Gerrymandering Vs Redistricing Essay

1116 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Compare and contrast Republicans vs Democrats

This essay examines some topical political matters in the USA. To this end, this essay discusses the three arms of the US government, the functions of each, and how they check and balance each other. The essay further identifies key positions in each of the three arms of government and the constitutional qualifications for each of these positions. Moreover, the essay defines redistricting and gerrymandering and identifies their differences. Based on chapter 4, this essay further identifies districts that are gerrymandered within Texas and analyses how such gerrymandering impacted the 2012 election. The essay also analyses how housing districts are entwined with State and education representation within Texas. The U.S. Government comprises …show more content…

Gerrymandering could seek to disadvantage unfavorable incumbents, help a particular political party to win extra seats, or to make the electoral environment safer for both parties. Given these definitions, whereas redistricting is guided by the constitution, gerrymandering is guided by personal and party interests. Further, while redistricting has a constitutionally-defined calendar, gerrymandering is done whenever personal and party interests dictate. Moreover, whereas redistricting is done for the benefit of the general populace, gerrymandering does not necessarily seek to benefit the electorate. During the latest redistricting exercise that was performed in 2011, several instances of gerrymandering were witnessed in the State of Texas. On this note, congressional districts that are currently gerrymandered in Texas include District 33 and District 35 (Gibson and Robison). During the 2012 general elections, such gerrymandering within Texas’ 33rd District enabled a Democratic candidate to beat a Republican candidate who was the main contender (Ibid.) by more than fifty thousand

Show More
Related

  • Pros And Cons Of Partisan Elections

    614 Words  | 2 Pages

    A direct consequence of partisan elections is extremely referred to the limited variation in the share of the vote delivered by judicial candidates. Thus, the majority of Texas judges are elected in accordance with their legal qualifications and not with their own campaign

    Read More

  • Texas Plural Executive

    1009 Words  | 3 Pages

    An issue in Texas today is whether the public have sufficient control over the executive branch of Texas government. Texas has a plural executive, which mean the public not only elects the Lieutenant Governor, but also the Attorney General, Comptroller, Land Commissioner, and Agricultural Commissioner (Benson, Clinkscale, and Giardino 216). These elections add significantly to the “long ballet” that the public can vote for. Some argue that because there are so many to vote for, people cannot adequately vote for the positions. The research and attention needed to stay up to date on the elections can steer people away from voting. Many people vote for the governor and the lieutenant governor because of the title and how high the positions are.

    Read More

  • Structure of American and California Governments

    9636 Words  | 20 Pages

    The legislative branch of America helps create the laws or legislation. Ideally, it works to create a society that is safe for all members. The State of California like the federal government has a bicameral legislature, in other words, composed of two chambers. The upper chamber is called the senate, while the lower is called the assembly. A unique process for the state level is that it allows for the initiative. This process circumvents the state congress and can create laws without their aide. In the state of California, every ten years, following a US census, which collects demographic information, state legislators draw redistricting plans for itself, California seats in the US House of Representatives, and the State Board of Equalization. There have been attempts to create a “non-partisan” redistricting commission, but this has been turned down by voters numerous times. Proposition 14, 39, 118, and 119 were all turned down by voters to create a non-partisan districting commission. Every decade a large portion of the state congress’s energy is spent on redistricting. In fact, two of the last four censuses, Supreme Court has had to step in to break a deadlock. In 1970, Ronald Reagan, a Republican, vetoed all together the Democratic redistricting plan. The Supreme Court had to step in and created its own plans for California to follow. Then in 1981, Democrats proposed redistricting as well as congressional delegation redistricting. The Republicans stopped this by adding referendums to the state ballot. Because it was too close to elections though, Supreme Court overturned these referendums in 1982. In 1984, they officially passed the new redistricting plan which was very similar to the original plans.

    Read More

  • Three Branches of the Texas Government

    1619 Words  | 4 Pages

    University of Texas at Austin. Texas Politics, The legislative Branch. Austin, 2nd Edition-Revision 94 2009, Liberal Arts Instructional Technology Services.

    Read More

  • Political Change In Texas Politics

    1256 Words  | 3 Pages

    Texas went through a great amount of political change from being dominated by the Democratic Party during the 1960s and 70s, from the Republican Party taking over in the 80s. One of the big reasons for this change was due to the political party’s views. Throughout this essay I will discuss the changes of the political stances in Texas as well as the present day factors that affect America.

    Read More

  • The Changing Demographics of Texas

    1420 Words  | 3 Pages

    The political future of Texas has been widely debated since the 2012 election of President Bush. Barack Obama, since the state has always played a significant role in impacting national elections. Nationally, there was uneven support among minority voters in favor of the president and Democrats, and as a result there has been an increasing interest in the Hispanic population growth in Texas (Lawrence.) The speculation regards how the changing complexion of Texas voters will influence the political process, with political pundits broadly predicting that since the Latino population typically votes for Democrats, there is a possibility that Texas will eventually become a blue state.... ...

    Read More

  • Gerrymandering Case Study

    861 Words  | 2 Pages

    Gerrymandering is a way for a political party to keep control of a state by drawing the district lines unevenly. They make sure to keep a majority of the people in the districts are a part of their party, so their party will have more seats in the House of Representatives. This is a big problem because in most districts, there is no way for the minority party to win in those districts.

    Read More

  • The Detrimental Practice of Gerrymandering

    988 Words  | 2 Pages

    When gerrymandering occurs, a political party draws the boundaries of an electoral district in a way that helps their party win elections over the other parties. For example, if a Republican controls a state, and it appears like the party will lose a seat in the future, the Republicans will draw the district in a way to exclude as many Democratic voters as possible. Perhaps they will do this by removing a democratic stronghold from one district and adding it to another district that will either easily go Republican or will have a Democratic representative no matter what happens. Before 1964, the majority party could draw districts in any way they wanted to, and chaos ensued. Consequently, in 1964, the U.S Supreme Court legislated that the districts “had to contain equal population, and be as compact as possible” (“Gerrymandering”). Every ten years the U.S. issues a census to determine the population of each state. After this, each state receives their share of the 435 seats, and then the state gets to break the population into the corresponding number of districts. This whole process, known as reapportionment, takes weeks to determine, and in many cases, courts must determine the shape and area of each district. Even though the districts must contain equal population, gerry...

    Read More

  • Essay On Gerrymandering

    1156 Words  | 3 Pages

    This includes two districts to be redrawn to cause two incumbents to run against one another in one district. This will cause the other district to be open for possibly being one by the opposing party, due to the conflict of interest. Finally, kidnapping is yet another way that the election can be rigged and can be rigged solely against a single candidate. The purpose of kidnapping is to move a voter bloc of supporters for one candidate into another district to give the advantage to the opposition. In many instances when redrawing districts, these four tactics are used I combination with one another, which is a smart approach as opposed to simply using one of these gerrymandering tools for the entirety of a state. This often results in the winner of the election who used these tools winning by a very miniscule amount in most of the state’s voting districts; in turn, this also means that the candidate is likely to win by a large sum in only a small number of voting

    Read More

  • The Power Struggle of the States and Federal Government in the United States

    1531 Words  | 4 Pages

    To define the terminology of federalism to a simplistic way is the sharing of sovereignty between the national government and the local government. It is often described as the dual sovereignty of governments between the national and the local to exert power in the political system. In the US it is often been justified as one of the first to introduce federalism by the ‘founding fathers’ which were developed in order to escape from the overpowered central government. However, federalism in the United States is hitherto uncertain where the power lies in the contemporary political system. In this essay I will outline and explain how power relationship alternates between states and federal government. Moreover I will also discuss my perspective by weighing the evidence based upon resources. Based on these resources, it will aid me to evaluate the recent development in the federal-state relationship.

    Read More

  • Single-Member Districts

    764 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are quite a few problems that come with any form of representation. Problems such as how to give the voters a specific person to whom they can address their concerns, protecting voters from being too heavily influenced by big parties, ensuring voters can talk to a representative who can address concerns that are local, and finding ways to make sure the representatives themselves are loyal to their constituents. Single-member districts solve all of these problems and more. They give voters a way to directly elect the representatives that will serve them in their specific location. They protect voters because the big parties don’t have as much influence. And they give the voters a sense of security because they can remove any representative that doesn’t meet their expectations. Single-member districts are the best way to elect the people who will represent us.

    Read More

  • Gerrymandering: Equal Representation In The United States

    441 Words  | 1 Pages

    Our founding father created a system of the checks and balance system where each branch has the same amount of power. Each branch has a specific task in which they are in charge of carrying out. In the issue of equal representation, it is the court's role to interpret the law of the land. However, regarding equal representation in

    Read More

  • Politics In Texas

    1565 Words  | 4 Pages

    Democrats, Republicans, and Libertarians are perhaps three of the most prominent political parties within Texas. Within the pages of their party platforms, we see that each possesses a unique philosophy, with specific viewpoints and recommendations for shaping or reforming government policy. To be sure, the people of Texas face many challenges, two of the most compelling issues being the crisis in healthcare and in education. Not only are we lacking in these areas as Texans, but also on the national level. The parties’ stance on these two major issues defines them, giving us insight into the mind and intentions of each.

    Read More

  • Texas Judicial Reforms

    528 Words  | 2 Pages

    Judicial reforms in Texas have called for implementation strategies since late 1970’s. Before then Texas was a nonpartisan in terms of judicial election with the democratic being the only party that was winning seats in the region. Later in the early 1980’s, the spirit of bipartisan began when the governor under the Republican Party was overwhelmingly elected and later supported bipartisanship in judiciary (Champagne 68)

    Read More

  • Gill Vs Whitford Analysis

    1737 Words  | 4 Pages

    The most powerful jurists in the country cannot do math. In March 2018, when the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in Gill v. Whitford, a landmark case that would determine the future of partisan gerrymandering, its members were reluctant to consider statistical evidence seriously.

    Read More

More about Gerrymandering Vs Redistricing Essay

Open Document