and strategy was the number one reason for L’Oreal becoming such a big name. The main strategy was to adopt new companies and expand it from within believing that the brand could be taken globally and benefit their overall brand portfolio. The main role of acquisitions was to increase and lengthen the internal growth rate. L’Oreal started acquiring companies from the beginning of their name. They started with the basics of their own brands such as L’Oreal Professional, L’Oreal Paris, Kerastase, and Club des Createurs de Beaute.
Procter and Gamble (P&G) and Colgate-Palmolive (C-P) are two of the largest consumer goods company in the world and have been in the industry since the 80s. The companies manufacture and market fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) such as household products, personal care and hygiene, targeting at various segments of consumers. Among the brands carried by P&G are Downy, Olay, Tide, Clairol and Bounty. Popular brands under C-P are Palmolive, Kleenex, and Colgate.
Question 3: It’s clear that, in general, the company’s growth initiatives were sound in terms of generating the growth expected by Wall Street. But which of Starbucks’ initiatives, in retrospect, were sound decisions for the brand and which were inconsistent with brand
Although Unilever’s Path to Growth strategy involves all components of the general environment, two segments that are especially relevant are the global and sociocultural segments. A major strength of the company’s global environment is its geographic diversification of its major product markets. In 2003, Unilever had sales and marketing efforts in 88 different countries. The key is that it gave decision-making power to its managers in different countries so that they could tailor their products to the market’s specific preferences and consumers’ local tastes. Thus, it was the cross-country preferences of consumers that determined what products Unilever would carry. The global segment provides an enormous opportunity for Unilever. The case states that emerging country markets show the greatest potential for sales growth. Major competitors such as Procter & Gamble and Kraft Foods had sales in roughly 140 to 150 different countries in 2003, and Nestle, Unilever’s main rival, had market penetration in almost every country in the world. If Unilever is able to expand its operations into 50 or more new countries and concentrate its advertising campaign on consumer preferences, it could significantly increase its market share in the global economy.
Relationships have been in place with two main groups in Singapore long before Proctor and Gamble ever decided to build a plant. The Economic Development Board and A*Star’s Institute for Materials Research and Engineering are the two main groups they have been involved with. Since Proctor and Gamble built these relationships before building a plant in Singapore they have thus established a strategic alliance with Singapore. The Economic Development Board and A*Star’s Institute for Materials Research and Engineering have come together with Proctor and Gamble to share resources and complete a project. Proctor and Gamble benefit from setting up a strategic alliance with A*Star by getting the privilege of looking at IMRE’s innovative research (Moneycontrol.com, 2008). In return for this preferential treatment, P&G shares its new innovations with A*Star’s IMRE (Moneycontrol.com, 2008).
Cadbury Schweppes (CS) is one of the biggest international beverage and confectionary companies in the world with a market capitalisation of £10 billions. With approximately 200 years of history, Cadbury and Schweppes mergence in 1969 granted themselves the position of one of the 10 Global leaders in Food. The company emp...
BR was sold to Delta Foods in 1996 for US $2 billion. At this time, it was one of the largest fast-food chains in the world generating sales of US $6.8 billion. DF purchase of BR brought in a new cultural paradigm. DF is an individualistic, aggressive growth company with brands they believe are strong enough to support entry into new overseas markets without the need for local partnership. The DF strategy is one of direct acquisition and JV’s were not part of their strong suit. DF strategic implementation is based on hiring local managers directly or transferring seasoned managers from their soft drink and snack food divisions. The DF disdain for JVs is clearly reflected by their participation in only those JVs where local partnering was mandatory (e.g. China) to overcome regulatory barriers to entry. JVs had been the predominant strategy for BR which was unlike the DF outlook. Terralumen’s strategy was misaligned and out of sync with the DF strategy. This was unlike the complementarity that existed with BR’s strategy. This misalignment began to affect the JV relationship that had worked well with BR in the initial years. The failure of Terralumen and DF to recognize this fundamental cultural difference between their operational strategy styles i.e. Individualistic and Collectivism leads to their inability to proactively create steps for better alignment in the early period after acquisition, creating uncertainties and difficulties for both corporations. There is a lack of communication and virtually absence of trust between two new partners. DF appeared to be flexing its muscles in the relationship and using a more masculine approach compared to Terralumen’s more feminine approach. Both the corporations are strategically involved in a complex situation where they appear reluctant to address the issues at stake and move ahead together. The DF strategy of
The analysis of the Kellogg’s case is presented in this chapter and will contribute to answer the research question. The case are evaluated and compared to the literature presented in the previous chapters and will support the conclusion of this paper.
Unilever is a multinational company which ranks third globally in fast moving consumer goods. They have an excellent value chain which is one of the factors that has resulted in them to be among top consumer goods company globally. Their merger and acquisitions have led them to expand their company in different sectors of the consumer goods. They have 400 brands and sell their products across 190 countries. They have to work on some areas of the value chain to work even better than how they are working now. Also, there are many opportunities that will help Unilever to overcome their shortcomings and make them a successful Consumer goods
In 1991, CP launched new products in the U.S market CP and held 43% of the world toothpaste market and 16% of the world toothbrush market. Other oral care products included dental floss and mouth rinses. In 1991, worldwide sales of CP's oral care products increased 12% to $1.3 billion, accounting for 22% of CP's total sales.
P&G targeted the broad market while trying to achieve differentiation. And by differentiation I mean to get low cost differentiation. The products that they produced were very appealing and prevalent that the competitors tried to replicate them. Moreover, they focused on the price, quality and i...